1
|
Opoku M, Fang M, Lu W, Li Y, Xiao W. Acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: can repair become an alternative to reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. J Orthop Surg Res 2024; 19:331. [PMID: 38825707 PMCID: PMC11145936 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04812-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform a meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair and ACL reconstruction for acute ACL rupture. METHOD We searched Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to seek relevant studies. Clinical outcomes included failure rate, hardware removal rate, anteroposterior (AP) knee laxity, and patient-reported outcomes. In addition, subgroup analysis was carried out according to repair techniques, rupture locations, and study designs. Funnel plots were used to detect publication bias. All statistical analysis was performed using STATA (version 14.2, StataCorp). RESULTS A total of 10 articles were included in this study, comprising 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 cohort studies, involving a total of 549 patients. We found no statistical differences between the ACL repair and ACL reconstruction in the following outcomes: failure rate, AP knee laxity, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) Score, and Tegner score. However, the ACL repair group had a higher hardware removal rate. Except for AP knee laxity results on different repair techniques, there was no statistical difference in other subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION Compared with ACL reconstruction, ACL repair shows similar results in clinical outcomes, and it is promising to be an effective alternative treatment for acute ACL rupture. Larger samples and higher-quality studies are needed to support our results and further explore the advantages of ACL repair in other aspects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Opoku
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China
| | - Mingqing Fang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410083, China
| | - Wenhao Lu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China
| | - Yusheng Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China.
| | - Wenfeng Xiao
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haack C, Zeppieri G, Moser MW. Rehabilitation Following ACL Repair with Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation in Female Gymnast: A Resident's Case Report. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2024; 19:745-757. [PMID: 38835983 PMCID: PMC11144659 DOI: 10.26603/001c.117773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries continue to be a major source of morbidity in gymnastics. The gold standard is to perform an ACL Reconstruction (ACLR). However, injuries to the proximal femoral attachment of the ACL have demonstrated an ability to regenerate. An alternative surgical intervention to the ACLR in this ACL tear subgroup is an ACL repair. The purpose of this case report is to provide a rehabilitation progression for a female gymnast after an ACL repair with Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation (IBLA). Case Description The subject was a 16-year-old female who presented with a Sherman Type 1 proximal avulsion of her ACL. She underwent an ACL repair with IBLA. Physical therapy interventions followed a sequential and multi-phased approach based on time for tissue physiologic healing and individual progression. Patient reported outcomes including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) and the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) were assessed in conjunction with isokinetic strength and hop performance testing to determine return to sport readiness. Outcomes The subject completed 42 sessions over the course of 26 weeks in addition to a home exercise program. At return to sport, clinically meaningful improvement was observed in patient reported outcomes including the IKDC, ACL-RSI, and OSPRO-YF. Additionally, strength and hop performance surpassed established thresholds of clinical significance. The subject returned to sport at six months post-operatively. Conclusion The subject in this case report returned to full participation in gymnastics six months after an ACL repair with internal bracing following a sequential and multi-phased rehabilitation. The primary ACL repair with IBLA appeared beneficial to this patient and could benefit from additional study in other athletes and athletic populations. Level of Evidence Level 5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colten Haack
- Department of Sports MedicineUniversity of Wisconsin Health
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nyland J, Sirignano MN, Richards J, Krupp RJ. Regenerative Anterior Cruciate Ligament Healing in Youth and Adolescent Athletes: The Emerging Age of Recovery Science. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2024; 9:80. [PMID: 38804446 PMCID: PMC11130880 DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9020080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries mainly arise from non-contact mechanisms during sport performance, with most injuries occurring among youth or adolescent-age athletes, particularly females. The growing popularity of elite-level sport training has increased the total volume, intensity and frequency of exercise and competition loading to levels that may exceed natural healing capacity. Growing evidence suggests that the prevailing mechanism that leads to non-contact ACL injury from sudden mechanical fatigue failure may be accumulated microtrauma. Given the consequences of primary ACL injury on the future health and quality of life of youth and adolescent athletes, the objective of this review is to identify key "recovery science" factors that can help prevent these injuries. Recovery science is any aspect of sports training (type, volume, intensity, frequency), nutrition, and sleep/rest or other therapeutic modalities that may prevent the accumulated microtrauma that precedes non-contact ACL injury from sudden mechanical fatigue failure. This review discusses ACL injury epidemiology, current surgical efficacy, the native ACL vascular network, regional ACL histological complexities such as the entheses and crimp patterns, extracellular matrix remodeling, the concept of causal histogenesis, exercise dosage and ligament metabolism, central nervous system reorganization post-ACL rupture, homeostasis regulation, nutrition, sleep and the autonomic nervous system. Based on this information, now may be a good time to re-think primary ACL injury prevention strategies with greater use of modified sport training, improved active recovery that includes well-planned nutrition, and healthy sleep patterns. The scientific rationale behind the efficacy of regenerative orthobiologics and concomitant therapies for primary ACL injury prevention in youth and adolescent athletes are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Nyland
- Norton Orthopedic Institute, 9880 Angie’s Way, Suite 250, Louisville, KY 40241, USA (J.R.); (R.J.K.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Braithwaite C, Hafen TJ, Dean R, Lebaschi A, Guettler J, Bicos J. Outcomes of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Repair for Proximal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2024; 16:e59124. [PMID: 38803739 PMCID: PMC11129541 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare failure rates among different techniques of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair for the treatment of proximal ACL ruptures. Meta-analysis and systematic review were completed, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Studies from Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed published between June 2011 and June 2022 reporting outcomes of primary ACL repair on proximal tears with a minimum two-year follow-up were included. Primary ACL repair was divided into dynamic, static, and non-augmented repair. The primary outcome was failure rates, and the secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and anterior tibial stability (ATT). Eighteen studies on primary ACL repair were included, with a total of 614 patients (ages ranging from 6 to 65, 60% male). Only two studies were level 1 randomized controlled clinical trials. The static repair had a failure rate of 33 out of 261 (12.6%), non-augmented was 17 out of 179 (9.4%), and dynamic repair was 31 out of 174 (17.8%); no statistically significant difference was found comparing the failure rates (p = 0.090). PROs using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores had weighted averages of 91.7 (95% confidence interval (CI): 89.6-93.8) and 94.7 (95% CI: 92.7-96.7), respectively. ATT had a weighted average of 1.668 mm (95% CI: 1.002-2.334). The primary findings of this paper include a 12.6% combined failure rate for primary proximal ACL repair with no significant difference in failure rate or PROs when accounting for the methodology of repair at a minimum two-year follow-up. It is important to note the lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials, the heterogeneity of included studies, and the lack of long-term data. Despite these limitations, the findings of the current analysis suggest that primary repair may be a useful treatment option for indicated candidates with proximal ACL ruptures. Further long-term and higher-quality comparative studies on ACL reconstruction are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Collin Braithwaite
- Department of Orthopedics, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, USA
| | - Tanner J Hafen
- Department of Orthopedics, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, USA
| | - Robert Dean
- Department of Orthopedics, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, USA
| | - Amir Lebaschi
- Department of Orthopedics, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, USA
| | - Joseph Guettler
- Department of Orthopedics, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, USA
| | - James Bicos
- Department of Orthopedics, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jackson GR, Lee J, Tuthill T, Chan J, Sugrañes J, Mowers CC, Batra A, Khan ZA, Mameri ES, Brusalis CM, Chahla J, Verma NN. Higher Rates of Residual Postoperative Instability after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Female Patients: A Systematic Review of Level II Studies. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2023; 5:100772. [PMID: 37560145 PMCID: PMC10407150 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare revision rates and residual postoperative instability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction based on biological sex. METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane library databases were queried from database inception through October 2022. Level I and II prospectively-enrolling human clinical studies that compared revision rates and physical examination of postoperative stability after ACL reconstruction between male and female patients were included. Outcomes were stratified by patient sex and quantitatively compared using a χ2 test. Study quality was assessed using the MINORS criteria. RESULTS Four studies consisting of 406 patients (50% males) with a mean age of 25 years (range, 13.9-62 years) were identified. Mean follow-up time was 34.4 months (range, 22-60 months). Hamstring tendon autografts were used in 62% of ACL reconstructions in males and in 65% of ACL reconstructions in females, whereas bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts were used in 38% and 35% of procedures in males and females, respectively. A residual positive Lachman test result was more frequently reported among females compared to males (5.8% vs 0.6%; P = 0.03). No significant difference in revision rates or residual pivot-shift on examination was observed between males and females (P = 0.38 and P = 0.08, respectively). CONCLUSION Female patients undergoing ACL reconstruction have higher reported rates of residual anterior instability with Lachman than male patients. However, no sex-based differences were identified with residual pivot-shift on examination or rate of revision ACL surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II; Systematic Review of level II studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett R. Jackson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jonathan Lee
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A
| | - Trevor Tuthill
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jimmy Chan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joan Sugrañes
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Colton C. Mowers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Anjay Batra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Zeeshan A. Khan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Enzo S. Mameri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
- Instituto Brasil de Tecnologia da Saúde, Rio de Janeiro
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Jorge Chahla
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nikhil N. Verma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fayard JM, Foissey C, Pacoret V, Abid H, Vieira TD, Gabr A, Thaunat M. Return to Sports After ACL Augmentation With Anterolateral Reconstruction (ALR) Harvesting Gracilis Only Compared With ACL Reconstruction With ALR Harvesting Both Hamstring Tendons. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:2918-2927. [PMID: 37548031 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231187038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair (ACL-Rp) is known to be a valuable alternative to ACL reconstruction (ACL-Rc) in selected indications. The majority of the ACL-Rp techniques recommend the use of a synthetic brace. The use of the gracilis allows both a biological internal brace and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALR). PURPOSE The primary objective was to compare the early ability to return to sports between patients who underwent ACL-Rp using a gracilis autograft as an internal brace augmentation with ALR and patients who underwent the conventional ACL-Rc with ALR technique sacrificing both the gracilis and the semitendinosus. The secondary objective was to compare the failure rate, clinical scores, and return to sports at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS A retrospective analysis was undertaken. A total of 49 patients who underwent ACL-Rp with ALR between December 2018 and May 2019 were propensity matched at a 1:1 ratio to those who underwent ACL-Rc with ALR during the same period. The decision to perform ACL-Rp with ALR was based on preoperative selection and intraoperative arthroscopic findings: proximal avulsion tear, partial ACL tear, low- to midlevel sports participation, and good tissue quality. The ability to return to sports was assessed using isokinetic tests and the Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport test functional test at 6 months postoperatively. At the final follow-up, knee laxity parameters, return to sports, and clinical outcome (Lysholm score, Tegner Activity Scale score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury score) were recorded. RESULTS The ACL-Rp group had significantly less hamstring strength deficit when compared with their counterparts who underwent ACL-Rc (0.2% vs 10.2% in concentric, P < .001; 2.5% vs 14% in eccentric, P < .001). The mean Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport test score was significantly higher in the ACL-Rc group (69.7% ± 16.6% [range, 19%-100%] vs 61% ± 16.8% [range, 19%-100%]; P = .001). In the ACL-Rp group, 61% (30/49) of the patients were authorized to return to pivot sports versus 41% (20/49) in the ACL-Rc group (P = .04). At a mean final follow-up of 31.4 ± 3.5 months, no significant differences were demonstrated between groups with respect to clinical scores and knee laxity parameters. There was a trend for a higher failure rate in the ACL-Rp group without any significance (ACL-Rp: 6.1% [3/49] vs ACL-Rc: 0%; P = .08). CONCLUSION At 6 months after operation, harvesting only the gracilis with this ACL-Rp and augmentation with ALR technique was linked to a better early ability to return to sports compared with the ACL-Rc with ALR technique harvesting both the gracilis and semitendinosus. This technique had a limited effect on early flexion strength and provided a satisfactory rerupture rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Marie Fayard
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
- Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Constant Foissey
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
- Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Victor Pacoret
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
- Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Hichem Abid
