The optimal degree of lateral wedge insoles for reducing knee joint load: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Exploring the Potential of Lateral Wedge Insoles in Alleviating Bone Marrow Lesions in End-Stage Knee Osteoarthritis: A Preliminary Case Report

The efficacy of lateral wedge insoles (LWIs) in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) is unclear. A 43-year-old male underwent two anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in his right knee and was later diagnosed with end-stage knee OA. An LWI combining arch support with a lateral heel wedge was fabricated for this patient and used over 12 months. As a result, after 12 months, the bone marrow lesion (BML), as measured by the magnetic resonance imaging Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS), was downgraded from grade 2 to grade 1. The use of LWI in a patient with end-stage knee OA showed lower co-contraction ratios in knee muscles even after 12 months. The results provide preliminary evidence suggesting the use of LWI in patients with end-stage knee OA has potential benefits for reducing BML.

Effect of Hind- and Fore-Foot Eversion on Positional and Rotational Displacement of the Knee in Standing Posture

We investigated the effects of hindfoot and forefoot eversion on the knee's positional and rotational displacement, plantar pressure, and foot discomfort in a standing posture, beyond the traditional focus on external knee adduction moments (EKAM) in lateral wedge insoles. Twenty-six healthy participants underwent hindfoot eversion from 0 to 10 degrees in 2-degree increments, and forefoot eversion from 0 degrees to the hindfoot eversion angle in 2-degree increments in a standing posture. At each eversion angle, the knee's medial displacement, EKAM's moment arm decrease, plantar pressure changes, and foot discomfort were obtained and compared across varying angles. Both hindfoot-only and entire-foot eversion led to significant medial knee displacement and the EKAM's moment arm decrease, with more pronounced effects in entire-foot eversion. At each hindfoot eversion angle, increasing forefoot eversion resulted in significant medial knee displacement and EKAM's moment arm decrease. Lower leg rotations were not significantly affected in hindfoot-only eversion but displayed significant medial tilting and internal rotation in entire-foot eversion at specific combinations. Varying eversion angles significantly influenced the forefoot pressure, with heel pressure remaining unaffected. Notably, the lateral forefoot pressure increased significantly as the forefoot eversion angle increased, particularly at higher hindfoot eversion angles. Foot discomfort increased significantly with higher eversion angles, particularly in entire-foot eversion, and also increased significantly as the forefoot eversion angle increased at higher hindfoot eversion angles. Insole configurations incorporating 6-10 degrees of hindfoot eversion and 40-60% forefoot eversion of the hindfoot angle may offer optimized biomechanical support for knee osteoarthritis patients.

Fundamentals of osteoarthritis. Rehabilitation: Exercise, diet, biomechanics, and physical therapist-delivered interventions

Insights related to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA) have informed rehabilitative treatments that aim to mitigate the influence of several known impairments and risk factors for OA, with the goal to improve pain, function, and quality of life. The purpose of this invited narrative review is to provide fundamental knowledge to non-specialists about exercise and education, diet, biomechanical interventions, and other physical therapist-delivered treatments. In addition to summarizing the rationale for common rehabilitative therapies, we provide a synthesis of current core recommendations. Robust evidence based on randomized clinical trials supports exercise with education and diet as core treatments for OA. Structured, supervised exercise therapy is advised. The mode of exercise may vary but should be individualized. The dose should be based on an initial assessment, the desired physiological changes, and progressed when appropriate. Diet combined with exercise is strongly recommended and studies demonstrate a dose-response relationship between the magnitude of weight loss and symptom improvement. Recent evidence suggests the use of technology to remotely deliver exercise, diet and education interventions is cost-effective. Although several studies support the mechanisms for biomechanical interventions (e.g., bracing, shoe inserts) and physical therapist-delivered (passive) treatments (e.g., manual therapy, electrotherapeutic modalities) fewer rigorous randomized trials support their clinical use; these therapies are sometimes recommended as adjuncts to core treatments. The mechanisms of action for all rehabilitative interventions include contextual factors such as attention and placebo effects. These effects can challenge our interpretation of treatment efficacy from clinical trials, yet also provide opportunities to maximize patient outcomes in clinical practice. When evaluating rehabilitative interventions, the field may benefit from increased emphasis on research that considers contextual factors while evaluating mechanistic, longer-term, clinically-important and policy-relevant outcome measures.

Rehabilitation interventions in osteoarthritis

The goals of the management of osteoarthritis (OA) are to relieve joint pain and stiffness, maintain or increase joint mobility and stability, improve activities and participation, and enhance quality of life. The first step in the management is to make a comprehensive holistic assessment to understand the impact of the disease on the individual. Then, an individualized management plan can be set via a shared-decision making process between the patient and the clinician taking into account all components of functioning affected by the disease. Rehabilitation interventions serve as the basis of OA management whereas pharmacological modalities are usually administered for additional symptom control. This study aimed to overview the rehabilitation interventions used for people with OA with an update of the recent evidence. First, core management approaches that include patient education, physical activity and exercises, and weight loss were addressed; then adjunctive treatments including biomechanical interventions (e.g. orthoses, assistive devices) and physical modalities were overviewed.

A comparison of the biomechanical and clinical effects of a biaxial ankle-foot orthosis and lateral wedge insole in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare a biaxial ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) with a lateral wedge insole in terms of the biomechanical and clinical outcomes in individuals with knee osteoarthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-over randomized design was used where 31 individuals (25 females and six males, mean age of 52.19 ± 4.12 years) with knee osteoarthritis wore each intervention for two weeks with two weeks washout period. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data and clinical outcomes were collected to evaluate the effects of each intervention on knee adduction moment (KAM), pain, stiffness, and function.

