1
|
Kurtoğlu A, Yıldız A, Arda B. The view of synthetic biology in the field of ethics: a thematic systematic review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2024; 12:1397796. [PMID: 38863492 PMCID: PMC11165145 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1397796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Synthetic biology is designing and creating biological tools and systems for useful purposes. It uses knowledge from biology, such as biotechnology, molecular biology, biophysics, biochemistry, bioinformatics, and other disciplines, such as engineering, mathematics, computer science, and electrical engineering. It is recognized as both a branch of science and technology. The scope of synthetic biology ranges from modifying existing organisms to gain new properties to creating a living organism from non-living components. Synthetic biology has many applications in important fields such as energy, chemistry, medicine, environment, agriculture, national security, and nanotechnology. The development of synthetic biology also raises ethical and social debates. This article aims to identify the place of ethics in synthetic biology. In this context, the theoretical ethical debates on synthetic biology from the 2000s to 2020, when the development of synthetic biology was relatively faster, were analyzed using the systematic review method. Based on the results of the analysis, the main ethical problems related to the field, problems that are likely to arise, and suggestions for solutions to these problems are included. The data collection phase of the study included a literature review conducted according to protocols, including planning, screening, selection and evaluation. The analysis and synthesis process was carried out in the next stage, and the main themes related to synthetic biology and ethics were identified. Searches were conducted in Web of Science, Scopus, PhilPapers and MEDLINE databases. Theoretical research articles and reviews published in peer-reviewed journals until the end of 2020 were included in the study. The language of publications was English. According to preliminary data, 1,453 publications were retrieved from the four databases. Considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 58 publications were analyzed in the study. Ethical debates on synthetic biology have been conducted on various issues. In this context, the ethical debates in this article were examined under five themes: the moral status of synthetic biology products, synthetic biology and the meaning of life, synthetic biology and metaphors, synthetic biology and knowledge, and expectations, concerns, and problem solving: risk versus caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayşe Kurtoğlu
- Department of Medical History and Ethics, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aravind Paleri V, Hens K. Beyond the Organism versus Machine Dichotomy: A Review of Ethical Concerns in Synthetic Biology. ACS Synth Biol 2024; 13:3-14. [PMID: 38070167 DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Synthetic Biology (SynBio) is a technology that brings new possibilities and benefits, as well as new ethical concerns. We have performed a systematic review and thematic analysis of papers that deal with the possible ethical and social issues surrounding SynBio. We found that articles mention deontological concerns related to tinkering with life and more consequentialist matters related to biosafety and biosecurity. At the same time, justice aspects, such as socioeconomic and environmental impacts, are far less mentioned. Moreover, there is a lack of systematic study of the ethical issues that SynBio researchers in the lab encounter on a day-to-day basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varsha Aravind Paleri
- Centre for Ethics, Department of Philosophy, Universiteit Antwerpen-Stadscampus, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Kristien Hens
- Centre for Ethics, Department of Philosophy, Universiteit Antwerpen-Stadscampus, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
De Wannemaeker L, Bervoets I, De Mey M. Unlocking the bacterial domain for industrial biotechnology applications using universal parts and tools. Biotechnol Adv 2022; 60:108028. [PMID: 36031082 DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Synthetic biology can play a major role in the development of sustainable industrial biotechnology processes. However, the development of economically viable production processes is currently hampered by the limited availability of host organisms that can be engineered for a specific production process. To date, standard hosts such as Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are often used as starting points for process development since parts and tools allowing their engineering are readily available. However, their suboptimal metabolic background or impaired performance at industrial scale for a desired production process, can result in increased costs associated with process development and/or disappointing production titres. Building a universal and portable gene expression system allowing genetic engineering of hosts across the bacterial domain would unlock the bacterial domain for industrial biotechnology applications in a highly standardized manner and doing so, render industrial biotechnology processes more competitive compared to the current polluting chemical processes. This review gives an overview of a selection of bacterial hosts highly interesting for industrial biotechnology based on both their metabolic and process optimization properties. Moreover, the requirements and progress made so far to enable universal, standardized, and portable gene expression across the bacterial domain is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lien De Wannemaeker
- Centre for Synthetic Biology (CSB), Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Indra Bervoets
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marjan De Mey
- Centre for Synthetic Biology (CSB), Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Analysing bio-art’s epistemic landscape: from metaphoric to post-metaphoric structure. BIOSOCIETIES 2022. [DOI: 10.1057/s41292-022-00270-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
AbstractSince its emergence, bio-art has developed numerous metaphors central to the transfer of concepts of modern biology, genetics, and genomics to the public domain that reveal several cultural, ethical, and social variations in their related themes. This article assumes that a general typology of metaphors developed by practices related to bio-art can be categorised into two categories: pictorial and operational metaphors. Through these, information regarding several biological issues is transferred to the public arena. Based on the analysis, this article attempts to answer the following questions: How does bio-art develop metaphors to advance epistemic and discursive agendas that constitute public understanding of a set of deeply problematic assumptions regarding how today’s biology operates? Under the influence of today’s synthetic biology, could bio-media operationally reframe these epistemic agendas by reframing complex and multi-layered metaphors towards post-metaphoric structures? Finally, what are the scientific, cultural, and social implications of reframing?
