Outpatient versus inpatient superficial parotidectomy: clinical and pathological characteristics

The timing of drain removal in parotidectomies: outcomes of removal at 4 h post-operatively and a Canadian survey of practice patterns

BACKGROUND

The post-operative management of parotidectomies is highly provider dependent. No guidelines are currently available for timing of parotid drain removal. This study aimed to assess: (1) outcomes and complications after early drain removal (< 4 h, post-operative day [POD] 0) versus late drain removal (POD ≥ 1); (2) current Canadian provider practices.

METHODS

A single surgeons ten-year parotidectomy practice was reviewed, spanning his practice change from routine POD ≥ 1 drain removal to POD 0 removal, with extraction of patient demographic, disease, and complication variables. An anonymous, cross-sectional survey on parotid drain practices was distributed to Canadian Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery members. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon Rank Sum, and unpaired student's t-tests were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 526 patients were included and 44.7% (235/526) had drains removed POD 0. There was no significant difference in hematoma or seroma rates between the POD 0 and POD ≥ 1 drain removal cohorts. The national survey on parotid drain management had 176 responses. The majority (67.9%) reported routinely using drains after parotidectomy and 62.8% reported using a drain output based criteria for removal. The most common cut-off output was 30 ml in 24 h (range 5-70 ml).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in hematoma or seroma rates for patients with parotid drains removed on POD 0 versus POD ≥ 1. Our national survey found significant variation in Canadian parotidectomy drain removal practices, which may be an area that can be further assessed to minimize hospital resources and improve patient care.

[On the state of intersectoral treatment in otolaryngology in Germany - Results of a survey]

BACKGROUND

The German Healthcare System is currently subject of significant structural changes. Due to politic influences it is obvious that more and more even complex diagnostic and therapeutic procedures will be performed in an office setting or as day treatments. This is due to the high rate of hospital treatments in Germany compared to other OECD countries. A revision of the healthcare system will include both, ambulatory and hospital treatments, which will only be possible with some new structures for this "intersectoral" treatment. Currently there are no data available on the status, possibilities and structure of the "intersectoral" treatment in ENT in Germany.

METHODS

To get an overview on the possibilities for an "intersectoral" treatment in ENT in Germany a survey was conducted. Each chariman of an ENT clinic/Department and all ENT specialists in private practice were contacted and got a questionnaire. The evaluation was performed differently for chairmen of an ENT department, ENT specialists in private practice without and with a ward for inpatients in hospitals.

RESULTS

4,548 questionnaires were mailed. Out of them 493 were filled and came back (10.8%). The return rate in the group of ENT Department chairmen was with 52.9% even higher. "Intersectoral" for physicians in hospitals means that they are usually working with a personal authorization by the local Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, ENT specialists in private practice usually with a ward for inpatient authorization in a hospital. Appropriate structures for an intersectoral organization of patients´s treatment are currently missing. Both, ENT Department chairmen and ENT specialists in private practice declared the current remuneration system for ambulatory and day surgery as completely inaedequate and is urgently to be revised. Beside this, ENT Department chairmen declared problems with the emergency care of patients with complications operated on outside the hospital, problems with the continuing education of residents and with information transfer. They request that hospital specialists should be allowed to work in the contractual medical care of outpatients without a restriction. ENT specialists in private practice mentioned positively the good cooperation possibilities with hospital physicians, knowledge sharing, and wide ranges of indications in the ENT Departments. Negative points could be possible worse information sharing when there is no distinct contact person in the ENT Departments, a possible competitive situation between ENT Departments and specialists in private practice, and sometimes long waiting times for the patients.

