1
|
Kudriavtsev A, Pastor B, Mirandola A, Pisareva E, Gricourt Y, Capdevila X, Thierry AR, Cuvillon P. Association of the immediate perioperative dynamics of circulating DNA levels and neutrophil extracellular traps formation in cancer patients. PRECISION CLINICAL MEDICINE 2024; 7:pbae008. [PMID: 38699382 PMCID: PMC11062027 DOI: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbae008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Elevated circulating DNA (cirDNA) concentrations were found to be associated with trauma or tissue damage which suggests involvement of inflammation or cell death in post-operative cirDNA release. We carried out the first prospective, multicenter study of the dynamics of cirDNA and neutrophil extracellular trap (NETs) markers during the perioperative period from 24 h before surgery up to 72 h after curative surgery in cancer patients. Methods We examined the plasma levels of two NETs protein markers [myeloperoxidase (MPO) and neutrophil elastase (NE)], as well as levels of cirDNA of nuclear (cir-nDNA) and mitochondrial (cir-mtDNA) origin in 29 colon, prostate, and breast cancer patients and in 114 healthy individuals (HI). Results The synergistic analytical information provided by these markers revealed that: (i) NETs formation contributes to post-surgery conditions; (ii) post-surgery cir-nDNA levels were highly associated with NE and MPO in colon cancer [r = 0.60 (P < 0.001) and r = 0.53 (P < 0.01), respectively], but not in prostate and breast cancer; (iii) each tumor type shows a specific pattern of cir-nDNA and NETs marker dynamics, but overall the pre- and post-surgery median values of cir-nDNA, NE, and MPO were significantly higher in cancer patients than in HI. Conclusion Taken as a whole, our work reveals the association of NETs formation with the elevated cir-nDNA release during a cancer patient's perioperative period, depending on surgical procedure or cancer type. By contrast, cir-mtDNA is poorly associated with NETs formation in the studied perioperative period, which would appear to indicate a different mechanism of release or suggest mitochondrial dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei Kudriavtsev
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier 34298, France
| | - Brice Pastor
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier 34298, France
- Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier 34298, France
| | - Alexia Mirandola
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier 34298, France
| | - Ekaterina Pisareva
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier 34298, France
| | - Yann Gricourt
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU) Carémeau, Place du Professeur Debré,Nîmes 30400, France
- University of Montpellier, Montpellier 34298, France
| | - Xavier Capdevila
- Division of Anaesthesia Intensive Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier 34090, France
- Montpellier NeuroSciences Institute, INSERM U1298, University of Montpellier, Montpellier 34295, France
| | - Alain R Thierry
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier 34298, France
- Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier 34298, France
| | - Philippe Cuvillon
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU) Carémeau, Place du Professeur Debré,Nîmes 30400, France
- University of Montpellier, Montpellier 34298, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anitha K, Posinasetty B, Naveen Kumari K, Chenchula S, Padmavathi R, Prakash S, Radhika C. Liquid biopsy for precision diagnostics and therapeutics. Clin Chim Acta 2024; 554:117746. [PMID: 38151071 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2023.117746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Liquid biopsy (LB) has emerged as a highly promising and non-invasive diagnostic approach, particularly in the field of oncology, and has garnered interest in various medical disciplines. This technique involves the examination of biomolecules released into physiological fluids, such as urine samples, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The analysed biomolecules included circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumour cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), exosomes, and other cell-free components. In contrast to conventional tissue biopsies, LB provides minimally invasive diagnostics, offering invaluable insights into tumor characteristics, treatment response, and early disease detection. This Review explores the contemporary landscape of technologies and clinical applications in the realm of LB, with a particular emphasis on the isolation and analysis of ctDNA and/or cfDNA. Various methodologies have been employed, including droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (DDP), BEAMing (beads, emulsion, amplification, and magnetics), TAm-Seq (tagged-amplicon deep sequencing), CAPP-Seq (cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing), WGBS-Seq (whole genome bisulfite sequencing), WES (whole exome sequencing), and WGS (whole-genome sequencing). Additionally, CTCs have been successfully isolated through biomarker-based cell capture, employing both positive and negative enrichment strategies based on diverse biophysical and other inherent properties. This approach also addresses challenges and limitations associated with liquid biopsy techniques, such as sensitivity, specificity, standardization and interpretability of findings. This review seeks to identify the current technologies used in liquid biopsy samples, emphasizing their significance in identifying tumor markers for cancer detection, prognosis, and treatment outcome monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuttiappan Anitha
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Technology Management (SPTM), SVKM's Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies (NMIMS) Deemed-to-University, Shirpur 425405, India
| | | | - K Naveen Kumari
- Sri Krishna Teja Pharmacy College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh 517502, India
| | | | - R Padmavathi
- SVS Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Satya Prakash
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal 462020, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lin Y, Ho C, Hsu W, Liao W, Yang C, Yu C, Tsai T, Yang JC, Wu S, Hsu C, Hsieh M, Huang Y, Wu C, Shih J. Tissue or liquid rebiopsy? A prospective study for simultaneous tissue and liquid NGS after first-line EGFR inhibitor resistance in lung cancer. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6870. [PMID: 38140788 PMCID: PMC10807591 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION According to current International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer guideline, physicians may first use plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methods to identify epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-resistant mechanisms (liquid rebiopsy) for lung cancer. Tissue rebiopsy is recommended if the plasma result is negative. However, this approach has not been evaluated prospectively using next-generation sequencing (NGS). METHODS We prospectively enrolled patients with lung cancer with first-line EGFR-TKI resistance who underwent tissue rebiopsy. The rebiopsied tissues and cfDNA were sequenced using targeted NGS, ACTDrug®+, and ACTMonitor®Lung simultaneously. The clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Totally, 86 patients were enrolled. Twenty-six (30%) underwent tissue biopsy but the specimens were inadequate for NGS. Among the 60 patients with paired tissue and liquid rebiopsies, two-thirds (40/60) may still be targetable. T790M mutations were found in 29, including 14 (48%) only from tissue and 5 (17%) only from cfDNA. Twenty-four of them were treated with osimertinib, and progression-free survival was longer in patients without detectable T790M in cfDNA than in patients with detectable T790M in cfDNA (p = 0.02). For the 31 T790M-negative patients, there were six with mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) amplifications, four with ERBB2 amplifications, and one with CCDC6-RET fusion. One with MET amplification and one with ERBB2 amplification responded to subsequent MET and ERBB2 targeting agents respectively. CONCLUSIONS NGS after EGFR-TKI resistance may detect targetable drivers besides T790M. To do either liquid or tissue NGS only could miss patients with T790M. To do tissue and liquid NGS in parallel after EGFR-TKI resistance may find more patients with targetable cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen‐Ting Lin
- Graduate Institute of Clinical MedicineNational Taiwan University College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
- Department of MedicineNational Taiwan University Cancer CenterTaipeiTaiwan
- Department of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Chao‐Chi Ho
- Department of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Wei‐Hsun Hsu
- Department of Medical ResearchNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Wei‐Yu Liao
