1
|
Mauthe T, Meerwein CM, Holzmann D, Soyka MB, Mueller SA, Held U, Freiberger SN, Rupp NJ. Outcome-oriented clinicopathological reappraisal of sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma with broad morphological spectrum and high MYB::NFIB prevalence. Sci Rep 2024; 14:18655. [PMID: 39134604 PMCID: PMC11319476 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69039-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) is a salivary gland neoplasm that infrequently appears in the sinonasal region. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome and clinicopathological parameters of sinonasal AdCC. A retrospective analysis was conducted on all cases of AdCC affecting the nasal cavity or paranasal sinuses between 2000 and 2018 at the University Hospital Zurich. Tumor material was examined for morphological features and analyzed for molecular alterations. A total of 14 patients were included. Mean age at presentation was 57.7 years. Sequencing revealed MYB::NFIB gene fusion in 11/12 analyzable cases. Poor prognostic factors were solid variant (p < 0.001), histopathological high-grade transformation (p < 0.001), and tumor involvement of the sphenoid sinus (p = 0.02). The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS were 5.2 years and 11.3 years. The RFS rates at 1-, 5-, and 10-year were 100%, 53.8%, and 23.1%. The OS rates at 1-, 5-, and 10- years were 100%, 91.7%, and 62.9%, respectively. In Conclusion, the solid variant (solid portion > 30%), high-grade transformation, and sphenoid sinus involvement are negative prognostic factors for sinonasal AdCC. A high prevalence of MYB::NFIB gene fusion may help to correctly classify diagnostically challenging (e.g. metatypical) cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Mauthe
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Christian M Meerwein
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David Holzmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael B Soyka
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simon A Mueller
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ulrike Held
- Department of Biostatistics, at the Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sandra N Freiberger
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Niels J Rupp
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qian Shi, Wang R, Hou L, Huang Z, Ma H, Zhang Y, Zhong Q, Feng L, He S, Chen X, Li P, Yang Y, Li Y, Zhang L, Fang J. Prognostic Analysis of Individualized Treatments of Malignant Tumors Primary From Maxillary Sinus. EAR, NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL 2024; 103:173-182. [PMID: 35938483 DOI: 10.1177/01455613221115134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the prognosis and quality of life for primary malignant maxillary sinus tumors. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis. 164 patients diagnosed with primary malignant maxillary sinus tumors between 2005 and 2018 were recruited. Patients were treated according to the pathological type and the lesion range. Prognostic differences of different pathological types, surgical resection methods, repair methods, treatment methods, and different local recurrence sites were analyzed. Survival analysis and prognostic factors analysis were performed. RESULTS Overall survival (OS) rate was 74.7% at 3 years, 60.5% at 5 years, and 45.8% at 10 years. Disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 67.2% at 3 years, 45.6% at 5 years, and 30.8% at 10 years. There was significant difference in OS rate among different pathological types (χ2 = 14.18, P < 0.05). The order of 5-year OS rate was as follows: malignant transformation of inverted Papilloma (77.7%) > adenoid cystic carcinoma (74.1%) > squamous cell carcinoma (48.4%) > sarcoma (22.1%). The order of disease-free survival was as follows: total maxillary resection > subtotal maxillary resection > endoscopic nasal tumor resection ≥enlarged maxillary resection, the 5-year DFS rate were 68.6%, 53.5%, 46.2%, and 42.9%, respectively. The OS of postoperative radiotherapy was significantly better than that of preoperative radiotherapy (χ2 = 7.16, P < 0.05). There was significant difference in OS between recurrent and non-recurrent patients (χ2 = 68.57, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The pathological type and the timing of radiotherapy are independent prognostic factors for primary malignant tumor of maxillary sinus. In addition, different local surgical resection methods are independent factors affecting the recurrence rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Shi
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | - Ru Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | - Lizhen Hou
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | - Zhigang Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | - Hongzhi Ma
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | - Qi Zhong
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | - Ling Feng
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | - Shizhi He
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | - Xiaohong Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | - Pingdong Li
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | - Yifan Yang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | - Yunxia Li
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | - Luo Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | - Jugao Fang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
López F, Shah JP, Beitler JJ, Snyderman CH, Lund V, Piazza C, Mäkitie AA, Guntinas-Lichius O, Rodrigo JP, Kowalski LP, Quer M, Shaha A, Homma A, Sanabria A, Ferrarotto R, Lee AWM, Lee VHF, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. The Selective Role of Open and Endoscopic Approaches for Sinonasal Malignant Tumours. Adv Ther 2022; 39:2379-2397. [PMID: 35352310 PMCID: PMC9122878 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02080-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic endonasal surgery has been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of selected cases of sinonasal cancers. However, in cases of locally advanced neoplasms, as well as recurrences, the most appropriate approach is still debated. The present review aims to summarize the current state of knowledge on the utility of open approaches to resect sinonasal malignant tumours. Published comparative studies and meta-analyses suggest comparable oncological results with lower morbidity for the endoscopic approaches, but selection biases cannot be excluded. After a critical analysis of the available literature, it can be concluded that endoscopic surgery for selected lesions allows for oncologically safe resections with decreased morbidity. However, when endoscopic endonasal surgery is contraindicated and definitive chemoradiotherapy is not appropriate, craniofacial and transfacial approaches remain the best therapeutic option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando López
