1
|
Hirota K. Are there beneficial effects to hybrid anesthesia*? J Anesth 2024; 38:295-300. [PMID: 38551676 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-024-03310-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
As the COVID-19 pandemic increased the use of propofol in the intensive care unit for the management of respiratory sequelae and supply had become a major issue. Indeed, most hospitals in Japan were forced to use propofol only for induction of anesthesia with inhalational maintenance. Large amounts of propofol remain in the syringe which exacerbates the problems by increased waste. I propose that use of low dose propofol in combination with a low concentration inhaled anesthetic as an alternative and call this hybrid anesthesia. Several advantages of hybrid anesthesia are evident in the literature. Volatile anesthesia has several disadvantages such as cancer progression, emergence agitation, marked reduction in motor evoked potentials (MEP), laryngospasm with desflurane and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Volatile anesthesia exerts some beneficial actions such as myocardial protection and fast emergence with desflurane. In contrast, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) provides better survival in patients undergoing radical cancer surgery, reduction in emergence agitation, laryngospasm, PONV and better MEP trace Intraoperative awareness occurs more often during TIVA. When intravenous and volatile anesthesia are combined (hybrid anesthesia), the disadvantages of both methods may be offset by clear advantages. Thus, hybrid anesthesia may, therefore, be a viable anesthetic choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuyoshi Hirota
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Belgodère L, Emmerich J, Albin N, Bacon T, Daynes P, Vignot S, Vial T, Renaud G, Le Saulnier C, Maillard-Couvreur C, Cachet M, Veyries ML, Youdarene R, Oualikene-Gonin W, Ratignier-Carbonneil C, Maison P. Prevention and management of health products shortages by the French national agency (ANSM), 10 years of experience. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1293110. [PMID: 38045969 PMCID: PMC10690943 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1293110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Shortages of drugs and medical devices have tended to increase in France and worldwide, with consequences for patients and healthcare professionals. Preventing shortages of health products has become a priority for regulatory authorities, including the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM). To highlight perspectives for a better prevention, we described and analyzed the management of shortages in the availability of health products in France over the last 10 years. The supply chain was mapped to identify the main causes of shortages and stakeholders involved in managing shortages throughout the supply chain. National and European initiatives and regulatory measures were reviewed. A retrospective nationwide data analysis from the French reporting system of health product shortage reports was conducted over 10 years for drugs (2013-2022) and over an 18-month period for medical devices, from 1st March 2022 to 31st August 2023. An increase in drug shortage reports was observed, rising from 404 in 2013 to 3,761 in 2022 for drugs, with a relatively constant distribution of affected therapeutic classes. In 2022, the main reported causes of drug shortage risk were insufficient production capacity (27.1%), increased sales volume (21.5%), or lack of supply (13.6%). Over half of the reports on medical devices (55.4%) were objectified as indispensable, and their causes were mainly due to a lack of supply (48.2%), discontinuation of marketing (14.9%), increased sales volume (13.2%), and regulatory reasons (9.6%). ANSM and French authorities have engaged a public health policy for prevention and management of health product shortages including financial penalties, minimum safety stocks for Major Therapeutic Interest drugs, and a shortage management plan. Based on 10 years of experience, four priority measures have been identified to anticipate the risk of heath products shortages based: the importance of a national coordination from raw materials to local market, the implementation of new prevention and management actions in the supply chain, strengthening European cooperation and regulation including the establishment of a list of critical drugs, and promoting transparency and information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laëtitia Belgodère
- Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM), Saint Denis, France
| | - Joseph Emmerich
- Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM), Saint Denis, France
- Hôpital Saint Joseph Paris (Médecine Vasculaire), INSERM 1153 CRESS, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Albin
- Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM), Saint Denis, France
- Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Institut Daniel Hollard, Grenoble, France
| | - Trystan Bacon
- Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM), Saint Denis, France
- General Practitioner, Montmerle-sur-Saône, France
- Collège universitaire de médecine générale, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Groupe de travail "Thérapeutique", Collège de la médecine générale, Paris, France
| | - Pascale Daynes
- Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM), Saint Denis, France