- Department of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Ching‐Yao Yang
- Department of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Chong‐Jen Yu
- Department of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
- Department of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University Hospital Hsin‐Chu BranchHsin‐ChuTaiwan
| | - Tzu‐Hsiu Tsai
- Department of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
| | - James Chih‐Hsin Yang
- Department of Medical OncologyNational Taiwan University Cancer CenterTaipeiTaiwan
- Department of OncologyNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
- Graduate Institute of OncologyNational Taiwan University College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Shang‐Gin Wu
- Department of MedicineNational Taiwan University Cancer CenterTaipeiTaiwan
- Department of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Chia‐Lin Hsu
- Department of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Min‐Shu Hsieh
- Department of PathologyNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
- Department of PathologyNational Taiwan University Cancer CenterTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Yen‐Lin Huang
- Department of PathologyNational Taiwan University Cancer CenterTaipeiTaiwan
| | | | - Jin‐Yuan Shih
- Graduate Institute of Clinical MedicineNational Taiwan University College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
- Department of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zheng J, Wang Y, Hu C, Zhu M, Ii J, Lin C, Lu C, Dou Y, Zhao C, Zhang Y, Wu D, Li L, Tang H, He T, Pan C, Han R, He Y. Predictive value of early kinetics of ctDNA combined with cfDNA and serum CEA for EGFR-TKI treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac Cancer 2022; 13:3162-3173. [PMID: 36193794 PMCID: PMC9663669 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has made a breakthrough as an early biomarker in operable early-stage cancer patients. However, the function of ctDNA combined with cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a predictor in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown. Here, we explored its potential as a biomarker for predicting the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS A retrospective analysis was undertaken. Plasma collected from 51 patients with advanced NSCLC prior to and serially after starting treatment with EGFR-TKIs was analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). The performance of ctDNA, cfDNA, and combining ctDNA with cfDNA were evaluated for their ability to predict survival outcomes. RESULTS Patients with early undetectable ctDNA and increasing cfDNA had a markedly better progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.001) than those with early detectable ctDNA and decreasing cfDNA. Patients with early ctDNA clearance were more likely to have the ctDNA persistent clearance (p = 0.006). The early clearance rate of ctDNA in the normal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) group was significantly higher than in the low and high groups (p = 0.028). Patients with greater CEA decline had a higher early clearance rate of ctDNA than those with minor CEA change (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS We based this study on ctDNA and cfDNA, explored its prognostic predictive ability, and combined CEA to monitor EGFR-TKI efficacy. This study may provide new perspectives and insights into the precise treatment strategies for NSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Zheng
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina,School of MedicineChongqing UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Yubo Wang
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Chen Hu
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Mengxiao Zhu
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Jianghua Ii
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Caiyu Lin
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Conghua Lu
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Yuanyao Dou
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Chenlong Zhao
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Yimin Zhang
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Di Wu
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Li Li
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Huan Tang
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Tingting He
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | | | - Rui Han
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Yong He
- Department of Respiratory Disease, Daping HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina,School of MedicineChongqing UniversityChongqingChina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hou T, Zeng J, Xu H, Su S, Ye J, Li Y. Performance of different methods for detecting T790M mutation in the plasma of patients with advanced NSCLC after developing resistance to first‑generation EGFR‑TKIs in a real‑world clinical setting. Mol Clin Oncol 2022; 16:88. [PMID: 35251639 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2022.2521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tongtong Hou
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, P.R. China
| | - Jiahao Zeng
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, P.R. China
| | - Hanyan Xu
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, P.R. China
| | - Shanshan Su
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, P.R. China
| | - Junru Ye
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, P.R. China
| | - Yuping Li
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality. It is classified into different histologic subtypes, including adenocarcinoma, squamous carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma (commonly referred as non-small cell lung cancer) and small cell lung cancer. Comprehensive molecular characterization of lung cancer has expanded our understanding of the cellular origins and molecular pathways affected in each of these subtypes. Many of these genetic alterations represent potential therapeutic targets for which drugs are constantly under development. This article discusses the molecular characteristics of the main lung cancer subtypes and discusses the current guidelines and novel targeted therapies, including checkpoint immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Ruiz-Cordero
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, 1825 4th Street Room L2181A, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
| | - Walter Patrick Devine
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero Street Room B-620, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang J, Zhang X, Shen S. Treatment and relapse in breast cancer show significant correlations to noninvasive testing using urinary and plasma DNA. Future Oncol 2020; 16:849-858. [PMID: 32270709 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Circulating tumor DNA is promising for routine monitoring of breast cancer. Noninvasive testing allows regular probing using plasma and urine samples. Methods: Peripheral blood and simultaneous urine collection from patients were quantified. Concordance between methods were made. Serial time-point measurements were correlated to disease outcome. Results: Index measurements demonstrate over 90% concordance with biopsy. Receiver operating characteristics curves showed over 0.95 for both plasma and urine results comparing with controls. Patients with lower risk of relapse experienced greater declines in detected DNA levels. Maximal declines were registered at 4.0- and 6.8-fold for plasma and urine results, respectively. Conclusion: Measuring and monitoring DNA levels complement existing testing regimes and provides better risk profiling of patients for possible relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinling Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Jingzhou Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubeii, PR China
| | - Xueli Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Jingzhou Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubeii, PR China
| | - Shuwei Shen