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
- Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias and CIBERONC, ISCIII, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
| | - Jatin P Shah
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Plastic Surgery, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Jonathan J Beitler
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Maine General Hospital, Augusta, Maine, USA
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Valerie Lund
- The Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, UCLH Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Cesare Piazza
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, Italy, Brescia, Italy
| | - Antti A Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Institute of Phoniatry/Pedaudiology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Juan P Rodrigo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
- Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias and CIBERONC, ISCIII, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Luiz P Kowalski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Miquel Quer
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ashok Shaha
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Akihiro Homma
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Alvaro Sanabria
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad de Antioquia/Hospital Universitario San Vicente Fundación, Medellín, Colombia
- CEXCA Centro de Excelencia en Enfermedades de Cabeza y Cuello, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anne W M Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
- Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| | - Victor H F Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
- Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| | | | - Alfio Ferlito
- Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang Z, Wu R, Zhang J, Chen X, Wang J, Wang K, Qu Y, Huang X, Luo J, Xiao J, Xu G, Gao L, Yi J, Zhang Y. Omitting elective neck irradiation in clinically N0 sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis. Oral Oncol 2021; 124:105653. [PMID: 34871873 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the effects of elective neck irradiation (ENI) in clinically node-negative (cN0) sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma (SNACC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between January 2000 and December 2016, 60 patients with cN0 sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma receiving surgery combined with radiotherapy were analyzed retrospectively, there were 39 received ENI (ENI group) and 21 with no ENI (non-ENI group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance clinical factors and match patients. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model were used to evaluate the impact of ENI on regional relapse risk and survival outcomes. RESULTS The median follow-up time for our cohort was 82.0 months (12.4-190.7 months). Four patients (6.7%) developed neck nodal relapses, with a median time to progression of 38.8 months. Among them, two patients in ENI group but failed out-field. After PSM, 21 patients were matched in each group. The 7-year regional relapse-free survival (RRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between ENI group and non-ENI group were 85.4% vs 73.3% (p = 0.845), 65.2% vs 65.6% (p = 0.548), 68.3% vs 66.2% (p = 0.425), and 87.3% vs 84.0% (p = 0.953). Multivariate Cox analysis showed ENI was not an independent prognostic factor associated with RRFS, DMFS, PFS and OS. CONCLUSION Our findings firstly demonstrated the omission of elective neck irradiation in the management of cN0 sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma might be safe without compromising disease control and should be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zekun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Runye Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianghu Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xuesong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jingbo Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Qu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaodong Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jingwei Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianping Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Guozhen Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Li Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Junlin Yi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Surgical Management of Sinonasal Cancers: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13163995. [PMID: 34439150 PMCID: PMC8393312 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13163995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgery plays an important role in the treatment of sinonasal cancer. Many surgical approaches have been described, including open, endoscopic, or combined approaches. The choice is based on several criteria: general criteria related to the oncological results and morbidity of each technique, specific criteria related to the tumor (tumor extensions, tumor pathology), the patient, or the surgeon himself. The aims of this review are (i) to provide a complete overview of the surgical techniques available for the management of sinonasal malignant tumors, with a special focus on recent developments in the field of transnasal endoscopic surgery; (ii) to summarize the criteria that lead to the choice of one technique over another. In particular, the oncological outcomes, the morbidity of the different techniques, and the specificities of each histologic subtype will be discussed based on a comprehensive literature review.
