Evaluation of markers of outcome in real-world treatment of diabetic macular edema

Enhancing Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment Outcomes: Exploring the ESASO Classification and Structural OCT Biomarkers

INTRODUCTION

This study assessed the European School of Advanced Studies in Ophthalmology (ESASO) classification's prognostic value for diabetic macular edema (DME) in predicting intravitreal therapy outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective, multicenter study, patients aged > 50 years with type 1 or 2 diabetes and DME received intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents (ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept) or steroids (dexamethasone). The primary outcome was visual acuity (VA) change post-treatment, termed as functional response, measured 4-6 weeks post-third anti-VEGF or 12-16 weeks post-steroid injection, stratified by initial DME stage.

RESULTS

Of the 560 eyes studied (62% male, mean age 66.7 years), 31% were classified as stage 1 (early), 50% stage 2 (advanced), 17% stage 3 (severe), and 2% stage 4 (atrophic). Visual acuity (VA; decimal) improved by 0.12-0.15 decimals in stages 1-2 but only 0.03 decimal in stage 3 (all p < 0.0001) and 0.01 in stage 4 (p = 0.38). Even in eyes with low baseline VA ≤ 0.3, improvements were significant only in stages 1 and 2 (0.12 and 0.17 decimals, respectively). Central subfield thickness (CST) improvement was greatest in stage 3 (-229 µm, 37.6%, p < 0.0001), but uncorrelated with VA gains, unlike stages 1 and 2 (respectively: -142 µm, 27.4%; - 5 µm, 12%; both p < 0.0001). Stage 4 showed no significant CST change. Baseline disorganization of retinal inner layers and focal damage of the ellipsoid zone/external limiting membrane did not influence VA improvement in stages 1 and 2. Treatment patterns varied, with 61% receiving anti-VEGF and 39% dexamethasone, influenced by DME stage, with no significant differences between therapeutic agents.

CONCLUSION

The ESASO classification, which views the retina as a neurovascular unit and integrates multiple biomarkers, surpasses single biomarkers in predicting visual outcomes. Significant functional improvement occurred only in stages 1 and 2, suggesting reversible damage, whereas stages 3 and 4 likely reflect irreversible damage.

Does HbA1c Level or Glomerular Filtration Rate Affect the Clinical Response to Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy (Ranibizumab or Aflibercept) in Diabetic Macular Edema? A Real-Life Experience

INTRODUCTION

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the first-line treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME). We investigated the effect of initial glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) on treatment outcomes in patients with DME receiving anti-VEGF injections in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of data from the prospective, multi-center, observational Fight Retinal Blindness! registry was performed. A total of 178 eyes with DME treated with anti-VEGF agents (ranibizumab or aflibercept) from 1 January 2010 to 31 March 2019 were enrolled in the analysis, with the long study period to allow for up to 24 months of follow-up. Data for eyes were tracked in the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry, and clinical parameters were collected by using local software. Changes in visual (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], in letters) and anatomic outcomes (central subfield thickness [CST], in microns) between subgroups of patients according to baseline HbA1c level (≤ 7% vs. > 7%) and GFR (> vs. ≤ 60 ml/min/m2 at 24 months were assessed.

RESULTS

The multivariate adjusted mean improvement in BCVA at 24 months of treatment was + 5.2 and + 6.8 letters in subgroups with baseline HbA1c level ≤ 7% and > 7%, respectively (p = 0.541), and + 6.9 and + 6.4 letters in subgroups with GFR > 60 and < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively (p = 0.852). The multivariate adjusted mean CST reduction was - 89.9 and - 76.4 µm in subgroups with baseline HbA1c level ≤ 7% and > 7%, respectively (p = 0.505), and - 85 and - 115 µm in subgroups with baseline GFR > 60 and ≤ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively (p = 0.130).

CONCLUSION

These results seem to indicate that visual and anatomical improvement in patients receiving intravitreal VEGF inhibitors for DME are independent of baseline HbA1c level and GFR, leading to the conclusion that high HbA1c levels or low GFR should not dictate injection timing in routine clinical practice. This study offers valuable insights for ophthalmologists, enabling a personalized treatment approach and optimizing DME patient outcomes.

