Treatment of large, chronic and persistent macular hole with internal limiting membrane transposition and tuck technique

The time course of spontaneous closure of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes

PURPOSE

Spontaneous closure of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (iFTMH) has been reported regularly. However, little is known about its probability and timeline.

METHODS

In this retrospective study all consecutive patients who presented between August 2008 and August 2019 were screened for the presence of a macular hole and only iFTMHs were included. The primary outcome measure was the spontaneous closure of the iFTMH.

RESULTS

Of 1256 eyes with macular holes, 338 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Spontaneous closure of the iFTMH was detected in 31 eyes (9.2%) with a median time of 44 days after diagnosis. Eyes exhibiting spontaneous closure demonstrated a higher baseline best-corrected visual-acuity (BCVA) and smaller iFTMH diameter (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The mean BCVA improved from 0.4 logMAR (SD ± 0.21) to 0.29 logMAR (SD ± 0.20) after spontaneous closure (p = 0.031). The iFTMH diameter was positively correlated with the time to spontaneous closure (Pearson-r = 0.37, p = 0.0377). Spontaneously closed iFTMHs reopened in 16% (n = 5) of cases, with a median of 136 days after closure. A logistic regression model showed the hole diameter was associated with spontaneous closure (odds-Ratio 0.97, 95%CI [0.96, 0.98]). The Kaplan-Meier-Curve revealed that approximately 25% of small-iFTMH (n = 124) and 55% of iFTMH with a diameter < 150µm (n = 48) closed spontaneously within two months.

CONCLUSION

The established gold-standard for the treatment of iFTMHs is macular surgery. However, the potential for spontaneous closure of small iFTMHs must be acknowledged. Therefore, if surgical treatment is delayed in individual cases, close observation is recommended.

MANAGEMENT OF LARGE FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLES: Long-Term Outcomes of Internal Limiting Membrane Flaps and Internal Limiting Membrane Peels

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To determine and compare the efficacy of a surgical internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique with the traditional ILM peel on long-term visual and anatomical outcomes for large (>400 µm) full-thickness macular holes.

METHODS

From October 2016 to July 2022, patients undergoing initial full-thickness macular hole repair with the ILM flap or ILM peel technique were reviewed. Final outcomes were recorded and based on size in microns: 401 to 800, 801 to 1,200, and >1,200.

RESULTS

Patients treated with ILM flap (n = 52, 94.2% closure rate) or ILM peel (n = 407, 93.6% closure rate) were followed with a mean follow-up time of 15.0 ± 10.2 and 20.0 ± 13.4 months, respectively. Success rates for ILM flaps and ILM peels were compared for full-thickness macular holes of 401 to 800 (100%, 95.8%, P = 0.39), 801 to 1,200 (95%, 93%, P = 0.74), and >1,200 (86.7%, 86.7%, P = 1.0) µm. Mean best-recorded logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution visual acuity for ILM flaps and ILM peels, respectively, was 1.02 ± 0.46 and 0.87 ± 0.47 preoperatively, with follow-up acuity of 0.48 ± 0.32 (P < 0.03) and 0.39 ± 0.42 (P < 0.01) at Year 3.

CONCLUSION

Both techniques provide a similar anatomical closure rate and functional improvement in vision. Comparisons should be cautiously made based on difference in preoperative hole size.

Inverted Pedicled Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Attached to an Optic Disc with Autologous Blood Clot for Large Macular Holes

Purpose

An inverted ILM flap might be accidentally separated from the retina or sucked away during surgery for large macular holes (MHs). This article is to determine the efficacy of a new inverted pedicled internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap attached to an optic disc with an autologous blood clot (ABC) technique for the treatment of large MHs.

Methods

An inverted pedicled ILM flap connected to the optic disc with ABC was used to treat 12 consecutive patients with significant macular holes (>600 m). The ILM was first peeled off around MH as a semidiameter of about 1.5 diameters of the optic disc. The superior residual ILM was used to produce a pedicled ILM flap that was connected to the optic disc and was later inverted to cover the MH. The macular hole was covered with a repositioned flap larger than 2 MH diameters in an inverted way. ABC was used to fasten the flap, followed by fluid-air exchange with air or C3F8 as tamponade. Spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were performed at each postoperative follow-up.