- Department of Anaesthesia, Jingzhou Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubeii, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liao Y, Chen Y, Kou X, Xiao Y, Ye J, Wu A. Diagnostic test accuracy of droplet digital PCR for the detection of EGFR mutation (T790M) in plasma: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta 2019; 503:190-196. [PMID: 31805270 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND T790M mutation was a primary lead cause in the acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs confirmed in earlier studies. Since the shortcomings of tumor tissue detection are well known, the liquid biopsy is more appropriate to track T790M status. We assessed the accuracy and clinical significance of the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) detection of T790M mutation in plasma. METHODS We retrieved PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of science with no limitation of language and publication year. Summary sensitivity and specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio of detection of EGFR T790M status were calculated from extracted data from included articles. The summary receiver operating curve (SROC), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating curve (AUC) was used to assess the overall diagnostic accuracy. I2 and meta-regression were used to evaluate heterogeneity and the source of heterogeneity, respectively. RESULT We identified 15 studies in the total search of 1364 reports, including 427 paired tissue and plasma samples. The pooled sensitivity and the pooled specificity were 0.68 (95% CI 0.61-0.75) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.75-0.91) by the bivariate model, respectively. The AUC and the pooled DOR were 0.78 (95% CI 0.74-0.81) and 12 (95% CI 7-22), respectively. None of the cofactors could account for the heterogeneity. CONCLUSION The plasma analysis is of a promising performance to screen EGFR-T790M mutation status by ddPCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingyin Liao
- KingMed School of Laboratory Medicine of Guangzhou Medical University, No. 195 Dongfengxi Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yuan Chen
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, No. 151 Yanjiangxi Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaoxia Kou
- KingMed School of Laboratory Medicine of Guangzhou Medical University, No. 195 Dongfengxi Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yi Xiao
- The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, No. 621 Gangwan Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Junkai Ye
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, No. 151 Yanjiangxi Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Aiwu Wu
- KingMed School of Laboratory Medicine of Guangzhou Medical University, No. 195 Dongfengxi Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Han X, Han Y, Tan Q, Huang Y, Yang J, Yang S, He X, Zhou S, Song Y, Pi J, Zuo L, Yao J, Wu D, Zhang Z, Shi Y. Tracking longitudinal genetic changes of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in advanced Lung adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy. J Transl Med 2019; 17:339. [PMID: 31597567 PMCID: PMC6785899 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-2087-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Pemetrexed combined with platinum complexes can be used as first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however, the efficacy and safety is varying from individuals. There is a need to better understand the genetic variations associated with platinum response. Materials and Methods We performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) based on BGI Oseq-ctDNA panel to analyze 98 longitudinal plasma samples from 32 lung adenocarcinoma patients during platinum-based chemotherapy, and a bioinformatic pipeline was developed to detect point mutations. Results We found that mutation burden was decreased after chemotherapy, which reflected chemotherapy sensitivity, especially the frequency of C>G and C>A substitutions. Moreover, neoplastic cells carrying a specific set of somatic mutations, such as EGFR(L858R), KRAS (p.G12C) were obviously correlated with platinum treatment. In addition, the MAPK pathway was found to have a pivotal role in NSCLC and platinum based response. Finally, we found that smokers benefit less from platinum-based chemotherapy. Conclusions Collectively, this work described the dynamic changes of ctDNA mutation status during platinum-based treatment, which may contribute to advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients stratification and precision treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaohong Han
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing, China.,Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Han
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing, China
| | - Qiaoyun Tan
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing, China
| | - Jianliang Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing, China
| | - Sheng Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohui He
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing, China
| | - Shengyu Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Song
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing, China
| | - Jinping Pi
- Beijing Chaoyang Sanhuan Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lijie Zuo
- Beijing Chaoyang Sanhuan Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jiarui Yao
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing, China
| | - Di Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing, China
| | - Zhishang Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing, China
| | - Yuankai Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ivanov M, Chernenko P, Breder V, Laktionov K, Rozhavskaya E, Musienko S, Baranova A, Mileyko V. Utility of cfDNA Fragmentation Patterns in Designing the Liquid Biopsy Profiling Panels to Improve Their Sensitivity. Front Genet 2019; 10:194. [PMID: 30915108 PMCID: PMC6422983 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Genotyping of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma samples has the potential to allow for a noninvasive assessment of tumor biology, avoiding the inherent shortcomings of tissue biopsy. Next generation sequencing (NGS), a leading technology for liquid biopsy analysis, continues to be hurdled with several major issues with cfDNA samples, including low cfDNA concentration and high fragmentation. In this study, by employing Ion Torrent PGM semiconductor technology, we performed a comparison between two multi-biomarker amplicon-based NGS panels characterized by a substantial difference in average amplicon length. In course of the analysis of the peripheral blood from 13 diagnostic non-small cell lung cancer patients, equivalence of two panels, in terms of overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity was shown. A pairwise comparison of the allele frequencies for the same somatic variants obtained from the pairs of panel-specific amplicons, demonstrated an identical analytical sensitivity in range of 140 to 170 bp amplicons in size. Further regression analysis between amplicon length and its coverage, illustrated that NGS sequencing of plasma cfDNA equally tolerates amplicons with lengths in the range of 120 to 170 bp. To increase the sensitivity of mutation detection in cfDNA, we performed a computational analysis of the features associated with genome-wide nucleosome maps, evident from the data on the prevalence of cfDNA fragments of certain sizes and their fragmentation patterns. By leveraging the support vector machine-based machine learning approach, we showed that a combination of nucleosome map associated features with GC content, results in the increased accuracy of prediction of high inter-sample sequencing coverage variation (areas under the receiver operating curve: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.750–0.752 vs. 0.65, 95% CI: 0.63–0.67). Thus, nucleosome-guided fragmentation should be utilized as a guide to design amplicon-based NGS panels for the genotyping of cfDNA samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxim Ivanov
- Department of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | | | - Valery Breder
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Ekaterina Rozhavskaya
- Atlas Oncology Diagnostics, Ltd., Moscow, Russia.,Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Ancha Baranova
- Department of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia.,Atlas Oncology Diagnostics, Ltd., Moscow, Russia.,Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow, Russia.,School of Systems Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
The lonely driver or the orchestra of mutations? How next generation sequencing datasets contradict the concept of single driver checkpoint mutations in solid tumours - NSCLC as a scholarly example. Semin Cancer Biol 2018; 58:22-28. [PMID: 30458202 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2018.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Driver mutations are considered to be responsible for the majority of cancers and several of those mutations provide targets in order to set up personalized therapies. So far the generally accepted opinion had been that driver mutations occur as stand-alone factors, but novel sequencing technologies induced an essential rethink. Next generation sequencing approaches have shown that double, triple or multiple concurrent mutations could occur within the same tumour and may by interaction influence sensitivity to anticancer drugs and therapy success. This review focusses on this novel concept and discusses the challenges for molecular pathology and laboratory diagnostics while providing putative solutions to overcome the present pitfalls, thereby taking NSCLC as an example.
