Client-therapist dyads and therapy outcome: Does sex matching matters? A cross-sectional study

Exploring perspectives on how to improve psychological treatment for women from minoritised ethnic communities: A qualitative study with service users

BACKGROUND

Women are disproportionately impacted by depression and anxiety disorders and in particular, women from minoritised ethnic communities experience inequalities in access to outcomes of psychological treatment for these disorders. Better understanding from the views of service users about the factors that impact their access to, and experiences of care could help to optimise treatment for these groups.

METHOD

This study explored experiences of treatment and gathered suggestions about treatment improvement, from the perspectives of women currently using psychological therapy services. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 female NHS Talking Therapies for anxiety and depression (NHSTTad) service users from minoritised ethnic communities. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four high-order themes were identified: (1) cultural identity and experiences of mental health and treatment, (2) challenges associated with treatment, (3) facilitators of good treatment experiences and outcomes and (4) improvements for women from minoritised ethnic communities.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings showed that cultural sensitivity and awareness are important to minoritised ethnic women receiving therapy. Challenges included access difficulties and limitations of treatment options offered, alongside personal challenges of engaging in therapy. Facilitators of good treatment experiences and outcomes included flexibility on the part of the service, as well as therapist-related factors such as identity characteristics (age, gender and culture of therapist), a good therapeutic relationship and the therapist's ability to deliver person-centred care. Improvements included ensuring care is culturally sensitive, reducing waiting times or providing better support for people on waiting lists, providing a flexible service that takes individual needs into account, increasing workforce diversity and reaching out to underserved communities. Many of the suggested improvements are generalisable to underserved minoritised ethnic groups, regardless of gender and could be applied to other psychological therapies services other than NHSTTad.

Therapeutic alliance and suicidal ideation in brief cognitive behavioral therapy for outpatients

OBJECTIVE

The therapeutic alliance is central to psychotherapy. However, research on the relationship between alliance and suicidality is scarce. We examined whether pretreatment suicidality is associated with an impaired alliance formation in brief cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and whether the therapeutic alliance is associated with change in suicidal ideation (difference between pretreatment and posttreatment assessment).

METHODS

N = 643 outpatients (64% female; age: M[SD] = 37.09[13.15], range: 18-73 years), received 12 sessions of manual-based short-term CBT for primary diagnosis treatment. Using self-report questionnaires, suicidal ideation and behavior were assessed before and after therapy, patient-rated therapeutic alliance was assessed after the fourth session and posttreatment. We performed correlation analyses and two hierarchical linear regressions, unadjusted and adjusted for possible confounding variables (age, gender, lifetime suicide attempts and depression).

RESULTS

Pretreatment suicidal ideation was not predictive of the quality of the early alliance. In addition, the therapeutic alliance was not predictive of change in suicidal ideation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the outpatient setting, no association was found between therapeutic alliance and suicidality. Future studies should investigate therapeutic alliance as a predictor of prospective suicidal behavior in different clinical settings.

Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Patient-Therapist Matching on Gender and Race/Ethnicity: Predictors/Moderators of the Effectiveness of Trust/Respect Feedback

A plethora of studies has exhibited the effectiveness of using measurement-based care feedback systems within mental health services to improve treatment outcomes; however, patient gender/race and patient-therapist matching on gender and race remain relatively unexplored as predictors/moderators in feedback studies. We conducted predictor/moderator analyses focusing on the relation of gender, race/ethnicity, and patient-therapist gender and race/ethnicity matching on two outcomes: patient self-reported levels of (1) functioning and (2) trust/respect within the therapeutic relationship. We used data from a randomized controlled trial studying the effectiveness of a feedback system comparing patient-reported levels of trust and respect towards their provider (together with symptom feedback) in comparison to symptom only feedback. We found that men improved in functioning more than women when their therapists received trust/respect feedback compared to symptom only feedback (F[1, 902] = 9.79, p = .002, d = 0.21). We also found that dyads matched on race/ethnicity but not gender, and those matched on gender but not race/ethnicity, improved in functioning over time more than dyads mismatched on both gender and race/ethnicity and those matched on both gender and race/ethnicity (F[1, 897] = 8.63, p = .0034, d = 0.20). On trust/respect outcomes, we found a gender difference over time (F[1, 759] = 6.61, p = .01, d = 0.19), a gender matching difference by feedback condition interaction (F[1, 757] = 5.25, p = .02, d = 0.17), and a racial/ethnic matching difference on trust/respect scores over time (F[1, 785] = 3.89, p = .049, d = 0.14). Male patients showed an initial decrease followed by a steady increase in trust/respect over time while female patients showed an initial increase followed by a steady decrease. Gender-matched therapeutic dyads showed higher levels of trust/respect compared to mismatched dyads when therapists received symptom only feedback, but this difference was not apparent when trust/respect feedback was provided. Dyads mismatched on race/ethnicity improved steadily in trust/respect over time, but matched dyads decreased in trust/respect after an initial increase. Future research should focus on the use of feedback systems to enhance outcomes for patients with specific gender and racial/ethnic identities.