Concomitant palonosetron ameliorates cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, nausea, and vomiting: a retrospective cohort study and pharmacovigilance analysis

Evaluation of Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Coprescribed Serotonin Receptor Antagonists: A Retrospective Analysis

Key Points

Serotonin receptor antagonists reduce the incidence of AKI in patients receiving cisplatin as chemotherapy. New-generation serotonin receptors do not offer any additional advantage in terms of protection from cisplatin induced AKI.

Background

Cisplatin is an effective first-line therapy for a variety of cancers. Cisplatin is highly emetogenic and resulting volume depletion can contribute to AKI. Antiemetic drugs, such as 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonists (5-HT3RAs), are commonly prescribed to prevent this complication. Preclinical studies suggest first-generation 5-HT3RAs may alter the renal clearance and increase cisplatin toxicity. This retrospective study evaluated whether different 5-HT3RAs modify the risk of AKI in patients receiving cisplatin.

Methods

Patients with cancer who received cisplatin between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016, were included. Patients older than 18 years with available data for baseline and post-treatment serum creatinine, cisplatin cumulative dose, and administration of 5-HT3RAs, including first-generation (ondansetron, granisetron, and ramosetron) and second-generation (palonosetron), were analyzed. AKI was defined as 1.5× increase in serum creatinine. Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to assess univariable associations between baseline covariates and AKI and logistic regression for multivariable associations with AKI.

Results

Of 8703 patients identified with cisplatin exposure, 6889 were included. A total of 3881 patients (56.3%) received at least one 5-HT3RA, including palonosetron (3750, 54.4%), ondansetron (1399, 20.3%), and granisetron (11, 0.2%). AKI developed in 1666 patients (24.2%) after cisplatin therapy. Patients who received any 5-HT3RAs were less likely to experience AKI as compared with patients who did not (22.6% versus 26.2%, P = 0.001). Older age, male sex, African ethnicity, and cumulative cisplatin dose were univariably associated with higher risk of AKI (P < 0.001). After adjusting for these variables, use of any of these antiemetic drugs was protective for AKI (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 0.94; P = 0.003) with no difference detected between type of 5-HT3RA.

Conclusions

Nephrotoxicity continues to be a concern after cisplatin therapy. Given its emetogenic nature, use of antiemetic drugs, such as 5-HT3RAs, can lessen emesis and lower risk of kidney injury. This retrospective analysis supports use of any 5-HT3RAs to lower risk of AKI.

Effect of Hydration with Bicarbonate Ringer's Solution on Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Cisplatin (CDDP) often causes acute kidney injury (AKI), and magnesium supplementation has been suggested to be important in preventing CDDP-induced AKI. Sodium bicarbonate Ringer's solution (BRS) is a crystalloid solution composed of various electrolytes, including Mg2+, and can be generally used to supplement missing extracellular fluid and correct metabolic acidosis; however, the clinical outcomes of hydration with BRS for CDDP-induced AKI remain unclear. In this study, we retrospectively compared the effects of BRS and normal saline for hydration in patients undergoing CDDP treatment.

METHODS

We analyzed the incidence rate of AKI (grade ≥ 1), the severity of AKI, the serum magnesium level, and the incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 hematological toxicities (leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, or thrombocytopenia) following CDDP and fluorouracil (5-FU) administration in 131 in-patients who received CDDP and 5-FU for the first time to treat esophageal cancer.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients (43%) received saline alone, while 75 patients (57%) received BRS for hydration. The incidence rate of AKI (grade ≥ 1) was significantly lower in the BRS group (11%) than that in the saline group (39%, p < 0.001). Moreover, severe AKI (grade ≥ 2) was significantly less common in the BRS group than in the saline group. Although the serum magnesium levels before CDDP administration were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.939), the serum magnesium levels on days 2-3 after CDDP administration in the BRS group were significantly higher than those in the saline group (p < 0.001). In contrast, there were no significant differences in the incidence rates of hematological toxicity between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that BRS use was an independent factor that significantly contributed to AKI prevention (odds ratio = 0.061, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Hydration with BRS could prevent CDDP-induced AKI in patients with esophageal cancer.

Future Directions in Optimizing Anesthesia to Reduce Perioperative Acute Kidney Injury

BACKGROUND

Perioperative acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in surgical patients and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. There are currently few options for AKI prevention and treatment. Due to its complex pathophysiology, there is no efficient medication therapy to stop the onset of the injury or repair the damage already done. Certain anesthetics, however, have been demonstrated to affect the risk of perioperative AKI in some studies. The impact of anesthetics on renal function is particularly important as it is closely related to the prognosis of patients. Some anesthetics can induce anti-inflammatory, anti-necrotic, and anti-apoptotic effects. Propofol, sevoflurane, and dexmedetomidine are a few examples of anesthetics that have protective association with AKI in the perioperative period.

SUMMARY

In this study, we reviewed the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and pathogenesis of AKI. Subsequently, the protective effects of various anesthetic agents against perioperative AKI and the latest research are introduced.

KEY MESSAGE

This work demonstrates that a thorough understanding of the reciprocal effects of anesthetic drugs and AKI is crucial for safe perioperative care and prognosis of patients. However, more complete mechanisms and pathophysiological processes still need to be further studied.