1
|
Persistence of Residual Submicroscopic P. falciparum Parasitemia following Treatment of Artemether-Lumefantrine in Ethio-Sudan Border, Western Ethiopia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2022; 66:e0000222. [PMID: 35993723 PMCID: PMC9487599 DOI: 10.1128/aac.00002-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The emergence of artemisinin-resistant parasites in Africa has had a devastating impact, causing most malaria cases and related deaths reported on the continent. In Ethiopia, artemether-lumefantrine (AL) is the first-line drug for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. This study is one of the earliest evaluations of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) efficacy in western Ethiopia, 17 years after the introduction of this drug in the study area. This study aimed at assessing PCR- corrected clinical and parasitological responses at 28 days following AL treatment. Sixty uncomplicated falciparum malaria patients were enrolled, treated with standard doses of AL, and monitored for 28 days with clinical and parasitological assessments from September 15 to December 15, 2020. Microscopy was used for patient recruitment and molecular diagnosis of P. falciparum was performed by Var gene acidic terminal sequence (varATS) real-time PCR on dried blood spots collected from each patient from day 0 and on follow-up days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28. MspI and msp2 genotyping was done to confirm occurrence of recrudescence. Data entry and analysis were done by using the WHO-designed Excel spreadsheet and SPSS version 20 for Windows. A P value of less or equal to 0.05 was considered significant. From a total of 60 patients enrolled in this efficacy study, 10 were lost to follow-up; the results were analyzed for 50 patients. All the patients were fever-free on day 3. The asexual parasite positivity rate on day 3 was zero. However; 60% of the patients were PCR positive on day 3. PCR positivity on day 3 was more common among patients <15 years old as compared with those ≥15 years old (AOR = 6.44, P = 0.027). Only two patients met the case definition of treatment failure. These patients were classified as a late clinical failure as they showed symptoms of malaria and asexual stages of the parasite detected by microscopy on day 14 of their follow-ups. Hence, the Kaplan-Meier analysis of PCR- corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) rate of AL among study participants was 96% (95% CI: 84.9-99). In seven patients, the residual submicroscopic parasitemia persists from day 0 to day 28 of the follow-up. In addition, 16% (8/50) of patients were PCR- and then turned PCR+ after day 7 of the follow-up. AL remains efficacious for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in the study area. However, the persistence of PCR-detected residual submicroscopic parasitemia following AL might compromise this treatment and need careful monitoring.
Collapse
|
2
|
Trojánek M, Grebenyuk V, Richterová L, Zicklerová I, Nohýnková E, Manďáková Z, Kantor J, Roháčová H, Stejskal F. Epidemiology and clinical features of imported malaria: a 14-year retrospective single-centre descriptive study in Prague, Czech Republic. Malar J 2022; 21:257. [PMID: 36068598 PMCID: PMC9447980 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-022-04282-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malaria represents one of the most important imported tropical infectious diseases in European travellers. The objective of the study was to identify changes in the epidemiological features of imported malaria and to analyse the clinical findings and outcomes of imported malaria. Methods This single-centre descriptive study retrospectively analysed the medical records of all imported malaria cases in travellers treated at the Department of Infectious Diseases of University Hospital Bulovka in Prague from 2006 to 2019. Results The study included 203 patients with a median age of 37 years (IQR 30–48) and a male to female ratio of 3.72:1. Plasmodium falciparum was the predominant species (149/203), and its proportion significantly increased from 35/60 cases (58.3%) in 2006–2011 to 69/80 (86.3%) in 2016–2019 (p < 0.001). In contrast, the incidence of Plasmodium vivax malaria decreased from 19/60 cases (31.7%) in 2006–2011 to 5/80 (6.3%) in 2016–2019 (p < 0.001). Malaria was imported from sub-Saharan Africa in 161/203 cases (79.3%). The proportion of travellers from Southeast and South Asia decreased from 16/60 (26.7%) and 6/60 (10.0%) in 2006–2011 to 2/80 (2.5%) and no cases (0.0%) in 2016–2019, respectively (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006). Tourism was the most common reason for travel (82/203), however, the proportion of non-tourists significantly increased over time from 29/60 (48.3%) in 2006–2011 to 55/80 (68.8%) in 2016–2019, p = 0.015. Severe malaria developed in 32/203 (15.8%) patients who were significantly older (p = 0.013) and whose treatment was delayed (p < 0.001). Two lethal outcomes were observed during the study period. Conclusions This study demonstrated a significant increase in P. falciparum malaria, which frequently resulted in severe disease, especially in older patients and those with delayed treatment initiation. The rising proportion of imported malaria in non-tourists, including business travellers and those visiting friends and relatives, is another characteristic finding analogous to the trends observed in Western European and North American centres. The described changes in the aetiology and epidemiology of imported malaria may serve to optimize pre-travel consultation practices and improve post-travel diagnostics and medical care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-022-04282-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milan Trojánek