OCT biomarkers as predictors of visual improvement in diabetic macular edema eyes receiving dexamethasone implants

BACKGROUND

Several optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers have been proposed as predictors for functional and anatomical outcomes in Diabetic Macular Edema (DME). This study aims to examine the impact of these OCT features on the visual acuity improvement of patients with DME after long-acting Dexamethasone intravitreal implants (DEX-I) injection. Furthermore, the safety and impact of DEX-I on clinical parameters, including intraocular pressure (IOP) were assessed.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we reviewed the medical records of naïve and non-naïve eyes with DME who received at least one DEX-I. The primary endpoint was visual acuity improvement of ≥ 5 ETDRS letters at 1 month and 4 months after treatment. Secondary outcomes were the changes in OCT biomarkers and the impact of DEX-I on IOP at 1 and 4 months of follow-up. Linear panel regression analysis was used to test for differences in central subfield thickness (CST) over time and it was stratified according to biomarkers at baseline. Finally, a logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors predicting visual improvement at 1 and 4 months.

RESULTS

We included 33 eyes of which 63.6% were at an advanced stage of DME. Overall, CST, cube average thickness (CAT), cube volume (CV), and intraretinal cystoid spaces > 200 μm (ICS) decreased following DEX-I injection (p < 0.001). Additionally, a thicker CST at baseline was observed in eyes with better visual improvement at one month (p = 0.048). After logistic regression analysis, CST was retained as the only predictor for visual improvement at one month (p = 0.044). Furthermore, panel regression analysis identified a relation between subfoveal neuroretinal detachment (SND) at baseline and CST increase at four months. Lastly, only 15.2% of the eyes necessitated topical medication for IOP reduction, with no differences observed when stratifying between naïve and non-naïve eyes.

CONCLUSION

Our analyses suggest that a ticker baseline CST may serve as a positive predictor of early visual improvement and SND presence at baseline may be a negative prognostic factor for CST increase 4 months after DEX-I injection. Other well-known biomarkers, such as disorganization of the inner retinal layers (DRIL) and hyperreflective foci (HF), did not demonstrate prognostic value on visual outcomes, at least within the first four months following the injection.

Predictive factors for treatment outcomes with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections in diabetic macular edema in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections are the standard of care for diabetic macular edema (DME), a common complication of diabetes. This study aimed to identify factors influencing DME intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment outcomes in real-world practice.

METHODS

This was a multi-center retrospective observational study using medical chart review of participants receiving anti-VEGF injections for DME (N = 248). Demographic and clinical variables were assessed for association with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) outcomes using regression models.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in BCVA (p < 0.001) and CMT (p < 0.001) after 12 months of treatment, although 21% of participants had decreased BCVA, and 41% had a < 10% CMT reduction at 12 months. Higher baseline BCVA (p = 0.022, OR=-0.024, 95% CI=-0.046,-0.004) and longer duration of diabetic retinopathy (p = 0.048, OR=-0.064, 95% CI=-0.129,-0.001) were negative predictors for BCVA response, whereas Aflibercept treatment (p = 0.017, OR = 1.107, 95% CI = 0.220,2.051) compared with other drugs and a positive "early functional response" (p < 0.001, OR=-1.393, 95% CI=-1.946,-0.857) were positive predictors. A higher baseline CMT (p < 0.001, OR = 0.019, 95% CI = 0.012,0.0261) and an "early anatomical response", (p < 0.001, OR=-1.677, 95% CI=-2.456, -0.943) were predictors for greater reduction in CMT. Overall, the variables could predict only 23% of BCVA and 52% of CMT response.

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows a significant proportion of DME patients do not respond to anti-VEGF therapy and identifies several clinical predictors for treatment outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was approved through the Human Research Ethics Committee, University of Tasmania (approval number H0012902), and the Southern Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number 86 - 067).

Anatomic Biomarkers of Macular Edema Associated with Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To assess the relationship between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomic features in patients with macular edema (ME) related to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of 3 clinical trials, which included verified diagnoses, protocol refractions, and the assessment of OCT and fluorescein angiography (FA) images at a masked reading center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients diagnosed with RVO-ME.

