Morphological changes in tibial tunnels after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft

Influence of selected plane on the evaluation of tibial tunnel locations using a three-dimensional bone model in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of a selected plane on the evaluation of tibial tunnel locations following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) between two planes: the plane parallel to the tibial plateau (Plane A) and the plane perpendicular to the proximal tibial shaft axis (Plane B).

METHODS

Thirty-four patients who underwent double-bundle ACLR were included. Three-dimensional model of tibia was created using computed tomography images 2 weeks postoperatively, and tibial tunnels of the anteromedial bundle (AMB) and posterolateral bundle (PLB) were extracted. To evaluate tibial tunnel locations, two planes (Planes A and B) were created. The locations of the tibial tunnel apertures of each bundle were evaluated using a grid method and compared between Planes A and B. The difference in coronal alignment between Planes A and B were also assessed.

RESULTS

The AMB and PLB tunnel apertures in Plane A were significantly more laterally located than in Plane B (mean difference; AMB, 1.5%; PLB, 1.7%, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the anteroposterior direction between the planes. Coronal alignment difference between the planes was 16.8 ± 2.2°; Plane B was more valgus than Plane A.

CONCLUSION

Although tibial tunnel locations were not significantly influenced by the selected planes in the AP direction, subtle but statistically significant differences were found in the ML direction between the Planes A and B in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The findings suggest that both Planes A and B can be used in the assessment of tibial tunnel locations after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Tunnel Enlargement Correlates With Postoperative Posterior Laxity After Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

There exists little information in the relevant literature regarding tunnel enlargement after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction (PCLR).

Purpose:

To sequentially evaluate tunnel enlargement and radiographic posterior laxity through double-bundle PCLR using autologous hamstring tendon grafts.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

We prospectively analyzed 13 patients who underwent double-bundle PCLR for an isolated PCL injury. Three-dimensional computed tomography images were obtained at 3 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively, and the tunnel enlargement was calculated by sequentially comparing the cross-sectional areas of the bone tunnels. We also sequentially measured radiographic posterior laxity. The correlation between the tunnel enlargement ratio and the postoperative increase in posterior laxity was evaluated.

Results:

The cross-sectional area at the aperture in each tunnel significantly increased from 3 weeks to 6 months (P < .003), but it did not continue doing so thereafter. The 6-month tunnel enlargement ratios of the femoral anterolateral tunnel, the femoral posteromedial tunnel, the tibial anterolateral tunnel, and the tibial posteromedial tunnel were 31.6% ± 23.5%, 90.3% ± 54.7%, 30.5% ± 26.8%, and 49.6% ± 37.0%, respectively, while the corresponding ratios at 1 year were 28.1% ± 19.8%, 83.1% ± 56.9%, 26.8% ± 32.8%, and 47.6% ± 39.0%, respectively. The posterior laxity was 9.0 ± 4.0 mm, −1.5 ± 2.3 mm, 3.4 ± 2.0 mm, and 3.9 ± 1.9 mm, preoperatively, immediately after surgery, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively, respectively. From the immediate postoperative period, the posterior laxity significantly increased at 6 months postoperatively (P < .001), but it did not thereafter. The postoperative increase in posterior laxity had a significant positive correlation with the anterolateral tunnel enlargement ratio in both femoral and tibial tunnels at 6 months (ρ = 0.571-0.699; P = .011-.041) and 1 year (ρ = 0.582-0.615; P = .033-.037).

Conclusion:

Tunnel enlargement after PCLR mainly occurred within 6 months, with no progression thereafter. The anterolateral tunnel enlargement positively correlated with postoperative increase in posterior laxity.

Biological Augmentation of ACL Repair and Reconstruction: Current Status and Future Perspective

Historically, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) suture repair mostly resulted in failure because of intra-articular hypovascularity and poor intrinsic healing capacity of ACL. ACL reconstruction was therefore deemed the gold standard with a high success rate because of more evolved surgical technique. There are, however, clinical and subclinical disadvantages of reconstruction; low rate in full recovery to sports, donor harvest morbidity, tunnel enlargement, and incomplete microscopic healing of the graft. Recent experimental and clinical studies on biological augmentation of mesenchymal stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, or the other biologic agents with scaffold suggested potential feasibility of positive effects by such bio-therapies for both ACL repair and reconstruction. Biological augmentation of ACL surgery is still in the exploratory stages and more evidence from preclinical and clinical studies is required for implementation in clinical practice.