1
|
Li X, Zhang W, Zhong XR, Han HX, Dong B. Genome sequencing analysis of a novel thermophilic strain Geobacillus sp. CX412. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:1035311. [DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1035311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The thermophilic spore-forming strain Geobacillus sp. CX412 was isolated from hot spring soil in Tengchong City, Yunnan Province, China. We sequenced the complete genome of Geobacillus sp. CX412 using PacBio SMRT Sequencing. Genome-scale phylogenetic analysis and average nucleotide identity (ANI) results indicated that Geobacillus sp. CX412 is a novel species in the genus Geobacillus. The metabolic potential of Geobacillus sp. CX412 based on COG, KEGG, and CAZymes analysis demonstrated that Geobacillus sp. CX412 was a highly adaptable strain with an unusually high number of 73 annotated transposons in the genome, which is relatively rare in Geobacillus. Compared with the near-derived strains, it was found that Geobacillus sp. CX412 has the unique β-lactam resistance and more active metabolism (more than 50.5–100.1%). Additionally, its genome encodes glycoside hydrolases and other genes related to lignocellulose breakdown, suggesting that Geobacillus sp. CX412 has a considerable biomass degradation potential. Thus, Geobacillus sp. CX412 is a new thermophilic bacterial species that add to the increasing repertoire of known lignocellulose degraders.
Collapse
|
2
|
Najar IN, Das S, Kumar S, Sharma P, Mondal K, Sherpa MT, Thakur N. Coexistence of Heavy Metal Tolerance and Antibiotic Resistance in Thermophilic Bacteria Belonging to Genus Geobacillus. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:914037. [PMID: 36110304 PMCID: PMC9469766 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.914037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Hot springs are thought to be potential repositories for opportunistic infections, such as antibiotic-resistant strains. However, there is a scarcity of information on the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) uptake, occurrence, and expression in thermophilic bacteria. Furthermore, because the genesis and proliferation of ARGs in environmental microorganisms are unknown, the research on antibiotic resistance profiles and probable mechanisms in thermophilic bacteria will become increasingly important. The goals of this study are to explore bacterial diversity, antibiotic and heavy metal resistance, and the prevalence and presence of ARG and metal resistance gene (MRG) in Geobacillus species. The 16S rRNA sequencing was used to determine the culturable bacterium diversity of 124 isolates. Standard Kirby Bauer Disc Diffusion and tube dilution procedures were used to determine antibiotic sensitivity and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The tube dilution method was also used to check metal tolerance. To detect ARG and heavy MRG (HMRG), whole genome sequencing studies of the type species of the genus Geobacillus and five randomly selected Geobacillus species were performed. Graph Pad Prism and XLSTAT were used to perform statistical analyses such as ANOVA, EC50 analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA). The phylum Firmicutes and the genus Geobacillus dominated the culture-dependent bacterial diversity. Surprisingly, all thermophilic isolates, i.e., Geobacillus species, were sensitive to at least 10 different antibiotics, as evidenced by the lack of ARGs in whole genome sequencing analysis of numerous Geobacillus species. However, some of these isolates were resistant to at least five different heavy metals, and whole genome sequencing revealed the presence of MRGs in these thermophilic bacteria. The thermophilic genus Geobacillus is generally antibiotic sensitive, according to this study. In contrast, heavy metal is tolerated by them. As a result, it is possible that ARGs and MRGs do not coexist in these bacteria living in hot springs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sayak Das
- Department of Microbiology, Sikkim University, Gangtok, India
| | - Santosh Kumar
- Department of Microbiology, Sikkim University, Gangtok, India
| | - Prayatna Sharma
- Department of Microbiology, Sikkim University, Gangtok, India
| | | | | | - Nagendra Thakur
- Department of Microbiology, Sikkim University, Gangtok, India
- *Correspondence: Nagendra Thakur