METHODS

Correlation analyses were performed to determine the correlation between BCVA and macular anatomy at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks and between changes from baseline to 12 and 24 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The correlations between BCVA and central subfield thickness (CST), ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity, intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid, central leakage, and ischemia were assessed.

RESULTS

In a total of 828 eyes with RVO-ME, the mean age, BCVA, and CST at baseline was 64.7 years, 51.1 letters, and 656.9 μm, respectively. At baseline, a moderate negative correlation was observed between BCVA and CST (r = - 0.56, P < 0.001). At weeks 12 and 24, the mean BCVA of eyes with definitely abnormal (absent) EZ was statistically significantly worse than that of eyes with normal EZ. At week 12, a moderate negative correlation was observed between changes in BCVA and changes in CST (r = - 0.35, P < 0.001), with a similar degree of association noted at week 24 (r = - 0.35, P < 0.001). At weeks 12 and 24, eyes that showed any improvement in central IRF showed a greater improvement in BCVA than eyes that showed no improvement worsening (week 12: 463 eyes, 18.3 letters vs. 177 eyes, 13.0 letters, respectively, P < 0.001) and (week 24: 332 eyes, 20.2 letters vs. 131 eyes, 13.3 letters, respectively, P < 0.001). With respect to the correlation between baseline BCVA and fluorescein leakage or capillary nonperfusion, the Pearson correlation coefficients were - 0.41 (P < 0.001) and - 0.16 (P = 0.060), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to CST, there are important clinically relevant relationships between BCVA and both OCT and FA anatomic features in patients with RVO-ME.

Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment: Laser Photocoagulation Versus anti-VEGF Drugs

Abstract: Objective: The present study was aimed to compare best-corrected vision and central macular thickness for macular edema in diabetes (DME) after utilizing laser, Avastin, and Lucentis. Methods: A retrospective randomized cross-sectional study was conducted at Alfaisal Eye Center, Khartoum. Best-corrected vision and central macular thickness (CMT) were assessed by Snellen's chart and Heidelberg optical coherence tomography OCT, respectively. Results: In this study, a total of 252 records of DME-treated patients with laser applications, Avastin, and Lucentis were enrolled, their mean age was 57 ± 5.22 yrs. A significant enhancement in best-corrected vision and CMT of studied groups with laser applications, Avastin, and Lucentis was obtained (P= 0.000) with no differences between treated groups (p= 0.445 and 0,479), respectively. Non-significant differences in variable measurements related to gender or age (p = 0.117, 0.781), respectively. CMT of females (260 ± 48 μm) was thinner than males (306 ± 74 μm) after treatment (P = 0.000). Conclusion: laser applications, Avastin, and Lucentis improved best-corrected vision and reduced central macular thickness significantly with no clear differences between studied groups. Age or gender have a non-significant impact on dependent variables. Females gained thinner results compared to males after treatment.  

Fluctuations in macular thickness in patients with diabetic macular oedema treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents

PURPOSE

To evaluate retinal thickness fluctuations in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections.

METHODS

Visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST) were collected at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Retinal thickness fluctuation was quantified by standard deviation (SD) of CST across 12 months. A mixed effects regression model evaluated the relationship between CST SD and VA at 12 months. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate predictors of CST SD.

RESULTS

Mean baseline and 12-month VAs were 63.5 ± 15.7 and 69.0 ± 13.8 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (change = +5.1 ± 16.1 letters, p < 0.001). Mean baseline and 12-month CSTs were 396.9 ± 109.7 and 337.7 ± 100.7 μm (change = -59.2 ± 114.8 μm, p < 0.001). Retinal thickness variability across the first 12 months was 59.4 ± 43.6 μm. Stratification of patient eyes by CST SD demonstrated 9.7 letters difference in 12-month VA between first and fourth quartiles. Significant predictors of CST SD include baseline CST, injection type, laser treatment, and DR stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger retinal thickness fluctuations are associated with poorer visual outcomes in eyes with DMO treated with anti-VEGF injections. Retinal thickness variability may be an important prognostic biomarker for DMO patients.