Collapse
|
5
|
Nerlich B, Stelmach A. Gene drive communication: exploring experts' lived experience of metaphor use. NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY 2022; 41:3-22. [PMID: 35722062 PMCID: PMC9197202 DOI: 10.1080/14636778.2021.2020633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Metaphors have been crucial in making genetics and genomics public, from the code and the book of life to genetic scissors and gene surgery. A new field is emerging called "gene drive" - a range of controversial technologies that can potentially be used for the eradication or conservation of animal species. At the same time, metaphors are emerging to talk about the promises and dangers of "gene drive". In this article we use thematic analysis to examine thirty interviews with gene drive science and communication experts, and stakeholders, focusing on how they talk about their lived experience of metaphor use in the context of gene drive communication, including their struggle to remember salient metaphors and their reflections on which metaphors to use and which to avoid. We discuss the significance of our findings for research and practice of responsible science communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigitte Nerlich
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Metabolic Reprogramming, Questioning, and Implications for Cancer. BIOLOGY 2021; 10:biology10020129. [PMID: 33562201 PMCID: PMC7916061 DOI: 10.3390/biology10020129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The expression "metabolic reprogramming" has been encountered more and more in the literature since the mid-1990s. It seems to encompass several notions depending on the author, but the lack of a clear definition allows it to be used as a "catch-all" expression. Our first intention is to point out the inconsistencies in the use of the reprogramming terminology for cancer metabolism. The second is to address the over-focus of the role of mutations in metabolic adaptation. With the increased interest in metabolism and, more specifically, in the Warburg effect in cancer research, it seems appropriate to discuss this terminology and related concepts in detail.
Collapse
|
7
|
H Birk R, Samuel G. Can digital data diagnose mental health problems? A sociological exploration of 'digital phenotyping'. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2020; 42:1873-1887. [PMID: 32914445 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
This paper critically explores the research and development of 'digital phenotyping', which broadly refers to the idea that digital data can measure and predict people's mental health as well as their potential risk for mental ill health. Despite increasing research and efforts to digitally track and predict ill mental health, there has been little sociological and critical engagement with this field. This paper aims to fill this gap by introducing digital phenotyping to the social sciences. We explore the origins of digital phenotyping, the concept of the digital phenotype and its potential for benefit, linking these to broader developments within the field of 'mental health sensing'. We then critically discuss the technology, offering three critiques. First, that there may be assumptions of normality and bias present in the use of algorithms; second, we critique the idea that digital data can act as a proxy for social life; and third that the often biological language employed in this field risks reifying mental health problems. Our aim is not to discredit the scientific work in this area, but rather to call for scientists to remain reflexive in their work, and for more social science engagement in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasmus H Birk
- Department of Communication & Psychology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Gabrielle Samuel
- Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Domínguez M, Peretó J, Porcar M. The rose and the name: the unresolved debate on biotechnological terms. Microb Biotechnol 2019; 13:305-310. [PMID: 31872971 PMCID: PMC7017807 DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The largest survey on the perception of synthetic biology‐related disciplines (Porcar et al., 2019,EMBO Rep 20) recently revealed that the Spanish society does not have a very positive perception of the term synthetic biology. On the other hand, the terms biotechnology and even genetic engineering received relatively higher scores. The issue of nomenclature and perception is a classical one in science perception studies. Synthetic biologists have been debating their neologism (Synthetic Biology, from now on SB) for years. Even in a 2006 blog, Rob Carlson discussed the various labels for the new field, such as intentional biology, constructive biology, natural engineering, synthetic genomics and biological engineering. This diversity of names, along with the above mentioned negative public perception of the term synthetic biology, raises the question on whether the term itself is suitable or whether it could, in an extreme scenario, be replaced by another combining scientific consensus with public acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martí Domínguez
- Language Theory and Communication Sciences Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Juli Peretó
