The Mcgill thyroid nodule score - does it help with indeterminate thyroid nodules?

Validating the Modified McGill Thyroid Nodule Score for Assessment of Preoperative Risk of Pediatric Thyroid Malignancy

OBJECTIVE

The McGill Thyroid Nodule Score (MTNS) is a preoperative tool used to predict the risk for well-differentiated thyroid cancer in adults. It was developed by a multidisciplinary team using established evidence-based risk factors for thyroid cancer. The modified McGill Thyroid Nodule Score (mMTNS) was developed to predict malignancy risk in children. A pilot study suggested the mMTNS was able to assess malignancy risk in children with indeterminate cytology on fine needle aspiration (FNA). This study seeks to validate these findings.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review identified subjects who underwent FNA biopsy and subsequent resection. Each patient was assigned a score to compare to final pathology. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS. All tests were 2-tailed and statistical significance defined p < 0.05. Logistic regression used to determine predictive values of scores.

RESULTS

46 patients ≤21 years of age underwent resection of a thyroid nodule. Female predominance of 85% (n = 39). 78% (n = 36) of patients had palpable nodule. 65% (n = 30) found to have benign pathology and 35% (n = 16) found to have malignancy. Malignant nodules associated with greater mean mMTNS compared to benign [13.63 vs 7.23]. An mMTNS greater >12 had sensitivity of 86.7%, specificity of 90.3%, positive predictive value of 81.3%, and negative predictive value of 93.3%.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests the mMTNS continues to be a useful adjunct in predicting malignancy risk of pediatric thyroid nodules. An mMTNS >12 has a high risk for malignancy, which can aid in counseling and clinical decision making, particularly when there is indeterminate cytology on FNA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Approach to Thyroid Nodules: Diagnosis and Treatment

Thyroid nodules (TNs) are prevalent and found in up to 50% of individuals. While most TNs are benign, some can be malignant. The evaluation of TNs is crucial to rule out malignancy and identify those requiring surgical intervention. This study aimed to clarify the reported prevalence of TNs, focusing specifically on their various types, assessment and diagnostic processes, current evaluation methods, and evidence-based management. It also provides recommendations for follow-up. TNs are typically found during physical exams or incidentally during imaging procedures. Routine laboratory and clinical evaluations of TNs are common. Ultrasound is the preferred imaging method to determine if a TN needs a biopsy. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is crucial in deciding whether surgery or surveillance is necessary. TNs that show suspicious features on the ultrasound may require cytologic analysis to assess the risk of malignancy. The effectiveness of several supplementary molecular tests is still uncertain, although some studies report promising results. The management and treatment approach for TNs primarily depends on the results of FNA cytology and ultrasound characteristics. The optimal treatment strategy for TNs ranges from straightforward follow-ups for low-risk cases to surgical intervention for high-risk patients. Rather than adopting a uniform approach, clinicians should assess each patient on a case-by-case basis using current knowledge and a collaborative, multidisciplinary method.

A prospective comparison of ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS in thyroid nodule assessment for FNA-US

OBJECTIVE

Prospective data on the accuracy of ultrasound (US) classification systems in thyroid nodules are still scarce. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS) and European (EU)-TIRADS classification systems.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Consecutive patients with one or more thyroid nodule(s) who underwent fine-needle aspiration (FNA) under ultrasonographic guidance (FNA-US) were prospectively evaluated.

MEASUREMENTS

Clinical evaluation and US data were collected. The reference standard used for this study was FNA-US cytology and histopathological diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 186 thyroid nodules in 166 patients were evaluated, resulting in 168 nodules from 149 patients with conclusive benign or malignant results. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and false negative (FN) were 100.0%, 28.7%, 100.0% and 0.0%, respectively, for ACR-TIRADS; and 90.0%, 19.1%, 96.8% and 9.1% (n = 1), respectively, for EU-TIRADS. The number of unnecessary FNA-US indicated by ACR-TIRADS was lower than EU-TIRADS (71.3% vs. 80.9%, p = .017), and the number of possibly avoided FNA-US was higher (26.7% vs. 17.8%). Using the same threshold of ACR-TIRADS to indicate FNA-US in EU-TIRADS 3 nodules (2.5 cm), there was an improvement in specificity (30.6%) and avoided FNA-US (28.6%). The best performance of both systems was demonstrated when FNA-US would be indicated only in highly suspicious nodules and/or in the presence of lymphadenopathy, with 85.7% and 89.3% of possibly avoided FNA-US for ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS, respectively, without increasing FN.

