Effectiveness of skull X-RAY to determine cochlear implant insertion depth

Advancing Cochlear Implant Programming: X-ray Guided Anatomy-Based Fitting

BACKGROUND

Anatomy-based fitting (ABF) is a new research area in the field of cochlear implants (CIs). Despite the reported benefits and acceptable levels of ABF among CI recipients, some limitations remain, like the postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan, which is preferred for confirming electrode array insertion.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using plain film radiography (X-ray) for postoperative electrode detection and for building ABF as an alternative to CT.

METHODS

A total of 53 ears with CI were studied. All cases had routine post-insertion X-rays in the cochlear view and additionally underwent postoperative CT. The insertion angles and center frequencies measured by two independent observers were compared for each imaging modality. The angular insertion depth and center frequencies resulting from the X-ray and CT scans were then compared.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the X-ray- and CT-measured angles for the electrode contacts. Radiographic measurements between the two readers showed an almost perfect (≥0.8) or substantial (0.71) intraclass correlation coefficient along the electrode contacts. X-ray images showed a mean difference of 4.7 degrees from CT. The mean semitone deviation of the central frequency between the CT and X-ray images was 0.6.

CONCLUSIONS

X-ray imaging provides a valid and easy-to-perform alternative to CT imaging, with less radiation exposure and lower costs. The radiographs showed excellent concordance with the CT-measured angular insertion depth and consequently with the central frequency for most electrode contacts. Therefore, plain X-ray could be a viable alternative in building ABF for the CI recipients.

Frequency of electrode migration after cochlear implantation in the early postoperative period. What are associated risk factors?

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the prevalence of, and risk factors associated with electrode migration (EM) in cochlear implant (CI) recipients.

DESIGN

Historical cohort study of all CIs performed between 1 January 2018 and 1 August 2021 in a single tertiary adult and paediatric CI centre in the UK.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary aim is to determine the prevalence of electrode migration, comparing intraoperative surgeon report and examination of a routine plain radiograph performed 2 weeks after surgery. EM is defined as the detection of movement of two or more electrodes out of the cochlea from the time of surgery. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate preoperative and intraoperative risk factors that might predispose to migration.

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-five patients, having 516 distinct surgeries, with 628 implants were analysed. EM occurred following 11.5% of implant operations. Pre-existing cochlear abnormality was an independent associated risk factor for EM (OR: 3.40 ⟨1.20-9.62⟩ p = .021). Demographics, surgical technique, usage of a precurved electrode, CSF leak, surgeon seniority and intraoperative telemetry did not influence risk of migration. There were 5 implants (0.8%) which migrated later than 2 weeks, with a median date of imaging diagnosis (x-ray or CT scan) of 263 days ⟨IQR:198⟩, for which head injury was a common precipitating factor. There were differences in the risk of migration between different lateral wall electrodes.

CONCLUSION

EM in the early postoperative period is a common occurrence and is more likely in implant recipients with obstructed or malformed cochleae.

Transtympanic Visualization of Cochlear Implant Placement With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the ability of transtympanic middle ear optical coherence tomography (ME-OCT) to assess placement of cochlear implants (CIs) in situ.

PATIENT

A 72-year-old man with bilateral progressive heredodegenerative sensorineural hearing loss due to work-related noise exposure received a CI with a slim modiolar electrode for his right ear 3 months before his scheduled checkup.

INTERVENTION

A custom-built swept source ME-OCT system (λo = 1550 nm, ∆λ = 40 nm) designed for transtympanic middle ear imaging was used to capture a series of two- and three-dimensional images of the patient's CI in situ. Separately, transtympanic OCT two-dimensional video imaging and three-dimensional imaging were used to visualize insertion and removal of a CI with a slim modiolar electrode in a human cadaveric temporal bone through a posterior tympanotomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Images and video were analyzed qualitatively to determine the visibility of implant features under ME-OCT imaging and quantitatively to determine insertion depth of the CI.

RESULTS

After implantation, the CI electrode could be readily visualized in the round window niche under transtympanic ME-OCT in both the patient and the temporal bone. In both cases, characteristic design features of the slim modiolar electrode allowed us to quantify the insertion depth from our images.

