Comparing the efficacy of dual Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Hyaluronic Acid (HA) therapy with PRP-alone therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid combination therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate whether a combination of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) is more effective and safer than injection alone for treating KOA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for articles published until January 2024, and gray literature and bibliographic references were searched. All published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared pain, functional outcomes, and adverse events (AEs) associated with PRP + HA therapy vs. PRP or HA treatments. Two independent researchers extracted the pertinent data and evaluated the methodological quality following the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcomes were pain, functional outcomes, and AEs. A fixed-effects model was used for data analysis in cases with low heterogeneity (P > 0.10 and I2 < 50%). Otherwise, a random effects model was used.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs involving 943 patients were included in the analysis. The statistical findings did not differ between the treatment of PRP + HA and PRP alone, while a discernible enhancement in treatment efficacy was observed when compared to HA monotherapy: the visual analog scale scores at 1- (mean difference[MD], -1.00; 95% CI: -1.37 - -0.62; P < .001), 6- (MD, -1.87; 95% CI: -3.46 - -0.28; P = .02), 12-months (MD, -2.07; 95% CI: -3.77 - -0.38; P = .02), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index total scores at 12-months (MD, -8.82; 95% CI: -14.48 - -3.16; P = .002). The incidence of adverse events was notably lower with PRP + HA than with HA alone (OR, 0.37; 95% CI: 0.19 - 0.69; P = .00) or PRP alone (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30 - 0.87; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

PRP + HA therapy resulted in more pronounced pain and functional improvement in symptomatic KOA patients than HA treatments, and combination therapy may have higher clinical safety than PRP or HA monotherapy.

Evaluation of single and multiple hyaluronic acid injections at different concentrations with high molecular weight in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis is severe progressive and most commonly diagnosed articular disease and its incidence is increasing around the world depending on age. This pathologic condition which limits daily activity of patients can be characterized by degeneration of cartilage and inflammation. Although non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAII) agents and other analgesics are routinely used treatment options, the potential effects of intraarticular injections including hyaluronic acid (HA) have also been demonstrated by various studies. However, few studies compare the efficacy of a single high molecular weight (HMW) high dose and a triple HMW low dose. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of single high molecular weight (HMW) high dose (2 mL / 60 mg) and triple HMW low dose (2 mL /30 mg) intra-articular injection of HA in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients by evaluating function and pain parameters during 12 months.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective clinical study that included and involved 128 patients. Group I (n=64) patients received triple 30 mg HA injections (SEMICAL®) with one-week intervals, while Group II (n=64) patients received a single 60 mg HA injection (SEMICAL®). Lequesne Index, WOMAC and VAS scores were recorded to assess pain and function during a 12-month period.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in characteristics of patient demographics. Our finding indicate that WOMAC, VAS score, and Lequesne Index values during follow-up visits exhibited a decrease, signifying improvement in the clinical condition. Notably, scores were significantly more favorable with the 30 mg of HA injection compared to the 60 mg of HA injection.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the triple low-dose injection of HMW HA is more effective in improving WOMAC, VAS scores and Lequesne Index values than a single high-dose injection.

Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma combined with Tai Chi for knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a placebo-controlled randomized trial

BACKGROUND

No definitive treatment methods of curative for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The combined therapies that into account both the biochemical and biomechanical may provide potential opportunities for treat KOA, and previous studies have demonstrated that the platelet-rich plasma of intra-articular injection (IAI-PRP) and exercise treatments afford more benefits than do their corresponding monotherapies. The absence of a specific exercise plan and detailed explanation renders the aforementioned study results questionable. Furthermore, Tai Chi (TC) with moderate-intensity, whole body movements and good adherence may prove to be more effective for treating KOA. However, few studies examined the effectiveness and safety of combined IAI-PRP and TC for KOA.

METHODS

This study protocol will be a placebo-controlled, assessor-blinded randomized trial involving 12-week intervention and 1-year follow-up. The stratified randomization will be used to randomly assign the 212 participants to four groups: group A (placebo IAI); group B (PRP IAI); group C (TC and placebo IAI); group D (TC and PRP IAI). Injection will be performed once a week, three consecutive times as a course, after a week of rest to continue the next course, a total of 3 courses (12 week). Additionally, the TC interventions will be carried out 3 days per week for a total of 12 weeks. The primary outcome measures will include the efficacy (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index), acceptability and safety of these interventions. The secondary outcome measures will include physical function (Timed Up and Go test), walking function (Gait Analysis), inflammatory factor levels (e.g., Interleukin-1 β, interleukin-6, vascular endothelial growth factor), quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey), volume of patellofemoral cartilage and effusion-synovitis (MRI). Two-way of variance with repeated measures will be applied to examine the main effects of the group and the time factor and group-time interaction effects for all outcome measures.

