Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and the risk of infection: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

A systematic review of tourniquet use in paediatric orthopaedic surgery: can we extrapolate from adult guidelines?

Purpose

Tourniquets are commonly used intraoperatively in orthopaedic surgery to control bleeding and improve visibility in the surgical field. Recent evidence has thrown into question the routine use of tourniquets in the adult population resulting in a British Orthopaedic Association standard for intraoperative use. This systematic review evaluates the evidence on the practice, benefits, and risks of the intraoperative use of tourniquets for trauma and elective orthopaedic surgery in the paediatric population.

Methods

A prospectively registered systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42022359048). A search of MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and a Grey literature search was performed from their earliest record to 23 March 2023. Studies reporting tourniquet data in paediatric patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery were included. Data extracted included demographics, involved limb, trauma versus elective use, tourniquet use as primary or secondary measure, and tourniquet parameters and complications.

Results

Thirty-nine studies were included. Tourniquet practices and information reporting varied considerably. Tourniquets were used uneventfully in the majority of patients with no specific benefits reported. Several physiological and biochemical changes as well as complications including nerve injury, compartment syndrome, skin burns, thrombosis, post-operative limb swelling, and pain were reported.

Conclusions

Tourniquets are routinely used in both trauma and elective paediatric orthopaedic surgery with no high-quality research affirming benefits. Severe complications associated with their use are rare but do occur. High-quality studies addressing their benefits, the exact indication in children, and the safest way to use them in this population are necessary.

Change in organism between first- and second-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of knee arthroplasty independently associated with increased risk of failure

Aims

Achievement of accurate microbiological diagnosis prior to revision is key to reducing the high rates of persistent infection after revision knee surgery. The effect of change in the microorganism between the first- and second-stage revision of total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) on the success of management is not clear.

Methods

A two-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted to review the outcome of patients who have undergone two-stage revision for treatment of knee arthroplasty PJI, focusing specifically on isolated micro-organisms at both the first- and second-stage procedure. Patient demographics, medical, and orthopaedic history data, including postoperative outcomes and subsequent treatment, were obtained from the electronic records and medical notes.

Results

The study cohort consisted of 84 patients, of whom 59.5% (n = 50) had successful eradication of their infection at a mean follow-up of 4.7 years. For the 34 patients who had recurrence of infection, 58.8% (n = 20) had a change in isolated organism, compared to 18% (n = 9) in the infection eradication group (p < 0.001). When adjusting for confound, there was no association when the growth on the second stage was the same as the first (odd ratio (OR) 2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 12.50; p = 0.269); however, when a different organism was identified at the second stage, this was independently associated with failure of treatment (OR 8.40, 95% CI 2.91 to 24.39; p < 0.001). There were no other significant differences between the two cohorts with regard to patient demographics or type of organisms isolated.

Conclusion

Change in the identified microorganism between first- and second-stage revision for PJI was associated with failure of management. Identification of this change in the microorganism prior to commencement of the second stage may help target antibiotic management and could improve the success of surgery in these patients.

Tourniquet use does not impact trajectory of total knee arthroplasty early recovery: A prospective, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The impact of tourniquet use on recovery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The purpose of this prospective, single blinded, randomized controlled trial, was to investigate the effect of tourniquet use on early recovery after TKA using a smartphone app-based patient engagement platform (PEP) with a wrist-based activity monitor to obtain more robust data on early recovery.

METHODS

There were 107 patients undergoing primary TKA for osteoarthritis who were enrolled (54 tourniquet [TQ+]; 53 no tourniquet [TQ-]). All patients utilized a PEP and wrist-based activity sensor for two weeks preoperatively and 90 days postoperatively to collect Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores and opioid consumption, as well as weekly Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and monthly Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). There was no difference in demographics between groups. Formal physical therapy assessments were performed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Independent sample t-tests were used for continuous data and Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used for discrete data.

RESULTS

Tourniquet use did not have a statistically significant impact on daily VAS pain or opioid consumption during the first 30 days postoperatively (P > 0.05). Tourniquet use did not have a significant impact on OKS or FJS at 30 or 90 days postoperatively (P> 0.05), or on performance of formal physical therapy testing at 3 months postoperatively (P> 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a digital technology to collect daily patient data, we found that tourniquet use has no clinically significant negative impact on pain and function in the first 90 days after primary TKA.