1
|
Estradé O, Vozmediano V, Carral N, Isla A, González M, Poole R, Suarez E. Key Factors in Effective Patient-Tailored Dosing of Fluoroquinolones in Urological Infections: Interindividual Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Variability. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11050641. [PMID: 35625285 PMCID: PMC9137891 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11050641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are a critical group of antimicrobials prescribed in urological infections as they have a broad antimicrobial spectrum of activity and a favorable tissue penetration at the site of infection. However, their clinical practice is not problem-free of treatment failure, risk of emergence of resistance, and rare but important adverse effects. Due to their critical role in clinical improvement, understanding the dose-response relation is necessary to optimize the effectiveness of FQs therapy, as it is essential to select the right antibiotic at the right dose for the right duration in urological infections. The aim of this study was to review the published literature about inter-individual variability in pharmacological processes that can be responsible for the clinical response after empiric dose for the most commonly prescribed urological FQs: ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin. Interindividual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability, particularly in elimination, may contribute to treatment failure. Clearance related to creatinine clearance should be specifically considered for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Likewise, today, undesired interregional variability in FQs antimicrobial activity against certain microorganisms exists. FQs pharmacology, patient-specific characteristics, and the identity of the local infecting organism are key factors in determining clinical outcomes in FQs use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oskar Estradé
- Department of Urology, Cruces University Hospital, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain;
| | - Valvanera Vozmediano
- Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32612, USA; (V.V.); (M.G.); (R.P.)
| | - Nerea Carral
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Nursey, University of Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Spain;
- Biocruces Health Research Institute, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Arantxa Isla
- Pharmacokinetic, Nanotechnology and Gene Therapy Group (PharmaNanoGene), Faculty of Pharmacy, Centro de Investigación Lascaray Ikergunea, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain;
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Bioaraba, Microbiology, Infectious Disease, Antimicrobial Agents, and Gene Therapy, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
| | - Margarita González
- Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32612, USA; (V.V.); (M.G.); (R.P.)
| | - Rachel Poole
- Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32612, USA; (V.V.); (M.G.); (R.P.)
| | - Elena Suarez
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Nursey, University of Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Spain;
- Biocruces Health Research Institute, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Optimal levofloxacin dosing regimens in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. J Crit Care 2020; 63:154-160. [PMID: 33012583 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSES To determine appropriate dosing of levofloxacin in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). METHODS All necessary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters from critically ill patients were obtained to develop mathematical models with first order elimination. Levofloxacin concentration-time profiles were calculated to determine the efficacy based on the probability of target attainment (PTA) of AUC24h/MIC ≥50 for Gram-positive and AUC24h/MIC ≥125 for Gram-negative infections. A group of 5000 virtual patients was simulated and tested using Monte Carlo simulations for each dose in the models. The optimal dosing regimens were defined as the dose achieved target PTA at least 90% of the virtual patients. RESULTS No conventional, FDA approved regimens achieved at least 90% of PTA for Gram-negative infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa at MIC of 2 mg/L. The successful dose (1750 mg on day 1, then 1500 mg q 24 h) was far exceeded the maximum FDA-approved doses. For Gram-positive infections, a levofloxacin 750 mg q 24 h was sufficient to attain PTA target of ~90% at the MIC of 2 mg/L for Streptococcus pneumoniae. CONCLUSIONS Levofloxacin cannot be recommended as an empiric monotherapy for serious Gram-negative infections in patients receiving CRRT due to suboptimal efficacy.
Collapse
|