Association of inner retinal reflectivity with qualitative and quantitative changes in retinal layers over time in diabetic eyes without retinopathy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the course of neurodegeneration based on retinal layer thickness and integrity analysis in diabetic patients without retinopathy and to evaluate its association with inner retinal reflectivity.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study included 80 eyes of 80 patients with DM without retinopathy and 40 eyes of 40 healthy subjects with a follow-up of ≥1 year. SD-OCT was used for assessment of retinal reflectivity and macular layer thicknesses. Optical intensity ratios (OIRs) were defined as the mean OCT reflectivity of ganglion cell and inner nuclear layer to the mean reflectivity of RPE.

RESULTS

After Bonferroni correction, thinning in pericentral, superior and nasal sectors in total retina, superior ganglion cell, pericentral and nasal inner plexiform, and superior inner retinal layers, as well as thickening in inferior and pericentral outer plexiform layer remained significant in the study group (p < 0.0125). Ganglion cell layer OIR significantly correlated with the changes in superior retina (r = 0.278, p = 0.013), central inner retina (r = 0.247, p = 0.027), and pericentral retinal thickness (r = 0.240, p = 0.032), and no eyes had disruption of retinal layers in the study group initially or finally.

CONCLUSION

Ganglion cell layer reflectivity significantly correlated with the amount of pericentral retinal thinning during the time course in the diabetic group, which was more prominent in the inner retinal layers.

Optical Coherence Tomography Anatomic and Temporal Biomarkers in Uveitic Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To assess the relationship between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features in noninfectious uveitis (NIU)-related macular edema.

DESIGN

Clinical cohort study from post hoc analysis of 2 phase 3 clinical trials.

METHODS

Correlation and longitudinal treatment analyses were performed. Of 198 patients with NIU, 134 received suprachoroidal CLS-TA (proprietary formulation of a triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension), and 64 received sham, with 12.9% and 72%, respectively, receiving rescue therapy.

RESULTS

At baseline, mean BCVA progressively worsened with each ordinal drop in central subfield ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity. Eyes with normal baseline EZ experienced greater 24-week change in BCVA versus those with some degree of baseline EZ disruption (11.9 vs 9.4 letters, P = .006). In contrast, eyes with baseline central subfield cystoid spaces and/or subretinal fluid showed more improvement (13.7 or 17.2 letters, respectively) at 24 weeks, versus those without such findings (5.5 [P = .012] or 9.5 letters [P < .001], respectively). Longitudinal modeling for CLS-TA-treated eyes showed that central subfield thickness (CST) reached 90% of maximal improvement by week 3, whereas 90% maximal response in BCVA was not reached until week 9. CLS-TA-treated eyes that showed CST reduction of ≥50 µm at 4 weeks experienced a greater 24-week improvement in BCVA versus those without such an early response (14.6 vs 6.5 letters, P = .006 for difference).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment EZ integrity and the presence of central subfield cystoid spaces or subretinal fluid each predict improved therapeutic response to treatment in eyes with NIU. In CLS-TA treated eyes, longitudinal modeling shows CST improvement preceding BCVA improvement.

Visual outcomes of open globe injury patients with traumatic cataracts

PURPOSE

Open globe injury (OGI) is a serious form of ocular trauma that can significantly lower quality of life post-injury due to comorbidities. This study was designed to investigate how traumatic cataracts and other pre-operative variables affect visual outcomes of OGIs.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted for OGI patient records with presence of traumatic cataracts, visual outcomes, comorbidity data and provider training. Multivariable logistic regression analysis determined if several pre-operative variables including traumatic cataracts, retinal detachment and hyphema were predictive of final visual acuity and need for retinal surgery. Ancillary multivariable analysis was conducted to evaluate if timing of traumatic cataract extraction predicted poor final visual acuity.

RESULTS

Multivariable logistic regression analysis did not find traumatic cataract to be an independent predictor of final visual outcome in the open globe injury sample population (n = 102, p = 0.386), but did find retinal detachment (p = 0.008), hyphema (p = 0.035) and scleral laceration (p = 0.009) to be independent predictors of poor final visual acuity. In the subgroup of eyes with traumatic cataract (n = 64), delayed cataract extraction was not found to be an independent predictor of poor final visual acuity (p = 0.156).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that retinal detachment, hyphema, and scleral laceration influence final visual outcome while traumatic cataract does not. Within the subpopulation of patients that received lens extraction, timing of extraction was not found to independently influence final visual acuity.

Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema in People With Early-Onset Diabetes

This study examined the clinical profile, treatment profile, and vision outcomes of people ≤40 years of age with diabetes and diabetic macular edema (DME). Within this age-group, the prevalence of center-involving DME was 16%, with 74% of eyes showing cystoid edema, 37% showing spongiform edema, and 41% having neurosensory detachment. Longer diabetes duration (P = 0.001) and greater severity of diabetic retinopathy (P <0.001) were associated with DME prevalence. Thus, regular and more frequent follow-up, as well as early and aggressive treatment of diabetic eye disease, are required in people diagnosed early with diabetes.

[Diabetic Macular Edema]

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a chronic retinal disease, which requires intensive clinical monitoring. Within the last ten years the intravitreal anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) therapy has become the standard of care to improve and stabilize vision in patients with centre involving DME. Long-acting intravitreal corticosteroids can achieve similar visual results with fewer injection rates. Because of steroid-induced side effects (progression of cataract, glaucoma) these drugs are regarded as second-line medication. Since the introduction of anti-VEGF-medication the focal laser photocoagulation is no longer considered as first-line therapy for DME. However, a focal laser treatment can sometimes be a possible alternative in specific situations. In patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy and DME, the intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy is approved for both conditions. In ischemic maculopathy the functional outcome is restricted. For the indication of anti-VEGF-treatment for DME with accompanying central ischemia not only visual acuity and optical coherence tomography parameters should be considered, the amount of ischemia seen on fluorescein angiography should also be taken into account. In tractional macular edema due to epiretinal membranes and vitreomacular adhesions a pars-plana vitrectomy with membrane peeling is indicated.

Diabetisches Makulaödem

Das diabetische Makulaödem (DMÖ) ist für den Großteil der Visusminderungen bei Diabetikern verantwortlich. Eine Reduktion der Sehschärfe durch ein DMÖ kann schon im milden nicht-proliferativen Stadium der diabetischen Retinopathien (DR) auftreten 1. Der chronische Verlauf der diabetischen Makulopathie erfordert ein intensives klinisches Monitoring über einen langen Zeitraum. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über das diagnostische und therapeutische Management beim Vorliegen eines DMÖ.

Prognostic biomarkers of chronic diabetic macular edema treated with a fiuocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant

Background

This study aimed to investigate retinal imaging biomarkers, such as disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL) and/or ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and functional outcomes in eyes treated with 0.2 µg/day of a fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (FAc) after an insufficient response to previous treatments.

Methods

This was a retrospective comparative study of 18 eyes (15 patients) with persistent and/or recurrent diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with FAc. Eyes were divided according to the number of prior intravitreal treatments: group 1 (n = 8) with ≤ 6 injections (early switch) and group 2 (n = 10) with > 6 injections (late switch). Outcomes included percentage of eyes with DRIL and/or EZ disruption at baseline and analysis of the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using ETDRS letters, central macular thickness (CMT), DRIL, and EZ disruption at the last observation.

Results

Group 2 revealed a significantly higher percentage of DRIL and/or EZ disruption than group 1 (P < 0.05). At the last observation, group 1 revealed a higher percentage of eyes achieving vision stability/ improvement, gaining ≥ 15 letters, and achieving ≥70 letters (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). The mean BCVA gain was 8.8 and 0.7 letters for groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.397). Both groups revealed a significant mean CMT reduction (> 20% reduction from the baseline value), without a significant statistical difference between them (P = 0.749). After treatment, most eyes from both groups showed resolution of DRIL and EZ disruption.

Conclusions

Patients with DME presenting with a lower percentage of DRIL and/or EZ disruption at baseline had better functional outcomes, supporting the possible benefit of an early switch to FAc after insufficient response to previous treatments. Future randomized studies with a larger patient cohort are warranted to confirm our conclusions.