- Department of Infectious Diseases, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Budínova 2, 180 81, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Bulovka, Budínova 2, 180 81, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute for Postgraduate Medical Education, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Vyacheslav Grebenyuk
- Department of Infectious Diseases, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Budínova 2, 180 81, Prague, Czech Republic. .,Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Bulovka, Budínova 2, 180 81, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Lenka Richterová
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Bulovka, Budínova 2, 180 81, Prague, Czech Republic.,National Reference Laboratory for the Diagnosis of Tropical Parasitic Infections, Budínova 2, 180 81, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Budínova 2, 180 81, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Microbiology of the 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 50, 100 34, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ivana Zicklerová
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Bulovka, Budínova 2, 180 81, Prague, Czech Republic.,National Reference Laboratory for the Diagnosis of Tropical Parasitic Infections, Budínova 2, 180 81, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Eva Nohýnková
- National Reference Laboratory for the Diagnosis of Tropical Parasitic Infections, Budínova 2, 180 81, Prague, Czech Republic.,Institute of Immunology and Microbiology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Studničkova 7, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Zdenka Manďáková
- Department of Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jakub Kantor
- Department of Infectious Diseases, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Budínova 2, 180 81, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Hana Roháčová
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Bulovka, Budínova 2, 180 81, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - František Stejskal
- Department of Infectious Diseases, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Budínova 2, 180 81, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Bulovka, Budínova 2, 180 81, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Regional Hospital Liberec, Husova 10, 460 63, Liberec, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abamecha A, Yilma D, Adissu W, Yewhalaw D, Abdissa A. Efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Malar J 2021; 20:213. [PMID: 33957925 PMCID: PMC8101141 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03745-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Regular monitoring of anti-malarial drug efficacy is vital for establishing rational malaria treatment guidelines and ensuring adequate treatment outcomes. This study aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the efficacy of artemether–lumefantrine for the management of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Ethiopia. Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Relevant published studies were searched from the databases (PubMed, Google Scholar and Clinical trial registry) on published artemether–lumefantrine therapeutic efficacy studies conducted in Ethiopia from 2004 to 2020. The retrieved studies were assessed for quality using the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale for observational studies and modified Jadad scale for interventional studies. Risk of bias was also assessed by using ROBINS-I tool. OpenMeta-Analyst software was used for the statistical analysis. The review protocol is registered in PROSPERO, number CRD42020201859. Results Fifteen studies (1523 participants) were included in the final analysis. The overall PCR-uncorrected pooled proportion of treatment success of artemether–lumefantrine therapy for uncomplicated falciparum malaria was 98.4% (95%CI 97.6–99.1). A random-effects model was used because of considerable heterogeneity [χ2 = 20.48, df (14), P = 0.011 and I2 = 31.65]. PCR-corrected pooled proportion of treatment success of artemether–lumefantrine therapy was 98.7% (95% CI 97.7–99.6). A random-effects model was used [χ2 = 7.37, df(6), P = 0.287 and I2 = 18.69]. Most studies included in the present review achieved a rapid reduction of fevers and parasitaemia between D0 and D3 of assessment. Adverse events were mostly mild and only two cases were reported as serious, but were not directly attributed to the drug. Conclusion The present meta-analysis suggests that artemether–lumefantrine therapy is efficacious and safe in treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Ethiopia. However, owing to the high risk of bias in the included studies, strong conclusions cannot be drawn. Further high-quality RCTs assessing anti-malarial efficacy and safety should be performed to demonstrates strong evidence of changes in parasite sensitivity to artemether–lumefantrine in Ethiopia. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-021-03745-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulhakim Abamecha
- School of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. .,Clinical Trial Unit, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. .,Tropical and Infectious Diseases Research Center (TIDRC), Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. .,Department of Biomedical, College of Public Health and Medical Science, Mettu University, Mettu, Ethiopia.
