A large mural nodule in branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous adenoma of the pancreas: a case report

Towards a Simplified and Cost-Effective Diagnostic Algorithm for the Surveillance of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMNs): Can We Save Contrast for Later?

The increased detection of pancreatic cysts in recent years has triggered extensive diagnostic investigations to clarify their potential risk of malignancy, resulting in a large number of patients undergoing numerous imaging follow-up studies for many years. Therefore, there is a growing need for optimization of the current surveillance protocol to reduce both healthcare costs and waiting lists, while still maintaining appropriate sensibility and specificity. Imaging is an essential tool for evaluating patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) since it can assess several predictors for malignancy and thus guide further management recommendations. Although contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) has been widely recommended by most international guidelines, recent results support the use of unenhanced abbreviated-MRI (A-MRI) protocols as a surveillance tool in patients with IPMN. In fact, A-MRI has shown high diagnostic performance in malignant detection, with high sensitivity and specificity as well as excellent interobserver agreement. The aim of this paper is, therefore, to discuss the current available evidence on whether the implementation of an abbreviated-MRI (A-MRI) protocol for cystic pancreatic lesion surveillance could improve healthcare economics and reduce waiting lists in clinical practice without significantly reducing diagnostic accuracy.

Can the location of the mural nodule indicate benign or malignant in branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas?

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are classified into main duct (MD)-type IPMNs, branch duct (BD)-type IPMNs, and mixed type IPMNs. While MD-type IPMN has a high risk of malignancy and should therefore be considered for resection if the patient is fit, BD-type IPMN needs to be carefully judged for surgical indication. The decision to resect BD-type IPMN is often based on international consensus Fukuoka guidelines 2017, but further investigation is required. In this study, we focused on whether the location of the mural nodule (MN) could be an indicator of malignancy.

METHODS

We enrolled 17 cases who had been diagnosed BD-type IPMNs which were surgically resected from January 2016 to December 2019. These cases were classified into benign and malignant group. Subsequently, a clinicopathological study was conducted based on the localization of MN (MN-central type or MN-peripheral type).

RESULTS

Although MN was found in 57% (4/11) in the benign group, 88% (7/8) was noted in the malignant group, indicating the presence of MN to be more common in the malignant group. Those with MN consisted of 6 cases of MN-central type and 5 cases of MN-peripheral type. All cases of central type were malignant compared to only one case of the peripheral group being confirmed on histology as cancer.

CONCLUSION

BD-IPMN with central mural nodule should be considered high risk for malignancy.