Assessment of Inflammation Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant

Purpose: To evaluate inflammation biomarkers in diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex^®). Methods: This retrospective single-center study investigated 64 eyes of 64 patients with DME who were nonresponsive to prior antivascular endothelial growth factor and treated with intravitreal Ozurdex. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet/lymphocyte ratio were calculated. Visual acuity and optical coherence tomography markers, including hyper-reflective dots and subretinal fluid (SRF), were determined, and central retinal thickness was also evaluated monthly for 3 months. Results: The average age was 64.06 ± 7.81 (48-84) years. The baseline NLR and MLR were significantly higher in patients with better visual outcomes (P = 0.029 and P = 0.048, respectively). Better anatomical outcomes were observed in the presence of SRF (P = 0.027). No significant differences were observed in the rates of the presence of SRF and hyper-reflective points about the better functional outcome (P > 0.05). Conclusions: SRF as an imaging biomarker, and NLR and MLR as blood biomarkers, stand out as markers of inflammation and were found to be associated with better response to Ozurdex implantation in DME.

Age, Initial Central Retinal Thickness, and OCT Biomarkers Have an Influence on the Outcome of Diabetic Macular Edema Treated With Ranibizumab- Tri-center 12-Month Treat-and-Extend Study

Objective: We report the tri-center 1-year outcomes of a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen in four-week intervals with ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods: In this retrospective study, all eyes received 3 monthly loading injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab, followed by a T&E regimen for DME. Regression models were used to evaluate the associating factors for visual and anatomical outcomes.

Results: Ninety one eyes from 64 patients were enrolled. Mean LogMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 0.58 at baseline to 0.36 at month 12 and mean central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased from 411 μm at baseline to 290 μm at month 12. Younger age and eyes having thinner baseline CRT, with ellipsoid zone disruption (EZD), and without epiretinal membrane (ERM) were associated with better final CRT. Moreover, eyes with thicker baseline CRT tend to receive more injections. Among the parameters, only having ERM or EZD was associated with significant BCVA recovery.

Conclusions: A T&E regimen with ranibizumab by 4-week intervals is effective in improving BCVA and reducing CRT with efficacy notable starting from the third month. Clinical parameters including age, initial CRT, and presence of ERM or EZD significantly influenced therapeutic outcomes. Moreover, the presence of ERM should not preclude DME patients from receiving anti-VEGF therapy. Future studies with larger cohorts are warranted.

Short-Term Outcomes of Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema Switch From Ranibizumab to Dexamethasone Implant and the Influential Factors: A Retrospective Real World Experience

Introduction: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implants in refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) treated by intravitreal ranibizumab.

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed DME patients who received DEX implant treatment after being refractory to at least 3 monthly intravitreal ranibizumab injections. The main outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and intraocular pressure (IOP).

Results: Twenty-nine eyes of 26 patients who had previously received an average of 8.1 ± 4.4 ranibizumab injections were included. Patients received between one and three DEX implants during 12.4 ± 7.4 months of follow-up. The mean final CRT significantly decreased from 384.4 ± 114.4 μm at baseline to 323.9 ± 77.7 μm (p = 0.0249). The mean final BCVA was 51.4 ± 21.3 letters, which was not significant compared to baseline (44.9 ± 30.2 letters, p = 0.1149). Mean IOP did not increase significantly. All patients tolerated the treatment well without serious adverse events. Higher baseline CRT and worse BCVA correlated with better therapeutic responses.

Conclusion: Switching to DEX implant is feasible and safe for treating patients of DME refractory to intravitreal ranibizumab in real world. Further larger-scale or multicenter studies would be conducted to explore different DEX treatment strategies for DME, such as first-line or early switch therapy, for better BCVA improvement.

Intracystic hyperreflective material in centre-involving diabetic macular oedema

PURPOSE

To report evolution and predictive value of intracystic hyperreflective material (ICHRM) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) in centre-involving diabetic macular oedema (CI-DME).

METHODS

Demographic and OCT features of patients with treatment-naïve CI-DME were analysed retrospectively. OCT parameters noted were macular oedema type, ICHRM presence, presence of hyperreflective spots, disorganised inner retinal layers and outer retinal layers integrity. Eyes were grouped into group 1 CI-DME without ICHRM and group 2 CI-DME with ICHRM. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were done to study the correlation between various OCT features and final vision.

