Endovascular coiling versus microsurgical clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Computer-assisted microcatheter shaping for intracranial aneurysm embolization: evaluation of safety and efficacy in a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, stability, and safety of computer-assisted microcatheter shaping (CAMS) in patients with intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

A total of 201 patients with intracranial aneurysms receiving endovascular coiling therapy were continuously recruited and randomly assigned to the CAMS and manual microcatheter shaping (MMS) groups. The investigated outcomes included the first-trial success rate, time to position the microcatheter in aneurysms, rate of successful microcatheter placement within 5 min, delivery times, microcatheter stability, and delivery performance.

RESULTS

The rates of first-trial success (96.0% vs 66.0%, P<0.001), successful microcatheter placement within 5 min (96.04% vs 72.00%, P<0.001), microcatheter stability (97.03% vs 84.00%, P=0.002), and 'excellent' delivery performance (45.54% vs 24.00%, P<0.001) in the CAMS group were significantly higher than those in the MMS group. Additionally, the total microcatheter delivery and positioning time (1.05 minutes (0.26) vs 1.53 minutes (1.00)) was significantly shorter in the CAMS group than in the MMS group (P<0.001). Computer assistance (OR 14.464; 95% CI 4.733 to 44.207; P<0.001) and inflow angle (OR 1.014; 95% CI 1.002 to 1.025; P=0.021) were independent predictors of the first-trial success rate. CAMS could decrease the time of microcatheter position compared with MMS, whether for junior or senior surgeons (P<0.001). Moreover, computer assistance technology may be more helpful in treating aneurysms with acute angles (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of computer-assisted procedures can enhance the efficacy, stability, and safety of surgical plans for coiling intracranial aneurysms.

Comparison of endovascular interventional embolization and microsurgical clipping for ruptured cerebral aneurysms: impact on patient outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To compare the therapeutic efficacy of endovascular interventional embolization and microsurgical clipping in patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms and investigate their subsequent influence on inflammatory indices, neurological function, prognosis, and recovery.

METHODS

The two groups were compared in terms of surgery duration, hospital stay, Hunt-Hess classification, and inflammatory indices before and after the surgery, as well as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Baethel Index (BI), and one-year prognosis of patients affected.

RESULTS

The surgery duration and hospital stay of the intervention group were (116.27 ± 12.32) min and (19.82 ± 2.26) d, respectively, and those of the clipping group was (173.87 ± 10.39) min and (24.11 ± 2.33) d, respectively (both p < 0.05). Neither the intervention nor the microscopic approach had a significant impact on the severity of the patients' conditions in terms of Hunt-Hess classification (p > 0.05). In the intervention group, CRP was changed to (5.31 ± 1.22) mg/L and PCT decreased to (1.17 ± 0.39) μg/L after the surgery, while the corresponding values in clipping group were (9.78 ± 2.35) mg/L and (2.75 ± 0.81) μg/L (p > 0.05). After surgery, both groups' NIHSS scores declined dramatically, with the intervention group scoring lower than the microscopy group (6.81 ± 1.22 vs 8.72 ± 1.27) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study support the potential advantages of endovascular interventional embolization (coiling) over microsurgical clipping for the management of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. These advantages include shorter surgical duration, reduced hospital stay, lower inflammatory response, improved neurological and functional outcomes, and better long-term prognosis.

Effectivity and safety of endovascular coiling versus microsurgical clipping for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing lack of consensus among clinicians regarding on the optimal aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) management approach between endovascular coiling and microsurgical clipping.

METHODS

Comprehensive literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in Medline and Cochrane databases until January 1st, 2023 without language constraints. Effectivity outcomes included one-year mortality, one-year poor outcomes, and one-year complete aneurysmal occlusion, while safety outcomes comprised the incidence of vasospasms, rebleeding, post-operative complications, and cerebral ischemia.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs, involving 3585 aSAH patients, underwent comprehensive quantitative analysis. Among them, 1792 underwent endovascular coiling and 1773 patients had microsurgical clipping. Regarding effectivity, the rates of one-year mortality (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.61-1.03, p = 0.08) exhibited no significant difference. However, endovascular coiling demonstrated an inferior one-year complete aneurysmal occlusion rate (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21-0.53, p < 0.00001), although with significantly lower rates of poor outcomes (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.57-0.81, p < 0.00001) compared to the microsurgical clipping group. As for safety, endovascular coiling group exhibited lower rates of vasospasm (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.92, p = 0.02), post-operative complications (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.23-0.71, p = 0.02), and cerebral ischemia (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.20-0.63, p = 0.0004). No significant effect on the incidence of rebleeding was observed (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.73-1.63, p = 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular coiling proves superior and safer for aSAH patients, but consideration of resources, patient condition, and surgeon preferences is crucial for selecting the optimal approach.

A cases series of endovascular and microsurgical combined treatment of intracranial aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Our scientific paper is aimed at describing multimodal treatment of intracranial aneurysms represented by microsurgery and endovascular therapy.

PATIENTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report four cases of intracranial aneurysms treated in our Department of Neurosurgery by microsurgery (clipping) and endovascular treatment (coiling), through the joint efforts of a team of highly skilled neurosurgeons.

RESULTS

Mixed treatment has been imposed by the complications we were presented with, resulting from either of the two surgical methods employed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although endovascular surgery is considered a newer treatment method, favored by many practitioners, and preferred by patients, there are situations where open surgery is still required. There are certain situations were using one of the surgical methods fails and a complementary procedure is required for a secure and successful treatment. The cases reported here will demonstrate the utility of combining the two procedures.

Comaneci-Assisted Coiling of Wide-Necked Intracranial Aneurysm: A Single-Center Preliminary Experience

BACKGROUND

Wide-necked aneurysms remain challenging for both coiling and microsurgical clipping. They often require additional techniques to prevent coil prolapse into the parent artery, such as balloon- and stent-assisted coiling. Comaneci is an expandable and removable stent that acts as a bridging device and does not interfere with the blood flow of the parent artery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our institutional radiological and clinical chart of patients treated for saccular intracranial aneurysm via endovascular Comaneci-assisted coiling. The aim of the study was to report our preliminary experience in Comaneci-assisted coiling of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms.

RESULTS

We included 14 patients in the study. Of these, 11 had a ruptured intracranial aneurysm and were treated with Comaneci-assisted coiling. We registered five minor intraprocedural complications and two intraprocedural failures of the device. At one-year follow-up, a satisfying aneurysm occlusion was observed in 85% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Though long-term follow-up data and larger case series are needed, this preliminary study showed the feasibility of the Comaneci-assisted coiling method for both ruptured and unruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysms, with similar occlusion rates as balloon-assisted coiling. However, we registered high incidence of thromboembolic complications; these were probably related to the lack of heparin administration. The main advantageous application of this technique is likely in cases of ruptured intracranial aneurysms, as there is no need for post-procedural antiplatelet therapy.