CONCLUSIONS

ME-OCT could potentially be used in a clinic as a noninvasive, nonionizing means to confirm implant placement. This study shows that features of the CI electrode visible under ME-OCT can be used to quantify insertion depth in the postoperative ear.

Quality-assured training in the evaluation of cochlear implant electrode position: a prospective experimental study

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to demonstrate the utility of an approach in training predoctoral medical students, to enable them to measure electrode-to-modiolus distances (EMDs) and insertion-depth angles (aDOIs) in cochlear implant (CI) imaging at the performance level of a single senior rater.

METHODS

This prospective experimental study was conducted on a clinical training dataset comprising patients undergoing cochlear implantation with a Nucleus® CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode (N = 20) or a CI512 Contour Advance electrode (N = 10). To assess the learning curves of a single medical student in measuring EMD and aDOI, interrater differences (senior-student) were compared with the intrarater differences of a single senior rater (test-retest). The interrater and intrarater range were both calculated as the distance between the 0.1th and 99.9th percentiles. A "deliberate practice" training approach was used to teach knowledge and skills, while correctives were applied to minimize faulty data-gathering and data synthesis.

RESULTS

Intrarater differences of the senior rater ranged from - 0.5 to 0.5 mm for EMD and - 14° to 16° for aDOI (respective medians: 0 mm and 0°). Use of the training approach led to interrater differences that matched this after the 4th (EMD) and 3rd (aDOI) feedback/measurement series had been provided to the student.

CONCLUSIONS

The training approach enabled the student to evaluate the CI electrode position at the performance level of a senior rater. This finding may offer a basis for ongoing clinical quality assurance for the assessment of CI electrode position.

Cochlear Implantation in Infants: Why and How

In children with congenital deafness, cochlear implantation (CI) prior to 12 months of age offers the opportunity to foster more typical auditory development during late infancy and early childhood. Recent studies have found a positive association between early implantation and expressive and receptive language outcomes, with some children able to achieve normal language skills by the time of school entry. Universal newborn hearing screening improved early detection and diagnosis of congenital hearing loss, allowing for earlier intervention, including decision-making regarding cochlear implant (CI) candidacy. It can be more challenging to confirm CI candidacy in infants; therefore, a multidisciplinary approach, including objective audiometric testing, is recommended to not only confirm the diagnosis but also to counsel families regarding expectations and long-term management. Surgeons performing CI surgery in young children should consider both the anesthetic risks of surgery in infancy and the ways in which mastoid anatomy may differ between infants and older children or adults. Multiple studies have found CI surgery in infants can be performed safely and effectively. This article reviews current evidence regarding indications for implantation in children younger than 12 months of age and discusses perioperative considerations and surgical technique.

Assessment of Angular Insertion-Depth of Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using Plain X-ray Scans

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate in cochlear implant patients, the feasibility and reliability of angular depth of insertion (aDOI) measurements using plain x-ray scans.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study where three observers independently evaluated and compared intraoperative anterior-posterior and oblique x-ray scans.

SETTING

A tertiary pediatric medical center.

PATIENTS

Included were 50 children (100 ears) who underwent bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantation during 2008 to 2015.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Inter-rater agreement of aDOI measured in plain x-ray scans; effect of head position on measured aDOI; and symmetry of aDOI between patients' ears in bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantations.

RESULTS

Differences in the average aDOI measurements among the three observers ranged between 2 and 7 degrees. There was high inter-rater agreement (R = 0.99, p < 0.01) among all observers, and strong correlations between each pair of observers (0.92-0.99). Head rotation of 45 degrees (between the two views) resulted in a median difference in aDOI of 14 degrees, with excellent correlation among the observers. The rate of asymmetry was high, with a median difference of 39 degrees and up to 220 degrees between ears.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of aDOI using intraoperative plain x-rays is efficient and reliable. The effect of head positioning on measurement is small. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of aDOI and insertion symmetry on functional outcomes.