RESULTS

In this study, 62 eyes of 50 patients were included in group 1 and 61 eyes of 51 patients in group 2. Mean presenting logMAR vision in groups 1 and 2 was 0.374 ± 0.346 and 0.523 ± 0.369 respectively. Poor final visual acuity was noted in CI-DME with ICHRM group (p = 0.015). On linear regression analysis, 3 OCT features, namely, ICHRM presence (p = 0.034), inner segment-outer segment layer disruption (p = 0.001) and ellipsoid zone defects (p = 0.003), were associated with poor final vision. More intravitreal anti-VEGF (2.98 vs 0.629) and steroid (1.51 vs 0.242) injections were required for macular oedema resolution in ICHRM group.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to assess the ICHRM on OCT as predictor for treatment outcome in DME eyes. We described its evolution during the DME management and its plausible influence on intravitreal therapy. We believe that this finding has the potential to become a novel biomarker for predicting the visual outcome in DME.

Visual Acuity in Retinal Vein Occlusion, Diabetic, and Uveitic Macular Edema: Central Subfield Thickness and Ellipsoid Zone Analysis

PURPOSE

This study assessed relationships between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity in macular edema (ME) patients.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of 6 clinical trials, which included verified diagnoses, protocol refractions, and reading center assessment of OCT images.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants (n = 1063) were diagnosed with ME from retinal vein occlusion (RVO), diabetic retinopathy (DR; diabetic macular edema, DME), or noninfectious uveitis (NIU).

METHODS

For CST, 2 clinical trials for each disorder were analyzed. For EZ, 3 studies across 2 disorders were analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes were correlations between BCVA and CST, and between BCVA and 4 central subfield EZ grades.

RESULTS

For baseline BCVA and CST, Pearson correlation coefficients were: ME from RVO, -0.56 (774 eyes; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.61 to -0.51; P < 0.001); DME, -0.50 (91 eyes; 95% CI, -0.64 to -0.33; P < 0.001); and ME from NIU, -0.38 (198 eyes; 95% CI, -0.49 to -0.26; P < 0.001). Regarding change from baseline to 24 weeks for both BCVA and CST, Pearson correlation coefficients were: ME from RVO, -0.35 (95% CI, -0.43 to -0.27; P < 0.001); DME, -0.30 (95% CI, -0.48 to -0.09; P = 0.006); and ME from NIU, -0.42 (95% CI, -0.53 to -0.29; P < 0.001). Acute and chronic ME showed similar baseline and 24-week change linear correlations. With lower baseline CST, a trend of decreased baseline and 24-week change correlations was found. For central subfield EZ at baseline, mean BCVA progressively worsened with each of 4 EZ grades in 185 eyes with gradable EZ (DME, 41 eyes; NIU, 144 eyes; P ≤ 0.050 for all pairwise comparisons except between normal and questionably abnormal EZ grades). Eyes with normal baseline central subfield EZ showed greater 24-week change in BCVA than those with abnormal baseline EZ (15.00 letters vs. 8.16 letters; P = 0.0005, with baseline BCVA, CST, and age as covariates).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite these correlations, CST and EZ integrity, as graded herein, account for the minority of BCVA variation in patients with ME resulting from RVO, DR, and NIU.

A Real-World Study of Dexamethasone Implant in Treatment-Naïve Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema: Efficacy and Correlation Between Inflammatory Biomarkers and Treatment Outcome

Purpose

There has been an increasing clinical interest in specific retinal parameters as non-invasive biomarkers of retinal inflammation in diabetic macular edema (DME) that have been shown to have prognostic value, such as hyperreflective retinal fields (HRFs) and subfoveal neuroretinal detachment (SND).

Methods

We conducted a prospective, non-comparative study of treatment-naïve patients with DME to evaluate the efficacy of a Pro Re Nata (PRN) regimen of intravitreal dexamethasone implant 0.7 mg (DexI, Ozurdex™). After administration, patients underwent subsequent injections according to PRN criteria in case of edema relapse, but not earlier than 4 months after the previous treatment. Patients were evaluated at baseline, within 15 days of injection, and every month thereafter. During all visits, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded; central retinal thickness (CRT), type of edema, presence of SND, and presence and number of HRFs were evaluated using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) 3D. Treatment outcome was defined as changes in BCVA, CRT, SND and HRFs at 12 (T12) and 24 (T24) months compared with baseline (T0).