DISCUSSION

The German health care system is currently facing a radical reform with the overcoming of traditional rigid and inflexible sectors in outpatient care and inpatient hospital care. To achieve this, the intersectoral patient treatment should play the key role. "Intersectoral" means that the whole process of patient care from diagnosis to therapy is closely interlinked and can also be managed by the same physicians, no matter whether they are working as spcialists in an ENT-Department in a hospital or in private practice. However, currently there are no appropriate structures available to achieve this goal. Beside creating structural conditions for intersectoral treatment the current remuneration system for outpatient procedures and dayclinic treatments must be renewed in a way to cover all the costs. Further conditions are the development of good cooperation models between ENT Departments and specialists in private practice, and the possibility for hospital ENT physicians to work in the contractual medical care of outpatients without a restriction. Intersectoral patient care must take the quality management, the continuing education of residents and the patient safety under consideration.

Patient safety and quality improvements in parotid surgery

Parotidectomy is the mainstay treatment for tumors of the parotid gland. In an effort to improve clinical outcomes, several modern surgical techniques and perioperative interventions have been evaluated and refined. This review discusses current and actively debated perioperative interventions aimed at improving patient safety and the quality of parotidectomy. Relevant high‐impact literature pertaining to preoperative diagnostic modalities, intraoperative surgical techniques, and postoperative care will be described.

Fine needle aspiration is a suitable diagnostic modality for parotid tumors but has important limitations.

Extracapsular dissection is safe and effective for small superficial tumors away from the facial nerve.

Nerve monitoring may reduce temporary facial weakness but does not replace robust surgical technique.

Outpatient parotidectomy is safe and feasible for appropriately selected patients.

Total Hysterectomy by Low-Impact Laparoscopy to Decrease Opioids Consumption: A Prospective Cohort Study

Our objective was to evaluate postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing hysterectomy by low-impact laparoscopy and compare these parameters with conventional laparoscopy. We conducted a prospective study in two French gynecological surgery departments from May 2017 to January 2018. The primary endpoint was the intensity of postoperative pain evaluated by a validated numeric rating scale (NRS) and opioid consumption in the postoperative recovery unit on Day 0 and Day 1. Thirty-two patients underwent low-impact laparoscopy and 77 had conventional laparoscopy. Most of the patients (90.6%) who underwent low-impact laparoscopy were managed as outpatients. There was a significantly higher consumption of strong opioids in the conventional compared to the low-impact group on both Day 0 and Day 1: 26.0% and 36.4% vs. 3.1% and 12.5%, respectively (p = 0.02 and p < 0.01). Over two-thirds of the patients in the low-impact group did not require opioids postoperatively. Two factors were predictive of lower postoperative opioid consumption: low-impact laparoscopy (OR 1.38, 95%CI 1.13−1.69, p = 0.002) and a mean intraoperative peritoneum below 10 mmHg (OR 1.25, 95%CI 1.03−1.51). Total hysterectomy by low-impact laparoscopy is feasible in an outpatient setting and is associated with a marked decrease in opioid consumption compared to conventional laparoscopy.

[Outpatient Surgery in German ENT]

Currently there is an intense discussion ongoing to enhance and expand outpatient surgery in the ENT in Germany, which is the intention by several politicians. The goal is to achieve a frequency of outpatient surgery comparable to an international level.To achieve this goal, acceptance of outpatient interventions by both, surgeons and patients is required, particularly in regard of equal quality standards and patient safety requirements.In the following review the organization, outcome, quality management and strategies for different ENT outpatient surgery worldwide is analyzed. Basically, outpatient surgery is organized in different ways: office-based-procedures in local anesthesia, procedures in ambulatory surgery center settings as standalone facilities or in connection with and adjacent to a hospital with possible inpatient treatment. Contact and resident times of the patients in the outpatient surgery centers differ between some hours through 23 hours. A deliberated and careful selection of patients which are suitable for outpatient procedures is required and should address comorbidities, medications, social circumstances, health literacy of the patient and its relatives, and distance from home to the hospital. A careful and strict quality management is mandatory which comprises the entire process from patient selection through patient entry, surgery, discharge and postoperative care in a multidisciplinary setting.Zur besseren Lesbarkeit des Textes wird bei geschlechterbezogenen Bezeichnungen die männliche Form benutzt. Es sind jedoch in gleicher Rangfolge auch das jeweilige weibliche Geschlecht oder andere Geschlechtsausprägungen gemeint.