| | - Daniel Yilma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.,Clinical Trial Unit, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
| | - Wondimagegn Adissu
- School of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.,Clinical Trial Unit, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
| | - Delenasaw Yewhalaw
- School of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.,Tropical and Infectious Diseases Research Center (TIDRC), Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
| | - Alemseged Abdissa
- School of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.,Clinical Trial Unit, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.,Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gebrekidan MG, Gebremedhin GB, Gebregiorgis YS, Gezehegn AA, Weldearegay KT. Artemether-lumefantrin treatment adherence among uncomplicated plasmodium falciparum malaria patients, visiting public health facilities in AsgedeTsimbla district, Tigray, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020; 9:184. [PMID: 33168093 PMCID: PMC7653737 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-020-00846-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Ethiopia has set a goal to eliminate malaria by 2030; Artemether–lumefantrine (AL) is put as one of the cornerstone strategies for uncomplicated plasmodium falciparum malaria treatment. However, only focusing on prescribing of the treatment without assessing patients’ adherence could lead to the resistance of the drug. In Ethiopia, there is limited evidence about patients’ adherence to AL and its influencing factors. Therefore, this study aimed at addressing this information gap. Methods A health facility based cross-sectional study was employed. Participants were selected using simple random sampling technique from registration books of the public health facilities in AsgedeTsimbla. Data were collected from March 24th to April 30th, 2018. We interviewed participants using a pre-tested structured questionnaire, and the blister pack was also inspected at their homes on day 4. Data were entered into Epi-Info and analyzed using SPSS 21. Odds ratios with 95% Confidence Intervals were estimated and the level of significance was declared at p-value ≤ 0.05. Results A total of 384 study participants were interviewed with a response rate of 95.5%. The overall AL adherence was 53.6% (95% CI 48.4–58.3%). Children aged < 5 years [AOR: 0.4, 95% CI (0.2–0.8)], and being treated in health post [AOR: 0.3, 95% CI (0.1–0.5)] were more likely to show AL adherence whereas illiteracy [AOR: 9.4, 95% CI (4.2–21.3)], didn’t know the consequence of discontinued AL [AOR: 4.0, 95% CI (2.1–7.6)], had concomitant drugs [AOR: 2.5, 95% CI (1.4–4.5)], and stopped/saved drug when improved before tablet got finished [AOR: 3.2, 95% CI (1.7–5.9)] were factors less likely to be associated with AL adherence. Conclusion AL adherence was low. Children aged < 5 years, and being treated in health post were determinants of AL adherence whereas illiteracy, didn’t know the consequence of discontinued the drug, had concomitant drugs, and stopped/saved drug when improved before tablet got finished were factors that hindered the AL adherence. Stakeholders should emphasize designing appropriate strategies including educational interventions to increase the AL adherence and prevent drug resistance. Further research should be conducted to evaluate AL resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gebretsadik Berhe Gebremedhin
- College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia
| | - Yosef Sibhatu Gebregiorgis
- College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
| | | | - Kissanet Tesfay Weldearegay