Results

The mean aperture and base macular hole diameters were 737.9 ± 109.6 µm (range, 607-982 µm) and 1244.3 ± 227.4 µm (range, 975-1658 µm). All macular holes (100%) were closed after a single surgery without intraoperative or postoperative complications related to the ILM transposition technique. At the last postoperative visit, we found one eye with a U-shaped closure, three eyes with W-shaped closures, and eight eyes with V-shaped closures. No postoperative flap closures were noted in all cases. The preoperative mean BCVA was 1.5 ± 0.3 (range, 1.1-2.0). After a mean follow-up of 5.3 ± 4.8 (range, 3-16) months, the postoperative mean BCVA was 0.8 ± 0.2 (range, 0.6-1.1), and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

This novel technique is safe and suitable for large MHs and can be an alternative option for accidental ILM flap loss during other inverted ILM flap operations.

AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE TRANSPLANT IN A PATIENT WITH RECURRENT MACULAR HOLE AND ATROPHIC AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

PURPOSE

To report a case of a recurrent macular hole (MH) and atrophic age-related macular degeneration in a patient, treated with human amniotic membrane transplant.

METHODS

Interventional case report.

RESULTS

A 72-year-old man was referred to our Retina Unit for a recurrent MH associated with atrophic age-related macular degeneration. The patient was already operated for a full-thickness MH without any anatomical and functional benefit. A 25-gauge vitrectomy, under local anesthesia was performed. A human amniotic membrane patch was transplanted under the retina through a 180° retinectomy to close the MH and eventually exploit his regenerative effects on the atrophic pigment epithelium. Follow-up was taken at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1 year. No intra- or postoperative complications were recorded. At 1 month, a complete MH closure was achieved, and best-corrected visual acuity increased from 20/400 to 20/320. Unfortunately, after 1 year, the macular atrophic area increased and the best-corrected visual acuity came back to 20/400.

CONCLUSION

A human amniotic membrane was used to close a MH in a patient with atrophic age-related macular degeneration, although progression of the geographic atrophy continued after MH closure.

Surgical classification for large macular hole: based on different surgical techniques results: the CLOSE study group

BACKGROUND

The CLOSE study group proposes an updated surgical classification for large macular holes based on a systematic review of new treatments. Recently, many new techniques have been introduced to treat large full-thickness macular holes (FTMH); although the indications are not clear. An updated surgical classification is needed to help surgical decision-making.

METHODS

We gathered published series by the CLOSE Study Group members and from literature search until June 2021. Techniques included: internal limiting membrane peeling (ILM peeling), ILM flaps, macular hydrodissection (macular hydro), human amniotic membrane graft (hAM), and autologous retinal transplantation (ART). Within each technique, chi-square test assessed association between the minimal linear diameter (MLD) (in µm) and closure rate; the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) gains were compared among groups.

RESULTS

Data extraction included 31 published articles: total of 1135 eyes. Eyes were divided into the following groups: ILM peel (n: 683), ILM Flap (n: 233), macular hydrodissection (n: 64), hAM (n: 59), and ART (n: 96). The initial BCVA and size were heterogenous between the groups. ILM peel showed the best results in large FTMH ≤ 535 µm (closure rate 96.8%); adjusted mean BCVA: 0.49 (LogMAR) with a statistical difference among groups. Large FTMH between 535 and 799 µm: ILM flap technique showed better results (closure rate 99.0%); adjusted mean BCVA: 0.67(LogMAR); also with a statistical difference. For large FTMH ≥ 800 µm more invasive techniques are required. Use of hAM, macular hydrodissection and ART showed higher closure rates for this category (100%, 83.3% and 90.5% respectively), and adjusted mean BCVA varied from 0.76 to 0.89. Although there was no statistical difference between those techniques for this group due to the smaller number of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The CLOSE study group demonstrated the potential usefulness of a new surgical classification for large FTMHs and propose OCT biomarkers for use in clinical practice and future research. This new classification demonstrated that Large (400-550 µm) and X-Large (550-800 µm) holes can be treated highly successfully with ILM peel and ILM flap techniques, respectively. Further studies are necessary for the larger FTMHs (XX-Large and Giant), using the CLOSE classification, in order to determine which technique is better suited for each hole size and characteristics.