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Koutsoumanis K, Allende A, Alvarez‐Ordóñez A, Bolton D, Bover‐Cid S, Chemaly M, Davies R, De Cesare A, Hilbert F, Lindqvist R, Nauta M, Peixe L, Ru G, Simmons M, Skandamis P, Suffredini E, Cocconcelli PS, Fernández Escámez PS, Maradona MP, Querol A, Suarez JE, Sundh I, Vlak J, Barizzone F, Correia S, Herman L. Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 11: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2019. EFSA J 2020; 18:e05965. [PMID: 32874211 PMCID: PMC7448003 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Qualified presumption of safety (QPS) was developed to provide a generic safety evaluation for biological agents to support EFSA's Scientific Panels. The taxonomic identity, body of knowledge, safety concerns and antimicrobial resistance are assessed. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit (TU) are where possible to be confirmed at strain or product level, reflected by 'qualifications'. No new information was found that would change the previously recommended QPS TUs and their qualifications. The list of microorganisms notified to EFSA was updated with 54 biological agents, received between April and September 2019; 23 already had QPS status, 14 were excluded from the QPS exercise (7 filamentous fungi, 6 Escherichia coli, Sphingomonas paucimobilis which was already evaluated). Seventeen, corresponding to 16 TUs, were evaluated for possible QPS status, fourteen of these for the first time, and Protaminobacter rubrum, evaluated previously, was excluded because it is not a valid species. Eight TUs are recommended for QPS status. Lactobacillus parafarraginis and Zygosaccharomyces rouxii are recommended to be included in the QPS list. Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius and Paenibacillus illinoisensis can be recommended for the QPS list with the qualification 'for production purposes only' and absence of toxigenic potential. Bacillus velezensis can be recommended for the QPS list with the qualification 'absence of toxigenic potential and the absence of aminoglycoside production ability'. Cupriavidus necator, Aurantiochytrium limacinum and Tetraselmis chuii can be recommended for the QPS list with the qualification 'production purposes only'. Pantoea ananatis is not recommended for the QPS list due to lack of body of knowledge in relation to its pathogenicity potential for plants. Corynebacterium stationis, Hamamotoa singularis, Rhodococcus aetherivorans and Rhodococcus ruber cannot be recommended for the QPS list due to lack of body of knowledge. Kodamaea ohmeri cannot be recommended for the QPS list due to safety concerns.
Collapse
|
4
|
Koutsoumanis K, Allende A, Alvarez‐Ordóñez A, Bolton D, Bover‐Cid S, Chemaly M, Davies R, De Cesare A, Hilbert F, Lindqvist R, Nauta M, Peixe L, Ru G, Simmons M, Skandamis P, Suffredini E, Cocconcelli PS, Fernández Escámez PS, Maradona MP, Querol A, Suarez JE, Sundh I, Vlak J, Barizzone F, Correia S, Herman L. Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA (2017-2019). EFSA J 2020; 18:e05966. [PMID: 32874212 PMCID: PMC7448045 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) was developed to provide a safety pre-assessment within EFSA for microorganisms. Strains belonging to QPS taxonomic units (TUs) still require an assessment based on a specific data package, but QPS status facilitates fast track evaluation. QPS TUs are unambiguously defined biological agents assessed for the body of knowledge, their safety and their end use. Safety concerns are, where possible, to be confirmed at strain or product level, and reflected as 'qualifications'. Qualifications need to be evaluated at strain level by the respective EFSA units. The lowest QPS TU is the species level for bacteria, yeasts and protists/algae, and the family for viruses. The QPS concept is also applicable to genetically modified microorganisms used for production purposes if the recipient strain qualifies for the QPS status, and if the genetic modification does not indicate a concern. Based on the actual body of knowledge and/or an ambiguous taxonomic position, the following TUs were excluded from the QPS assessment: filamentous fungi, oomycetes, streptomycetes, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli and bacteriophages. The list of QPS-recommended biological agents was reviewed and updated in the current opinion and therefore now becomes the valid list. For this update, reports on the safety of previously assessed microorganisms, including bacteria, yeasts and viruses (the latter only when used for plant protection purposes) were reviewed, following an Extensive Literature Search strategy. All TUs previously recommended for 2016 QPS list had their status reconfirmed as well as their qualifications. The TUs related to the new notifications received since the 2016 QPS opinion was periodically evaluated for QPS status in the Statements of the BIOHAZ Panel, and the QPS list was also periodically updated. In total, 14 new TUs received a QPS status between 2017 and 2019: three yeasts, eight bacteria and three algae/protists.