CONCLUSION

Both systems presented high sensitivity, but low specificity in selecting nodules for FNA-US. The use of nodular size for FNA-US selection is questioned.

Association of Bethesda category and molecular mutation in patients undergoing thyroidectomy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to ascertain the relationship between Bethesda category and molecular mutation of thyroid nodules in patients undergoing thyroidectomy.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort of patients who underwent thyroidectomy following needle biopsy and molecular profile testing was performed.

SETTING

Two tertiary care academic hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients with a dominant thyroid nodule who underwent both USFNA and molecular profile testing followed by thyroidectomy were included in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

The main outcome was postoperative diagnosis of thyroid cancer and aggressivity of disease based on histopathological variants, nodal metastasis or extra-thyroidal extension. Associations between Bethesda category, molecular mutation and postoperative pathology was assessed using descriptive analysis and chi-square testing.

RESULTS

Four hundred fifty-one patients were included. 95.9% (93/97) of patients with a BRAFV600E mutation had a Bethesda category V or VI (p < .001), and all had confirmed thyroid cancer on postoperative pathology. Those with H, K or N RAS or EIF1AX mutations, gene expression profiling (GEP) or copy number alterations showed an association with Bethesda categories III and IV (p ≤ .01). Those with no identified molecular mutation had a lower incidence of aggressive thyroid cancer compared to those with an identified mutation (12.6% vs. 44.3%, p < .01).

CONCLUSION

BRAFV600E mutations were associated with thyroid cancer subtypes known to be more aggressive whereas RAS and EIF1AX mutations, copy number alterations, and GEP were related to Bethesda categories III and IV. These findings may help thyroid specialists better identify aggressive thyroid nodules associated with indeterminate Bethesda categories.

Cytological Sub-Classification of Atypia of Undetermined Significance May Predict Malignancy Risk in Thyroid Nodules

BACKGROUND

Atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) carries a malignancy risk reaching up to 50%. Based on the reported malignancy rate in a given population, the clinical practice towards such a category varies. We hereby identify clinical parameters for risk stratification to aid in decision-making for either surgical referral or a clinical follow-up. Our aim is to identify clinical parameters that guided both clinicians and patients at our institutions to reach a clinical decision including atypia types.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with Bethesda III category thyroid nodules from tertiary centres in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi during January 2011 through December 2015 was carried out. Malignancy risk in Bethesda category III nodules and repeat FNA utility were calculated. Parameters that guided both clinicians and patients for appropriate referral to surgery were studied.

RESULTS

Two hundred and two cases were included in the study. Of these, 101 cases underwent surgery initially following the first FNA and 10 cases following FNA repeat. Histology confirmed malignancy in (41%) of cases that went initially to surgery and in (40%) of cases that underwent a repeat FNA. Repeat FNA resulted in 17 (44.74%) cases being re-classified into benign category, 10 (26.3%) being AUS/FLUS category, 6 (15.7%) being both suspicious and malignant, and 5 (13.16%) being unsatisfactory. Repeating FNA resulted in a definitive diagnostic utility in 50% of the cases. Eighty percent of malignant cases demonstrated nuclear atypia.

CONCLUSION

The relatively high malignancy rate in our institutions, the suspicious radiographic features, the atypia groups, and the repeat FNA predictive value stratified Bethesda III category nodules for proper malignancy prediction and appropriate management.

McGill Thyroid Nodule Score in Differentiating Thyroid Nodules in Total Thyroidectomy Cases of Indeterminate Nodules