Factors Influencing Pediatric Cochlear Implant Outcomes: Carolina Sibling Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the correlation between speech perception performance between pediatric sibling pairs with severe to profound sensory hearing loss receiving cochlear implants, and in cases of discordance in performance, determine which variables negatively impacted performance.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary academic referral center.

SUBJECTS

Eighty-nine pediatric subjects, 43 sibling groups, under the age of 18 with severe to profound sensory hearing loss who received a cochlear implant with a sibling who also received a cochlear implant.

INTERVENTION

Cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Speech perception scores, consonant-nucleus- consonant score.

RESULTS

A statistically significant correlation was found between speech perception performance of pediatric siblings. Depth of insertion is positively correlated with better speech perception in siblings with discordant results. There was no significant relationship with either electrode type, unilateral/bilateral status, or age of implantation.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric siblings have a high correlation in speech perception outcomes following cochlear implantation, suggesting family environment plays a strong role. In circumstances in which outcomes between siblings are substantially different, greater depth of implant insertion is correlated with better consonant-nucleus- consonant word scores.

Reliability of Measuring Insertion Depth in Cochlear Implanted Infants and Children Using Cochlear View Radiography

OBJECTIVES

Cochlear implant depth of insertion affects audiologic outcomes and can be measured in adults using plain films obtained in the "cochlear view." The objective of this study was to assess interrater and intrarater reliability of measuring depth of insertion using cochlear view radiography.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, observational.

SETTING

Tertiary referral pediatric hospital.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Patients aged 11 months to 20 years (median, 4 years; interquartile range [IQR], 1-8 years) undergoing cochlear implantation at our institution were studied over 1 year. Children underwent cochlear view imaging on postoperative day 1. Films were deidentified and 1 image per ear was selected. Two cochlear implant surgeons and 2 radiologists evaluated each image and determined angular depth of insertion. Images were re-reviewed 6 weeks later by all raters. Inter- and intrarater reliability were calculated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

RESULTS

Fifty-seven ears were imaged from 42 children. Forty-nine ears (86%) had successful cochlear view x-rays. Median angular depth of insertion was 381° (minimum, 272°; maximum, 450°; IQR, 360°-395°) during the first round of measurement. Measurements of the same images reviewed 6 weeks later showed median depth of insertion of 382° (minimum, 272°; maximum, 449°; IQR, 360°-397°). Interrater and intrarater reliability ICCs ranged between 0.81 and 0.96, indicating excellent reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative cochlear view radiography is a reliable tool for measurement of cochlear implant depth of insertion in infants and children. Further studies are needed to determine reliability of intraoperatively obtained cochlear view radiographs in this population.

Validating a New Tablet-based Tool in the Determination of Cochlear Implant Angular Insertion Depth

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to determine the reliability of a new tablet-based software that utilizes postoperative computed tomography to determine angular insertion depth (AID), cochlear duct length (CDL), and the cochlear place frequency of individual electrodes in cochlear implant recipients.

PATIENTS

Twenty adult cochlear implant recipients with lateral-wall electrode arrays of varying lengths were included in the study.

INTERVENTION

Cochlear and electrode array measurements were made by 2 otolaryngologists using a tablet-based software. The user manually identifies the modiolus, round window, and each electrode contact to calculate AID. The user also manually identifies cochlear landmarks to calculate the CDL. The AID and CDL are applied to the Greenwood function to obtain an estimate of the cochlear place frequency for each electrode.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome measure was the reliability of the instrument, as assessed with intra and interrater reliability of measured AID and CDL. The resultant differences in the estimated cochlear place frequency of the most apical electrode were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A broad range of AIDs were observed (390°-659°). Intraclass correlation coefficients for intra (0.991) and interrater reliability (0.980) of AID of the most apical electrode contact were excellent. Intra (0.820) and interrater reliability (0.784) of CDL were also excellent. The estimated cochlear place frequency for the most apical electrode differed by an average of 6.7% (0-18.7%) across the 2 raters.

CONCLUSION

There is excellent agreement amongst clinicians in the determination of AID and CDL, resulting in small changes in estimated cochlear place frequency of the most apical electrode using this new software.