Cancer screening and treatment in patients with end-stage renal disease: remaining issues in the field of onco-nephrology

Does the hemodialysis program affect the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum levels in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD)? A cross-sectional descriptive study

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the effect of high-flux membrane hemodialysis on total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) serum levels in hemodialysis patients and to evaluate the clinical significance of any observed changes.

METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted involving 75 hemodialysis patients at An-Najah National University Hospital. tPSA and hematocrit (Hct) serum levels were measured before and after one hemodialysis session. The correlation between changes in tPSA and Hct levels was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS).

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 54.25 ± 15.27 years, with a mean hemodialysis duration of 40 ± 38 months. The mean tPSA levels before and after hemodialysis were 0.95 ± 0.81 ng/ml and 1.15 ± 0.96 ng/ml, respectively. Significant increases were observed in both tPSA (t = -3.264, p = 0.002) and Hct levels (t = -7.861, p < 0.001). The percentage changes in tPSA and Hct were 20% and 12%, respectively, with no significant correlation between the changes (r = 0.152, p = 0.215).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemodialysis significantly elevates tPSA serum levels; however, no significant correlation was found between changes in tPSA and Hct. None of the patients showed clinically significant elevations in tPSA that would necessitate prostate biopsy. Therefore, high-flux membrane hemodialysis does not appear to compromise the diagnostic value of tPSA in hemodialysis patients.

Stage at Diagnosis and Prognosis of Colorectal, Stomach, Lung, Liver, Kidney, and Bladder Cancers in Dialysis Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Study Using Cancer Registry Data and Administrative Data

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Cancer is an important comorbidity that can affect survival in dialysis patients. However, it is unclear if dialysis patients who develop cancer are disadvantaged by later detection and poorer prognosis. This study comparatively examined the stage at diagnosis and prognosis of several common cancer types in dialysis and nondialysis patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this retrospective cohort study, cancer registry data were linked with administrative data to identify dialysis and nondialysis patients with any new diagnosis of cancer between 2010 and 2015 at 36 hospitals in Osaka Prefecture, Japan. In these patients, we identified the cancer stage at diagnosis for patients with colorectal, stomach, lung, liver, kidney, and bladder cancers. The association between dialysis and survival time (up to 3 years of follow-up) was examined for each cancer type using Cox proportional hazards models that adjusted for age, sex, and cancer stage. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We analyzed 2,161 dialysis patients and 158,964 nondialysis patients with cancer. Dialysis patients had a higher prevalence of colorectal, liver, and kidney cancers than nondialysis patients. Colorectal, stomach, lung, liver, and kidney cancers were diagnosed earlier in dialysis patients, whereas bladder cancer was diagnosed at an advanced stage. The Cox proportional hazards models revealed that mortality was significantly higher in dialysis patients with colorectal, stomach, lung, and bladder cancers than in nondialysis patients (all <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Dialysis patients had higher mortality for several common cancers despite their earlier detection. This poorer prognosis may be influenced by the unavailability and complications of cancer treatment for these patients.

Postoperative outcomes of cancer surgery in patients with and without kidney failure with dialysis therapy: A matched-pair cohort study

Background

The difference in outcomes of cancer surgery between patients with and without kidney failure with dialysis therapy (KFDT) remains uncertain.

Methods

Using 2010–18 data in a national inpatient database in Japan, we identified patients who had undergone resection of colorectal, lung, gastric or breast cancer. We matched selected patient characteristics, type of cancer, surgical procedure and hospital of up to four patients without KFDT to each patient with KFDT. We assessed 30-day mortality and postoperative complications.

Results

Through matching, we identified 2248 patients with KFDT (807 with colorectal, 579 with lung, 500 with gastric and 362 with breast cancer) and 8210 patients without KFDT (2851 with colorectal, 2216 with lung, 1756 with gastric and 1387 with breast cancer). Postoperative complications occurred in a higher proportion of patients with KFDT than of those without KFDT after colorectal {20.3% versus 14.6%; risk difference (RD): 5.7% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.6%–8.8%]}, lung [18.0% versus 12.9%; RD: 5.1% (95% CI 1.6%–8.4%)], gastric [25.0% versus 13.2%; RD: 11.8% (95% CI 7.6%–16.2%)] and breast cancer surgery [7.5% versus 3.5%; RD: 3.9% (95% CI 1.1%–6.9%)]. Patients with KFDT had a higher 30-day mortality than those without KFDT after gastric cancer surgery [1.6% versus 0.3%; RD: 1.3% (95% CI 0.1%–2.3%)]. Heart failure and ischemic heart disease occurred more frequently in patients with KFDT.