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the first-line modality in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. However, the results of indeterminate pathology place the thyroid surgeon in difficult management situations. This study evaluates McGill Thyroid Nodule Score (MTNS) to identify thyroid nodules that harbor malignancy in cases of indeterminate FNABs and to guide surgeon about the need and extent of surgery. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 344 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy between January 2013 and January 2018. Patients with FNAB of indeterminate nodules (Bethesda types III, IV, and V) and calculated MTNS were included in the study. Postoperative histopathology was divided into benign and malignant groups. The median and the mean MTNS, the malignancy rate, and the standard deviations were calculated for each subgroup. Of the 344 patient charts reviewed, 106 (30.8%) had an indeterminate FNA biopsy. Eighty-one (76.4%) patients were females and 25 (23.6%) were males. Final pathology revealed malignancy in 69 patients (65.1%). The mean MTNS of patients with malignant pathology (12.81  ± 3.55) was higher than the mean in the benign group (8.32  ± 2.32). 82.4% of thyroid nodules with median MTNS of less than 8 had a benign pathology, and 91.4% of thyroid nodules with median MTNS equal or more than 11 had a malignant pathology (p = 0.002). The rate of malignancy in our series of indeterminate FNABs was 65.1%. The MTNS can be of value to thyroid surgeons in preoperative decision-making when dealing with an indeterminate thyroid nodule.

Thyroid nodules: diagnostic evaluation based on thyroid cancer risk assessment

Thyroid nodules are extremely common and can be detected by sensitive imaging in more than 60% of the general population. They are often identified in patients without symptoms who are undergoing evaluation for other medical complaints. Indiscriminate evaluation of thyroid nodules with thyroid biopsy could cause a harmful epidemic of diagnoses of thyroid cancer, but inadequate selection of thyroid nodules for biopsy can lead to missed diagnoses of clinically relevant thyroid cancer. Recent clinical guidelines advocate a more conservative approach in the evaluation of thyroid nodules based on risk assessment for thyroid cancer, as determined by clinical and ultrasound features to guide the need for biopsy. Moreover, newer evidence suggests that for patients with indeterminate thyroid biopsy results, a combined assessment including the initial ultrasound risk stratification or other ancillary testing (molecular markers, second opinion on thyroid cytology) can further clarify the risk of thyroid cancer and the management strategies. This review summarizes the clinical importance of adequate evaluation of thyroid nodules, focuses on the clinical evidence for diagnostic tests that can clarify the risk of thyroid cancer, and highlights the importance of considering the patient's values and preferences when deciding on management strategies in the setting of uncertainty about the risk of thyroid cancer.

Utilizing the McGill Thyroid Nodule Score to compare between hemithyroidectomy cases who required completion thyroidectomy and cases of hemithyroidectomy alone

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate whether the McGill Thyroid Nodule Score (MTNS) accurately helps to decide the extent of surgery (hemithyroidectomy versus total thyroidectomy) based on the malignancy risk and to assess whether its use lowers the rate of completion thyroidectomy in cases of indeterminate thyroid nodules.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing MTNS results of patients undergoing hemithyroidectomy in King Abdulaziz Medical City, NGHA, Jeddah from the period of January 2013 to December 2017. We divided the cases into hemithyroidectomy who required completion and hemithyroidectomy who did not need completion surgery. The pre-operative indeterminate FNA biopsy subgroup comprised of Bethesda type III (atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance) and Bethesda type IV (follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm/Hurthle cell neoplasm). Post-operative histopathology was divided into benign or malignant groups.

RESULTS

Of the 501 patient charts reviewed, 111 (22.2%) had an indeterminate FNA biopsy. 97 (87.4%) patients were females and 14 (12.6%) were males. In the hemithyroidectomy group, the pre-operative mean of the MTNS was 6.65, while in the completion thyroidectomy the mean was 11.47. The median MTNS was 7 (32% risk of malignancy) for the hemithyroidectomy group and 11 (63% risk of malignancy) for the completion thyroidectomy group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the MTNS the risk of malignancy in cases of hemithyroidectomy who required completion surgery was significantly higher than those who underwent hemithyroidectomy only. The MTNS can be of value to thyroid surgeon in the pre-operative decision-making when dealing with an indeterminate thyroid nodule on FNA biopsy.

Diagnostic accuracy of the McGill thyroid nodule score in paediatric patients

INTRODUCTION

Thyroid cancer is the most common paediatric endocrine cancer; accurate diagnosis and prompt management of paediatric thyroid nodules is critical. The McGill Thyroid Nodule Score (MTNS), based upon clinical, ultrasound (US) and cytology criteria, has recently been modified and studied in a pilot paediatric group with good results. We aim to describe the diagnostic accuracy of the paediatric modified MTNS (PMTNS) in a large paediatric cohort.