- Union Francophone des Patients Partenaires, Faculté de Médecine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, La Tronche, France
| | - Stéphane Vignot
- Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM), Saint Denis, France
- Institut Godinot, Reims, France
| | - Thierry Vial
- Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM), Saint Denis, France
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Guillaume Renaud
- Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM), Saint Denis, France
| | - Carole Le Saulnier
- Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM), Saint Denis, France
| | | | - Mélanie Cachet
- Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM), Saint Denis, France
| | - Marie-Laure Veyries
- Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM), Saint Denis, France
| | - Rym Youdarene
- Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM), Saint Denis, France
| | - Wahiba Oualikene-Gonin
- Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM), Saint Denis, France
| | | | - Patrick Maison
- Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM), Saint Denis, France
- EA 7379, Epiderme, Faculté de Santé, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
- CHI Créteil, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schnider TW, Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke GJ, Beck-Schimmer B, Hemmerling TM. Pro-Con Debate: Should All General Anesthesia Be Done Using Target-Controlled Propofol Infusion Guided by Objective Monitoring of Depth of Anesthesia? Anesth Analg 2023; 137:565-575. [PMID: 37590801 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
In this Pro-Con commentary article, we discuss whether all general anesthesia should be done using target-controlled propofol anesthesia guided by monitoring of depth of anesthesia. This is an ongoing debate since more than 25 years, representing a scientific, cultural as well as geographical divide in the anesthesia community. The Pro side argues that total intravenous anesthesia causes less postoperative nausea and higher patient satisfaction than anesthesia using volatile anesthetics. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) of anesthetic agents allows for better titration of intravenous anesthesia using pharmacokinetic models. Processed EEG monitors, such as bispectral index monitoring, allows for better assessing the effect of TCI anesthesia than solely assessment of clinical parameters, such as ECG or blood pressure. The combination of TCI propofol and objective depth of anesthesia monitoring allows creating a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile for each patient. Finally, anesthesia using volatile anesthetics poses health risks for healthcare professionals and contributes to greenhouse effect. The Con side argues that for procedures accompanied with ischemia and reperfusion injury of an organ or tissue and for patients suffering from a severe inflammation' the use of volatile anesthetics might well have its advantages above propofol. In times of sudden shortage of drugs, volatile anesthetics can overcome the restriction in the operating theater or even on the intensive care unit, which is another advantage. Volatile anesthetics can be used for induction of anesthesia when IV access is impossible, end-tidal measurements of volatile anesthetic concentration allows confirmation that patients receive anesthetics. Taking environmental considerations into account, both propofol and volatile anesthetics bear certain harm to the environment, be it as waste product or as greenhouse gases. The authors therefore suggest to carefully considering advantages and disadvantages for each patient in its according environment. A well-balanced choice based on the available literature is recommended. The authors recommend careful consideration of advantages and disadvantages of each technique when tailoring an anesthetic to meet patient needs. Where appropriate, anesthesia providers are encouraged to account for unique features of anesthetic drug behavior, patient-reported and observed postoperative outcomes, and economic and environmental considerations when choosing any of the 2 described techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas W Schnider
- From the Department for Anesthesiology, Intensive, Rescue and Pain medicine, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Gertrude J Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Postma DJ, Notenboom K, De Smet PAGM, Leufkens HGM, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK. Medicine shortages: impact behind numbers. J Pharm Policy Pract 2023; 16:44. [PMID: 36918981 PMCID: PMC10013985 DOI: 10.1186/s40545-023-00548-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current research to assess the impact that medicine shortages have on patients is limited to general aspects, such as the prevalence of shortages and product characteristics. The aim of this study is to assess the overall impact that medicine shortages have on economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes. METHODS A cohort of all known products in shortage in the Netherlands between 2012 and 2015 were characterized by their route of administration, anatomical therapeutic chemical class, and whether they were originator or generic products. A representative sample of 324 shortages (18% of all shortages) was rated as having low, medium, or high impact on the five elements that determine the impact of shortages on patients: availability of an alternative product, underlying