Collapse
|
12
|
Cabanero M, Tsao MS. Circulating tumour DNA in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 25:S38-S44. [PMID: 29910646 DOI: 10.3747/co.25.3761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The advent of targeted therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) has made the routine molecular diagnosis of EGFR mutations crucial for optimal patient management. Obtaining tumour tissue for biomarker testing, especially in the setting of re-biopsy, can present many challenges. A potential alternative source of tumour dna is circulating cell-free tumour-derived dna (ctdna). Although ctdna is present in low quantities in plasma, the convenience of sample acquisition and the increasing reliability of detection methods make this approach a promising one. The various performance characteristics of both digital and nondigital platforms are still variable, and a standardized approach is needed that will make those platforms reliable clinical tools for the detection of EGFR sensitizing mutations and resistance mutations, including the T790M resistance mutation. Information derived from ctdna can be used to assess tumour burden, to identify genomic-based resistance mechanisms, and to track dynamic changes during therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Cabanero
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, and.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - M S Tsao
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, and.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhang R, Chen B, Tong X, Wang Y, Wang C, Jin J, Tian P, Li W. Diagnostic accuracy of droplet digital PCR for detection of EGFR T790M mutation in circulating tumor DNA. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:1209-1218. [PMID: 29844700 PMCID: PMC5962302 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s161382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Although different methods have been established to detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a wide range of diagnostic accuracy values were reported in previous studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to provide pooled diagnostic accuracy measures for droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in the diagnosis of EGFR T790M mutation based on ctDNA. Materials and methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out based on resources from Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library up to October 11, 2017. Data were extracted to assess the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic OR (DOR), and areas under the summary receiver-operating characteristic curve (SROC). Results Eleven of 311 studies identified have met the including criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of ddPCR for the detection of T790M mutation in ctDNA ranged from 0.0% to 100.0% and 63.2% to 100.0%, respectively. For the pooled analysis, ddPCR had a performance of 70.1% (95% CI, 62.7%–76.7%) sensitivity, 86.9 % (95% CI, 80.6%–91.7%) specificity, 3.67 (95% CI, 2.33–5.79) PLR, 0.41 (95% CI, 0.32–0.55) NLR, and 10.83 (95% CI, 5.86–20.03) DOR, with the area under the SROC curve being 0.82. Conclusion The ddPCR harbored a good performance for detection of EGFR T790M mutation in ctDNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Zhang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Bojiang Chen
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiang Tong
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Ye Wang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.,Lung Cancer Treatment Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Chengdi Wang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Panwen Tian
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.,Lung Cancer Treatment Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Weimin Li
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Merker JD, Oxnard GR, Compton C, Diehn M, Hurley P, Lazar AJ, Lindeman N, Lockwood CM, Rai AJ, Schilsky RL, Tsimberidou AM, Vasalos P, Billman BL, Oliver TK, Bruinooge SS, Hayes DF, Turner NC. Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018; 142:1242-1253. [PMID: 29504834 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0901-sa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE.— Clinical use of analytical tests to assess genomic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasing. This joint review from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists summarizes current information about clinical ctDNA assays and provides a framework for future research. METHODS.— An Expert Panel conducted a literature review on the use of ctDNA assays for solid tumors, including preanalytical variables, analytical validity, interpretation and reporting, and clinical validity and utility. RESULTS.— The literature search identified 1338 references. Of those, 390, plus 31 references supplied by the Expert Panel, were selected for full-text review. There were 77 articles selected for inclusion. CONCLUSIONS.— The evidence indicates that testing for ctDNA is optimally performed on plasma collected in cell stabilization or EDTA tubes, with EDTA tubes processed within 6 hours of collection. Some ctDNA assays have demonstrated clinical validity and utility with certain types of advanced cancer; however, there is insufficient evidence of clinical validity and utility for the majority of ctDNA assays in advanced cancer. Evidence shows discordance between the results of ctDNA assays and genotyping tumor specimens, and supports tumor tissue genotyping to confirm undetected results from ctDNA tests. There is no evidence of clinical utility and little evidence of clinical validity of ctDNA assays in early-stage cancer, treatment monitoring, or residual disease detection. There is no evidence of clinical validity or clinical utility to suggest that ctDNA assays are useful for cancer screening, outside of a clinical trial. Given the rapid pace of research, reevaluation of the literature will shortly be required, along with the development of tools and guidance for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason D Merker
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geoffrey R Oxnard
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Carolyn Compton
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Hurley
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neal Lindeman
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christina M Lockwood
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex J Rai
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard L Schilsky
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Vasalos
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Brooke L Billman
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas K Oliver
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suanna S Bruinooge
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel F Hayes
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas C Turner
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Merker JD, Oxnard GR, Compton C, Diehn M, Hurley P, Lazar AJ, Lindeman N, Lockwood CM, Rai AJ, Schilsky RL, Tsimberidou AM, Vasalos P, Billman BL, Oliver TK, Bruinooge SS, Hayes DF, Turner NC. Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:1631-1641. [PMID: 29504847 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.8671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 579] [Impact Index Per Article: 96.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Clinical use of analytical tests to assess genomic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasing. This joint review from ASCO and the College of American Pathologists summarizes current information about clinical ctDNA assays and provides a framework for future research. Methods An Expert Panel conducted a literature review on the use of ctDNA assays for solid tumors, including pre-analytical variables, analytical validity, interpretation and reporting, and clinical validity and utility. Results The literature search identified 1,338 references. Of those, 390, plus 31 references supplied by the Expert Panel, were selected for full-text review. There were 77 articles selected for inclusion. Conclusion The evidence indicates that testing for ctDNA is optimally performed on plasma collected in cell stabilization or EDTA tubes, with EDTA tubes processed within 6 hours of collection. Some ctDNA assays have demonstrated clinical validity and utility with certain types of advanced cancer; however, there is insufficient evidence of clinical validity and utility for the majority of ctDNA assays in advanced cancer. Evidence shows discordance between the results of ctDNA assays and genotyping tumor specimens and supports tumor tissue genotyping to confirm undetected results from ctDNA tests. There is no evidence of clinical utility and little evidence of clinical validity of ctDNA assays in early-stage cancer, treatment monitoring, or residual disease detection. There is no evidence of clinical validity and clinical utility to suggest that ctDNA assays are useful for cancer screening, outside of a clinical trial. Given the rapid pace of research, re-evaluation of the literature will shortly be required, along with the development of tools and guidance for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason D Merker