DISCUSSION

This trial will be first one to propose an integrated scheme combing IAI-PRP and TC for treatment of KOA, based on the consideration of the biochemical and biomechanical pathogenesis of KOA. These results of the study will provide evidence with high quality for integrated IAI-PRP and TC to treatment KOA. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300067559. Registered on 11 January 2023.

Combination of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Hyaluronic Acid vs. Platelet-Rich Plasma Alone for Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most documented form of OA and is accountable for about 80% of total OA cases worldwide [...].

Efficacy and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid and Platelet-Rich Plasma Combination Therapy Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma Alone in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a chronic degenerative disease of the joint characterized by biochemical and biomechanical alterations of articular cartilage, degradation of the joint edge, and subchondral bone hyperplasia. Nowadays, intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has become a popular treatment modality for treating KOA. Each treatment can be used independently or in combination. However, the efficacy and safety of combination treatment are still inconclusive, and there is a lack of high-quality level 1 studies that support using combination therapy over PRP alone. Consequently, we conducted a systematic review to examine the effectiveness and safety of combining HA and PRP therapy versus using PRP therapy alone in KOA patients. Based on the most up-to-date evidence, the dual approach of PRP and HA therapy yields outcomes similar to PRP therapy alone in the short term, up to 12 months. Nonetheless, when considering longer-term results, particularly in the 24-month follow-up, dual therapy holds the potential to produce superior outcomes compared to PRP alone therapy. Additionally, in terms of safety, dual therapy has been associated with slightly fewer adverse events.

A comparative study of the efficacy of intra-articular injection of different drugs in the treatment of mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) has a high clinical prevalence and frequently interferes with patients normal lives. In KOA patients, evidence suggests that intra-articular (IA) injection improves joint function and decreases discomfort. Several IA injection treatments are used in daily practice to improve symptomatic control of knee osteoarthritis, but their efficacy is frequently disputed.

METHODS

This network meta-analysis compares the efficacy of different IA injections for mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis. Seven databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine disc, WanFang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) were searched for randomized controlled trials published up to and including December 20, 2021, and final follow up indicators were used. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score change from baseline were the primary outcomes. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess the quality and risks of biases of papers. We calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome. State (Version 15.1, Texas, USA) and SPSS (Version 20, Chicago, USA) was used in all statistical analyses, and Review Manager (version 5.4) was used in assessing the risks of biases.

RESULTS

Our study included 16 randomized controlled trials with a total of 1652 patients. platelet-rich plasma (PRP) IA injection therapy had the highest likelihood of being the best intervention in reducing WOMAC pain (surface under the cumulative ranking area [SUCRA] 84.7%), stiffness (SUCRA 95.1%), and function (SUCRA 98.5%) scores, according to the SUCRA. The best measures for lowering the WOMAC total and VAS scores were IA injection platelet-rich plasma-derived growth factor (SUCRA 84.9%) and hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma (SUCRA 84.9%). In the VAS score group, PRP outperformed hyaluronic acid (HA) (WMD 1.3, 95% CI 0.55-2.55) and corticosteroids (CS) (WMD 4.85, 95% CI 4.02-5.08), according to the forest map results. PRP also outperformed CS (WMD 14.76, 95% CI 12.11-17.41), ozone (WMD 9.16, 95% CI 6.89-11.43), and PRP + HA (WMD 2.18, 95% CI 0.55-3.81) in the WOMAC total score group. Furthermore, PRP outperforms other drugs in terms of reducing WOMAC function, stiffness, and function score.

CONCLUSION

In patients with mild to moderate KOA, IA injection PRP outperformed IA injection ozone, HA, CS, platelet-rich plasma-derived growth factor, and hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma in terms of pain, stiffness, and dysfunction.

A comparison of different physical stimulation combined with platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) contains various growth factors and inflammatory regulators, which can effectively reduce inflammation in joints and promote tissue repair. Multiple studies have proved its effectiveness in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) are non-invasive and safe physical therapy methods for KOA. This study is the first to propose the treatment of KOA with physical stimulation after PRP treatment, and to observe the clinical efficacy of the treatment method.

METHODS

This is a protocol paper that outlines a randomized controlled trial, patients will be assigned randomly to the PRP group, PRP+LIFU group, PRP+TENS group, and PRP+LIFU combined TENS group. The patients will be followed at 12-week and 24-week time points to evaluate the primary and secondary outcomes of the study. The primary outcome is the VAS pain score. Secondary outcomes include Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and International Knee Documentation Committee scores (IKDC). After baseline examination, all patients will sign a written informed consent for study participation after a full explanation of the treatment protocol. We have planned a total of 120 patients (30 patients per group).

DISCUSSION

The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of different physical stimulation after PRP treatment for KOA. The data will be published after the completion of the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study has been registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200065119 (registered date: 10/28/2022).

