1
|
Chudyk AM, Stoddard R, Duhamel TA, Schultz ASH. Future directions for patient engagement in research: a participatory workshop with Canadian patient partners and academic researchers. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:24. [PMID: 38350974 PMCID: PMC10865599 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01106-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient engagement in research (also commonly referred to as patient or patient and public involvement in research) strives to transform health research wherein patients (including caregivers and the public) are regularly and actively engaged as multidisciplinary research team members (i.e. patient partners) working jointly towards improved health outcomes and an enhanced healthcare system. To support its mindful evolution into a staple of health research, this participatory study aimed to identify future directions for Canadian patient engagement in research and discusses its findings in the context of the international literature. METHODS The study met its aim through a multi-meeting pan-Canadian virtual workshop. Participants (n = 30) included Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research-funded academic researchers and patient partners identified through a publicly available database, personal and professional networks and social media. All spoke English, could access the workshop virtually, and provided written informed consent. The workshop was composed of four, 1.5-3-h virtual meetings wherein participants discussed the current and preferred future states of Canadian patient engagement in research. Workshop discussions (i.e. data) were video and audio recorded. Themes were generated through an iterative process of inductive thematic analysis that occurred concurrently with the multi-week workshop. RESULTS Our participatory and iterative process identified 10 targetable areas of focus for the future of Canadian patient engagement in research. Five were categorized as system-level (systemic integration; academic culture; engagement networks; funding models; compensation models), one as researcher-level (engagement processes), and four crossed both levels (awareness; diversity and recruitment; training, tools and education; evaluation and impact). System level targetable areas called for reshaping the patient engagement ecosystem to create a legitimized and supportive space for patient engagement to be a staple component of a learning health system. Researcher level targetable areas called for academic researchers and patient partners to collaboratively generate evidence and apply knowledge to inform values and behaviours necessary to foster and sustain supportive health research spaces that are accessible to all. CONCLUSIONS Future directions for Canadian patient engagement in research span 10 interconnected targetable areas that require strong leadership and joint action between patient partners, academic researchers, and health and research institutions if patient engagement is to become a ubiquitous component of a learning health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Chudyk
- College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, CR3024-369 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada.
| | - Roger Stoddard
- Horizon Health Network, 80 Woodbridge Street, Fredericton, NB, E3B 4R3, Canada
| | - Todd A Duhamel
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, 212 Active Living Centre, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, St. Boniface General Hospital-Albrechtsen Research Centre, 351 Tache Ave, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada
| | - Annette S H Schultz
- College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, CR3022-369 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giannini AT, Leong M, Chan K, Ghaltaei A, Graham E, Robinson C, Skorska MN, Cross A, Gabison S. Patient, Family, Caregiver, and Community Engagement in Research: A Sensibility Evaluation of a Novel Infographic and Planning Guide. Physiother Can 2024; 76:64-77. [PMID: 38465302 PMCID: PMC10919359 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
Background Engaging patients, families, caregivers, and the community (PFCCs) throughout the research cycle ensures that research is meaningful for the target population. Although tools have been developed to promote PFCC engagement, many are lengthy, complex, and lack recommended behaviours. This study evaluated the sensibility of an infographic and accompanying planning guide for facilitating engagement of PFCCs in research. Methods Thirteen rehabilitation researchers reviewed the PFCC engagement tool and planning guide, participated in a semi-structured interview, and completed a 10-item sensibility questionnaire. Interviews were transcribed, imported into NVivo, and analyzed using direct content analysis. Median scores and proportions of responses for each of the 10 items in the questionnaire were calculated. Results Median scores for all questionnaire items were ≥ 4 on a 7-point Likert Scale. Participants reported the tool was easy to navigate, contained relevant items to promote PFCC engagement, and followed a logical sequence. Suggested modifications of the tool related to formatting, design, and changing the title. Conclusions The tool was deemed sensible for overt format, purpose and framework, face and content validity, and ease of usage and provides guidance to engage PFCCs across the research cycle. Further studies are recommended to assess the effectiveness of the tool to engage PFCCs in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan Leong
- From the:Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kelvin Chan
- From the:Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arman Ghaltaei
- From the:Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eden Graham
- From the:Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Craig Robinson
- From the:Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Malvina N. Skorska
- Child & Youth Psychiatry, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Cross
- School of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Paediatrics, CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University and the Institute of Applied Health Sciences, CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharon Gabison