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geoffrey R Oxnard
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Carolyn Compton
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Hurley
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neal Lindeman
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christina M Lockwood
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex J Rai
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard L Schilsky
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Vasalos
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Brooke L Billman
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas K Oliver
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suanna S Bruinooge
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel F Hayes
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas C Turner
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Aisner DL, Arcila ME, Beasley MB, Bernicker EH, Colasacco C, Dacic S, Hirsch FR, Kerr K, Kwiatkowski DJ, Ladanyi M, Nowak JA, Sholl L, Temple-Smolkin R, Solomon B, Souter LH, Thunnissen E, Tsao MS, Ventura CB, Wynes MW, Yatabe Y. Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018; 142:321-346. [PMID: 29355391 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0388-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 515] [Impact Index Per Article: 85.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT - In 2013, an evidence-based guideline was published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology to set standards for the molecular analysis of lung cancers to guide treatment decisions with targeted inhibitors. New evidence has prompted an evaluation of additional laboratory technologies, targetable genes, patient populations, and tumor types for testing. OBJECTIVE - To systematically review and update the 2013 guideline to affirm its validity; to assess the evidence of new genetic discoveries, technologies, and therapies; and to issue an evidence-based update. DESIGN - The College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the key questions and literature search terms, review abstracts and full articles, and draft recommendations. RESULTS - Eighteen new recommendations were drafted. The panel also updated 3 recommendations from the 2013 guideline. CONCLUSIONS - The 2013 guideline was largely reaffirmed with updated recommendations to allow testing of cytology samples, require improved assay sensitivity, and recommend against the use of immunohistochemistry for EGFR testing. Key new recommendations include ROS1 testing for all adenocarcinoma patients; the inclusion of additional genes ( ERBB2, MET, BRAF, KRAS, and RET) for laboratories that perform next-generation sequencing panels; immunohistochemistry as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and/or ROS1 testing; use of 5% sensitivity assays for EGFR T790M mutations in patients with secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors; and the use of cell-free DNA to "rule in" targetable mutations when tissue is limited or hard to obtain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal I Lindeman
- From the Departments of Pathology (Drs Lindeman and Sholl) and Medicine (Dr Kwiatkowski), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; the Cancer Center (Dr Bernicker) and the Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas (Dr Cagle); the Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver (Dr Aisner); the Diagnostic and Molecular Pathology Laboratory (Dr Arcila) and the Molecular Diagnostics Service (Dr Ladanyi), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; the Department of Pathology & Medicine, Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, New York, New York (Dr Beasley); the Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Mss Colasacco and Ventura); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Medicine and Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver (Dr Hirsch); the Department of Pathology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland (Dr Kerr); the Department of Molecular Pathology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Clinical and Scientific Affairs Division, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland (Dr Temple-Smolkin); the Molecular Therapeutics and Biomarkers Laboratory, Peter Maccallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia (Dr Solomon); the Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Dr Thunnissen); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Tsao); Scientific Affairs, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Aurora, Colorado (Dr Wynes); and the Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan (Dr Yatabe). Dr Souter is in private practice in Wellanport, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Aisner DL, Arcila ME, Beasley MB, Bernicker EH, Colasacco C, Dacic S, Hirsch FR, Kerr K, Kwiatkowski DJ, Ladanyi M, Nowak JA, Sholl L, Temple-Smolkin R, Solomon B, Souter LH, Thunnissen E, Tsao MS, Ventura CB, Wynes MW, Yatabe Y. Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology. J Thorac Oncol 2018; 13:323-358. [PMID: 29396253 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 329] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT In 2013, an evidence-based guideline was published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology to set standards for the molecular analysis of lung cancers to guide treatment decisions with targeted inhibitors. New evidence has prompted an evaluation of additional laboratory technologies, targetable genes, patient populations, and tumor types for testing. OBJECTIVE To systematically review and update the 2013 guideline to affirm its validity; to assess the evidence of new genetic discoveries, technologies, and therapies; and to issue an evidence-based update. DESIGN The College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the key questions and literature search terms, review abstracts and full articles, and draft recommendations. RESULTS Eighteen new recommendations were drafted. The panel also updated 3 recommendations from the 2013 guideline. CONCLUSIONS The 2013 guideline was largely reaffirmed with updated recommendations to allow testing of cytology samples, require improved assay sensitivity, and recommend against the use of immunohistochemistry for EGFR testing. Key new recommendations include ROS1 testing for all adenocarcinoma patients; the inclusion of additional genes (ERBB2, MET, BRAF, KRAS, and RET) for laboratories that perform next-generation sequencing panels; immunohistochemistry as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and/or ROS1 testing; use of 5% sensitivity assays for EGFR T790M mutations in patients with secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors; and the use of cell-free DNA to "rule in" targetable mutations when tissue is limited or hard to obtain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal I Lindeman
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Philip T Cagle
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Dara L Aisner
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, New York
| | - Maria E Arcila
- Diagnostic and Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mary Beth Beasley
- Department of Pathology & Medicine, Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Carol Colasacco
- Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois
| | - Sanja Dacic
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Fred R Hirsch
- Department of Medicine and Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, New York
