1
|
King BH, Gunathunga PB. Gustation in insects: taste qualities and types of evidence used to show taste function of specific body parts. JOURNAL OF INSECT SCIENCE (ONLINE) 2023; 23:11. [PMID: 37014302 PMCID: PMC10072106 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iead018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
The insect equivalent of taste buds are gustatory sensilla, which have been found on mouthparts, pharynxes, antennae, legs, wings, and ovipositors. Most gustatory sensilla are uniporous, but not all apparently uniporous sensilla are gustatory. Among sensilla containing more than one neuron, a tubular body on one dendrite is also indicative of a taste sensillum, with the tubular body adding tactile function. But not all taste sensilla are also tactile. Additional morphological criteria are often used to recognize if a sensillum is gustatory. Further confirmation of such criteria by electrophysiological or behavioral evidence is needed. The five canonical taste qualities to which insects respond are sweet, bitter, sour, salty, and umami. But not all tastants that insects respond to easily fit in these taste qualities. Categories of insect tastants can be based not only on human taste perception, but also on whether the response is deterrent or appetitive and on chemical structure. Other compounds that at least some insects taste include, but are not limited to: water, fatty acids, metals, carbonation, RNA, ATP, pungent tastes as in horseradish, bacterial lipopolysaccharides, and contact pheromones. We propose that, for insects, taste be defined not only as a response to nonvolatiles but also be restricted to responses that are, or are thought to be, mediated by a sensillum. This restriction is useful because some of the receptor proteins in gustatory sensilla are also found elsewhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B H King
- Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Uebi T, Sakita T, Ikeda R, Sakanishi K, Tsutsumi T, Zhang Z, Ma H, Matsubara R, Matsuyama S, Nakajima S, Huang RN, Habe S, Hefetz A, Ozaki M. Chemical identification of an active component and putative neural mechanism for repellent effect of a native ant’s odor on invasive species. Front Physiol 2022; 13:844084. [PMID: 36111148 PMCID: PMC9468892 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.844084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The invasive Argentine ants (Linepithema humile) and the red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) constitute a worldwide threat, causing severe disruption to ecological systems and harming human welfare. In view of the limited success of current pest control measures, we propose here to employ repellents as means to mitigate the effect of these species. We demonstrate that cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) used as nestmate-recognition pheromone in the Japanese carpenter ant (Camponotus japonicus), and particularly its (Z)-9-tricosene component, induced vigorous olfactory response and intense aversion in these invasive species. (Z)-9-Tricosene, when given to their antennae, caused indiscriminate glomerular activation of antennal lobe (AL) regions, creating neural disarray and leading to aversive behavior. Considering the putative massive central neural effect, we suggest that the appropriate use of certain CHCs of native ants can facilitate aversive withdrawal of invasive ants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Uebi
- Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
- KYOUSEI Science Center for Life and Nature, Nara Women’s University, Nara, Japan
| | - Tomoya Sakita
- Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Ryo Ikeda
- Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Keita Sakanishi
- Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Tsutsumi
- Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Zijian Zhang
- Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Huiying Ma
- Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Matsubara
- Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Shigeru Matsuyama
- Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Satoko Nakajima
- Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Rong-Nan Huang
- Department of Entomology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shunya Habe
- Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Abraham Hefetz
- School of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mamiko Ozaki
- Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
- KYOUSEI Science Center for Life and Nature, Nara Women’s University, Nara, Japan
- Department of Chemical Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
- Morphogenetic Signaling Team, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Japan
- *Correspondence: Mamiko Ozaki,
| |
Collapse
|