disease, susceptibility of the patient, costs (for patients and society at large), and number of patients affected. Ratings were converted into numerical scores per element and multiplied to obtain an overall impact score. RESULTS Two elements were most frequently rated as having a high impact: disease (29%) and costs (20%). Nearly half of the shortages (47%) rated high on at least one element, while nearly 10% rated high on multiple elements. Thirty percent of the shortages rated high on direct impact, which is represented by these elements: alternative product and disease. An additional 17% of the shortages rated high on indirect impact, which is represented by these elements: costs, susceptibility, and number of patients. High impact scores could not significantly be attributed to characteristics of the products in shortage. CONCLUSIONS An assessment of the medicine shortages' impact using a framework based on economic, clinical, and economic outcomes showed that all three outcomes affect the overall impact that medicine shortages have on patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doerine J Postma
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Kim Notenboom
- Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter A G M De Smet
- Departments of IQ Health Care and of Clinical Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hubert G M Leufkens
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Machado-Duque ME, Gaviria-Mendoza A, Valladales-Restrepo LF, Albanés-Beltrán JP, Machado-Alba JE. Trends in the Use of Sedative-Hypnotics, Opioids, and Neuromuscular Blockers in Hospitalized Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Retrospective Study. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2022; 9:629-638. [PMID: 36329371 PMCID: PMC9633019 DOI: 10.1007/s40801-022-00337-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has increased the use of drugs administered for mechanical ventilation, leading to shortages in some countries. Objective The aim was to identify trends in the consumption of sedatives, hypnotics, neuromuscular blockers, and opioids used for anesthetic induction and deep sedation in hospitals in Colombia. Method This was a descriptive, longitudinal, and retrospective study with monthly follow-up of sedative, hypnotic, opioid, and neuromuscular blocker dispensing in 20 clinics and hospitals from January to November 2020. The frequencies of use of each drug and variations in the institutions and intensive care units (ICUs) were identified. Results A total of 1,252,576 units of the analyzed drugs were delivered to 79,094 treated patients, 55.0% of whom were women (n = 43,521). The drugs with the greatest increase in consumption were rocuronium (1058% variation in March–November) and propofol (511%). The consumption of midazolam and vecuronium initially increased, but by the end of the study period, it decreased. Among drugs dispensed only in ICUs, 920,170 units were delivered (73.5% of the drugs dispensed during the study), and the most often dispensed drugs were fentanyl (n = 251,519; 27.3% of the drugs used in the ICU) and midazolam (5 mg/5 mL) solution (n = 188,568; 20.5%). Specifically in the ICU, the drugs with the greatest increase in use were rocuronium (19,709%), propofol (2622%), and ketamine (2591%). Conclusion Rapid changes in the use of drugs were evident, which demonstrates the need for closer cooperation among treating physicians, service providers, pharmaceutical managers, and state institutions to maintain a sufficient and timely supply of critical drugs in this type of contingency. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40801-022-00337-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel E. Machado-Duque
- Grupo de Investigación en Farmacoepidemiología y Farmacovigilancia, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira-Audifarma S.A. Pereira, Calle 105 No. 14-140, Pereira, 660003 Risaralda, Colombia ,Grupo de Investigación Biomedicina, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia
| | - Andrés Gaviria-Mendoza
- Grupo de Investigación en Farmacoepidemiología y Farmacovigilancia, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira-Audifarma S.A. Pereira, Calle 105 No. 14-140, Pereira, 660003 Risaralda, Colombia ,Grupo de Investigación Biomedicina, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia
| | - Luis Fernando Valladales-Restrepo
- Grupo de Investigación en Farmacoepidemiología y Farmacovigilancia, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira-Audifarma S.A. Pereira, Calle 105 No. 14-140, Pereira, 660003 Risaralda, Colombia ,Grupo de Investigación Biomedicina, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia
| | - Juan Pablo Albanés-Beltrán
- Grupo de Investigación en Farmacoepidemiología y Farmacovigilancia, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira-Audifarma S.A. Pereira, Calle 105 No. 14-140, Pereira, 660003 Risaralda, Colombia
| | - Jorge Enrique Machado-Alba
- Grupo de Investigación en Farmacoepidemiología y Farmacovigilancia, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira-Audifarma S.A. Pereira, Calle 105 No. 14-140, Pereira, 660003 Risaralda, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mihalj M, Corona A, Andereggen L, Urman RD, Luedi MM, Bello C. Managing bottlenecks in the perioperative setting: Optimizing patient care and reducing costs. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2022; 36:299-310. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|