Elevated prothrombin time/international normalized ratio associated with concurrent administration of regorafenib and warfarin in a patient with advanced colorectal cancer

Delayed Postoperative Intracerebral Hemorrhage Associated With Oral Multikinase Inhibitor Therapy for Cancer: A Case Report

Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF) activity used as an antiangiogenic agent for metastatic colorectal cancer treatment and has been studied as a potential therapeutic agent for several other cancer treatments. Adverse reactions commonly reported with the use of regorafenib and similar oral multikinase inhibitors include hemorrhage, gastrointestinal fistulas, hypertension, and incomplete wound healing. We report a case of a 59-year-old man with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma post-colostomy on regorafenib treatment presenting to the emergency department with altered mental status. MRI showed a left frontoparietal mass, which was resected with a left frontal craniotomy. Postoperative MRI showed a resection cavity without significant hemorrhage. He had been prescribed regorafenib preceding his hospitalization, which was continued after admission before surgery and on postoperative day 1. Thirty-two hours after surgery, the patient exhibited sudden right-sided facial droop and right arm weakness. Imaging revealed an acute intraparenchymal hemorrhage within and adjacent to the tumor resection bed, which was managed conservatively. The patient was subsequently discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility. The unusual timing of the hemorrhage suggests that the hemorrhage was due to adverse effects of regorafenib. Patients undergoing neurosurgery should have regorafenib discontinued in preparation for surgery. Similar management should be considered for other anti-VEGF medications to avoid serious complications.

Anlotinib and fruquintinib co-administrated with warfarin increases the risk of bleeding: Studied from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspectives

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have reported a higher risk of bleeding among patients that are co-administrated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) and anticoagulant, which raises our concern about the possible TKIs-warfarin pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction that could be life-threatening to tumor patients who take warfarin for preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

Influences of anlotinib and fruquintinib on the pharmacokinetic and dynamic behavior of warfarin were estimated. Influence on the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes was detected in vitro through rat liver microsomes. Quantitative analysis of blood concentration in rats was finished by a validated UHPLC-MS/MS method. Furthermore, pharmacodynamic interactions were studied in rats by monitoring prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), while Inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis-induced DVT model was built to further investigate the antithrombotic effect after co-administration.

RESULTS

Anlotinib inhibited the activity of cyp2c6, cyp3a1/2 and cyp1a2 in rat liver microsomes in a dose-dependent manner, meanwhile enhanced the AUC0∼t and AUC0∼∞ of R-warfarin. However, fruquintinib showed no effects on pharmacokinetics of warfarin. Anlotinib and fruquintinib co-administrated with warfarin was found to exert more significant increase on PT and APTT values than that taking warfarin alone. In IVC stenosis-induced DVT model rats, the co-administration groups significantly reduced the length of thrombus compared with the single warfarin group.

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib and fruquintinib enhanced the anticoagulated and antithrombotic effect of warfarin. The anlotinib-induced interaction may due to the inhibition of the metabolism of warfarin. The mechanism of the pharmacodynamic interaction between fruquintinib and warfarin should be further investigated.

Effects of Apatinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Nifedipine and Warfarin in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Background and Purpose

Apatinib is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of recurrent or progressive advanced-stage gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction cancer. The in vitro inhibition studies suggested that apatinib exerted potent inhibition on CYP3A4 and CYP2C9. To evaluate the potential of apatinib as a perpetrator in CYP450-based drug–drug interactions in vivo, nifedipine and warfarin were, respectively, selected in the present study as the probe substrates of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 for clinical drug–drug interaction studies. Since hypertension and thrombus are common adverse effects of vascular targeting anticancer agents, nifedipine and warfarin are usually coadministered with apatinib in clinical practice.

Methods

A single-center, open-label, single-arm, and self-controlled trial was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors. The patients received a single dose of 30 mg nifedipine on Day 1/14 and a single dose of 3 mg warfarin on Day 3/16. On Day 9–21, the subjects received a daily dose of 750 mg apatinib, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of nifedipine and warfarin in the absence or presence of apatinib was, respectively, investigated.

Results

Compared with the single oral administration, coadministration with apatinib contributed to the significant increases of AUC_0–48h and C_max of nifedipine by 83% (90% confidence interval [CI] 1.46–2.31) and 64% (90% CI 1.34–2.01), respectively. Similarly, coadministration with apatinib contributed to the significant increases of AUC_0-t and C_max of S-warfarin by 92% (90% CI 1.68–2.18) and 24% (90% CI 1.10–1.39), respectively.

Conclusion

Concomitant apatinib administration resulted in significant increases in systemic exposure to nifedipine and S-warfarin. Owing to the risk of pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions based on CYP3A4/CYP2C9 inhibition by apatinib, caution is advised in the concurrent use of apatinib with either CYP2C9 or CYP3A4 substrates.

Cotreatment with lenvatinib and warfarin potassium caused prothrombin time prolongation

Lenvatinib is approved as a standard systemic therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients; however, experience with lenvatinib in clinical practice is insufficient. We present the case of a patient with advanced HCC whose prothrombin time - international normalized ratio (PT-INR) was elevated after cotreatment with lenvatinib and warfarin potassium. The patient was a 26-year-old man with congenital abnormalities who had to take warfarin potassium because he had a mechanical heart valve. He was diagnosed with unresectable HCC at 24 years old and was treated by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and transcatheter arterial infusion. After some interventional radiology treatments, lenvatinib was started. After 4 days of treatment with lenvatinib and warfarin potassium, his PT-INR increased to 4.13, and the treatment had to be stopped. No changes were observed in other Child-Pugh score factors. The elevation in the PT-INR after cotreatment with lenvatinib and warfarin potassium was thought to be caused by pharmacological effects of concurrent use or pharmacological sensitivity to warfarin potassium in this patient with liver dysfunction. The PT-INR must be monitored when lenvatinib is given to advanced HCC patients taking warfarin potassium.

Early prediction of postoperative liver dysfunction and clinical outcome using antithrombin III-activity

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Antithrombin III (ATIII) has been reported to be associated with liver pathologies and was shown to predict outcome in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. We now aimed to assess whether perioperative ATIII-activity could predict postoperative outcome in patients without underlying liver disease, as well as in a routine clinical setting of patients undergoing hepatic resection.

METHODS

ATIII-activity was evaluated preoperatively and on the first (POD1) and fifth day after liver resection in a retrospective evaluation cohort of 228 colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis (mCRC). We further aimed to prospectively validate our results in a set of 177 consecutive patients undergoing hepatic resection.

RESULTS

Patients developing postoperative liver dysfunction (LD) had a more pronounced postoperative decrease in ATIII-activity (P<0.001). ATIII-activity on POD1 significantly predicted postoperative LD (P<0.001, AUC = 84.4%) and remained independent upon multivariable analysis. A cut-off value of 61.5% ATIII-activity was determined using ROC analysis. This cut-off was vital to identify high-risk patients for postoperative LD, morbidity, severe morbidity and mortality (P<0.001, respectively) with a highly accurate negative predictive value of 97%, which could be confirmed for LD (P<0.001) and mortality (P = 0.014) in our independent validation cohort. Further, mCRC patients below our cut-off suffered from a significantly decreased overall survival (OS) at 1 and 3 years after surgery (P = 0.011, P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

The routine laboratory parameter ATIII-activity on POD1 independently predicted postoperative LD and was associated with clinical outcome. Patients with a postoperative ATIII-activity <61.5% might benefit from close monitoring and timely initiation of supportive therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01700231.