Hemodialysis crossover study using a relative blood volume change-guided ultrafiltration control compared with standard hemodialysis: the BV-UFC study

Closed Loop Ultrafiltration Feedback Control in Hemodialysis: A Narrative Review

While life-sustaining, hemodialysis is a non-physiological treatment modality that exerts stress on the patient, primarily due to fluid shifts during ultrafiltration. Automated feedback control systems, integrated with sensors that continuously monitor bio-signals such as blood volume, can adjust hemodialysis treatment parameters, e.g., ultrafiltration rate, in real-time. These systems hold promise to mitigate hemodynamic stress, prevent intradialytic hypotension, and improve the removal of water and electrolytes in chronic hemodialysis patients. However, robust evidence supporting their clinical application remains limited. Based on an extensive literature research, we assess feedback-controlled ultrafiltration systems that have emerged over the past three decades in comparison to conventional hemodialysis treatment. We identified 28 clinical studies. Closed loop ultrafiltration control demonstrated effectiveness in 23 of them. No adverse effects of closed loop ultrafiltration control were reported across all trials. Closed loop ultrafiltration control represents an important advancement towards more physiological hemodialysis. Its development is driven by innovations in real-time bio-signals monitoring, advancement in control theory, and artificial intelligence. We expect these innovations will lead to the prevalent adoption of ultrafiltration control in the future, provided its clinical value is substantiated in adequately randomized controlled trials.

Digital Health Support: Current Status and Future Development for Enhancing Dialysis Patient Care and Empowering Patients

Chronic kidney disease poses a growing global health concern, as an increasing number of patients progress to end-stage kidney disease requiring kidney replacement therapy, presenting various challenges including shortage of care givers and cost-related issues. In this narrative essay, we explore innovative strategies based on in-depth literature analysis that may help healthcare systems face these challenges, with a focus on digital health technologies (DHTs), to enhance removal and ensure better control of broader spectrum of uremic toxins, to optimize resources, improve care and outcomes, and empower patients. Therefore, alternative strategies, such as self-care dialysis, home-based dialysis with the support of teledialysis, need to be developed. Managing ESKD requires an improvement in patient management, emphasizing patient education, caregiver knowledge, and robust digital support systems. The solution involves leveraging DHTs to automate HD, implement automated algorithm-driven controlled HD, remotely monitor patients, provide health education, and enable caregivers with data-driven decision-making. These technologies, including artificial intelligence, aim to enhance care quality, reduce practice variations, and improve treatment outcomes whilst supporting personalized kidney replacement therapy. This narrative essay offers an update on currently available digital health technologies used in the management of HD patients and envisions future technologies that, through digital solutions, potentially empower patients and will more effectively support their HD treatments.

Proportional integral feedback control of ultrafiltration rate in hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Most hemodialysis patients without residual kidney function accumulate fluid between dialysis session that needs to be removed by ultrafiltration. Ultrafiltration usually results in a decline in relative blood volume (RBV). Recent epidemiological research has identified RBV ranges that were associated with significantly better survival. The objective of this work was to develop an ultrafiltration controller to steer a patient's RBV trajectory into these favorable RBV ranges.

METHODS

We designed a proportional-integral feedback ultrafiltration controller that utilizes signals from a device that reports RBV. The control goal is to attain the RBV trajectory associated with improved patient survival. Additional constraints such as upper and lower bounds of ultrafiltration volume and rate were realized. The controller was evaluated in in silico and ex vivo bench experiments, and in a clinical proof-of-concept study in two maintenance dialysis patients.

RESULTS

In all tests, the ultrafiltration controller performed as expected. In the in silico and ex vivo bench experiments, the controller showed robust reaction toward deliberate disruptive interventions (e.g. signal noise; extreme plasma refill rates). No adverse events were observed in the clinical study.

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrafiltration controller can steer RBV trajectories toward desired RBV ranges while obeying to a set of constraints. Prospective studies in hemodialysis patients with diverse clinical characteristics are warranted to further explore the controllers impact on intradialytic hemodynamic stability, quality of life, and long-term outcomes.