| | - Keith Kerr
- Department of Pathology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | | | - Marc Ladanyi
- Molecular Diagnostics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jan A Nowak
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Lynette Sholl
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robyn Temple-Smolkin
- Clinical and Scientific Affairs Division, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Benjamin Solomon
- Molecular Therapeutics and Biomarkers Laboratory, Peter Maccallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Erik Thunnissen
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ming S Tsao
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christina B Ventura
- Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois
| | - Murry W Wynes
- Scientific Affairs, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Yasushi Yatabe
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Aisner DL, Arcila ME, Beasley MB, Bernicker EH, Colasacco C, Dacic S, Hirsch FR, Kerr K, Kwiatkowski DJ, Ladanyi M, Nowak JA, Sholl L, Temple-Smolkin R, Solomon B, Souter LH, Thunnissen E, Tsao MS, Ventura CB, Wynes MW, Yatabe Y. Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn 2018; 20:129-159. [PMID: 29398453 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 215] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT In 2013, an evidence-based guideline was published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology to set standards for the molecular analysis of lung cancers to guide treatment decisions with targeted inhibitors. New evidence has prompted an evaluation of additional laboratory technologies, targetable genes, patient populations, and tumor types for testing. OBJECTIVE To systematically review and update the 2013 guideline to affirm its validity; to assess the evidence of new genetic discoveries, technologies, and therapies; and to issue an evidence-based update. DESIGN The College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the key questions and literature search terms, review abstracts and full articles, and draft recommendations. RESULTS Eighteen new recommendations were drafted. The panel also updated 3 recommendations from the 2013 guideline. CONCLUSIONS The 2013 guideline was largely reaffirmed with updated recommendations to allow testing of cytology samples, require improved assay sensitivity, and recommend against the use of immunohistochemistry for EGFR testing. Key new recommendations include ROS1 testing for all adenocarcinoma patients; the inclusion of additional genes (ERBB2, MET, BRAF, KRAS, and RET) for laboratories that perform next-generation sequencing panels; immunohistochemistry as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and/or ROS1 testing; use of 5% sensitivity assays for EGFR T790M mutations in patients with secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors; and the use of cell-free DNA to "rule in" targetable mutations when tissue is limited or hard to obtain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal I Lindeman
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Philip T Cagle
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Dara L Aisner
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado
| | - Maria E Arcila
- Diagnostic and Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mary Beth Beasley
- Department of Pathology & Medicine, Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Eric H Bernicker
- Cancer Research Program, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Carol Colasacco
- Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois
| | - Sanja Dacic
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Fred R Hirsch
- Department of Medicine and Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| | - Keith Kerr
- Department of Pathology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | | | - Marc Ladanyi
- Molecular Diagnostics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jan A Nowak
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Lynette Sholl
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robyn Temple-Smolkin
- Clinical and Scientific Affairs Division, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Benjamin Solomon
- Molecular Therapeutics and Biomarkers Laboratory, Peter Maccallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Erik Thunnissen
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ming S Tsao
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christina B Ventura
- Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois
| | - Murry W Wynes
- Scientific Affairs, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Yasushi Yatabe
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Li F, Huang J, Ji D, Meng Q, Wang C, Chen S, Wang X, Zhu Z, Jiang C, Shi Y, Liu S, Li C. Utility of urinary circulating tumor DNA for EGFR mutation detection in different stages of non-small cell lung cancer patients. Clin Transl Oncol 2017; 19:1283-1291. [PMID: 28497422 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1669-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Non-invasive methods of molecular profiling for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are useful for monitoring disease progression. The aim of the current study was to ascertain if transrenal DNA is sensitive for clinical correlation and EGFR detection in NSCLC patients. METHODS 160 patients at various stages of the disease participated and samples were collected prospectively at 2-month intervals. A baseline sample was taken before treatment commencement. To ascertain the sensitivity of transrenal DNA, we compared its results with plasma DNA. ddPCR was used to profile the urine and blood samples for key EGFR mutations. RESULTS Using tumor tissues as references, our study showed good concordance in EGFR mutations with transrenal DNA before treatment. Results were highly matching in late-stage NSCLC patients, with stage III/IV patients yielding an agreement of more than 90%. The assay was also sensitive to detect early-stage patients after surgical procedures. Profiles were highly concordant with results derived from plasma DNA, demonstrating the specificity of transrenal DNA assays. Serial monitoring of these patients showed stable molecular signatures and correlated to different treatments. Survival analysis showed good prognostic utility for late-stage patients with high transrenal DNA variations and patients that acquired T790M mutation. CONCLUSION The study demonstrated the feasibility of using transrenal DNA in mutation profiling for different stages of NSCLC patients. It highlights the importance of continual monitoring and has potential clinical utility in the clinical management of NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fajiu Li
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuhan No. 6 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital to Jianghan University, 168 Xianggang Rd, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Huang
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuhan No. 6 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital to Jianghan University, 168 Xianggang Rd, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Dongyuan Ji
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuhan No. 6 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital to Jianghan University, 168 Xianggang Rd, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Qinghua Meng
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuhan No. 6 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital to Jianghan University, 168 Xianggang Rd, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Chuanhai Wang
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuhan No. 6 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital to Jianghan University, 168 Xianggang Rd, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Shi Chen
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuhan No. 6 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital to Jianghan University, 168 Xianggang Rd, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaojiang Wang
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuhan No. 6 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital to Jianghan University, 168 Xianggang Rd, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiyang Zhu
