The impact of vancomycin trough concentrations on outcomes in non-deep seated infections: a retrospective cohort study

Is It Still Beneficial to Monitor the Trough Concentration of Vancomycin? A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Nephrotoxicity and Efficacy

This study conducted a quantitative meta-analysis to investigate the association of vancomycin indicators, particularly area under the curve over 24 h (AUC24) and trough concentrations (Ctrough), and their relationship with both nephrotoxicity and efficacy. Literature research was performed in PubMed and Web of Science on vancomycin nephrotoxicity and efficacy in adult inpatients. Vancomycin Ctrough, AUC24, AUC24/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), nephrotoxicity evaluation and treatment outcomes were extracted. Logistic regression and Emax models were conducted, stratified by evaluation criterion for nephrotoxicity and primary outcomes for efficacy. Among 100 publications on nephrotoxicity, 29 focused on AUC24 and 97 on Ctrough, while of 74 publications on efficacy, 27 reported AUC24/MIC and 68 reported Ctrough. The logistic regression analysis indicated a significant association between nephrotoxicity and vancomycin Ctrough (odds ratio = 2.193; 95% CI 1.582-3.442, p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve had an area of 0.90, with a cut-off point of 14.55 mg/L. Additionally, 92.3% of the groups with a mean AUC24 within 400-600 mg·h/L showed a mean Ctrough of 10-20 mg/L. However, a subtle, non-statistically significant association was observed between the AUC24 and nephrotoxicity, as well as between AUC24/MIC and Ctrough concerning treatment outcomes. Our findings suggest that monitoring vancomycin Ctrough remains a beneficial and valuable approach to proactively identifying patients at risk of nephrotoxicity, particularly when Ctrough exceeds 15 mg/L. Ctrough can serve as a surrogate for AUC24 to some extent. However, no definitive cut-off values were identified for AUC24 concerning nephrotoxicity or for Ctrough and AUC24/MIC regarding efficacy.

Use of Machine Learning for Dosage Individualization of Vancomycin in Neonates

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

High variability in vancomycin exposure in neonates requires advanced individualized dosing regimens. Achieving steady-state trough concentration (C0) and steady-state area-under-curve (AUC0-24) targets is important to optimize treatment. The objective was to evaluate whether machine learning (ML) can be used to predict these treatment targets to calculate optimal individual dosing regimens under intermittent administration conditions.

METHODS

C0 were retrieved from a large neonatal vancomycin dataset. Individual estimates of AUC0-24 were obtained from Bayesian post hoc estimation. Various ML algorithms were used for model building to C0 and AUC0-24. An external dataset was used for predictive performance evaluation.

RESULTS

Before starting treatment, C0 can be predicted a priori using the Catboost-based C0-ML model combined with dosing regimen and nine covariates. External validation results showed a 42.5% improvement in prediction accuracy by using the ML model compared with the population pharmacokinetic model. The virtual trial showed that using the ML optimized dose; 80.3% of the virtual neonates achieved the pharmacodynamic target (C0 in the range of 10-20 mg/L), much higher than the international standard dose (37.7-61.5%). Once therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) measurements (C0) in patients have been obtained, AUC0-24 can be further predicted using the Catboost-based AUC-ML model combined with C0 and nine covariates. External validation results showed that the AUC-ML model can achieve an prediction accuracy of 80.3%.

CONCLUSION

C0-based and AUC0-24-based ML models were developed accurately and precisely. These can be used for individual dose recommendations of vancomycin in neonates before treatment and dose revision after the first TDM result is obtained, respectively.

Necessity of vancomycin trough concentrations to manage uncomplicated acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: a laboratory stewardship analysis

Background

Recent recommendations by the American Society of Health System Pharmacists and Infectious Disease Society of America have provided guidance regarding vancomycin dosing and monitoring in serious infections (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus); however, trough monitoring for uncomplicated acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) were not addressed. Vancomycin use appears to lead to a low incidence of acute kidney injury with short durations and a low trough goal (10-15 mg/L). Nevertheless, clinical studies have found no difference in clinical outcomes for ABSSSI regardless of vancomycin level. Therefore, it can be posed whether trough monitoring is necessary in this patient population.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study comparing vancomycin therapy duration for ABSSSI in adult, general medicine patients who received scheduled vancomycin with an initial creatinine clearance rate of ≥50 mL/minute and had at least one vancomycin trough. The objective of this study was to determine if vancomycin treatment duration differs for patients with ABSSSI with a sub-therapeutic vancomycin trough (ST; <10 mg/L) compared with therapeutic trough (TT; ≥10 mg/L).

Results

There were 39 (67.2%) patients with ST compared with 19 (32.8%) with TT. A similar median vancomycin treatment duration for ST (48.25 hours) and TT (59.5 hours; p=0.65) was found. There was no statistical difference for hospital duration, time from last trough to vancomycin discontinuation, or incidence of acute kidney injury (p>0.05 for all).

Conclusion

Patients with ST and TT had similar vancomycin durations and clinical outcomes. It may be prudent for institutions to address vancomycin trough laboratory stewardship and associated costs.

Vancomycin Dosage and Its Association with Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Patients with Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether vancomycin trough concentrations at initial steady state are associated with clinical and microbiological outcomes along with vancomycin-related nephrotoxicity in pediatric patients with Gram-positive bacterial (GPB) infections.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients who received vancomycin for ≥72 hours during 2008–2016 was conducted. Study patients were divided into three cohorts in accordance with their first trough levels at steady state: <5 mg/L (lower-trough), 5–10 mg/L (low-trough), and >10 mg/L (high-trough; reference) cohorts.

Results

Of the 201 patients eligible for study inclusion, 60 patients in the lower- and low-trough cohorts, respectively, were idect 3ntified via propensity score matching and analyzed against 30 high-trough patients in each comparison pair (neonates were excluded due to small sample size). Lower-trough patients were at a greater risk for prolonged therapy, retreatment, and dose adjustment than high-trough patients. Final steady-state troughs remained substantially lower in both the lower- and low-trough cohorts (p<0.001 and p=0.005, respectively), despite greater dose up-titration in the lower-trough cohort and percent change in daily dose in both the lower- and low-trough cohorts than in the high-trough cohort (p<0.001 for all). Clinical cure and death risk, along with the risks of isolation of resistant strains and renal events, were not significantly different between cohorts in both comparison pairs.

Conclusion

Vancomycin troughs of <5 mg/L at initial steady state were associated with significantly compromised clinical outcomes in terms of risk of therapy prolongation, retreatment, and aggressive dose up-titration, compared to >10 mg/L troughs in pediatric patients with GPB infections.