- Institute for Integrative Systems Biology I2SysBio (University of Valencia - CSIC), Paterna, Spain.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Valencia, Burjassot, Spain.,Darwin Bioprospecting Excellence SL, Paterna, Spain
| | - Manuel Porcar
- Institute for Integrative Systems Biology I2SysBio (University of Valencia - CSIC), Paterna, Spain.,Darwin Bioprospecting Excellence SL, Paterna, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hallinan JS, Wipat A, Kitney R, Woods S, Taylor K, Goñi‐Moreno A. Future‐proofing synthetic biology: educating the next generation. ENGINEERING BIOLOGY 2019. [DOI: 10.1049/enb.2019.0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anil Wipat
- School of ComputingNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Richard Kitney
- Department of BioengineeringImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Simon Woods
- Policy, Ethics and Life Sciences (PEALS) Research CentreNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Ken Taylor
- Policy, Ethics and Life Sciences (PEALS) Research CentreNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Porcar M. The Hidden Charm of Life. Life (Basel) 2019; 9:life9010005. [PMID: 30621097 PMCID: PMC6463155 DOI: 10.3390/life9010005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2018] [Revised: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Synthetic biology is an engineering view on biotechnology, which has revolutionized genetic engineering. The field has seen a constant development of metaphors that tend to highlight the similarities of cells with machines. I argue here that living organisms, particularly bacterial cells, are not machine-like, engineerable entities, but, instead, factory-like complex systems shaped by evolution. A change of the comparative paradigm in synthetic biology from machines to factories, from hardware to software, and from informatics to economy is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Porcar
- Institute for Integrative Systems Biology I2SysBio, Universitat de València-CSIC, 46980 Paterna, Spain.
- Darwin Bioprospecting Excellence, SL., Parc Científic Universitat de València, 46980 Paterna, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gelinsky E, Hilbeck A. European Court of Justice ruling regarding new genetic engineering methods scientifically justified: a commentary on the biased reporting about the recent ruling. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE 2018; 30:52. [PMID: 30613460 PMCID: PMC6302053 DOI: 10.1186/s12302-018-0182-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
In July 2018, the European Court of Justice (Case C-528/16) ruled that organisms obtained by directed mutagenesis techniques are to be regarded as genetically modified organisms (GMOs) within the meaning of Directive 2001/18. The ruling marked the next round of the dispute around agricultural genetic engineering in Europe. Many of the pros and cons presented in this dispute are familiar from the debate around the first generation of genetic engineering techniques. The current wave of enthusiasm for the new genetic engineering methods, with its claim to make good on the failed promises of the previous wave, seems to point more to an admission of failure of the last generation of genetic engineering than to a true change of paradigm. Regulation is being portrayed as a ban on research and use, which is factually incorrect, and the judges of the European Court of Justice are being defamed as espousing "pseudoscience". Furthermore, this highly polarised position dominates the media reporting of the new techniques and the court's ruling. Advocates of the new genetic engineering techniques appear to believe that their benefits are so clear that furnishing reliable scientific evidence is unnecessary. Meanwhile, critics who believe that the institution of science is in a serious crisis are on the increase not just due to the cases of obvious documented scientific misconduct by companies and scientists, but also due to the approach of dividing the world into those categorically for or against genetic engineering. In this construct of irreconcilable opposites, differentiations fall by the wayside. This article is a response to this one-sided and biased reporting, which often has the appearance of spin and lacks journalistic ethics that require journalists to report on different positions in a balanced and factual manner instead of taking positions and becoming undeclared advocates themselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Gelinsky
- Critical Scientists Switzerland (CSS Board), Dändlikerrain 3, 3014 Berne, Switzerland
- Semnar/Seed Policy & Science, Tempikon 2, 6283 Baldegg, Switzerland
| | - Angelika Hilbeck
- European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility (ENSSER Board), Marienstrasse 19/20, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Institute of Integrative Biology, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ceccarelli L. CRISPR as agent: a metaphor that rhetorically inhibits the prospects for responsible research. LIFE SCIENCES, SOCIETY AND POLICY 2018; 14:24. [PMID: 30426260 PMCID: PMC6233552 DOI: 10.1186/s40504-018-0088-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
