The prevalence of medical symptoms in military aircrew

Physiological Fitness of U.S. Army Aviators Compared to the U.S. General Population

INTRODUCTION: U.S. Army aviators are required to maintain a level of physiological fitness as part of their qualifying process, which suggests that they are generally physically healthy. However, it has not been statistically proven that they are more "physiologically fit" than the general population.METHODS: This retrospective study compares physiological measurements of U.S. Army aviators from the Aeromedical Electronic Resource Office database to the U.S. general population using the Center for Disease Control's National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. To enable an accurate comparison of physiological metrics between U.S. Army aviators and the U.S. general population, aviators were categorized into the same age groups and biological genders used for segmentation of the national population data.RESULTS: On average, pulse rate was 4.85 bpm lower in male aviators and 6.84 bpm lower in female aviators. Fasting glucose levels were, on average, 10.6 mg · dL-1 lower in aviators compared to the general population. Key metrics like pulse rate and fasting glucose were lower in aviators, indicating cardiovascular and metabolic advantages. However, parameters like cholesterol showed less consistent differences.DISCUSSION: While aviation physical demands and administrative policies selecting for elite physiological metrics produce improvements on some dimensions, a nuanced view accounting for the multitude of factors influencing an aviator's physiological fitness is still warranted. Implementing targeted health monitoring and maintenance programs based on assessments conducted more frequently than the current annual flight physical may optimize aviator safety and performance over the course of a career.D'Alessandro M, Mackie R, Wolf S, McGhee JS, Curry I. Physiological fitness of U.S. Army aviators compared to the U.S. general population. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(4):175-186.

M3: The military medicine module: A focussed competency-based program

BACKGROUND

Military medicine is a unique and specific field for the armed forces doctors providing skill-based training on military specific injuries and diseases arising due to the unique occupational conditions. The current study retrospectively studied the planning and implementation of the military medicine module which was carried out with the aim of imparting the requisite skills to military doctors.

METHODS

The study was a qualitative research, carried over two years, 2017-2019. The study population included two batches of recently graduated medical doctors about to be commissioned . The methodology included needs assessment and gap analysis which was carried out by consulting experts from the tri services. Feedback was taken by medical education experts from both the batches using surveys, and modifications were done after brainstorming with experts keeping feedback in mind.

RESULTS

There was an improvement in the rating scores and an improved performance by participants was seen in the competencies.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion the module was developed and implemented keeping in mind the important skills that military physicians need to learn through training as these are not been taught in any educational syllabus. To achieve such skills and capabilities, gap analysis is essential and programs should be implemented keeping scope for modification depending on the feedback after brainstorming. Feedback remains important in development of such modules and hence should be collected anonymously.

Histopathological Evidence of Multiple Organ Damage After Simulated Aeromedical Evacuation in a Swine Acute Lung Injury Model

INTRODUCTION

Rapid aeromedical evacuation (AE) is standard of care in current conflicts. However, not much is known about possible effects of hypobaric conditions. We investigated possible effects of hypobaria on organ damage in a swine model of acute lung injury.

METHODS

Lung injury was induced in anesthetized swine via intravenous oleic acid infusion. After a stabilization phase, animals were subjected to a 4 hour simulated AE at 8000 feet (HYPO). Control animals were kept at normobaria. After euthanasia and necropsy, organ damage was assessed by combined scores for hemorrhage, inflammation, edema, necrosis, and microatelectasis.

RESULTS

Hemodynamic, neurological, or hematologic measurements were similar prior to transport. Hemodynamic instability became apparent during the last 2 hours of transport in the HYPO group. Histological injury scores in the HYPO group were higher for all organs (lung, kidney, liver, pancreas, and adrenal glands) except the brain, with the largest difference in the lungs (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Swine with mild acute lung injury subjected to a 4 hour simulated AE showed more injury to most organs and, in particular, to the lungs compared with ground transport. This may exacerbate otherwise subclinical pathology and, eventually, manifest as abnormalities in gas exchange or possibly end-organ function.