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
- Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Thais Dutra Vieira
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
- Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Ayman Gabr
- University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mathieu Thaunat
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
- Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
ACL repair for athletes? J Orthop 2022; 31:61-66. [PMID: 35464814 PMCID: PMC9018522 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The current gold standard treatment for an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear in an athlete is an arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with autografts. This restores the knee stability but is associated with unique complications like graft re-tear, kinesiophobia and graft donor site morbidity. ACL suture repair (ACLSR) is an attractive alternative method of surgical management of this injury. Current science of ACLSR The potential advantages of performing a repair are the preservation of native biology and proprioceptive function of ACL, elimination of a graft and preservation of bone stock. The purported benefits are better stability, reduction of kinesiophobia and faster rehabilitation. ACLSR is now performed only for proximal (femoral-sided) tears in the acute phase, when the tissue quality is good and using high-strength nonabsorbable sutures. There are several techniques for performing ACLSR but broadly speaking are either non-augmented, static augmented with suture tape, dynamic augmented or using bio-scaffolds. Clinical outcome of ACLSR There is a lot of literature on ACLSRs including case series, cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. The results from these studies are encouraging but mostly pertain to patient reported outcome measures, are in small numbers and in the short-term. The results are also inconsistent across different studies and not specifically performed for the athletic population. Moreover, most of these studies are from the innovator or designer surgeons and groups and have not been independently validated. Conclusion Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend ACLSR as a preferred method of managing even acute proximal tears in athletes. Improved rates of return to sports, lower retear rate and lesser kinesiophobia needs to be proven in athletes.
Collapse
|
8
|
Wilson WT, Hopper GP, Banger MS, Blyth MJG, Riches PE, MacKay GM. Anterior cruciate ligament repair with internal brace augmentation: A systematic review. Knee 2022; 35:192-200. [PMID: 35366618 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary repair of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures has re-emerged as a treatment option for proximal tears, with internal brace augmentation often utilised. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the current evidence presenting outcomes of ACL repair with internal bracing to assess the safety and efficacy of this technique. METHODS All studies reporting outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair of proximal ACL tears, augmented with internal bracing from 2014-2021 were included. Primary outcome was failure rate and secondary outcomes were subjective patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective assessment of anteroposterior knee laxity. RESULTS Nine studies were included, consisting of 347 patients, mean age 32.5 years, mean minimum follow up 2 years. There were 36 failures (10.4%, CI 7.4% - 14.1%). PROMs reporting was variable across studies. KOOS, Lysholm and IKDC scores were most frequently used with mean scores > 87%. The mean Tegner and Marx scores at follow-up were 6.1 and 7.8 respectively. The mean side to side difference measured for anteroposterior knee laxity was 1.2mm. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review with meta-analysis shows that ACL repair with internal bracing is a safe technique for treatment of proximal ruptures, with a failure rate of 10.4%. Subjective scores and clinical laxity testing also revealed satisfactory results. This suggests that ACL repair with internal bracing should be considered as an alternative to ACL reconstruction for acute proximal tears, with the potential benefits of retained native tissue and proprioception, as well as negating the need for graft harvest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W T Wilson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK; NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
| | - G P Hopper
- NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
| | - M S Banger
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
| | | | - P E Riches
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Glasbrenner J, Fischer M, Raschke MJ, Briese T, Müller M, Herbst E, Kittl C, Schliemann B, Kösters C. Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142:1589-1595. [PMID: 34331580 PMCID: PMC9217861 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04088-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The object of this study was to evaluate the primary stability of tibial interference screw (IFS) fixation in single-stage revision surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the case of recurrent instability after ACL repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS), dependent on the implant position during DIS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Tibial aperture fixation in ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) was performed in a porcine knee model using an IFS. Native ACL-R was performed in the control group (n = 15). In the intervention groups DIS and subsequent implant removal were performed prior to single-stage revision ACL-R. A distance of 20 mm in group R-DIS1 (n = 15) and 5 mm in group R-DIS2 (n = 15) was left between the joint line and the implant during DIS. Specimens were mounted in a material-testing machine and load-to-failure was applied in a worst-case-scenario. RESULTS Load to failure was 454 ± 111 N in the R-DIS1 group, 154 ± 71 N in the R-DIS2 group and 405 ± 105 N in the primary ACL-R group. Load-to-failure, stiffness and elongation of the group R-DIS2 were significantly inferior in comparison to R-DIS1 and ACL-R respectively (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between load-to-failure, stiffness and elongation of R-DIS1 and the control group. CONCLUSION Primary stability of tibial aperture fixation in single-stage revision ACL-R in case of recurrent instability after DIS depends on monobloc position during ACL repair. Primary stability is comparable to aperture fixation in primary ACL-R, if a bone stock of 20 mm is left between the monobloc and the tibial joint line during the initial procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Glasbrenner
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, Building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
| | - M Fischer
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, Building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - M J Raschke
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, Building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - T Briese
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, Building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - M Müller
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, Building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - E Herbst
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, Building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - C Kittl
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, Building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - B Schliemann
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, Building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - C Kösters
- Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Maria-Josef-Hospital Greven, Lindenstraße 29, 48268, Greven, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tang Y, Tian J, Li L, Huang L, Shen Q, Guo S, Jiang Y. Biomimetic Biphasic Electrospun Scaffold for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2021; 18:819-830. [PMID: 34355341 DOI: 10.1007/s13770-021-00376-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Replacing damaged anterior cruciate ligaments (ACLs) with tissue-engineered artificial ligaments is challenging because ligament scaffolds must have a multiregional structure that can guide stem cell differentiation. Here, we designed a biphasic scaffold and evaluated its effect on human marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) under dynamic culture conditions as well as rat ACL reconstruction model in vivo. METHODS We designed a novel dual-phase electrospinning strategy wherein the scaffolds comprised randomly arranged phases at the two ends and an aligned phase in the middle. The morphological, mechanical properties and scaffold degradation were investigated. MSCs proliferation, adhesion, morphology and fibroblast markers were evaluated under dynamic culturing. This scaffold were tested if they could induce ligament formation using a rodent model in vivo. RESULTS Compared with other materials, poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide)/poly(ε-caprolactone) (PLGA/PCL) with mass ratio of 1:5 showed appropriate mechanical properties and biodegradability that matched ACLs. After 28 days of dynamic culturing, MSCs were fusiform oriented in the aligned phase and randomly arranged in a paving-stone-like morphology in the random phase. The increased expression of fibroblastic markers demonstrated that only the alignment of nanofibers worked with mechanical stimulation to promote effective fibroblast differentiation. This scaffold was a dense collagenous structure, and there was minimal difference in collagen direction in the orientation phase. CONCLUSION Dual-phase electrospun scaffolds had mechanical properties and degradability similar to those of ACLs. They promoted differences in the morphology of MSCs and induced fibroblast differentiation under dynamic culture conditions. Animal experiments showed that ligamentous tissue regenerated well and supported joint stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya Tang
- Orthopedic Department, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
| | - Jialiang Tian
- Orthopedic Department, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
| | - Long Li
- College of Materials and Metallurgy, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
| | - Lin Huang
- College of Materials and Metallurgy, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
| | - Quan Shen
- College of Materials and Metallurgy, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
| | - Shanzhu Guo
- College of Materials and Metallurgy, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
| | - Yue Jiang