RESULTS

Both orthoses significantly improved pain by 17 and 22%, function by 11 and 14%, the first peak KAM by 15.7 and 19.2%, the second peak KAM by 10.4 and 16.7%, and KAM impulse by 14.8 and 22.2%, respectively. However, the biaxial AFO significantly reduced the KAM and improved function compared to the lateral wedge insole (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study have shown that both orthoses have a potential role in the conservative management of medial knee osteoarthritis. The biaxial AFO proved statistically better at improving function and KAM; though these differences do not seem to be clinically significant.IMPLICATION FOR REHABILITATIONOrthotic interventions have been reported to be effective in the management of medial knee osteoarthritis.Lateral wedge insole and biaxial ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) are effective in the improvement of pain, function, and knee adduction moment (KAM) in people with medial knee osteoarthritis.The biaxial AFO, compared with lateral wedge insole, contributes to statistically more improvement of function and KAM. However, these differences do not seem to be clinically significant.

Knee varus alters three-dimensional ankle alignment in standing- a study with upright computed tomography

Background

For knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment, it is important to correct the lower limb alignment including the foot. However, in the upright position, lower limb alignment is generally assessed from the body surface or radiographs, and it is a challenge to capture the exact characteristics of three-dimensional lower limb alignment. The purpose of the study was to measure lower limb alignment in patients with knee OA using upright computed tomography (CT) and radiography, and to identify features of knee joint deformity.

Methods

A total of 45 limbs in 25 patients with knee OA were enrolled. The subjects underwent both upright CT and radiography for the whole lower limb in the standing position. The joint angles were calculated on both images. The degree of knee OA was classified according to Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade by referring to radiography, which is mainly based on the degree of articular cartilage loss and severity of osteophytes, and the characteristics or correlation between knee and ankle joint in each group was investigated.

Results

In KL-I, there was an association between varus of the knee joint and internal rotation of the talocrural joint (r = 0.76, P < 0.05). In KL-II, there was an association between varus of the knee joint and eversion of the subtalar joint (r = 0.63, P < 0.05) and talocrural joint (r = − 0.65, P < 0.05). In KL-III, there was an association between varus of the knee joint and internal rotation of the subtalar joint (r = − 0.62, P < 0.05), and in KL-IV, there was an association between varus of the knee joint and internal rotation of the subtalar joint (r = − 0.58, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The lower limb alignment of patients with knee OA in the standing position was found that as knee OA worsened, it became apparent that compensatory knee joint alignment depended on the ankle joint rather than the subtalar joint. The results may help in the rehabilitation of patients with knee OA, since the ankle joint alignment has a significant impact on the knee joint during coarse movements involving load.

Postoperative external tibial rotation is correlated with inferior meniscal healing following pullout repair of a medial meniscus posterior root tear

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of tibial rotation on the postoperative healing status of the medial meniscus (MM) following pullout repair of the MM posterior root tear (MMPRT).

METHODS

Ninety-one patients (68 women and 23 men; mean age 63.3 ± 8.8 years) who had undergone transtibial pullout repair of MMPRT were enrolled in the study. The tibial external rotation angle (ERA) in each patient was measured postoperatively using computed tomography in the extended knee position. The meniscal healing status following transtibial pullout repair was assessed by second-look arthroscopy (mean postoperative period 12 months) using a previously published scoring system (range 0-10). The association between the ERA and the meniscal healing score was investigated using univariate linear regression models. The ERA cut-off for improved meniscal healing score (≥ 7) was determined using receiver-operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

The ERA and the meniscal healing score were significantly associated, confirming that increased ERAs were correlated with worse meniscal healing status (R =  - 0.28; P < 0.001). The optimum ERA cut-off value was 0.5°, with a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 63%. The mean meniscal healing scores were 7.3 and 6.2 among patients with ERAs < 0.5° and those with ERAs ≥ 0.5°, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the ERA was significantly correlated with the postoperative meniscal healing status. Postoperative tibial rotation could be one of the factors affecting postoperative outcomes of pullout repair of MMPRT. Controlling the tibial rotation may possibly improve meniscal healing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Effects of tailored lateral wedge insoles on medial knee osteoarthritis based on biomechanical analysis: 12-week randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Lateral wedge insoles adjusted by biomechanical analysis may improve the condition of patients with medial knee osteoarthritis.

DESIGN

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial.

SETTING

The study was conducted in a biomechanics laboratory.

SUBJECTS

A total of 38 patients with medial knee osteoarthritis were allocated to either an experimental group (lateral wedge insoles) or a control group (neutral insoles).

INTERVENTIONS

Experimental group (n = 20) received an adjusted lateral wedge insole of 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 degrees, after previous biomechanical analysis. Control group (n = 18) received a neutral insole (0 degrees). All patients used the insoles for 12 weeks.

MAIN MEASURES

Visual analogue scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire, biomechanical parameters: first and second peak of the external knee adduction moment and knee adduction angular impulse, and physical performance tests: 30-second sit-to-stand test, the 40-m fast-paced walk test, and the 12-step stair-climb test.

RESULTS

After 12 weeks, between-group differences did not differ significantly for pain intensity (-12.5 mm, (95% CI -29.4-4.4)), biomechanical parameters (p = 0.05), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and physical performance tests, except on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscale other symptoms (p = 0.002; 13.8 points, (95% CI 5.6-22.0)).

CONCLUSION

Tailored wedge insoles were no more effective at improving biomechanical or clinically meaningful outcomes than neutral insoles, except on symptoms. More participants from the experimental group reported they felt some improvement. However, these effects were minimal and without clinical significance.