- From the:Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Redding A, Santarossa S, Murphy D, Udumula MP, Munkarah A, Hijaz M, Rattan R. A patient perspective on applying intermittent fasting in gynecologic cancer. BMC Res Notes 2023; 16:190. [PMID: 37644560 PMCID: PMC10466878 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06453-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Researchers sought patient feedback on a proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which gynecological cancer patients would modify their diets with intermittent fasting to gain insight into patients' perspectives, receptivity, and potential obstacles. A convenience sample of 47 patients who met the inclusion criteria of the proposed RCT provided their feedback on the feasibility and protocols of the RCT using a multi-method approach consisting of focus groups (n = 8 patients) and surveys (n = 36 patients). RESULTS Patients were generally receptive to the concept of intermittent fasting, and many expressed an interest in attempting it themselves. Patients agreed that the study design was feasible in terms of study assessments, clinic visits, and biospecimen collection. Feedback on what could facilitate adherence included convenient appointment scheduling times and the availability of the research team to answer questions. Regarding recruitment, patients offered suggestions for study advertisements, with the majority concurring that a medical professional approaching them would increase their likelihood of participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Redding
- Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Sara Santarossa
- Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
| | - Dana Murphy
- Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Mary Priyanka Udumula
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, Women's Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Adnan Munkarah
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, Women's Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Miriana Hijaz
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, Women's Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Ramandeep Rattan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, Women's Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pozniak K, Buchanan F, Cross A, Crowson J, Galuppi B, Grahovac D, Gorter JW, Hlyva O, Ketelaar M, Kraus de Camargo O, Krpan Mesic M, Martens R, McCauley D, Nguyen L, Palisano RJ, Phoenix M, Putterman C, Rosenbaum P, Sprung J, Strohm S, Teplicky R, Thomson D, Wright M. Building a culture of engagement at a research centre for childhood disability. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2021; 7:78. [PMID: 34742354 PMCID: PMC8572501 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00319-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Engaging patients and family members as partners in research studies has become a widespread practice in healthcare. However, relatively little has been documented about what happens after the research study ends. For example, is patient and family engagement embedded in the wider infrastructure of organizations, and if so how? What are the long-term effects of engaging parents on research teams on the culture of how research is conducted? This study seeks to address these two gaps by examining how a culture of family engagement has been built over time at CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada. METHODS This study is based on ethnographic research methodology and combines elements of organizational ethnography, interviews, and collaborative auto-ethnography with parent partners, researchers, staff, and trainees. RESULTS Since the inception of CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research at McMaster University in 1989, parents have been involved in research studies. Over time, this involvement evolved from being consulted on research studies to undertaking decision-making roles as partners and most recently as co-principal investigators. A growing infrastructure fosters a community of engagement that goes beyond the individual research study, and often beyond CanChild. This infrastructure consists of training, knowledge mobilization and social networking. In addition, the "softer" building blocks of CanChild's culture of engagement are an openness to learning from others, a commitment to relationship building, and a drive to grow and improve. These values are espoused by the leadership and are instilled in the next generation of researchers to inform both research and clinical work. While some challenges should be acknowledged when researchers and family partners work together on research studies, we identify a number of strategies that we have used in our studies to foster authentic and meaningful family-researcher partnerships. CONCLUSION Engaging patients and families as partners in research constitutes a culture shift in health research, whereby studies about patients and families are carried out with them. Developing a community of engagement that transcends an individual research study is a step towards creating a culture of research that is truly shaped by the people about whom the research is being done.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kinga Pozniak
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Francine Buchanan
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Andrea Cross
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Jennifer Crowson
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Down Syndrome Association of Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Barb Galuppi
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Danijela Grahovac
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Jan Willem Gorter
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Oksana Hlyva
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Marjolijn Ketelaar
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olaf Kraus de Camargo
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Manda Krpan Mesic
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Rachel Martens
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Dayle McCauley
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Linda Nguyen
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Robert J. Palisano
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Michelle Phoenix
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Connie Putterman
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Peter Rosenbaum
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Jennifer Sprung
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Sonya Strohm
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Rachel Teplicky