METHODS

We utilized an established retrospective cohort between 1996 and 2015 of 99 patients ≤21 years old with 131 thyroid nodules. Two experienced paediatric radiologists, blinded to pathology and radiology reports, reviewed US features. We abstracted cytology, histology and laboratory results, assigning each nodule a PMTNS. PMTNS performance was compared to FNA and histology.

RESULTS

Approximately 33% of nodules were malignant. The cohort was predominantly adolescent (mean age 15.4 ± 3.8 years). The average PMTNS for malignant and benign nodules, based on final histology, was 12.7 ± 4.3 and 1.7 ± 2.9, respectively. A PMTNS ≥8 resulted in a 93.2% sensitivity and 93.1% specificity for detecting malignancy, while a PMTNS ≥9 resulted in a 90.9% sensitivity and 96.6% specificity. However, Bethesda cytology category ≥4 independently had a 97.7% sensitivity and 94.0% specificity for detecting malignancy. The PMTNS had diminishing diagnostic accuracy in younger children compared with older children.

CONCLUSION

Paediatric modified McGill Thyroid Nodule Score predicts malignancy, perhaps due to the score's emphasis on cytology results; however, the score is less accurate in younger patients. While cytology results remain reliable, further work is needed to develop a non-invasive scoring system to predict malignancy in children.

Evaluation and Management of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: The Revolution of Risk Stratification Beyond Cytological Diagnosis

In accordance with National Guidelines, we currently follow a linear approach to the diagnosis of thyroid nodules, with management decision based primarily on a cytological diagnosis following fine-needle aspiration biopsy. However, 25% of these biopsies render an indeterminate cytology, leaving uncertainty regarding appropriate management. Individualizing the risk of malignancy of these nodules could improve their management significantly. We summarize the current evidence on the relevance of clinical information, radiological features, cytological features, and molecular markers tests results and describe how these can be integrated to personalize the management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. Several factors can be used to stratify the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. Male gender, large tumors (>4 cm), suspicious sonographic patterns, and the presence of nuclear atypia on the cytology are all associated with an increased cancer prevalence. The added value of current molecular markers in the risk stratification process needs further study because their performance seems compromised in some clinical settings and remains to be validated in others. Risk stratification is possible in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology using data that are often underused by current guidelines. Future guidelines should integrate these factors and personalize the recommended diagnostic and therapeutic approaches accordingly.

McGill Thyroid Nodule Score in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Pediatric Thyroid Nodules: A Pilot Study

Objective The McGill Thyroid Nodule Score (MTNS) is a preoperative tool used to predict the risk for well-differentiated thyroid cancer given a specific nodule in adults. We evaluated the clinical utility of a modified pediatric MTNS with children and adolescents. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary care children's hospital. Subjects and Methods This is a retrospective chart review of 46 patients ≤18 years of age presenting with a solitary or dominant thyroid nodule treated with surgical resection between September 2008 and December 2015. The cumulative MTNS for each nodule was calculated and compared with the final pathology. Results Of 46 patients, 10 (21.7%) were diagnosed with well-differentiated thyroid cancer (80% papillary thyroid carcinoma, 10% follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma, 10% follicular thyroid carcinoma). Malignant nodules were associated with a greater mean MTNS (benign, 5.72 ± 3.03; malignant, 16 ± 3.13; P < .05). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of malignancy were 100%, 94.4%, and 83.3% for scores ≥10 and 80%, 100%, and 100% for scores ≥11, respectively. In nodules with indeterminate cytology (Bethesda III and IV), the pediatric MTNS showed good differentiation between benign and malignant disease, with mean scores of 7.95 and 12.5, respectively ( P = .006). Conclusion This pilot study suggests that a comprehensive scoring system may help assess the risk of malignancy in pediatric thyroid nodules and differentiate nodules with indeterminate cytology into higher- and lower-risk categories. Given these findings, larger, multi-institutional studies are warranted.