Collapse
|
6
|
Amit M, Bell D, Hunt PJ, Hanna E, Su SY, Kupferman M, Aashiq M, Takahashi H, Gidley PW, Nader ME, DeMonte F, Raza SM. Surgical management of carcinomas of the infratemporal fossa and skull base: patterns of failure and predictors of long-term outcomes. J Neurosurg 2021; 134:1392-1398. [PMID: 32534492 DOI: 10.3171/2020.3.jns192630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Infratemporal fossa (ITF) tumors are unique in histological characteristics and difficult to treat. Predictors of patient outcomes in this context are not known. The objective of this study was to identify independent predictors of outcome and to characterize patterns of failure in patients with ITF carcinoma. METHODS All patients who had been surgically treated for anterolateral skull base malignancy between 1999 and 2017 at the authors' institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, preoperative performance status, tumor stage, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and pathological data were collected. Primary outcomes were disease-specific survival (DSS) and local progression-free survival (LPFS) rates. Overall survival (OS) and patterns of progression were secondary outcomes. RESULTS Forty ITF malignancies with skull base involvement were classified as carcinoma. Negative margins were achieved in 23 patients (58%). Median DSS and LPFS were 32 and 12 months, respectively. Five-year DSS and OS rates were 55% and 36%, respectively. The 5-year LPFS rate was 69%. The 5-year overall PFS rate was 53%. Disease recurrence was noted in 28% of patients. Age, preoperative performance status, and margin status were statistically significant prognostic factors for DSS. Lower preoperative performance status and positive surgical margins increased the probability of local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS The ability to achieve negative margins was significantly associated with improved tumor control rates and DSS. Cranial base surgical approaches must be considered in multimodal treatment regimens for anterolateral skull base carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moran Amit
- 1Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery
| | | | - Patrick J Hunt
- 3Baylor College of Medicine; and
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ehab Hanna
- 1Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery
| | - Shirley Y Su
- 1Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery
| | | | - Mohamed Aashiq
- 1Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery
| | | | - Paul W Gidley
- 1Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery
| | | | - Franco DeMonte
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Shaan M Raza
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Spirin DS, Chernov IV, Cherekaev VA, Kalinin PL, Nazarov VV, Muzyshev IA, Absalyamova OV, Kobyakov GL, Vetlova ER. [Treatment of primary craniofacial (sinonasal) malignant tumors affecting the anterior and middle skull base]. ZHURNAL VOPROSY NEĬROKHIRURGII IMENI N. N. BURDENKO 2020; 84:101-108. [PMID: 32207749 DOI: 10.17116/neiro202084011101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Sinonasal malignant tumors are characterized by high histological variability and complexity of the differential diagnosis. Currently, there are classifications of these tumors, which are based on their localization and involvement of various anatomical structures. However, generally accepted algorithms for treatment of this pathology have not yet been developed. This review describes the most important algorithms for treatment of the most common histological variants of sinonasal malignant tumors: squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, esthesioneuroblastoma, adenoid cystic cancer, and sinonasal adenocarcinoma. The main problems in choosing the approach for treating these tumors are the lack of generally accepted resectability criteria and contradictions between oncological and neurosurgical indications for surgical treatment. Further research is needed to study the role of radiosensitizers and radioprotectors in comprehensive treatment of sinonasal malignant tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S Spirin
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - I V Chernov
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - P L Kalinin
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - V V Nazarov
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | | | - E R Vetlova
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li R, Tian S, Lin L, Liu Q, Wang S. Comparative outcome of surgical and nonsurgical therapy for T4bN0M0 sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 276:3113-3122. [PMID: 31451900 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05601-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Definitive radiotherapy (RT) is recommended by NCCN guidelines for T4b tumors of sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas (SNSCC). However, no multi-institutional clinical studies have proved its advantage over surgery-based modalities. The aim of this study was to assess the survival of T4bN0M0 SNSCC patients who received surgery plus postoperative radiation (S + PORT) compared with those who received RT. METHODS This study extracted 220 patients from the SEER database from 2004 to 2015. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to eliminate the baseline variations. RESULTS In SEER database, 43.6% of patients received S + PORT, and subsequently followed by RT (36.4%). Five-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival rates (CSS) in S + PORT were 42.5% and 46.9%, respectively, significantly better than for RT (21.7% and 26.7%). Multivariate analysis showed that therapy of RT had higher cancer-specific mortality risk than S + PORT [hazard ratio (HR) 1.578, p = 0.032]. After PSM, 57 pairs of patients were selected. There was still a significant difference noted with regard to 5-year OS or 5-year CSS between patients receiving S + PORT and RT (43% vs 22.5%, p = 0.012; 45.8% vs 27.7%, p = 0.025). The univariate and multivariate analyses of factors predictive of CSS showed that therapy of RT (HR 1.877, p = 0.018) and primary subsite of maxillary sinus (HR 2.629, p = 0.001) were significantly correlated with adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION Combination of surgery and postoperative radiotherapy may contribute to prolonged survival in T4bN0M0 SNSCC. Invasion of the sites of T4b tumors is not an absolute contraindication for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruichen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Xuhui, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China
| | - Shu Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Xuhui, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China
| | - Lan Lin
- Department of Pathology, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China
| | - Quan Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China
| | - Shengzi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Xuhui, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|