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuhan No. 6 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital to Jianghan University, 168 Xianggang Rd, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Cheng Jiang
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuhan No. 6 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital to Jianghan University, 168 Xianggang Rd, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi Shi
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuhan No. 6 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital to Jianghan University, 168 Xianggang Rd, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuang Liu
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuhan No. 6 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital to Jianghan University, 168 Xianggang Rd, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Chenghong Li
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuhan No. 6 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital to Jianghan University, 168 Xianggang Rd, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Circulating Cell Free Tumor DNA Detection as a Routine Tool forLung Cancer Patient Management. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18:ijms18020264. [PMID: 28146051 PMCID: PMC5343800 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18020264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2016] [Revised: 01/10/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Circulating tumoral DNA (ctDNA), commonly named “liquid biopsy”, has emerged as a new promising noninvasive tool to detect biomarker in several cancers including lung cancer. Applications involving molecular analysis of ctDNA in lung cancer have increased and encompass diagnosis, response to treatment, acquired resistance and prognosis prediction, while bypassing the problem of tumor heterogeneity. ctDNA may then help perform dynamic genetic surveillance in the era of precision medicine through indirect tumoral genomic information determination. The aims of this review were to examine the recent technical developments that allowed the detection of genetic alterations of ctDNA in lung cancer. Furthermore, we explored clinical applications in patients with lung cancer including treatment efficiency monitoring, acquired therapy resistance mechanisms and prognosis value.
Collapse
|
22
|
Han Y, Li J. Sample types applied for molecular diagnosis of therapeutic management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the precision medicine. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 55:1817-1833. [DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
AbstractIn this era of precision medicine, molecular biology is becoming increasingly significant for the diagnosis and therapeutic management of non-small cell lung cancer. The specimen as the primary element of the whole testing flow is particularly important for maintaining the accuracy of gene alteration testing. Presently, the main sample types applied in routine diagnosis are tissue and cytology biopsies. Liquid biopsies are considered as the most promising alternatives when tissue and cytology samples are not available. Each sample type possesses its own strengths and weaknesses, pertaining to the disparity of sampling, preparation and preservation procedures, the heterogeneity of inter- or intratumors, the tumor cellularity (percentage and number of tumor cells) of specimens, etc., and none of them can individually be a “one size to fit all”. Therefore, in this review, we summarized the strengths and weaknesses of different sample types that are widely used in clinical practice, offered solutions to reduce the negative impact of the samples and proposed an optimized strategy for choice of samples during the entire diagnostic course. We hope to provide valuable information to laboratories for choosing optimal clinical specimens to achieve comprehensive functional genomic landscapes and formulate individually tailored treatment plans for NSCLC patients that are in advanced stages.
Collapse
|
23
|
Molina-Vila MA, Mayo-de-Las-Casas C, Giménez-Capitán A, Jordana-Ariza N, Garzón M, Balada A, Villatoro S, Teixidó C, García-Peláez B, Aguado C, Catalán MJ, Campos R, Pérez-Rosado A, Bertran-Alamillo J, Martínez-Bueno A, Gil MDLL, González-Cao M, González X, Morales-Espinosa D, Viteri S, Karachaliou N, Rosell R. Liquid Biopsy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Front Med (Lausanne) 2016; 3:69. [PMID: 28066769 PMCID: PMC5179978 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2016.00069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 12/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Liquid biopsy analyses are already incorporated in the routine clinical practice in many hospitals and oncology departments worldwide, improving the selection of treatments and monitoring of lung cancer patients. Although they have not yet reached its full potential, liquid biopsy-based tests will soon be as widespread as “standard” biopsies and imaging techniques, offering invaluable diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive information. This review summarizes the techniques available for the isolation and analysis of circulating free DNA and RNA, exosomes, tumor-educated platelets, and circulating tumor cells from the blood of cancer patients, presents the methodological challenges associated with each of these materials, and discusses the clinical applications of liquid biopsy testing in lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel A Molina-Vila
- Laboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Biotech, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Clara Mayo-de-Las-Casas
- Laboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Biotech, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Ana Giménez-Capitán
- Laboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Biotech, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Núria Jordana-Ariza
- Laboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Biotech, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Mónica Garzón
- Laboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Biotech, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Ariadna Balada
- Laboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Biotech, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Sergi Villatoro
- Laboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Biotech, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Cristina Teixidó
- Laboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Biotech, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Beatriz García-Peláez
- Laboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Biotech, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Cristina Aguado
- Laboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Biotech, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - María José Catalán
- Laboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Biotech, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Raquel Campos
- Laboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Biotech, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Ana Pérez-Rosado
- Laboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Biotech, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Jordi Bertran-Alamillo
- Laboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Biotech, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | | | | | - María González-Cao
- Instituto Oncológico Dr Rosell, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Xavier González
- Instituto Oncológico Dr Rosell, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | | | - Santiago Viteri
- Instituto Oncológico Dr Rosell, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Niki Karachaliou
- Instituto Oncológico Dr Rosell, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Rafael Rosell