Results

The study enrolled 24 eyes of 18 patients. The mean duration of follow-up was 18±6.6 months; for all eyes, T12 data were available, while follow-up reached T24 for 12 eyes. BCVA improved significantly and CRT decreased significantly during treatment; the edema was no longer detectable in 13/24 eyes at T12 and 8/12 eyes at T24. No patient presented SND at T12 and T24, and the mean number of HRFs decreased significantly during treatment. Results with CRT and HRFs correlated with BCVA at 12 and 24 months. No significant adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

In patients with DME, the intravitreal dexamethasone implant was effective and safe in improving both functional and tomographic parameters. This result is consistent with improvement in biomarkers of inflammation.

Choroidal Thickness After Dexamethasone Implant or Aflibercept in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Persistent to Ranibizumab

Purpose: This study aims to compare subfoveal choroidal thicknesses (SFCTs) after intravitreal dexamethasone (IVD) or intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) treatment in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) unresponsive to intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR). Methods: The study consisted of patients with DME unresponsive to IVR treatment in which 37 were administered 1 dose IVD (group A) and 34 patients who were administered 3 doses of IVA (group B), as well as 35 healthy individuals (group C). Detailed ophthalmological examination and optical coherence tomography parameters of group A and group B, including central retinal thickness and SFCT, were retrospectively evaluated before and after treatment. Results from preinjection, and 1, 2, and 3 months after injection were analyzed. Results of group A and group B were compared within themselves and also compared with group C. Results: SFCT measurements were compared within group A and group B (1 = preinjection; 2 = 1 month postinjection; 3 = 2 months postinjection; 4 = 3 months postinjection). There was significant thinning in SFCT between 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 2-3, 2-4, and 3-4 time intervals within both group A and group B (both P < 0.001). Comparison of SFCT measurements showed preinjection, 1-, and 2-month values of group A were significantly thicker than those of group C (P < 0.001), whereas there was no significant difference between 3-month values (P = 0.09). Preinjection, 1-, and 2-month values of group B were significantly thicker than those of group C (P < 0.001), whereas there was no significant difference between 3-month values (P = 0.06). Conclusions: Three month follow-up showed thinning in SFCT measurements in patients with persistent DME unresponsive to IVR who were applied IVD or IVA treatment.

Short-term outcomes of intravitreal dexamethasone in relation to biomarkers in diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of dexamethasone implant (0.7 mg) on biomarkers such as hyper-reflective dots, external limiting membrane integrity and disorganization of retinal inner layers in treatment-naïve patients, patients who received less than three anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections and non-responder cases with diabetic macular edema and its effects on edema and visual acuity.

METHODS

This is a prospective study of treatment-naïve patients, patients who received less than three anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections and non-responder patients with diabetic macular edema, treated with single dexamethasone implant. Pre- and post-injection-based best-corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness, hyper-reflective dots, external limiting membrane integrity and disorganization of retinal inner layers were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 27 diabetic macular edema eyes, including 9 non-responder eyes, 9 eyes which received less than three anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections and 9 treatment-naïve eyes, were included in this study. Baseline hyper-reflective dots were 22.22 ± 11.76, 30 ± 7.91 and 19.44 ± 8.82 which reduced to 3.33 ± 1.32, 9 ± 8.35 and 8.78 ± 2.53 four months after implant in treatment-naïve patients, patients who received less than three anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections and non-responder cases, respectively. Baseline central macular thickness was 589.44 ± 175.37, 537 ± 181.81 and 673.11 ± 138.24 and the central macular thickness after dexamethasone implant was 272.11 ± 39.00, 336.44 ± 132.88 and 524.00 ± 200.39 in treatment-naïve patients, patients who received less than three anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections and non-responder cases, respectively. External limiting membrane integrity was restored in two patients in each group, whereas two patients with disorganization of retinal inner layers in treatment-naïve group showed reorganization of retinal structures after treatment with dexamethasone implant.

CONCLUSION

Better response to dexamethasone implant in cases with more hyper-reflective dots shows that these hyper-reflective dots can be used as a predictive biomarker. Dexamethasone implant might help in restoring external limiting membrane integrity and resolution of disorganization of retinal inner layers.