Retrospective investigation of combination therapy with clarithromycin and levofloxacin for pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex disease

Comparison of Rifabutin-Based Versus Rifampin-Based Regimens for the Treatment of Mycobacterium avium Complex: A meta-Analysis Study

Background: The incidence of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) increases as immunosuppressed conditions become more common. MAC's standard treatment regimen includes a macrolide, ethambutol, and a rifamycin, among which rifampin and rifabutin are the most commonly used. Although current guidelines recommend initial therapy for MAC with rifampin, it has been theorized to be less efficacious than rifabutin.

Methods: We reviewed the relevant scientific literature published up to February 18, 2020. Statistical analyses were performed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software Version 2.0 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ). The pooled frequency with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was assessed using a random-effect model. We considered P <0.05 as statistically significant for publication bias.

Results: After reviewing 3665 records, we identified 24 studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria. Among these studies, 8 had rifabutin in their regimens (rifabutin group) and 16 had rifampin in their regimens (rifampin group). The estimated pooled treatment success rate was found to be 54.7% (95% CI 41.0-67.0%) in rifabutin groups and 67.5% (95% CI 55.7-77.4%) in rifampin groups. There was no evidence of publication bias among the included studies (Egger’s test p-value was 0.7).

Conclusion: In this study, it was shown that in comparison to Rifabutin, rifampin has similar treatment success rates in treating MAC. In order to determine the exact preference of each of these drugs, double-blind clinical trial studies are recommended.

Role of Clofazimine in Treatment of Mycobacterium avium Complex

Background: Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), specifically Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), is an increasingly prevalent cause of pulmonary dysfunction. Clofazimine has been shown to be effective for the treatment of M. avium complex, but there were no published large-scale analyses comparing clofazimine to non-clofazimine regimens in MAC treatment. The objective of this large-scale meta-analysis was to evaluate patient characteristics and treatment outcomes of individuals diagnosed with MAC and treated with a clofazimine-based regimen.

Methods: We used Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to search for studies published from January 1, 1990 to February 9, 2020. Two reviewers (SSH and NY) extracted the data from all eligible studies and differences were resolved by consensus. Statistical analyses were performed with STATA (version 14, IC; Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).

Results: The pooled success treatment rate with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was assessed using random effect model. The estimated pooled treatment success rates were 56.8% in clofazimine and 67.9% in non-clofazimine groups. Notably, success rates were higher (58.7%) in treatment of HIV patients with disseminated infection.

Conclusions: Treatment was more successful in the non-clofazimine group overall. However, HIV patients with disseminated infection had higher treatment response rates than non-HIV patients within the clofazimine group.

First line treatment selection modifies disease course and long-term clinical outcomes in Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease

The combination of rifamycin (RFP), ethambutol (EB), and macrolides is currently the standard regimen for treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD). However, poor adherence to the standardized regimens recommended by current guidelines have been reported. We undertook a single-centred retrospective cohort study to evaluate the long-term outcomes in 295 patients with MAC-PD following first line treatment with standard (RFP, EB, clarithromycin [CAM]) or alternative (EB and CAM with or without fluoroquinolones (FQs) or RFP, CAM, and FQs) regimens. In this cohort, 80.7% were treated with standard regimens and 19.3% were treated with alternative regimens. After heterogeneity was statistically corrected using propensity scores, outcomes were superior in patients treated with standard regimens. Furthermore, alternative regimens were significantly and independently associated with sputum non-conversion, treatment failure and emergence of CAM resistance. Multivariate cox regression analysis revealed that older age, male, old tuberculosis, diabetes mellitus, higher C-reactive protein, and cavity were positively associated with mortality, while higher body mass index and M. avium infection were negatively associated with mortality. These data suggest that, although different combination regimens are not associated with mortality, first line administration of a standard RFP + EB + macrolide regimen offers the best chance of preventing disease progression in MAC-PD patients.

Efficacy and safety of fluoroquinolone-containing regimens in treating pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex disease: A propensity score analysis

Background

Although combination therapy using clarithromycin, rifampicin, and ethambutol is recommended for patients with pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease, some patients do not tolerate it because of adverse effects or underlying diseases. The efficacy and safety of fluoroquinolone-containing combination regimens as an alternative remain uncertain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of fluoroquinolone-containing regimens with those of the standard regimens for treating pulmonary MAC disease.