- College of Materials and Metallurgy, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu J, Kator JL, Zarro M, Leong NL. Rehabilitation Principles to Consider for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair. Sports Health 2021; 14:424-432. [PMID: 34344237 DOI: 10.1177/19417381211032949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is among the most common orthopaedic injuries, and reconstruction of a ruptured ACL is a common orthopaedic procedure. In general, surgical intervention is necessary to restore stability to the injured knee, and to prevent meniscal damage. Along with surgery, intense postoperative physical therapy is needed to restore function to the injured extremity. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) has been the standard of care in recent decades, and advances in surgical technology have reintroduced the prospect of augmented primary repair of the native ACL via a variety of methods. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A search of PubMed database of articles and reviews available in English was performed through 2020. The search terms ACLR, anterior cruciate ligament repair, bridge enhanced acl repair, suture anchor repair, dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, internal bracing, suture ligament augmentation, and internal brace ligament augmentation were used. STUDY DESIGN Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 5. RESULTS No exact consensus exists on effective rehabilitation protocols after ACL repair techniques, as the variation in published protocols seem even greater than the variation in those for ACLR. For some techniques such as internal bracing and dynamic interligamentary stabilization, it is likely permissible for the patients to progress to full weightbearing and discontinue bracing sooner. However, caution should be applied with regard to earlier return to sport than after ACLR as to minimize risk for retear. CONCLUSION More research is needed to address how physical therapies must adapt to these innovative repair techniques. Until that is accomplished, we recommend that physical therapists understand the differences among the various ACL surgery techniques discussed here and work with the surgeons to develop a rehabilitation protocol for their mutual patients. STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION TAXONOMY (SORT) C.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jocelyn Wu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jamie L Kator
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Michael Zarro
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Natalie L Leong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Surgery, Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Criss CR, Melton MS, Ulloa SA, Simon JE, Clark BC, France CR, Grooms DR. Rupture, reconstruction, and rehabilitation: A multi-disciplinary review of mechanisms for central nervous system adaptations following anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee 2021; 30:78-89. [PMID: 33873089 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite surgical reconstruction and extensive rehabilitation, persistent quadriceps inhibition, gait asymmetry, and functional impairment remain prevalent in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. A combination of reports have suggested underlying central nervous system adaptations in those after injury govern long-term neuromuscular impairments. The classic assumption has been to attribute neurophysiologic deficits to components of injury, but other factors across the continuum of care (e.g. surgery, perioperative analgesia, and rehabilitative strategies) have been largely overlooked. OBJECTIVE This review provides a multidisciplinary perspective to 1) provide a narrative review of studies reporting neuroplasticity following ACL injury in order to inform clinicians of the current state of literature and 2) provide a mechanistic framework of neurophysiologic deficits with potential clinical implications across all phases of injury and recovery (injury, surgery, and rehabilitation) RESULTS: Studies using a variety of neurophysiologic modalities have demonstrated peripheral and central nervous system adaptations in those with prior ACL injury. Longitudinal investigations suggest neurophysiologic changes at spinal-reflexive and corticospinal pathways follow a unique timecourse across injury, surgery, and rehabilitation. CONCLUSION Clinicians should consider the unique injury, surgery, anesthesia, and rehabilitation on central nervous system adaptations. Therapeutic strategies across the continuum of care may be beneficial to mitigate maladaptive neuroplasticity in those after ACL injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cody R Criss
- Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
| | - M Stephen Melton
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sergio A Ulloa
- OhioHealth Physician Group Heritage College: Orthopedic and Sports Medicine, OhioHealth O'Bleness Memorial Hospital, Athens, OH, USA
| | - Janet E Simon
- Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Division of Athletic Training, School of Applied Health Sciences and Wellness, College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA
| | - Brian C Clark
- Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA
| | - Christopher R France
- Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA
| | - Dustin R Grooms
- Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Division of Athletic Training, School of Applied Health Sciences and Wellness, College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Division of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation and Communication Sciences, College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fradin T, Haidar IM, Rayes J, Ngbilo C, Vieira TD, Sonnery-Cottet B. Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction After Failed ACL Repair. Arthrosc Tech 2021; 10:e1001-e1005. [PMID: 33981543 PMCID: PMC8085311 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