Comparative Study of Conventional Inverted ILM Flap Covering and ILM Flap Filling Technique in Idiopathic Macular Hole Treatment: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Objective

This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the anatomical efficacy and functional improvement of the conventional inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM), flap covering technique, and ILM flap filling technique for patients with idiopathic macular hole (MH).

Methods

Literature from Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were comprehensively retrieved. The primary outcomes included the MH closure rate and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The secondary outcomes were the proportion of external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) defect recovery. Pooled odds ratios (ORs), weighted mean differences (WMDs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using STATA 17.0 software.

Results

7 studies that contained 139 eyes in the inverted ILM flap covering group and 121 eyes in the ILM flap filling group were selected. Pooled data suggested that the surgical treatment resulted in an overall MH closure rate of up to 97.12% (135/139 eyes) in the inverted ILM flap covering group and 99.17% (120/121 eyes) in the filling group, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 0.55 to 7.09, and P=0.29). Similarly, the 2 techniques demonstrated equal effectiveness on the anatomical closure in MH with the average diameter smaller than 650 μm (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 0.48 to 9.77, and P=0.31) and larger than 650 μm (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 0.14 to 17.37, and P=0.71). However, compared with the filling technique, the inverted ILM flap covering technique was superior in postoperative BCVA (WMD = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.18, and P=0.0017) and presented a significantly higher proportion of reconstitution of ELM (OR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.08, and P < 0.0001) and EZ (OR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.32, and P=0.0001).

Conclusion

The inverted ILM flap covering technique was associated with the superior reconstitution of outer layers of the retina, including ELM and EZ, and more improvement in postoperative BCVA than the ILM flap filling technique.

Spotlight on the Internal Limiting Membrane Technique for Macular Holes: Current Perspectives

Pars plana vitrectomy has become the standard procedure for primary macular holes (MHs) repair, including the removal of the posterior cortical vitreous, the stripping of eventual epiretinal membranes, and finally an intraocular gas tamponade. During this procedure, peeling the internal limiting membrane (ILM) has been proven to increase closure rates and avoid postoperative reopening in several researches. In fact, even in large MHs more than 400 µm, the advantage of peeling off the ILM was highlighted by better anatomical closure rates. Nevertheless, some authors suggested that ILM peeling is not always essential, because it generates various side effects in retinal structure and function. Furthermore, the ideal amount of ILM peeling and the most effective strategies for removing the ILM are still subject of research. Different surgical modifications have been reported as alternatives to traditional peeling in certain clinical settings, including ILM flaps, ILM scraping, and foveal sparing ILM peeling. As regards large MHs, the introduction of ILM inverted flap appeared as a game changer, offering a significantly higher >90% closure rate when compared to traditional ILM peeling. Modifications to inverted ILM flap procedures have been claimed in recent years, in order to define the best area and direction of ILM peeling and its correlation with functional outcomes. Moreover, several innovations saw the light in the setting of recurrent MHs, such as ILM free flap transposition, inverted ILM flap combined autologous blood clot technique, neurosensory retinal flap, and human amniotic membrane (HAM) plug, claiming higher anatomical success rate also in those complex settings. In conclusion, the aim of this review is to report how the success rate of contemporary macular surgery has grown since the turn of the century, especially for big and chronic MHs, analyzing in which way ILM management became a crucial point of this kind of surgery.

Update on surgical management of complex macular holes: a review

Modern surgical interventions effectively treat macular holes (MHs) more than 90%. Current surgical treatment for MHs is pars plana vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane, internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, gas endotamponade, and prone posturing postoperatively. However, a small subset of MHs imposes challenges to surgeons and frustrations on patients. A narrative review was performed on the surgical treatment of challenging MHs including large and extra-large MHs, myopic MHs with or without retinal detachment, and chronic and refractory MHs. There are robust data supporting inverted ILM flap as the first-line treatment for large idiopathic MHs and certain secondary MHs including myopic MHs. In addition, several studies had shown that ILM flap manipulations in combination with surgical adjuncts increase surgical success, especially in difficult MHs. Even in eyes with limited ILM, surgical options included autologous retinal graft, human amniotic membrane, and creation of a distal ILM flap that can assist in MH closure even though the functional outcome may be affected by the MH chronicity. Despite relative success anatomically and visually after each technique, most techniques require a long-term study to analyze their safety profile and to establish any morphological changes of the MH plug in the closed MHs.

