Gambazza S, Mariani A, Guarise R, Ferrari B, Carta F, Brivio A, Bizzarri S, Castellani C, Colombo C, Laquintana D. Short-term effects of positive expiratory pressure mask on ventilation inhomogeneity in children with cystic fibrosis: A randomized, sham-controlled crossover study.
Pediatr Pulmonol 2024;
59:1354-1363. [PMID:
38362833 DOI:
10.1002/ppul.26915]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Can physiotherapy with a positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask improve peripheral ventilation inhomogeneity, a typical feature of children with cystic fibrosis (cwCF)? To answer this question, we used the nitrogen multiple-breath washout (N2MBW) test to measure diffusion-convection-dependent inhomogeneity arising within the intracinar compartment (Sacin*VT).
METHODS
For this randomized, sham-controlled crossover trial, two N2MBW tests were performed near the hospital discharge date: one before and the other after PEP mask therapy (1 min of breathing through a flow-dependent PEP device attached to a face mask, followed by three huffs and one cough repeated 10 times) by either a standard (10-15 cmH20) or a sham (<5 cmH20) procedure on two consecutive mornings. Deception entailed misinforming the subjects about the nature of the study; also the N2MBW operators were blinded to treatment allocation. Study outcomes were assessed with mixed-effect models.
RESULTS
The study sample was 19 cwCF (ten girls), aged 11.4 (2.7) years. The adjusted Sacin*VT mean difference between the standard and the sham procedure was -0.015 (90% confidence interval [CI]: -∞ to 0.025) L-1. There was no statistically significant difference in Scond*VT and lung clearance index between the two procedures: -0.005 (95% CI: -0.019 to 0.01) L-1 and 0.49 (95% CI: -0.05 to 1.03) turnovers, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Our findings do not support evidence for an immediate effect of PEP mask physiotherapy on Sacin*VT with pressure range 10-15 cmH20. Measurement with the N2MBW and the crossover design were found to be time-consuming and unsuitable for a short-term study of airway clearance techniques.
Collapse