- College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Therapeutic Efficacy of Artemether-Lumefantrine (Coartem®) for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria in Africa: A Systematic Review. J Parasitol Res 2020; 2020:7371681. [PMID: 33145101 PMCID: PMC7599419 DOI: 10.1155/2020/7371681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Africa still bears the largest burden of malaria as the majority of infections in the continent are caused by P. falciparum. Artemether-lumefantrine (AL, Coartem®) is the most widely used artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria globally. However, the development of resistance to antimalarial drugs is a major challenge for malaria control. In this review, the efficacy of AL for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Africa was evaluated. Methods Articles published between January 2015 and July 2019 were systematically searched using comprehensive search strings from PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, and grey literature from Google Scholar. Interventional studies that followed patients for at least 28 days were included. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. All the included articles were measured to be good quality. While computing the efficacy of AL, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–corrected cure rate (adequate clinical and parasitological response, ACPR) at day 28 was considered as the main endpoint. Meta-analysis was computed using STATA v 15 to calculate the pooled ACPR. Results In this review, 39 articles that reported the treatment outcome of 8,320 patients were included. After 28 days of follow-up, the pooled PCR uncorrected and corrected APCR was at 87% (95% CI: 85-90%) and 97.0% (95% CI: 96-98%), respectively. Moreover, the proportion of early treatment failure (ETF) was almost 0%, while most of the included articles reported <8% late treatment failures. The reinfection and recrudescence rate was less than 10% and 2.6%, respectively, within 28 days. We noted rapid fever and parasite clearance in which greater than 93% and 94% patients were parasite and fever free at day three following AL treatment. Conclusions This review discovered that despite more than a decade since its introduction, Coartem® remains effective and thus could continue to be the drug of choice for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria for all age groups in Africa. However, the risk of new emerging resistance for this combination warrants regular monitoring of its efficacy across the continent.
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhou W, Wang H, Yang Y, Chen ZS, Zou C, Zhang J. Chloroquine against malaria, cancers and viral diseases. Drug Discov Today 2020; 25:S1359-6446(20)30367-6. [PMID: 32947043 PMCID: PMC7492153 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Quinoline (QN) derivatives are often used for the prophylaxis and treatment of malaria. Chloroquine (CQ), a protonated, weakly basic drug, exerts its antimalarial effect mainly by increasing pH and accumulating in the food vacuole of the parasites. Repurposing CQ is an emerging strategy for new indications. Given the inhibition of autophagy and its immunomodulatory action, CQ shows positive efficacy against cancer and viral diseases, including Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Here, we review the underlying mechanisms behind the antimalarial, anticancer and antiviral effects of CQ. We also discuss the clinical evidence for the use of CQ and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) against COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenmin Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology and the State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences & the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, PR China
| | - Hui Wang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology and the State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences & the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, PR China; Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics/Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, PR China; The First Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 571199, PR China
| | - Yuqi Yang
- College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St John's University, Queens, New York, NY 11439, USA
| | - Zhe-Sheng Chen
- College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St John's University, Queens, New York, NY 11439, USA.
| | - Chang Zou
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, 518020, PR China.
