Chloroethylating anticancer drug-induced mutagenesis and its repair in Escherichia coli

Assessing genotoxic effects of chemotherapy agents by a robust in vitro assay based on mass spectrometric quantification of γ-H2AX in HepG2 cells

Chemotherapy has already proven widely effective in treating cancer. Chemotherapeutic agents usually include DNA damaging agents and non-DNA damaging agents. Assessing genotoxic effect is significant during chemotherapy drug development, since the ability to attack DNA is the major concern for DNA damaging agents which relates to the therapeutic effect, meanwhile genotoxicity should also be evaluated for chemotherapy agents' safety especially for non-DNA damaging agents. However, currently applicability of in vitro genotoxicity assays is hampered by the fact that genotoxicity results have comparatively high false positive rates. γ-H2AX has been shown to be a bifunctional biomarker reflecting both DNA damage response and repair. Previously, we developed an in vitro genotoxicity assay based on γ-H2AX quantification using mass spectrometry. Here, we employed the assay to quantitatively assess the genotoxic effects of 34 classic chemotherapy agents in HepG2 cells. Results demonstrated that the evaluation of cellular γ-H2AX could be an effective approach to screen and distinguish types of action of different classes of chemotherapy agents. In addition, two crucial indexes of DNA repair kinetic curve, i.e., k (speed of γ-H2AX descending) and t50 (time required for γ-H2AX to drop to half of the maximum value) estimated by our developed online tools were employed to further evaluate nine representative chemotherapy agents, which showed a close association with therapeutic index or carcinogenic level. The present study demonstrated that mass spectrometric quantification of γ-H2AX may be an appropriate tool to preliminarily evaluate genotoxic effects of chemotherapy agents.

Mechanism of AGT-Mediated Repair of dG-dC Cross-Links in the Drug Resistance to Chloroethylnitrosoureas: Molecular Docking, MD Simulation, and ONIOM (QM/MM) Investigation

Chloroethylnitrosoureas (CENUs) are important chemotherapies applied in the treatment of cancer. They exert anticancer activity by inducing DNA interstrand cross-links (ICLs) via the formation of two O6-alkylguanine intermediates, O6-chloroethylguanine (O6-ClEtG) and N1,O6-ethanoguanine (N1,O6-EtG). However, O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT), a DNA-repair enzyme, can restore the O6-alkylguanine damages and thereby obstruct the formation of ICLs (dG-dC cross-link). In this study, the inhibitory mechanism of ICL formation was investigated to elucidate the drug resistance of CENUs mediated by AGT in detail. Based on the structures of the substrate-enzyme complexes obtained from docking and MD simulations, two ONIOM (QM/MM) models with different sizes of the QM region were constructed. The model with a larger QM region, which included the substrate (O6-ClEtG or N1,O6-EtG), a water molecule, and five residues (Tyr114, Cys145, His146, Lys165, and Glu172) in the active pocket of AGT, accurately described the repairing reaction and generated the results coinciding with the experimental outcomes. The repair process consists of two sequential steps: hydrogen transfer to form a thiolate anion on Cys145 and alkyl transfer from the O6 site of guanine (the rate-limiting step). The repair of N1,O6-EtG was more favorable than that of O6-ClEtG from both kinetics and thermodynamics aspects. Moreover, the comparison of the repairing process with the formation of dG-dC cross-link and the inhibition of AGT by O6-benzylguanine (O6-BG) showed that the presence of AGT could effectively interrupt the formation of ICLs leading to drug resistance, and the inhibition of AGT by O6-BG that was energetically more favorable than the repair of O6-ClEtG could not prevent the repair of N1,O6-EtG. Therefore, it is necessary to completely eliminate AGT activity before CENUs medication to enhance the chemotherapeutic effectiveness. This work provides reasonable explanations for the supposed mechanism of AGT-mediated drug resistance of CENUs and will assist in the development of novel CENU chemotherapies and their medication strategies.

The DNA Alkyltransferase Family of DNA Repair Proteins: Common Mechanisms, Diverse Functions

DNA alkyltransferase and alkyltransferase-like family proteins are responsible for the repair of highly mutagenic and cytotoxic O6-alkylguanine and O4-alkylthymine bases in DNA. Their mechanism involves binding to the damaged DNA and flipping the base out of the DNA helix into the active site pocket in the protein. Alkyltransferases then directly and irreversibly transfer the alkyl group from the base to the active site cysteine residue. In contrast, alkyltransferase-like proteins recruit nucleotide excision repair components for O6-alkylguanine elimination. One or more of these proteins are found in all kingdoms of life, and where this has been determined, their overall DNA repair mechanism is strictly conserved between organisms. Nevertheless, between species, subtle as well as more extensive differences that affect target lesion preferences and/or introduce additional protein functions have evolved. Examining these differences and their functional consequences is intricately entwined with understanding the details of their DNA repair mechanism(s) and their biological roles. In this review, we will present and discuss various aspects of the current status of knowledge on this intriguing protein family.

Fanconi anemia-independent DNA inter-strand crosslink repair in eukaryotes

DNA inter-strand crosslinks (ICLs) are dangerous lesions that can be caused by a variety of endogenous and exogenous bifunctional compounds. Because covalently linking both strands of the double helix locally disrupts DNA replication and transcription, failure to remove even a single ICL can be fatal to the cell. Thus, multiple ICL repair pathways have evolved, with the best studied being the canonical Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway. However, recent research demonstrates that different types of ICLs (e.g., backbone distorting vs. non-distorting) can be discriminated by the cell, which then mounts a specific repair response using the FA pathway or one of a variety of FA-independent ICL repair pathways. This review focuses on the latter, covering current work on the transcription-coupled, base excision, acetaldehyde-induced, and SNM1A/RecQ4 ICL repair pathways and highlighting unanswered questions in the field. Answering these questions will provide mechanistic insight into the various pathways of ICL repair and enable ICL-inducing agents to be more effectively used as chemotherapeutics.