Clinical characteristics of adverse reactions to nonionic low osmolality contrast media in patients transferred from the CT room to the emergency room

Ligamentum Flavum Rupture by Epidural Injection Using Ultrasound with SMI Method

The loss of resistance (LOR) method has been used exclusively to identify epidural space. It is difficult to find the epidural space without the risk of dural puncture. Various devices have been developed to improve the accuracy of the LOR method; however, no method has overcome the problems completely. Therefore, we devised a ligamentum flavum rupture method (LFRM) in which the needle tip is placed only on the ligamentum flavum during the epidural injection, and the injection pressure is used to rupture the ligamentum flavum and spread the drug into the epidural space. We confirmed the accuracy of this method using ultrasound with superb microvascular imaging (SMI) to visualize the epidural space. Here, we report two cases of 63-year-old and 90-year-old males. The 63-year-old patient presented with severe pain in his right buttock that extended to the posterior lower leg. The 90-year-old patient presented with intermittent claudication every 10 min. LFRM was performed, and SMI was used to confirm that the parenteral solution had spread into the epidural space. Our results indicate that LFRM can be used for interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid injections.

Direct Visualization of Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Injections Using Sonography

In this case series, we describe a novel ultrasound (US)-guided cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injections (CILESIs) procedure that does not depend on the loss-of-resistance method for epidural space identification. A needle is introduced into three US-identified structures (triple bar sign), the interspinal ligament, ligamentum flavum, and dura mater. The injectants are monitored using superb microvascular imaging during injection. Here, we demonstrate the use of US-guided CILESIs in nine cases and propose the use of sonography, rather than conventional methods, for easier and safer cervical epidural injections. Sonography for direct visualization of cervical epidural injection may allow for outpatient injections.

Common causes and characteristics of adverse drug reactions in older adults: a retrospective study

Background

Aging populations are often accompanied by comorbidity and polypharmacy, leading to increases in adverse drug reactions (ADRs). We sought to evaluate the causes and characteristics of ADRs in older Korean adults (≥65 years) in comparison to younger individuals (< 65 years).

Methods

Of 37,523 cases reported at a Korean pharmacovigilance center from 2011 to 2018, we reviewed 18,842 ADRs of certain or probable causality on the basis of WHO-UMC criteria. We estimated the number of ADRs per 1000 patients exposed to the major culprit drugs, and incidence rate ratios were obtained to assess high- and low-risk medications in older adults.

Results

In total, 4152 (22.0%) ADRs were reported for 3437 older adults (mean age, 74.6 years and 57.3% female). Tramadol (rate ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21–1.44; P < 0.001) and fentanyl (1.49, 1.16–1.92, P = 0.002) posed higher risks of ADRs in the older adults, whereas nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (0.35, 0.30–0.40, P < 0.001) and iodinated contrast media (ICM) (0.82, 0.76–0.89, P < 0.001) posed lower risks. Ratios of serious ADRs to NSAIDs (odds ratio, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.48–3.15; P < 0.001) and ICM (2.09, 1.36–3.21, P = 0.001) were higher in the older adults than in the younger patients. Analgesics primarily elicited cutaneous ADRs in the younger patients and gastrointestinal reactions in the older adults. ICM more commonly led to anaphylaxis in the older adults than the younger patients (3.0% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.019).

Conclusion

For early detection of ADRs in older adults, better understanding of differences in the causes and characteristics thereof in comparison to the general population is needed.

Adverse Drug Reactions to Radiographic Contrast Media in a Teaching Hospital in North India: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Radiocontrast media are used extensively nowadays to visualize internal organs. Currently, non-ionic iodinated contrast media are used which are generally considered to be safe but some adverse reactions have been reported. Thus, the present study was carried out to analyze the nature and incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to radiographic contrast media in a teaching hospital.

METHODS

An observational study carried out for a period of six months in a teaching hospital. Contrast media induced adverse reactions were analyzed in terms of affected organs, rate, causality assessment, severity and preventability. The treatment and outcomes of adverse events were also recorded. Naranjo Probability Scale was used to evaluate the relationship between the contrast agent used and the suspected ADR. The severity of the suspected ADRs was determined using Hartwig Scale and preventability was assessed using modified Schumock and Thornton criterion.

RESULTS

A total of 15 suspected ADRs occurred in 11 patients with an incidence of 1.4%. It included 5 (45.4%) males and 6 (54.5%) females (p < 05). The highest percentage (72.7 %) of ADRs was seen in adult patients, the mean age being 40.8 years. Vomiting (33.3%) was the most common ADR noted followed by severe nausea and rashes. 64.7 % of ADRs were categorized as probable and 35.3 % were possible. Adverse reactions required treatment in 46.6% patients. There was no fatality reported.

CONCLUSION

The reactions observed were mild to moderate in severity and occurred within 30 minutes of the administration of the contrast.