Methods

We retrospectively included consecutive MAC patients who were treated in our hospital between January 2011 and May 2019. Patients treated with fluoroquinolone-containing regimens who had relapsed after treatment with standard regimens were excluded. A propensity score analysis was conducted to reduce selection bias, and the proportions of clinical improvement, defined by chest imaging findings and sputum conversion, were compared between the fluoroquinolone-containing regimen and standard regimen groups.

Results

We analyzed 28 patients who received fluoroquinolone-containing regimens and 46 who received the standard regimen. Fluoroquinolone-containing regimens were more likely selected for patients with cavitary lesions, diabetes mellitus, culture negativity, a low daily physical activity level, a decreased lymphocyte count and an increased CRP level. The propensity score was calculated using these variables (C-statistic of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the propensity score: 0.807, p < 0.0001). The fluoroquinolone-containing regimens were significantly inferior to the standard regimen in clinical improvements (p = 0.002, Log-rank test) in the univariate analysis, but the significance was lost after adjusting for the propensity score (HR 0.553, 95% CI 0.285–1.074, p = 0.080). Six (21%) patients in the fluoroquinolone-containing regimen group and ten (22%) patients in the standard regimen group experienced low-grade adverse effects.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in clinical improvement between these regimens after propensity score adjustment. A large-scale prospective study is required to validate these results.

Antibiotic therapy success rate in pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: The incidence of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease is increasing worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the treatment success rate of antibiotic therapy in MAC pulmonary disease and evaluate the effectiveness of aminoglycoside-containing regimens.Methods: We searched literature between 1 January 1980 to 19 June 2019. Studies with diagnosis criteria based on the current guidelines that reported treatment outcomes were included. We defined treatment success as the achievement of culture conversion and completion of the planned treatment without relapse while on treatment.Results: We retrieved 45 studies including 3862 patients. The estimated pooled treatment success rate was 68.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 64.7-71.4%]. Based on the Cochrane tool, the included studies had a low risk of bias. Forty-two studies reported macrolide-containing regimens, while 6 studies included aminoglycoside-containing regimens. Macrolide-containing regimens led to better treatment success rates comparing to non-macrolide-containing regimens; 69% vs 58.5%, respectively. Treatment duration of 12 months or more showed better results.Conclusion: Poor treatment success rate of MAC pulmonary disease calls for more randomized clinical trials designed based on consensus definitions of the disease diagnosis and treatment. New drugs with a better adherence rate need to be developed.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (pending registration ID: 151674).

Microbiologic Outcome of Interventions Against Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Pulmonary disease (PD) caused by Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is increasing worldwide. We conducted a systematic review of studies that include microbiologic outcomes to evaluate current macrolide-based treatment regimens.

METHODS

We searched literature published before April 2017 by using the MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Risk of bias in randomized trials was assessed using the Cochrane tool.

RESULTS

We retrieved 333 citations and evaluated 42 studies including 2,748 patients: 18 studies were retrospective chart reviews, 18 were prospective, and six were randomized. The weighted average proportion of sputum culture conversions in macrolide-containing regimens after subtracting posttreatment microbiologic recurrences was 52.3% (95% CI, 44.7%-59.9%). Using the triple-drug regimens recommended by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) achieved treatment success in 61.4% (95% CI, 49.7%-72.5%), which further increased to 65.7% (95% CI, 53.3%-77.4%) when drugs were taken for at least 1 year by patients who were macrolide susceptible and had previously untreated MAC. The overall risk of bias was low in five of the six randomized trials. However, selective outcome reporting because of a posteriori exclusion of initially included patients (14.0%), uncompleted treatment (17.6%), and inconsistent use of outcome parameters (17 definitions of treatment success) hampered the comparison of nonrandomized trials.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, randomized studies on treatment outcome in patients with MAC PD are scarce. Long-term treatments with ATS-recommended regimens for patients who are macrolide susceptible are superior to other macrolide-based therapies. A standardized definition of treatment success and genotypic distinction between reinfection and relapse by means of pretreatment and posttreatment identification of MAC species in cases of microbiologic recurrences may help to optimize evaluation of treatment regimens in the future.