For some authors, repair of the torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in selected patients can be considered a valuable surgical treatment option. One of the main advantages is that it leaves all grafts available for any type of reconstruction in case the repair fails. This Technical Note describes arthroscopic ACL reconstruction after failure of an ACL repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
- Address correspondence to Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet, M.D., Centre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Groupe Ramsay GDS, 69008 Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
ACL Repair: A Game Changer or Will History Repeat Itself? A Critical Appraisal. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10050912. [PMID: 33652689 PMCID: PMC7956607 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10050912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Until the past decade the common thought was that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was not able to heal and restore knee stability. In this manuscript a brief review of studies of the developers and the early adaptors of four different modern ACL repair techniques are presented. The present status and considerations for the future of ACL repair and its research are shared. After promising short- to midterm ACL healing results by the developers, the results of the early adaptors show more variety in terms of rerupture and reintervention for other reasons. Risk factors for failure are a young age, high preinjury sports activity level, midsubstance ruptures and impaired integrity of the ACL bundles and the synovial sheath. There is a call for more clinical data and randomized clinical trials. Conclusion: an important finding of the past decade is that the ACL is able to heal and subsequently restabilize the knee. Patient selection is emphasized: the ideal patient is a non-high athlete older than 25 and has an acute proximal one bundle ACL rupture. Further research will have to show if ACL repair could be a game changer or if history will repeat itself.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kawakami Y, Nonaka K, Fukase N, Amore AD, Murata Y, Quinn P, Luketich S, Takayama K, Patel KG, Matsumoto T, Cummins JH, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R, Wagner WR, Fu FH, Huard J. A Cell-free Biodegradable Synthetic Artificial Ligament for the Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament in a Rat Model. Acta Biomater 2021; 121:275-287. [PMID: 33129986 DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.10.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Traditional Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction is commonly performed using an allograft or autograft and possesses limitations such as donor site morbidity, decreased range of motion, and potential infection. However, a biodegradable synthetic graft could greatly assist in the prevention of such restrictions after ACL reconstruction. In this study, artificial grafts were generated using "wet" and "dry" electrospinning processes with a biodegradable elastomer, poly (ester urethane) urea (PEUU), and were evaluated in vitro and in vivo in a rat model. Four groups were established: (1) Wet PEUU artificial ligament, (2) Dry PEUU artificial ligament, (3) Dry polycaprolactone artificial ligament (PCL), and (4) autologous flexor digitorum longus tendon graft. Eight weeks after surgery, the in vivo tensile strength of wet PEUU ligaments had significantly increased compared to the other synthetic ligaments. These results aligned with increased infiltration of host cells and decreased inflammation within the wet PEUU grafts. In contrast, very little cellular infiltration was observed in PCL and dry PEUU grafts. Micro-computed tomography analysis performed at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively revealed significantly smaller bone tunnels in the tendon autograft and wet PEUU groups. The Wet PEUU grafts served as an adequate functioning material and allowed for the creation of tissues that closely resembled the ACL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohei Kawakami
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; Stem Cell Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Nonaka
- McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA
| | - Naomasa Fukase
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail CO 81657; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Antonio D' Amore
- McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA
| | - Yoichi Murata
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail CO 81657
| | - Patrick Quinn
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail CO 81657
| | - Samuel Luketich
- McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA
| | - Koji Takayama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; Stem Cell Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Kunj G Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; Stem Cell Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219
| | - Tomoyuki Matsumoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | | | - Masahiro Kurosaka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Kuroda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - William R Wagner
- McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA
| | - Freddie H Fu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Johnny Huard
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail CO 81657.
| |
Collapse
|