Factors Associated with Anatomic Failure and Hole Reopening after Macular Hole Surgery

A macular hole (MH), particularly an idiopathic macular hole (IMH), is a common cause of central vision loss. Risk factors for nonidiopathic MH include high myopia, cystoid macular edema, inflammation, and trauma. MH is primarily diagnosed using slit-lamp microscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Half of the patients with stage I MHs are treated conservatively and may show spontaneous resolution. The main treatment methods for MHs currently include vitrectomy and stripping of the internal limiting membrane (ILM). However, in some patients, surgery does not lead to anatomical closure. In this review, we summarize the factors influencing the anatomical closure of MHs and analyze the potential underlying mechanisms.

Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Flap Inverting under Air in Large Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling combined with modified flap inverting under air in the treatment of large idiopathic macular hole (MH).

Methods

Eyes with a large idiopathic MH (minimum diameter >550 μm) were included in this study. The surgical procedure included standard 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), ILM peeling, complete fluid-gas exchange, and ILM flap inversion under air. The patients underwent follow-up exam including optical coherence tomography (OCT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement.

Results

Sixteen eyes from 16 patients were included. Mean MH diameter was 681.43 ± 112.12 μm. After a mean follow-up time of 6.25 ± 2.65 months, in all cases, the MH was closed, and the ILM flap could be seen at the inner surface of the fovea. U-shaped and V-shaped MH closure was achieved in 11 and 5 cases, respectively. The BCVA improved significantly from 1.49 ± 0.35 logMAR to 0.89 ± 0.35 logMAR (p < 0.05), and visual acuity of 20/100 or better was achieved in 8 eyes.

Conclusion

ILM flap inverting under air was helpful in improving the functional and anatomic outcomes of vitrectomy for large idiopathic MH.

Current management strategies for atypical macular holes

This review evaluates the current surgical management options for refractory and atypical macular holes (MH) and proposes a treatment paradigm for approaching complex cases. A review of literature was performed to deliver a thorough discussion of the epidemiology and pathophysiology of MH as well as the historic evolution of surgical management strategies. With this context established, an update on recent surgical advances for management of large, chronic, and highly myopic MH is provided. New small MH may be adequately treated with pars plana vitrectomy, while those ≥300 μm should undergo internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel. For MH ≥400 μm with risk factors for failure, primary intervention should involve creation of an ILM flap and various methods of flap creation are discussed. For very large MH ≥700 μm or in refractory cases, autologous retinal transplants and other recently proposed procedures should be considered. While typical MHs enjoy high initial surgical success rates, atypical and refractory MH require additional intraoperative and postoperative considerations to maximize surgical success and optimize vision. With many techniques at the surgeon's disposal, patient selection becomes critical to improving outcomes.

Revision Surgery for Idiopathic Macular Hole after Failed Primary Vitrectomy

PURPOSE

To investigate the anatomical and functional outcomes of revision surgery after failed primary surgery for idiopathic macular hole (MH).

METHODS

All consecutive patients with MH were identified from a cohort of patients operated between 2014 and 2018 at the CHU de Québec-Université Laval (Québec). The clinical and anatomical features of patients with unclosed MH after primary surgery were retrospectively collected. Our primary outcome was MH nonclosure rate after revision surgery. Our secondary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with ETDRS scale and MH size of eyes with revision surgery preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months after revision surgery.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 1085 eyes, 926 eyes met inclusion criteria and were analyzed in the study. We identified 22 eyes with failed primary surgery (2.4%), of which 20 underwent revision surgery. We had no bilateral MH in these 22 eyes. The nonclosure rate of MH after revision surgery was 15%. The mean final BCVA for closed MH after revision surgery was 55 ± 19 letters. Compared to the initial presentation, the mean change in visual acuity (VA) for closed MH was +4 ± 31 letters and +16 ± 17 letters at 3 and 12 months after the revision surgery, respectively. At initial presentation, patients with failed primary surgery had a baseline MH size of 665 ± 226 μm. The mean MH size after failed primary surgery was 607 ± 162 μm and 546 ± 156 μm for the three unclosed MHs one month after revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

The success rate of revision surgery in eyes with unclosed MH is 85%. After successful revision surgery, eyes demonstrated an improvement in VA and closure of the MH.