In 2015, a group of 18 scientists and bioethicists published an editorial in Science calling for "open discourse on the use of CRISPR-Cas9 technology to manipulate the human genome" and recommending that steps be taken to strongly discourage "any attempts at germline genome modification" in humans with this powerful new technology. Press reports compared the essay to a letter written by Paul Berg and 10 other scientists in 1974, also published in Science, calling for a voluntary deferral of certain types of recombinant DNA experimentation. A rhetorical analysis of the metaphors in these two documents, and in the summary statements that came out of the respective National Academy of Sciences conferences they instigated, shows that while they have a lot in common, they are different in at least one important way. The more recent texts deploy conceptual metaphors that portray the biotechnology in question as an autonomous agent, subtly suggesting an inevitability to its development, in contrast to the earlier texts, which portray the scientists who are using the technology as the primary agents who take action. Rhetorical moves depicting biotechnology as an agent in the 2015 texts hint at contemporary skepticism about whether humans can restrain the forward momentum of science and technology in a global context, thus inhibiting scientists from imagining a consequential role for themselves in shaping the future of responsible research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Ceccarelli
- Department of Communication, University of Washington, Box 353740, Seattle, WA, 98195-3740, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kearnes M, Kuch D, Johnston A. How to do things with metaphors: engineering life as hodgepodge. LIFE SCIENCES, SOCIETY AND POLICY 2018; 14:22. [PMID: 30221313 PMCID: PMC6389216 DOI: 10.1186/s40504-018-0084-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
This paper presents a collaboration between social scientists and a chemist exploring the promises for new therapy development at the intersection between synthetic biology and nanotechnology. Drawing from ethnographic studies of laboratories and a recorded discussion between the three authors, we interrogate the metaphors that underpin what Mackenzie (Futures 48:5-12 2013) has identified as a recursive relationship in the iconography of the life sciences and its infrastructure. Focusing specifically on the use of gene editing techniques in synthetic biology and bio-nanotechnology, we focus our analysis on the key metaphors of 'evolutionary life as hodge-podge' within which 'cutting' of DNA and the 'sticking' and 'binding' of engineered particles to proteins can be performed by researchers in laboratory settings. Taken together, we argue that these metaphors are consequential for understanding metaphors of life-as-machine and the prevalence of notions of 'engineering life'. Exploring the ways in which notions of cutting, targeting and life as an evolutionary hodgepodge prefigure a more contingent notion of engineering and synthesis we close by considering the interpretive implications for ethnomethodological approaches to contemporary life science research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Kearnes
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science & Technology (CBNS), School of Humanities and Languages, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Declan Kuch
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science & Technology (CBNS), School of Humanities and Languages, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Angus Johnston
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science & Technology (CBNS), Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Porcar M, Peretó J. Creating life and the media: translations and echoes. LIFE SCIENCES, SOCIETY AND POLICY 2018; 14:19. [PMID: 30123943 PMCID: PMC6098992 DOI: 10.1186/s40504-018-0087-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Synthetic biology is the engineering view on biotechnology that ultimately aims at fulfilling the quest of building an artificial cell. From the very first attempts of synthesizing life, this subject has made an impact on the media through, very often, misleading headlines and news. We review here the historical journalistic approach on synthetic biology and related disciplines, from the early twentieth century to the lastest achievements on designing protocells or genome reduction. However, it would be very naive to consider the research community and the media to be unidirectionally linked, with the latter being mere displayers (and disrupters) of the research "reality". On the contrary, the research community has also received a strong influence from the media, as evidenced by statements from researchers, common metaphors and, even, a trend to unconsciously develop shared techno-social paradigms. We conclude that, beyond overstatements from researchers and journalists' misunderstandings, both communities provide strong feedback to each other and, together, contribute to define the dream that synthetic biologists are aiming for.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Porcar
- Institute for Integrative Systems Biology I2SysBio (UV-CSIC), Parc Científic de la Universitat de València, C. Catedràtic José Beltrán 2, 46980, Paterna, Spain.
- Darwin Bioprospecting Excellence SL, Paterna, Spain.
| | - Juli Peretó
- Institute for Integrative Systems Biology I2SysBio (UV-CSIC), Parc Científic de la Universitat de València, C. Catedràtic José Beltrán 2, 46980, Paterna, Spain.
- Darwin Bioprospecting Excellence SL, Paterna, Spain.
