Bromocriptine use for sudden peripartum cardiomyopathy in a patient with preeclampsia: a case report

Do Case Reports and Case Series Generate Clinical Discoveries About Preeclampsia? A Systematic Review

Background

Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. The management of preeclampsia has not changed much in more than two decades, and its aetiology is still not fully understood. Case reports and case series have traditionally been used to communicate new knowledge about existing conditions. Whether this is true for preeclampsia is not known.

Objective

To determine whether recent case reports or case series have generated new knowledge and clinical discoveries about preeclampsia.

Methods

A detailed search strategy was developed in consultation with a medical librarian. Two bibliographic databases were searched through Ovid: Embase and MEDLINE. We selected case reports or case series published between 2015 and 2020, comprising pregnant persons diagnosed with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including preeclampsia. Two reviewers independently screened all publications. One reviewer extracted data from included studies, while another conducted a quality check of extracted data. We developed a codebook to guide our data extraction and outcomes assessment. The quality of each report was determined based on Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for case reports and case series.

Results

We included 104 case reports and three case series, together comprising 118 pregnancies. A severe presentation or complication of preeclampsia was reported in 81% of pregnancies, and 84% had a positive maternal outcome, free of death or persistent complications. Only 8% of the case reports were deemed to be of high quality, and 53.8% of moderate quality; none of the case series were of high quality. A total of 26 of the 107 publications (24.3%) included a novel clinical discovery as a central theme.

Conclusion

Over two-thirds of recent case reports and case series about preeclampsia do not appear to present new knowledge or discoveries about preeclampsia, and most are of low quality.

Unveiling the Mystery of Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: A Traditional Review

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) can be classified as a variant of dilated cardiomyopathy identified usually within the first five months of delivery or during the last month of pregnancy. This condition presents as systolic heart failure. PPCM affects thousands of women in the United States each year. Even though it was first noticed in the 1800s, its etiology remains unknown. This study aims to review the pathophysiology and management of PPCM and explore the possible outcomes of peripartum cardiomyopathy. PPCM can lead to maternal death if diagnosis or treatment is delayed. Diagnosing PPCM has been challenging because it can be misdiagnosed or perceived as a sign of pregnancy since most of the symptoms of PPCM strongly match those within the typical pregnancy continuum and postpartum cycle. Patients' implications are fatal and carry a high mortality rate when PPCM is misdiagnosed or treatment is delayed. To accurately identify PPCM, using echocardiography, the left ventricular end-diastolic size and the ejection fraction should be measured to determine the severity of PPCM. Managing peripartum cardiomyopathy involves using traditional treatments for heart failure. Therapeutic recommendations are made depending on the patient's status (pregnancy, breastfeeding, postpartum) while considering the drug-safety profiles before administration. Some other treatments have also been used to control PPCM depending on how severe it has become; for example, antiarrhythmics have been used to treat cardiac arrhythmias when they ensue. In extreme cases, mechanical assistance and transplantation could be required. Based on the proposed pathophysiology involving the 16kDA anti-angiogenic sub-fragment, bromocriptine may be used even though it still needs more assessment due to limited evidence.

Using PubMed as a major search resource, a thorough analysis of publications was carried out after incorporating this review's inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 455,141 publications were found using keywords and keyword combinations. With a careful selection of articles, 31 publications provided relevant information on our primary endpoint. All articles in this examination were chosen without limitation to the type of study, including clinical trials, review articles, meta-analyses, and so on. Our review suggests that, based on factors such as early detection and management, disease severity, ethnicity, and quality of patient care, patients with PPCM presented different outcomes and prognosis. However, despite PPCM's high mortality rate and its risk of recurrence, most patients tend to recover within six months of disease onset.