Conclusions

Patients with KFDT had higher rates of postoperative complications and 30-day mortality; however, RDs varied between cancer types. The higher rates of postoperative complications in patients with KFDT were mainly attributable to cardiovascular complications.

Comparisons of postoperative outcomes after breast cancer surgery in patients with and without renal replacement therapy: a matched-pair cohort study using a Japanese nationwide inpatient database

BACKGROUND

Although patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) have more comorbidities and higher mortality and morbidity risks than the general population, surgery during breast cancer treatment is crucial because of limitations in anticancer agents for patients with renal insufficiency. We aimed to compare the short-term postoperative outcomes between patients with and without RRT.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for stages 0-III breast cancer between July 2010 and March 2017 were retrospectively identified in a Japanese nationwide inpatient database and divided into those with RRT (RRT group, n = 1547) and those without RRT (control group, n = 364,047). We generated a 1:4 matched-pair cohort matched for age, institution, and fiscal year at admission. We conducted multivariable regression analyses to compare postoperative complications, 30-day readmission, and anesthesia duration between the two groups.

RESULTS

The RRT group was more likely to have comorbidities (95.0% vs. 24.1%) and undergo total mastectomy (64.2% vs. 47.0%) than the control group. The RRT group was not significantly associated with complications (odds ratio 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.56) and 30-day readmission (odds ratio 0.88; 95% CI 0.65-1.18), but was associated with shorter anesthesia duration (difference, - 6.8 min; 95% CI - 10.7 to - 3.0 min) compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The matched-pair cohort analyses revealed no significant differences in postoperative complications after breast cancer surgery between patients with and without RRT. Breast cancer surgery in patients with RRT may be as safe as that in patients without RRT, if comorbidities other than chronic renal failure are adequately addressed.

Chemotherapy in cancer patients undergoing haemodialysis: a nationwide study in Japan

Background

Cancer is a major cause of death in patients undergoing haemodialysis. However, information about the actual clinical practice of chemotherapy for patients with cancer undergoing haemodialysis is lacking. We conducted a nationwide survey using questionnaires on the clinical practice of chemotherapy for such patients.

Patients and methods

The nationwide survey included patients undergoing haemodialysis who were subsequently diagnosed with cancer in 20 hospitals in Japan from January 2010 to December 2012. We reviewed their clinical data, including cancer at the following primary sites: kidney, colorectum, stomach, lung, liver, bladder, pancreas and breast. The questionnaires consisted of the following subjects: (1) patient characteristics; (2) regimen, dosage and timing of chemotherapy; and (3) clinical outcome.

Results

Overall, 675 patients were registered and assessed for main primary cancer site involvement. Of 507 patients with primary site involvement, 74 patients (15%) received chemotherapy (44 as palliative chemotherapy and 30 as perioperative chemotherapy). The most commonly used cytotoxic drugs were fluoropyrimidine (15 patients), platinum (8 patients) and taxane (8 patients), and the dosage and timing of these drugs differed between institutions; however, the dosage of molecular targeted drugs (24 patients) and hormone therapy drugs (15 patients) was consistent. The median survival time of patients receiving palliative chemotherapy was 13.0 months (0.1-60.3 months). Three patients (6.8%) died from treatment-related causes and nine patients (20%) died of causes other than cancer. Of the 30 patients who received perioperative chemotherapy, 6 (20%) died of causes other than cancer within 3 years after the initiation of chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Among the haemodialysis patients with cancer who received chemotherapy, the rates of mortality from causes other than cancer might be high for both palliative and perioperative chemotherapy. Indications for the use of chemotherapy in patients undergoing haemodialysis should be considered carefully.