Effects of regional perfusion block in healthy and injured lungs

Inhaled CO2 vs. Hypercapnia Obtained by Low Tidal Volume or Instrumental Dead Space in Unilateral Pulmonary Artery Ligation: Any Difference for Lung Protection?

Background

Unilateral ligation of the pulmonary artery (UPAL) induces bilateral lung injury in pigs undergoing controlled mechanical ventilation. Possible mechanisms include redistribution of ventilation toward the non-ligated lung and hypoperfusion of the ligated lung. The addition of 5% CO₂ to the inspiratory gas (FiCO₂) prevents the injury, but it is not clear whether lung protection is a direct effect of CO₂ inhalation or it is mediated by plasmatic hypercapnia. This study aims to compare the effects and mechanisms of FiCO₂vs. hypercapnia induced by low tidal volume ventilation or instrumental dead space.

Methods

Healthy pigs underwent left UPAL and were allocated for 48 h to the following: Volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) with V_T 10 ml/kg (injury, n = 6); VCV plus 5% FiCO₂ (FiCO₂, n = 7); VCV with V_T 6 ml/kg (low V_T, n = 6); VCV plus additional circuit dead space (instrumental V_D, n = 6). Histological score, regional compliance, wet-to-dry ratio, and inflammatory infiltrate were assessed to evaluate lung injury at the end of the study. To investigate the mechanisms of protection, we quantified the redistribution of ventilation to the non-ligated lung, as the ratio between the percentage of tidal volume to the right and to the left lung (V_TRIGHT/LEFT), and the hypoperfusion of the ligated lung as the percentage of blood flow reaching the left lung (Perfusion_LEFT).

Results

In the left ligated lung, injury was prevented only in the FiCO₂ group, as indicated by lower histological score, higher regional compliance, lower wet-to-dry ratio and lower density of inflammatory cells compared to other groups. For the right lung, the histological score was lower both in the FiCO₂ and in the low V_T groups, but the other measures of injury showed lower intensity only in the FiCO₂ group. V_TRIGHT/LEFT was lower and Perfusion_LEFT was higher in the FiCO₂ group compared to other groups.

Conclusion

In a model of UPAL, inhaled CO₂ but not hypercapnia grants bilateral lung protection. Mechanisms of protection include reduced overdistension of the non-ligated and increased perfusion of the ligated lung.

Addition of 5% CO2 to Inspiratory Gas Prevents Lung Injury in an Experimental Model of Pulmonary Artery Ligation

Rationale: Unilateral ligation of the pulmonary artery may induce lung injury through multiple mechanisms, which might be dampened by inhaled CO2. Objectives: This study aims to characterize bilateral lung injury owing to unilateral ligation of the pulmonary artery in healthy swine undergoing controlled mechanical ventilation and its prevention by 5% CO2 inhalation and to investigate relevant pathophysiological mechanisms. Methods: Sixteen healthy pigs were allocated to surgical ligation of the left pulmonary artery (ligation group), seven to surgical ligation of the left pulmonary artery and inhalation of 5% CO2 (ligation + FiCO2 5%), and six to no intervention (no ligation). Then, all animals received mechanical ventilation with Vt 10 ml/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure 5 cm H2O, respiratory rate 25 breaths/min, and FiO2 50% (±FiCO2 5%) for 48 hours or until development of severe lung injury. Measurements and Main Results: Histological, physiological, and quantitative computed tomography scan data were compared between groups to characterize lung injury. Electrical impedance tomography and immunohistochemistry analysis were performed in a subset of animals to explore mechanisms of injury. Animals from the ligation group developed bilateral lung injury as assessed by significantly higher histological score, larger increase in lung weight, poorer oxygenation, and worse respiratory mechanics compared with the ligation + FiCO2 5% group. In the ligation group, the right lung received a larger fraction of Vt and inflammation was more represented, whereas CO2 dampened both processes. Conclusions: Mechanical ventilation induces bilateral lung injury within 48 hours in healthy pigs undergoing left pulmonary artery ligation. Inhalation of 5% CO2 prevents injury, likely through decreased stress to the right lung and antiinflammatory effects.

Does Iso-mechanical Power Lead to Iso-lung Damage?: An Experimental Study in a Porcine Model

BACKGROUND

Excessive tidal volume, respiratory rate, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) are all potential causes of ventilator-induced lung injury, and all contribute to a single variable: the mechanical power. The authors aimed to determine whether high tidal volume or high respiratory rate or high PEEP at iso-mechanical power produce similar or different ventilator-induced lung injury.

METHODS

Three ventilatory strategies-high tidal volume (twice baseline functional residual capacity), high respiratory rate (40 bpm), and high PEEP (25 cm H2O)-were each applied at two levels of mechanical power (15 and 30 J/min) for 48 h in six groups of seven healthy female piglets (weight: 24.2 ± 2.0 kg, mean ± SD).

RESULTS

At iso-mechanical power, the high tidal volume groups immediately and sharply increased plateau, driving pressure, stress, and strain, which all further deteriorated with time. In high respiratory rate groups, they changed minimally at the beginning, but steadily increased during the 48 h. In contrast, after a sudden huge increase, they decreased with time in the high PEEP groups. End-experiment specific lung elastance was 6.5 ± 1.7 cm H2O in high tidal volume groups, 10.1 ± 3.9 cm H2O in high respiratory rate groups, and 4.5 ± 0.9 cm H2O in high PEEP groups. Functional residual capacity decreased and extravascular lung water increased similarly in these three categories. Lung weight, wet-to-dry ratio, and histologic scores were similar, regardless of ventilatory strategies and power levels. However, the alveolar edema score was higher in the low power groups. High PEEP had the greatest impact on hemodynamics, leading to increased need for fluids. Adverse events (early mortality and pneumothorax) also occurred more frequently in the high PEEP groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Different ventilatory strategies, delivered at iso-power, led to similar anatomical lung injury. The different systemic consequences of high PEEP underline that ventilator-induced lung injury must be evaluated in the context of the whole body.