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Universitat de València, Burjassot, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Döring M. Synthetic biology in the German press: how implications of metaphors shape representations of morality and responsibility. LIFE SCIENCES, SOCIETY AND POLICY 2018; 14:14. [PMID: 29936670 PMCID: PMC6015587 DOI: 10.1186/s40504-018-0079-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Synthetic biology (SynBio) represents a relatively young field of research which has developed into an important scientific endeavour. Characterised by a high degree of interdisciplinary work crossing disciplinary boundaries, such as biology, mathematics and engineering, SynBio has been, since its beginning, devoted to creating new biological functions, metabolic pathways or even minimal organisms. Although its often-articulated aim of developing new forms of life has so far not been archived, SynBio nowadays represents a well-established biotechnological approach and it has also attracted public concern, especially since Craig Venter's work on Mycoplasma Mycoides JCVI-syn1.0. Taking these developments as a starting point, the paper empirically investigates the metaphorical representations of SynBio in two leading German media publications, the daily newspaper Die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and the weekly magazine Der Spiegel between 2000 and 2010. Using a novel combination of metaphor and co-occurrence analysis, the paper engages in a systematic examination of implicit moral implications inherent in linguistic images permeating this news coverage. It demonstrates a method of how media-metaphorical representations and their moral implications of SynBio could analytically be revealed and analysed. In doing so, it aims at contributing to empirical ethical analyses of the news coverage on SynBio in particular and offers an approach that methodologically adds to literature on responsible language use, which is emerging in science and technology studies and ethical analyses of new technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Döring
- Institute of Geography, University of Hamburg, Bundesstraße 55, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Braun M, Fernau S, Dabrock P. Images of synthetic life: Mapping the use and function of metaphors in the public discourse on synthetic biology. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0199597. [PMID: 29928050 PMCID: PMC6013092 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 05/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Synthetic biology is currently one of the most frequently addressed emerging biotechnologies. Developments within this field receive a great deal of attention in media coverage, in which they are frequently illustrated by certain forms of metaphorical speech. Although it can be assumed that societal perceptions and evaluations of emerging biotechnologies are shaped by media coverage and its transported images, there is a lack of empirical research examining the reporting on synthetic biology as well as the use and function of metaphors within media articles. Thus, filling in this gap is one of the urgent desiderata for gaining an enhanced understanding of public views and assessments of this field of biotechnology. Against this background, this article addresses two main questions: (1) Which metaphors and framings are prevalent in the media discourse and what meaning do they have? (2) In which way are metaphors used in media coverage and what function do they have? The research is based on a media content analysis and includes a total number of 11.867 German- as well as English-language media articles dealing with synthetic biology, covering the period between 2004 and 2015. The findings suggest that forms of metaphorical speech address the novelty of current and envisioned scientific developments, highlighting their potential to shift social values and cultural concepts of life and nature. Basic expressions for describing progress within the field of synthetic biology are mainly descriptive metaphors originating from the semantic fields of craft, engineering, IT or art. In comparison, the total frequency of religiously charged metaphors, such as “playing God” or “creating life”, is substantially lower. This low usage rate of religio-cultural expressions in media coverage can be considered a surprising result, since other empirical studies and particularly the ongoing broader ethical discussion attach more importance to these forms of metaphorical speech.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Braun
- Chair of Systematic Theology II (Ethics), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Sandra Fernau
- Chair of Systematic Theology II (Ethics), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter Dabrock
- Chair of Systematic Theology II (Ethics), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zwart H. Scientific iconoclasm and active imagination: synthetic cells as techno-scientific mandalas. LIFE SCIENCES, SOCIETY AND POLICY 2018; 14:10. [PMID: 29761363 PMCID: PMC5950845 DOI: 10.1186/s40504-018-0075-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Metaphors allow us to come to terms with abstract and complex information, by comparing it to something which is structured, familiar and concrete. Although modern science is "iconoclastic", as Gaston Bachelard phrases it (i.e. bent on replacing living entities by symbolic data: e.g. biochemical and mathematical symbols and codes), scientists are at the same time prolific producers of metaphoric images themselves. Synthetic biology is an outstanding example of a technoscientific discourse replete with metaphors, including textual metaphors such as the "Morse code" of life, the "barcode" of life and the "book" of life. This paper focuses on a different type of metaphor, however, namely on the archetypal metaphor of the mandala as a symbol of restored unity and wholeness. Notably, mandala images emerge in textual materials (papers, posters, PowerPoints, etc.) related to one of the new "frontiers" of contemporary technoscience, namely the building of a synthetic cell: a laboratory artefact that functions like a cell and is even able to replicate itself. The mandala symbol suggests that, after living systems have been successfully reduced to the elementary building blocks and barcodes of life, the time has now come to put these fragments together again. We can only claim to understand life, synthetic cell experts argue, if we are able to technically reproduce a fully functioning cell. This holistic turn towards the cell as a meaningful whole (a total work of techno-art) also requires convergence at the "subject pole": the building of a synthetic cell as a practice of the self, representing a turn towards integration, of multiple perspectives and various forms of expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hub Zwart
- Department of Philosophy and Science Studies (Chair), Faculty of Science, Institute for Science in Society (ISIS), Radboud University Nijmegen, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|