Risks and management of hypertension in cancer patients undergoing targeted therapy: a review

Analysis of competing risks of cardiovascular death in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A population-based study

Clinical data has shown that cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have emerged as a prominent cause of mortality in individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This research aimed to reveal the comorbid effects of CVDs in patients with HCC. The cardiovascular mortality of patients diagnosed with HCC between 2000 and 2014 was compared to that of the general US population. Standardized mortality ratios were calculated to quantify the relative risk of cardiovascular mortality in HCC patients. The cumulative incidence of cardiovascular death (CVD) was estimated using Fine-Gray testing, and independent risk factors for CVD were determined using competing risk models. The results were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The overall SMR for CVD in HCC patients was 11.15 (95% CI: 10.99-11.32). The risk of CVD was significantly higher in patients aged < 55 years (SMR: 56.19 [95% CI: 54.97-57.44]) compared to those aged ≥ 75 years (SMR: 1.86 [95% CI: 1.75-1.97]). This study suggests that patients with HCC are at significant risk of developing CVD. Competing risk analyses indicated that age, grade, tumor size, surveillance, epidemiology, and end results stage, and surgical status were independent risk factors for CVD in patients with HCC. Therefore, patients with HCC require enhanced preventive screening and management of CVDs during and after treatment to improve patient survival.

Management of hypertension in patients with cancer: challenges and considerations

The survival rates of many cancers have significantly improved due to recent advancements in cancer screening and therapeutics. Although better cancer outcomes are encouraging, additional health challenges have surfaced, the utmost of which is the burden imposed by various cardiovascular and renal toxicities of anticancer therapies. To improve the overall outcome of patients with cancer, it is essential to understand and manage these treatment-related adverse effects. The cardiovascular side effects of antineoplastic therapies are well-known and include left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, myocardial ischaemia, QT prolongation, arrhythmia and hypertension. Among these, hypertension is the most common complication, prevalent in about 40% of all cancer patients, yet frequently overlooked and undertreated. This review explores the intricate connection between cancer and hypertension and provides distinct approaches to diagnosing, monitoring and managing hypertension in patients with cancer. We also outline the challenges and considerations that are relevant to the care of patients receiving anticancer drugs with prohypertensive potential.

The Intersection of Prostate Cancer and Hypertension: a Call to Action

OPINION STATEMENT

With improvements in treatment and survival from prostate cancer, comorbid cardiac conditions will significantly impact overall morbidity and mortality from prostate cancer. Hypertension is a well-established cardiovascular risk factor that increases the risk of heart failure, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Therapies used in the treatment of prostate cancer, including GnRH agonists, GnRH antagonists, enzalutamide, abiraterone, and others, can directly or indirectly increase the risk of hypertension. In this paper, we review the evidence available on the incidence and mechanism of hypertension in prostate cancer patients. In addition, we provide recommendations on the assessment, treatment, and future directions for hypertension management in the prostate cancer population. We propose an individualized goal for blood pressure in prostate cancer patients, balancing the target goal of 130/80 mmHg with common comorbidities of frailty, orthostatic symptoms, and imbalance in this population. The presence of additional comorbidities (myocardial infarction, heart failure, renal disease, diabetes) can assist in preference of anti-hypertensive drugs.

Repurposing of Chronically Used Drugs in Cancer Therapy: A Chance to Grasp

Despite the advancement in drug discovery for cancer therapy, drug repurposing remains an exceptional opportunistic strategy. This approach offers many advantages (faster, safer, and cheaper drugs) typically needed to overcome increased challenges, i.e., side effects, resistance, and costs associated with cancer therapy. However, not all drug classes suit a patient's condition or long-time use. For that, repurposing chronically used medications is more appealing. This review highlights the importance of repurposing anti-diabetic and anti-hypertensive drugs in the global fight against human malignancies. Extensive searches of all available evidence (up to 30 March 2023) on the anti-cancer activities of anti-diabetic and anti-hypertensive agents are obtained from multiple resources (PubMed, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, Drug Bank database, ReDo database, and the National Institutes of Health). Interestingly, more than 92 clinical trials are evaluating the anti-cancer activity of 14 anti-diabetic and anti-hypertensive drugs against more than 15 cancer types. Moreover, some of these agents have reached Phase IV evaluations, suggesting promising official release as anti-cancer medications. This comprehensive review provides current updates on different anti-diabetic and anti-hypertensive classes possessing anti-cancer activities with the available evidence about their mechanism(s) and stage of development and evaluation. Hence, it serves researchers and clinicians interested in anti-cancer drug discovery and cancer management.

Adverse Events and Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Multivariate Network Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSi) agents are emerging as standard treatments for prostate cancer across the disease spectrum, but much remains unknown regarding how their side-effect profiles compare.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the literature regarding adverse events (AEs) between the ARSi drugs abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC), and metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were queried for double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ARSi therapy up to September 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Two teams reviewed titles and abstracts, and 14 RCTs were included for analysis.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Forest plots were used to summarize risk ratios for the most common AEs. According to surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values, enzalutamide was ranked as the most toxic treatment regarding hypertension outcomes (SUCRA 0%, most likely to be the bottom-ranked treatment) in both mCRPC and nmCRPC (SUCRA 0%). Enzalutamide was also ranked as the most toxic regarding headache across all prostate cancer entities (SUCRA 0%, for mCRPC, 1% for nmCRPC, and 3% for mCSPC).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the ARSi side-effect profiles do not significantly differ, except that enzalutamide was ranked the most toxic regarding hypertension in mCRPC and nmCRPC, and the most toxic regarding headache across all prostate cancer settings. These results highlight the importance of close blood-pressure monitoring for enzalutamide, and future research should explore possible connections between cardiovascular and neurological risk with ARSi therapy. In addition, these comparisons rely on the validity of cross-trial comparisons.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed the side-effect profiles of second-generation antiandrogen drugs for the treatment of prostate cancer. Side effects were similar, apart from higher risk of high blood pressure and headache risk with enzalutamide.