Collapse
|
5
|
Sari B, Faiz O, Genc B, Sisecioglu M, Adiguzel A, Adiguzel G. New xylanolytic enzyme from Geobacillus galactosidasius BS61 from a geothermal resource in Turkey. Int J Biol Macromol 2018; 119:1017-1026. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Revised: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
6
|
Peculiarities and biotechnological potential of environmental adaptation by Geobacillus species. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2018; 102:10425-10437. [PMID: 30310966 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-018-9422-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Revised: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The genus Geobacillus comprises thermophilic bacilli capable of endospore formation. The members of this genus provide thermostable proteins and can be used in whole cell applications at elevated temperatures; therefore, these organisms are of biotechnological importance. While these applications have been described in previous reviews, the present paper highlights the environmental adaptations and genome diversifications of Geobacillus spp. and their applications in evolutionary-protein engineering. Despite their obligate thermophilic properties, Geobacillus spp. are widely distributed in nature. Because several isolates demonstrate remarkable properties for cell reproduction in their respective niches, they seem to exist not only as endospores but also as vegetative cells in diverse environments. This suggests their excellence in environmental adaptation via genome diversification; in fact, evidence suggests that Geobacillus spp. were derived from Bacillus spp. while diversifying their genomes via horizontal gene transfer. Moreover, when subjected to an environmental stressor, Geobacillus spp. diversify their genomes using inductive mutations and transposable elements to produce derivative cells that are adaptive to the stressor. Notably, inductive mutations in Geobacillus spp. occur more rapidly and frequently than the stress-induced mutagenesis observed in other microorganisms. Owing to this, Geobacillus spp. can efficiently generate mutant genes coding for thermostable enzyme variants from the thermolabile enzyme genes under appropriate selection pressures. This phenomenon provides a new approach to generate thermostable enzymes, termed as thermoadaptation-directed enzyme evolution, thereby expanding the biotechnological potentials of Geobacillus spp. In this review, we have discussed this approach using successful examples and major challenges yet to be addressed.
Collapse
|
7
|
Najar IN, Sherpa MT, Das S, Verma K, Dubey VK, Thakur N. Geobacillus yumthangensis sp. nov., a thermophilic bacterium isolated from a north-east Indian hot spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:3430-3434. [PMID: 30222099 DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
A thermophilic, spore-forming, rod-shaped bacterium isolated from the Yumthang hot spring in North Sikkim, India was subjected to taxonomic studies. The thermophilic bacterial isolate was designated as strain AYN2T. Cells were Gram-stain-positive, aerobic, motile, rod-shaped, catalase-positive and methyl red-negative. Strain AYN2T was able to grow in the pH range from 6 to 10 (optimum, pH 7.5-8.0), at 40-70 °C (60 °C) and in NaCl concentrations of 0-4 % (1 %). The major cellular fatty acids were iso-C15 : 0 (12.8 %), iso-C16 : 0 (13.9 %) and iso-C17 : 0 (13.8 %). No matches were found in the rtsba6 Sherlock libraries. The G+C content of the genomic DNA was 42.11 mol%. Based on phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences, strain AYNT showed highest sequence similarity to the type strain of Geobacillus toebii (96 %). However, the phenotypic properties of strain AYN2T were clearly distinct from those of G. toebii and related species. On the basis of polyphasic analysis, strain AYN2T represents a novel species in the genus Geobacillus, for which the name Geobacillus yumthangensis sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is AYN2T(MTCC=12749=KCTC=33950= JCM 32596).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishfaq Nabi Najar
- 1Department of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Sikkim University, 6th Mile, Samdur, Tadong, Gangtok - 737102, Sikkim, India
| | - Mingma Thundu Sherpa
- 1Department of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Sikkim University, 6th Mile, Samdur, Tadong, Gangtok - 737102, Sikkim, India
| | - Sayak Das
- 1Department of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Sikkim University, 6th Mile, Samdur, Tadong, Gangtok - 737102, Sikkim, India
| | - Kamalesh Verma
- 2Centre for the Environment, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati-781039, Assam, India
| | - Vikash Kumar Dubey
- 2Centre for the Environment, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati-781039, Assam, India.,3Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute ofTechnology Guwahati, Guwahati-781039, Assam, India
| | - Nagendra Thakur
- 1Department of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Sikkim University, 6th Mile, Samdur, Tadong, Gangtok - 737102, Sikkim, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
|