Comparison of Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid and Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection in Knee Osteoarthritis: Do the Results Differ in Geriatric Patients? A Retrospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

The intra-articular application of platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid have gained popularity as treatment options for knee osteoarthritis. Although intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections have been suggested to be superior to hyaluronic acid injections in the general population of patients with osteoarthritis, the effect of older age on both treatment options has not been thoroughly evaluated. Therefore, this study compared the results of platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid injections in geriatric patients with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

This study evaluated a total of 226 patients treated with intra-articular injections for knee osteoarthritis. The patients were divided into two groups: those who received platelet-rich plasma and those who received hyaluronic acid. All patients attended follow-up appointments at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months.

RESULTS

After applying the exclusion criteria, this study included 202 patients. The clinical results revealed significant improvements in all parameters compared to the baseline assessments in both groups (p&lt;0.05). The inter-group comparisons indicated significantly lower pain in the hyaluronic acid recipients at the first and third months compared to those in patients receiving platelet-rich plasma (p&lt;0.05).

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid injections appear to be effective in patients with knee osteoarthritis. In the geriatric patient population, hyaluronic acid showed superior effects on pain compared to platelet-rich plasma, contrary to the results in the general population.

Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma combined with hyaluronic acid versus platelet-rich plasma alone for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To systematically evaluate the curative efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with hyaluronic acid (HA) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), comparing with platelet-rich plasma alone.

Methods

Cochrane Library, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies regarding the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with hyaluronic acid (HA) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) comparing with platelet-rich plasma alone before January 15, 2022. The methodological quality of the ultimately included studies was assessed comprehensively, and meta-analysis was implemented using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

Thirteen articles (9 RCTs, 4 cohort studies), including 1118 patients, were covered. There was no significant difference between the PRP + HA therapy and PRP-alone therapy in VAS scores at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months, WOMAC total scores at 3 months and KOOS at 1 month and 6 months. Compared with PRP-alone therapy, PRP + HA therapy was associated with significantly better improvement in VAS scores at 1 month, WOMAC total scores at 6 months, KOOS at 3 months, IKDC scores at 6 months and Lequesne index scores at 3 and 6 months. However, the smallest treatment effect of VAS scores, WOMAC total scores, KOOS and IKDC scores did not exceed the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). However, PRP + HA therapy got a greater reduction in the rate of adverse events, compared with PRP-alone therapy.

Conclusion

The results of this meta-analysis indicated that PRP + HA therapy was not found to be superior to PRP-alone therapy in pain relief and function improvement for patients with KOA. However, combined PRP with HA injections was generally safer than PRP injections alone, by assessing the incidence of adverse events.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03398-6.

Nanomedicine and regenerative medicine approaches in osteoarthritis therapy

Osteoarthritis (OA), the most common chronic joint disease, is a degenerative disease that affects 7% of the worldwide population, more than 500 million people all over the world. OA is the main factor of disability in elderly people which decreases the quality of life of patients. It is characterized by joint pain, low bone density, and deterioration of the joint structure. Despite ongoing novel advances in drug discovery and drug delivery, OA therapy is still a big challenge since there is no available effective treatment and the existing therapies mainly focus on pain and symptomatic management rather than improving and/or suppressing its progression. This review aims to summarize the currently available and novel emerging therapies for OA including regenerative medicine and nanotechnology-based materials and formulations at the clinical and experimental levels. Applications of regenerative medicine and novel technologies such as nanotechnology in OA treatments have opened a new window to support OA patients by offering treatments that could halt or delay OA progression satisfactorily or provide an effective cure in near future. Nanomedicine and regenerative medicine suggest novel alternatives in the regeneration of cartilage, repair of bone damage, and control of chronic pain in OA therapy.

Study on the Application of PRP Enriched with Hyaluronic Acid to Skin Wounds-Macroscopic Result

Tissue healing is a complex process of replacing damaged tissue structures, being a dynamic process with spatial and temporal involvement. In practice, there are three types of healing: primary, secondary and tertiary. Since even tertiary healing can cause different problems depending on the individual patient, the medical world has always strived for new, easier, more effective, faster, and low cost-effective methods to cover skin wounds. This experiment aims to find a method that is as efficient and fast as possible, with minimal costs, of native healing of skin wounds and the development of a protocol that is as reliable and safe as possible for the patient. The experiment was carried out within the animal facility of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, with the agreement of our institutional Ethics Committee. The experimental group consisted of 30 individuals (Wistar laboratory rats), clinically healthy, male and female, being divided into 3 sublots of 10 individuals each. Each sublot was sacrificed at different time intervals: 7, 14 and 21 days, respectively. The local evolution of each individual was monitored during the experimental days, as well as their general state of health. Before slaughter, the lesions were examined macroscopically, following their size, whether or not the infection was present and the presence of other self-inflicted lesions later. Macroscopically, a faster wound healing was found where PRP enriched with hyaluronic acid was applied from the 7th day, so we can say that at first glance the "free" healing period in the case of enhanced epithelialization was about 7 days shorten. This fact will be confirmed or refuted following histopathological examinations and immunohistochemistry.