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Donna Thomson
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Marilyn Wright
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rosario MK, Hebert MA, Sahota BK, Eurich D. Capacity development in patient-oriented research: programme evaluation and impact analysis. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:89. [PMID: 32778132 PMCID: PMC7418304 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00606-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background National and provincial funding was invested to increase the quantity and quality of patient-oriented research (POR) across Canada. Capacity development became a priority to ensure all stakeholders were prepared to engage in POR. In part, this need was met through an annual Studentship competition in the province of Alberta, providing funding to students whose research incorporated principles of POR. However, despite efforts to build capacity in the health research trainee population, little is known about the outcomes of these programmes. This evaluation study examined the outcomes of a POR capacity development programme for health research trainees. Methods Final impact narrative reports were submitted by the 21 Studentship programme awardees for 2015 and 2016 who represent a variety of health disciplines across three major research universities. The reports describe the programme outcomes as well as the overall impact on individual, project and professional development as POR trainees. A synthesis of structured and categorised report data was conducted, along with additional qualitative analyses as new themes emerged that were not apparent in the competency framework utilised in the programme design. Results Awardee reports detailed the impact of the Studentship programme on the key themes of increased knowledge and skill, relationship building, confidence and leadership, as well as project and career impact. The impacts felt most profoundly by the awardees were not reflective of the competencies that guided programme design. The outcomes were then re-examined using a health research capacity development framework to gain a more comprehensive view of programme impact. Conclusion The Studentship programme narratives provided insight into the rarely tracked capacity development outcomes of POR research trainees. Awardee narratives indicated significant development beyond the intended competencies and suggested a need to revisit the competency framework for POR in Alberta. While competencies were useful in guiding the design of the initial programme, a more comprehensive capacity development framework was required to capture the broader impacts on trainee development. Future capacity development programmes may benefit from these early programme insights, specifically the need for more robust competencies for POR. Further exploration of evaluation methods for short-term awards and sustainability of capacity development programmes is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marilynne A Hebert
- University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | | | - Dean Eurich
- University of Alberta, 116 St and 85 Ave., Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abayneh S, Lempp H, Hanlon C. Participatory action research to pilot a model of mental health service user involvement in an Ethiopian rural primary healthcare setting: study protocol. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2020; 6:2. [PMID: 31934350 PMCID: PMC6951014 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-019-0175-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Involvement of service-users at all levels of the mental health system is a policy imperative in many countries internationally. However, putting policy into practice seems complex; little is known about how best to involve service users and efforts are often criticized for being tokenistic. In low-and-middle income countries, less attention has been given to the roles of service users within mental health systems. The proposed study is part of a larger project intended to develop service-user involvement in mental health system strengthening in Ethiopia. A Theory of Change (ToC) model has already been developed through a participatory approach. This study protocol aims to describe the theoretical background and methods to pilot this model using participatory action research (PAR) and explore participants' experience of involvement. METHODS The proposed study will apply a PAR approach situated in critical social theory and conduct a phenomenological case study to find out participants' experience of involvement. This will be conducted in three stages. The focus of Stage 1 will be to(i) establish a Research Advisory Group (RAG), and Research Participant Group (RPG) at district and primary healthcare facility levels, respectively, and (ii) identify and prioritize potential areas of concern for involvement in the domains of advocacy, service planning and development, monitoring and improving service quality. In Stage 2, we will work with the RPG to develop a plan of action for the selected area. Stage 3 will aim to assist the RPG to implement and evaluate the plan of action. Process indicators and observation will be combined with in-depth interviews with participants to elicit their experiences of involvement. Thematic content analysis will be used. DISCUSSION The participatory approach to mental health service user involvement in health system strengthening employed by this study will support the implementation of solutions through locally relevant and contextualized actions. Findings from this study will contribute to the body of knowledge towards understanding the complexity of implementation of service user involvement and refine the ToC model for transferability to similar settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sisay Abayneh
- College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Research and Capacity-Building, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Heidi Lempp
- King’s College London, Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Weston Education Centre, 10, Cutcombe Rd, London, SE5 9RJ UK
| | - Charlotte Hanlon
- College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Research and Capacity-Building, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- King’s College London, Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK
- Centre for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smith E, Bélisle-Pipon JC, Resnik D. Patients as research partners; how to value their perceptions, contribution and labor? CITIZEN SCIENCE : THEORY AND PRACTICE 2019; 4:10.5334/cstp.184. [PMID: 32064121 PMCID: PMC7021275 DOI: 10.5334/cstp.184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Citizen Science refers to the consultation, participation, engagement or involvement of the general public in research. Rationales for this interaction include increased public access and involvement of citizens in research, immersion of community values relevant to research, outreach and educational potential with the public, and ultimately, the democratization of science. This paper focuses on the specific subset of citizen science that seeks to engage "patient partners" in health research to gain the valuable experiential knowledge of those living with a disease. Greater patient engagement in research (PER) can provide researchers with insights about citizen values and needs relevant to determining research priorities, methodology, applications and ethical parameters; this would ideally lead to more effective real-world applications. Over the last decade, projects involving patients partners in research (PPR) have varied from mere tokenism and undervaluation to full involvement and empowerment of patient participants - the former, a subject of criticism, and the latter, promoted as an ideal. In this article, we will argue that the value of that experiential knowledge from patient partners in research should not only be acknowledged through its ongoing use, but also through recognition of participants who contribute to the creation and application of new knowledge. We will explore types of recognition that might be attributed to PPR, including scientific recognition; financial recognition or reward; personal and altruistic recognition; and the benefial outcomes of research applications. We will also consider whether such types of recognition could be applied to the broader field of citizen science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Smith
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709 USA
| | - Jean-Chrisophe Bélisle-Pipon
- The Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
| | - David Resnik
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709 USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pelletier C, Pousette A, Fox G, Keahey R, Ward K, Faulkner G, Rasali D, Allison S. Move the north: evaluation of a regional stakeholder engagement initiative to support the development of a community-partnered physical activity research agenda. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2019; 5:37. [PMID: 31798963 PMCID: PMC6882157 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-019-0167-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although it is generally accepted that engaging with members of the public contributes to more actionable and relevant research, there are a limited number of reported evaluations of community engagement initiatives. Certain populations, such as those with lower socioeconomic status and those who live in rural or dispersed communities, tend to face increased barriers to engagement. For researchers and community members alike, it is important to understand and evaluate engagement initiatives to support participatory research methods, particularly when working with underserved or hard to reach populations. METHODS Over 2-days in October 2018, we hosted a Research Agenda Development Workshop and Physical Activity Summit with relevant researchers, health professionals, and community partners. The objectives of this initiative were to develop a physical activity research agenda based on community-identified priorities, create networking opportunities, and understand factors impacting physical activity participation in communities across northern British Columbia (BC). An evaluation plan was created early in the planning process to understand the reach of the event based on representation targets. Stakeholder satisfaction with the event was evaluated with a post-meeting survey. RESULTS The event was successful in engaging community members from a broad geographic region with at least 90 people in attendance from 11 different northern BC communities, representing 46 different organizations. Meeting attendees indicated they were satisfied with the event and felt their perspectives were heard. To advance physical activity in the region, the most commonly desired outcome from the event was the need for ongoing communication channels to support knowledge translation and capacity building in the low-resourced communities of northern BC. There were some gaps in representation targets present at the event. Namely, there were a limited number of people representing Indigenous organizations, and the education and private sectors. CONCLUSIONS This two-day event was successful at achieving its objectives and engaged a diverse group of stakeholders from a broad geographic region. The outcomes from this event are being used to develop a community-partnered physical activity research agenda and contribute to ongoing learning by the research team to understand contextual factors influencing physical activity in the communities of northern BC. This model of engagement could be used by other researchers interested in engaging with a diverse, multi-sector group of academics, health professionals and community members to support community-centered population health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea Pelletier
- School of Health Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada
| | - Anne Pousette
- Promotion of Wellness in Northern BC (WINBC), Prince George, Canada
- Northern Medical Program, University of British Columbia, Prince George, Canada
- University Hospital of Northern BC, Northern Health, Prince George, Canada
| | - Gloria Fox
- Population and Public Health, Northern Health, Prince George, Canada
| | - Robin Keahey
- School of Health Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada
| | - Kirsten Ward
- School of Health Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada
| | - Guy Faulkner
- School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Drona Rasali
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, Canada Faculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, Canada
| | - Sandra Allison
- School of Health Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada
- Population and Public Health, Northern Health, Prince George, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|