The role of repeat fine needle aspiration in the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules

Background

Management decisions are not straightforward when the Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (USFNA) demonstrates a Bethesda score of either category III or IV, and a diagnostic hemi-thyroidectomy or a repeat USFNA (r-USFNA) could be performed. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of r-USFNA in the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules by evaluating the likelihood of obtaining a definite diagnosis.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of all patients with thyroid nodules between 2011 and 2015 at the Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, Canada). Three hundred fifty-one patients who had undergone a surgical procedure (hemi or total thyroidectomy) and a diagnosis of B3 or B4 on the primary USFNA (p-USFNA) were included in the study. Ninety-six of the included patients also had a repeat USFNA prior to the surgery. Demographic data, type of procedure, and McGill Thyroid Nodule Score (MTNS) were obtained from the medical records. Malignancy rates were calculated based on the final surgical histopathology report.

Results

Upon r-USFNA, an average 76 % of patients did not change Bethesda categories, 7.4 % downgraded to a benign category. The results showed that, on an average 17.3 % of patients with p-USFNA of B3 and 20 % of patients with p-USFNA of B4, upgraded to a malignant or suspicious for malignancy category, thus changing the clinical management to total thyroidectomy. Our data demonstrates that r-USFNA facilitates choosing the correct surgery of total thyroidectomy in about 20 % of nodules that have upgraded from B3/B4 to a more definite malignant category.

Conclusions

r-USFNA in patients with indeterminate diagnoses (B3 or B4) increases categorization into more definite categories. Approximately 20 % of patients are found to have malignant thyroid nodules and suspicious for malignancy thyroid nodules upon repeating the biopsy, hence a diagnostic hemi-thyroidectomy was avoided and a more definitive surgery could be performed. Furthermore, repeat USFNA results in a fewer number of hemi-thyroidectomy and completion thyroidectomy procedures.

Thyroid nodule update on diagnosis and management

Thyroid nodules are common. The clinical importance of thyroid nodules is related to excluding malignancy (4.0 to 6.5% of all thyroid nodules), evaluate their functional status and assess for the presence of pressure symptoms. Incidental thyroid nodules are being diagnosed with increasing frequency in the recent years with the use of newer and highly sensitive imaging techniques. The high prevalence of thyroid nodules necessitates that the clinicians use evidence-based approaches for their assessment and management. New molecular tests have been developed to help with evaluation of malignancy in thyroid nodules. This review addresses advances in thyroid nodule evaluation, and their management considering the current guidelines and supporting evidence.

The McGill Thyroid Nodule Score's (MTNS+) role in the investigation of thyroid nodules with benign ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsies: a retrospective review

Background

Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (USFNA) biopsies of thyroid nodules sometimes create a decision-making dilemma for surgeons as they may yield falsely benign results. The McGill Thyroid Nodule Score + (MTNS+) was developed to aid in clinical guidance regarding the management of patients with these USFNA results. The aim of this study was to assess the MTNS+ as a clinical tool in patients with benign preoperative thyroid nodule USFNAs and to analyze the relationship between nodule size and malignancy in these patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 1312 patients who underwent thyroidectomies between 2010 and 2015 at the McGill University Teaching Hospitals. Patients with Bethesda II (benign) USFNA results, calculated MTNS+, and nodule size evaluated on ultrasound were included in the study. The false-negative rate was calculated, and MTNS+ and nodule size were each compared to final pathology results. Binary logistic regression was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Of the 1312 patients, 101 met the inclusion criteria and together had an average MTNS+ score of 6.83, which corresponds to a predicted malignancy rate between 25 and 33 %. Final pathology revealed malignancy in 16 (15.8 %) subjects. The average MTNS+ of patients with malignant nodules on surgical pathology was 8.25, while that of patients with benign nodules was 6.56.

Patients with nodule size 1–1.9 cm (a) and 2–2.9 cm (b) each had an equal rate of malignancy of 2.97 % (n = 3), nodule size 3–3.9 cm (c) had a rate of 1.98 % (n = 2), and nodule size ≥4 cm (d) a rate of 7.92 % (n = 8).

Conclusion

The rate of malignancy (15.8 %) is higher than expected when reviewing the risk of malignancy in nodules considered as Bethesda class 2. On the other hand, the rate is lower than the 25–33 % predicted by the MTNS+. We also found a higher malignancy rate for nodules above 4 cm in size, but size was a poor predictor of malignancy when used alone. Therefore, while the MTNS+ may be helpful at helping to identify USFNAs that are incorrectly classified as benign, the percentage risk of malignancy is lower than expected.