- Instituto Oncológico Dr Rosell, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Cancer Biology and Precision Medicine Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Germans Trias i Pujol Health Sciences Institute and Hospital, Badalona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Calabuig-Fariñas S, Jantus-Lewintre E, Herreros-Pomares A, Camps C. Circulating tumor cells versus circulating tumor DNA in lung cancer-which one will win? Transl Lung Cancer Res 2016; 5:466-482. [PMID: 27826528 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2016.10.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Liquid biopsies appear to be a reliable alternative to conventional biopsies that can provide both precise molecular data useful for improving the clinical management of lung cancer patients as well as a less invasive way of monitoring tumor behavior. These advances are supported by important biotechnological developments in the fields of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Analysis of CTCs and ctDNA may be useful in treatment selection, for response monitoring, and in studying resistance mechanisms. This review focuses on the most recent technological achievements and the most relevant clinical applications for lung cancer patients in the CTC and ctDNA fields, highlighting those that are already (or are close to) being implemented in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Calabuig-Fariñas
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, General University Hospital Research Foundation, University General Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain;; Department of Pathology, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Eloísa Jantus-Lewintre
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, General University Hospital Research Foundation, University General Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain;; Department of Biotechnology, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alejandro Herreros-Pomares
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, General University Hospital Research Foundation, University General Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain;; Department of Biotechnology, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Carlos Camps
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, General University Hospital Research Foundation, University General Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain;; Department of Medicine, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain;; Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
de Las Casas CM, Gonzalez-Cao M, Ramirez SV, Ariza NJ, Balada A, Garzón M, Teixidó C, Karachaliou N, Morales-Espinosa D, Molina-Vila MÁ, Rosell R. Usefulness of circulating free DNA for monitoring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a case report. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2016; 5:532-537. [PMID: 27826535 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2016.10.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Genomic analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) released from cancer cells into the bloodstream has been proposed as a useful method to capture dynamic changes during the course of the disease. In particular, the ability to monitor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in cell-free circulating DNA (cfDNA) isolated from advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients EGFR can help to the correct management of the disease and overcome the challenges associated with tumor heterogeneity and insufficient biopsied material to perform key molecular diagnosis. Here, we report a case of long term monitorization of EGFR mutation status in cfDNA from peripheral blood in an NSCLC patient in, with excellent correlation with clinical evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Mayo de Las Casas
- Pangaea Biotech, Medical Oncology Laboratory, Dexeus University Hospital, Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Gonzalez-Cao
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, Instituto Oncológico Dr Rosell, Dexeus University Hospital-Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Santiago Viteri Ramirez
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, Instituto Oncológico Dr Rosell, Dexeus University Hospital-Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nuria Jordana Ariza
- Pangaea Biotech, Medical Oncology Laboratory, Dexeus University Hospital, Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ariadna Balada
- Pangaea Biotech, Medical Oncology Laboratory, Dexeus University Hospital, Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mónica Garzón
- Pangaea Biotech, Medical Oncology Laboratory, Dexeus University Hospital, Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Teixidó
- Pangaea Biotech, Medical Oncology Laboratory, Dexeus University Hospital, Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Niki Karachaliou
- Pangaea Biotech, Medical Oncology Laboratory, Dexeus University Hospital, Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain;; Translational Cancer Research Unit, Instituto Oncológico Dr Rosell, Dexeus University Hospital-Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain;; University Hospital Sagrat Cor, Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniela Morales-Espinosa
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, Instituto Oncológico Dr Rosell, Dexeus University Hospital-Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Ángel Molina-Vila
- Pangaea Biotech, Medical Oncology Laboratory, Dexeus University Hospital, Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rafael Rosell
- Pangaea Biotech, Medical Oncology Laboratory, Dexeus University Hospital, Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain;; Translational Cancer Research Unit, Instituto Oncológico Dr Rosell, Dexeus University Hospital-Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain;; Cancer Biology and Precision Medicine Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Germans Triasi Pujol Health Sciences Institute and Hospital, Campus Can Ruti, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Garzón M, Villatoro S, Teixidó C, Mayo C, Martínez A, de Los Llanos Gil M, Viteri S, Morales-Espinosa D, Rosell R. KRAS mutations in the circulating free DNA (cfDNA) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2016; 5:511-516. [PMID: 27826532 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2016.10.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) is obtained from serum or plasma by non-invasive methods such as a simple blood draw, a technique known as "liquid biopsy". Genetic analyses of driver alterations in cfDNA have proved very effective to predict survival and treatment response of cancer patients according to tumoral cfDNA burden in blood. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with higher concentration of tumoral cfDNA in blood have, on average, shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Regarding specific genetic alterations, KRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase (KRAS) is one of the main genes involved in NSCLC and several studies have been performed to determine its value as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in liquid biopsy. Unfortunately, to date no strong conclusions can be drawn since they have yielded contradictory results. Therefore, further investigations are necessary to establish the value of KRAS testing in liquid biopsy as prognostic or predictive factor in NSCLC. Herein, we review the current knowledge on the importance of KRAS as prognostic and predictive biomarker using non-invasive approaches and the scientific data available regarding its application in clinical practice for treatment of NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mónica Garzón
- Pangaea Biotech, Laboratory of Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sergi Villatoro
- Pangaea Biotech, Laboratory of Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Teixidó
- Pangaea Biotech, Laboratory of Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Clara Mayo
- Pangaea Biotech, Laboratory of Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alejandro Martínez
- Dr Rosell Oncology Institute, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Santiago Viteri
- Dr Rosell Oncology Institute, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Rafael Rosell
- Pangaea Biotech, Laboratory of Oncology, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, 08028 Barcelona, Spain;; Dr Rosell Oncology Institute, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, 08028 Barcelona, Spain;; Cancer Biology & Precision Medicine Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Germans Trias i Pujol Health Sciences Institute and Hospital, Crta de Canyet s/n, 08016 Badalona, Spain;; Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Campus Can Ruti, Crta de Canyet s/n, 08016 Badalona, Spain;; Molecular Oncology Research (MORe) Foundation, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|