1
|
Diedericks C, Crossley KJ, Davies IM, Riddington PJ, Cannata ER, Martinez OL, Thiel AM, Te Pas AB, Hooper SB. Influence of the chest wall on respiratory function at birth in near-term lambs. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2024; 136:630-642. [PMID: 38328823 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00496.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Airway liquid is cleared into lung tissue after birth, which becomes edematous and forces the chest wall to expand to accommodate both the cleared liquid and incoming air. This study investigated how changing chest wall mechanics affects respiratory function after birth in near-term lambs with different airway liquid volumes. Surgically instrumented near-term lambs (139 ± 2 days) were randomized into Control (n = 7) or Elevated Liquid (EL; n = 6) groups. Control lambs had lung liquid drained to simulate expected volumes following vaginal delivery. EL lambs had airway liquid drained and 30 mL/kg liquid returned to simulate expected airway liquid volumes after elective cesarean section. Lambs were delivered, transferred to a Perspex box, and ventilated (30 min). Pressure in the box was adjusted to apply positive (7-8 cmH2O above atmospheric pressure) or negative (7-8 cmH2O below atmospheric pressure) pressures for 30 min before pressures were reversed. External negative pressures expanded the chest wall, reduced chest wall compliance (CCW) and increased lung compliance (CL) in Control and EL lambs. External positive pressures compressed the chest wall, increased CCW and reduced CL in Control and EL lambs. External negative pressure improved pulmonary oxygen exchange, reducing the alveolar-arterial difference in oxygen (AaDO2) by 69 mmHg (95% CI [13, 125]; P = 0.016) in Control lambs and by 300 mmHg (95% CI [233, 367]; P < 0.001) in EL lambs. In contrast, external positive pressures impaired pulmonary gas exchange, increasing the AaDO2 by 179 mmHg (95% CI [73, 285]; P = 0.002) in Control and by 215 mmHg (95% CI [89, 343]; P < 0.001) in EL lambs. The application of external thoracic pressures influences respiratory function after birth.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study investigated how changes in chest wall mechanics influence respiratory function after birth. Our data indicate that the application of continuous external subatmospheric pressure greatly improves respiratory function in near-term lambs with respiratory distress, whereas external positive pressures impair respiratory function. Our findings indicate that, during neonatal resuscitation at birth, the forces applied to the chest wall should not be ignored as they can have a major impact on neonatal respiratory function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cailin Diedericks
- The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kelly J Crossley
- The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Indya M Davies
- The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paige J Riddington
- The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ebony R Cannata
- The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Olivia L Martinez
- The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison M Thiel
- The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Arjan B Te Pas
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Stuart B Hooper
- The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parfait M, Rohrs E, Joussellin V, Mayaux J, Decavèle M, Reynolds S, Similowski T, Demoule A, Dres M. An Initial Investigation of Diaphragm Neurostimulation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Anesthesiology 2024; 140:483-494. [PMID: 38088791 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung protective ventilation aims at limiting lung stress and strain. By reducing the amount of pressure transmitted by the ventilator into the lungs, diaphragm neurostimulation offers a promising approach to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury. This study investigates the physiologic effects of diaphragm neurostimulation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. The hypothesis was that diaphragm neurostimulation would improve oxygenation, would limit the distending pressures of the lungs, and would improve cardiac output. METHODS Patients with moderate ARDS were included after 48 h of invasive mechanical ventilation and had a left subclavian catheter placed to deliver bilateral transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation. Two 60-min volume-controlled mechanical ventilation (control) sessions were interspersed by two 60-min diaphragm neurostimulation sessions delivered continually, in synchrony with the ventilator. Gas exchange, lung mechanics, chest electrical impedance tomography, and cardiac index were continuously monitored and compared across four sessions. The primary endpoint was the Pao2/fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio2) ratio at the end of each session, and the secondary endpoints were lung mechanics and hemodynamics. RESULTS Thirteen patients were enrolled but the catheter could not be inserted in one, leaving 12 patients for analysis. All sessions were conducted without interruption and well tolerated. The Pao2/Fio2 ratio did not change during the four sessions. Median (interquartile range) plateau pressure was 23 (20 to 31) cm H2O and 21 (17 to 25) cm H2O, driving pressure was 14 (12 to 18) cm H2O and 11 (10 to 13) cm H2O, and end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure was 9 (5 to 11) cm H2O and 7 (4 to 11) cm H2O during mechanical ventilation alone and during mechanical ventilation + neurostimulation session, respectively. The dorsal/ventral ventilation surface ratio was 0.70 (0.54 to 0.91) when on mechanical ventilation and 1.20 (0.76 to 1.33) during the mechanical ventilation + neurostimulation session. The cardiac index was 2.7 (2.3 to 3.5) l · min-1 · m-2 on mechanical ventilation and 3.0 (2.4 to 3.9) l · min-1 · m-2 on mechanical ventilation + neurostimulation. CONCLUSIONS This proof-of-concept study showed the feasibility of short-term diaphragm neurostimulation in conjunction with mechanical ventilation in ARDS patients. Diaphragm neurostimulation was associated with positive effects on lung mechanics and on hemodynamics. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mélodie Parfait
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie respiratoire expérimentale et clinique, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France
| | - Elizabeth Rohrs
- Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Vincent Joussellin
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie respiratoire expérimentale et clinique, Paris, France
| | - Julien Mayaux
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France
| | - Maxens Decavèle
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie respiratoire expérimentale et clinique, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France
| | - Steven Reynolds
- Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Thomas Similowski
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie respiratoire expérimentale et clinique, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département "R3S," Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Demoule
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie respiratoire expérimentale et clinique, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France
| | - Martin Dres
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie respiratoire expérimentale et clinique, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|