1
|
Capurso M, Pazzagli C. Examining Children's Experiences of Visiting Their Pediatrician: Insights into Communication, Actions, and Emotions. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38373875 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2318130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
The way children experience a medical visit lays the groundwork for their health education and fosters trust and comfort in healthcare relationships. This study employed a retrospective and narrative-based design to analyze how children perceived their experiences of visits to their doctor, how they describe their emotions, and how they portray the different relationships within the doctor-caregiver-patient triad. Three hundred fifty students (50.75% female, 8-13 years, Mage = 10.5, SD = 5.93, 77.95% from primary school) completed a booklet comprising different narrative activities. The booklet underwent quantitative content analysis according to gender and school level. Children reported that the doctors primarily addressed their caregivers when asking for and delivering health-related information, while their role was mostly passive. Meeting with friendly doctors and being in a welcoming environment were associated with a positive medical experience, while negative emotions and encounters with unsympathetic practitioners contributed to negative experiences. Most respondents wanted to talk privately with their doctors at their next visit. Some examples and practices are discussed to enable healthcare practitioners to create an environment where children are heard and valued, and their involvement during consultation processes is enhanced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Capurso
- Department of Philosophy, Social & Human Sciences and Education, University of Perugia
| | - Chiara Pazzagli
- Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Graetz DE, Rivas S, Wang H, Vedaraju Y, Ferrara G, Fuentes L, Cáceres-Serrano A, Antillon-Klussmann F, Devidas M, Metzger M, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Mack JW. Cancer treatment decision-making among parents of paediatric oncology patients in Guatemala: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057350. [PMID: 35953257 PMCID: PMC9379539 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine treatment decision-making priorities and experiences among parents of children with cancer in Guatemala. SETTING This study was conducted at Guatemala's National Pediatric Cancer Center in Guatemala City. PARTICIPANTS Spanish-speaking parents of paediatric patients (≤18 years of age) diagnosed with any form of cancer within the 8 weeks prior to study enrolment. The quantitative portion of this study included 100 parent participants; the qualitative component included 20 parents. Most participants were Catholic or Evangelical Spanish-speaking mothers. OUTCOMES Priorities and experiences of cancer treatment decision-making including decision-making role and experienced regret. RESULTS A range of paediatric ages and cancer diagnoses were included. Most Guatemalan parents surveyed (70%) made decisions about their child's cancer together and almost all (94%) without input from their community. Surveyed parents predominately preferred shared decision-making with their child's oncologist (76%), however 69% agreed it was best not to be provided with many options. Two-thirds of surveyed parents (65%) held their preferred role in decision-making, with fathers more likely to hold their preferred role than mothers (p=0.02). A small number of parents (11%) experienced heightened decisional regret, which did not correlate with socio-demographic characteristics or preferred decision-making role. Qualitative results supported quantitative findings, demonstrating a decision-making process that emphasised trust and honesty. CONCLUSIONS Guatemalan parents preferred to make decisions with their medical team and appreciated providers who were honest and inclusive, but directive about decisions. This study reinforces the importance of the provider-parent relationship and encourages clinicians in all settings to ask about and honour each parent's desired role in decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan E Graetz
- Global Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Silvia Rivas
- Unidad Nacional de Oncologia Pediatrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Huiqi Wang
- Global Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Yuvanesh Vedaraju
- Global Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Gia Ferrara
- Global Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Lucia Fuentes
- Department of Psychology, Unidad Nacional de Oncologia Pediatrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Ana Cáceres-Serrano
- Department of Psychology, Unidad Nacional de Oncologia Pediatrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Federico Antillon-Klussmann
- Unidad Nacional de Oncologia Pediatrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala
- Universidad Francisco Marroquin Facultad de Medicina, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Meenakshi Devidas
- Global Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Monika Metzger
- Global Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Jennifer W Mack
- Department of Population Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sisk BA, Harvey K, Friedrich AB, Antes AL, Yaeger LH, Mack JW, DuBois J. Multilevel barriers and facilitators of communication in pediatric oncology: A systematic review. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29405. [PMID: 34662485 PMCID: PMC8875310 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Multiple factors can facilitate or impede the fulfillment of communication functions in pediatric cancer. In this systematic review, we evaluated 109 studies from the preceding 20 years that presented qualitative or quantitative evidence of barriers or facilitators to communication in pediatric cancer. Using a multilevel framework developed in our prior study, we then analyzed and categorized the levels of barriers and facilitators identified in included studies. The vast majority of studies focused on individual-level barriers, rather than team, organization/system, collaborating hospital, community, or policy-level barriers. Future studies should explore the full range of factors that affect communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A. Sisk
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kieandra Harvey
- Brown School of Social Work, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Annie B. Friedrich
- Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Alison L. Antes
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Lauren H Yaeger
- Bernard Becker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; and Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Graetz DE, Garza M, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Mack JW. Pediatric cancer communication in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review. Cancer 2020; 126:5030-5039. [PMID: 32991761 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
The burden of global childhood cancer lies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Communication is essential to pediatric cancer care, and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has defined 6 functions of communication between patients, family members, and providers, including 1) fostering healing relationships, 2) responding to emotions, 3) exchanging information, 4) making decisions, 5) managing uncertainty, and 6) enabling self-management. Nevertheless, communication needs and practices in LMICs remain incompletely understood. For this review, the Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Turning Research Into Practice databases were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews. Searching identified 2988 articles, with 11 added through snowballing. Forty articles met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers extracted data on study characteristics, communication functions, enablers, barriers, and additional major themes. This review included work from 17 countries. Most studies (85%) used qualitative methodology; the number of participants ranged from 7 to 304. All 6 of the NCI-defined communication functions were identified in included studies, with rates ranging from 100% of studies for information exchange to 28% of studies for decision making. Communication barriers included cancer misconceptions, stigma, and hierarchy between parents and providers. Provider training and community education facilitated communication. Additional themes included disclosure to children, family dynamics, and the multidisciplinary health care team. In conclusion, all 6 of the communication functions defined by the NCI were applied by pediatric cancer researchers in LMICs. Additional barriers, enablers, and communication themes noted in LMICs deserve further exploration, and a relative paucity of research in comparison with high-income countries highlights the need for further work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan E Graetz
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.,Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Marcela Garza
- Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.,Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.,Department of Hematology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kaye EC, Kiefer A, Zalud K, Gattas M, Snyder I, Spraker-Perlman H, Baker JN. Advancing the field of communication research in pediatric oncology: A systematic review of the literature analyzing medical dialogue. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:e27378. [PMID: 30070015 PMCID: PMC6192838 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Revised: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Historically, communication research in pediatric oncology has relied on surveys and interviews, resulting in cross-sectional and retrospective studies constrained by selection, recognition, and recall biases. This systematic review identifies and synthesizes the published literature analyzing primary data from recorded conversations between pediatric oncologists, patients with cancer, and their families, with the following objectives: (1) to identify the extent and content of the evidence base, (2) to describe methodological strategies utilized in the analysis of recorded medical dialogue, (3) to aggregate salient findings, and (4) to generate recommendations for future prospective research related to analysis of medical dialogue in pediatric oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ashley Kiefer
- Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital, Memphis, TN
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | | | | | - Ian Snyder
- Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital, Memphis, TN
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | | | | |
Collapse
|