| | - Jianye Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology and the State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences & the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, PR China; Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics/Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, PR China; The First Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 571199, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Warsame M, Hassan AM, Hassan AH, Jibril AM, Khim N, Arale AM, Gomey AH, Nur ZS, Osman SM, Mohamed MS, Abdulrahman A, Yusuf FE, Amran JGH, Witkowski B, Ringwald P. High therapeutic efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Somalia. Malar J 2019; 18:231. [PMID: 31296223 PMCID: PMC6624891 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2864-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Artemether–lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine (DHA/PPQ) are the recommended first- and second-line treatments, respectively, for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Somalia. The studies reported here were conducted to assess the efficacy of these artemisinin-based combinations and the mutations in Plasmodium falciparum K13-propeller (Pfk13) domain and amplification in Pfplasmepsin 2 (Pfpm2) gene in Somalia. Methods One-arm prospective studies were conducted to assess the clinical and parasitological responses to DHA/PPQ and AL at two sites in 2016 and 2017, respectively, using the standard WHO protocol. The patterns of molecular markers associated with artemisinin and PPQ resistance were investigated for the first time in Somalia. Results A total of 339 patients were enrolled with 139 for AL and 200 for DHA/PPQ. With AL, no parasite recurrence was observed among patients treated at either site, corresponding to 100% clinical and parasitological responses. For DHA–PPQ, an adequate clinical and parasitological response rate > 97% was observed. All study patients on both treatments at both sites were parasite-free on day 3. Of the 138 samples with interpretable results for the polymorphism in Pfk13, only one (0.7%), from Bosaso, contained a non-synonymous mutation (R622I), which is not one of the known markers of artemisinin resistance. No Pfpm2 amplification was observed among the 135 samples with interpretable results. Conclusions AL and DHA/PPQ were highly effective in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria, and there was no evidence of resistance to artemisinin or PPQ. These two combinations are thus relevant in the chemotherapeutic strategy for malaria control in Somalia. Trial registration ACTRN12616001005448 (Jowhar DP study), ACTRN12616000553471 (Bosaso DP study), ACTRN12617001055392 (AL study in Bosaso and Jowhar)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian Warsame
- Global Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland. .,University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | - Nimol Khim
- Malaria Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Pasteur Institute in Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Benoit Witkowski
- Malaria Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Pasteur Institute in Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.,Malaria Translational Research Unit, Pasteur Institute, Paris, France
| | - Pascal Ringwald
- Global Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Adam I, Ibrahim Y, Gasim GI. Efficacy and safety of artemisinin-based combination therapy for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Sudan: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Malar J 2018. [PMID: 29534720 PMCID: PMC5850971 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2265-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malaria is a major public health problem in endemic countries including Sudan, where about 75% of populations are at risk. Due to widespread of chloroquine-resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum, artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is currently treatment of choice for malaria in the vast majority of malaria-endemic countries. This systematic review and meta-analysis is performed to obtain an overall stronger evidence of the outcomes of ACT in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria from the existing literature in Sudan. Methods The preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis statement were used to select studies to be included in this review. A computerized systematic strategy was adopted to search articles from PubMed, Google Scholar and Science Direct databases. Unpublished materials were also included. Open Meta-Analyst software was used to perform the meta-analysis. Random effects model was used to combine the included studies and the heterogeneity of studies was assessed using Cochrane Q and I2 (χ2 = 73.05, df (19), P < 0.001 and I2 = 73.99). Results Twenty studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria (ACT in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria) and were included in the final analysis with a total number of 4070 participants. Malaria treatment outcome was assessed using World Health Organization guidelines. Adequate clinical and parasitological response was used to assess treatment success at the 28th day. Treatment success of all combined studies was 98% [(95% CI 97.2–98.8%), P < 0.001]. Treatment success was higher in malaria patients treated with artemether + lumefantrine (AL) than patients treated with artesunate + sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (AS + SP) (98.9% (95% CI 98.4–99.4%) vs 97.1% (95% CI 95.5–98.6%), P < 0.001). Eleven studies reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to ACT (184 participants out of 3957 (4.65%). The ADRs were mild and resolved spontaneously. There was no severe ADRs or deaths. Conclusion Based on this review, the overall malaria treatment success was high (98%). AL regimen showed higher efficacy compared to AS + SP. The overall regimens were associated with mild low rates ADRs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12936-018-2265-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishag Adam
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, P.O. Box 102, Khartoum, Sudan.
| | - Yassin Ibrahim
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, P.O. Box 741, Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Gasim I Gasim
- Faculty of Medicine, Alneelain University, Khartoum, Sudan
| |
Collapse
|