A qualitative exploration of the patient experience of erosive and non-erosive hand osteoarthritis

Experiences of people with hand osteoarthritis and perceptions of clinicians and carers on quality of life and treatment services: A qualitative synthesis

Introduction

We aimed to synthesise the experiences of people living with hand osteoarthritis (HOA) and the perceptions of clinicians and carers relating to the quality of life and treatment services.

Methods

We undertook a systematic search on MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL electronic databases for qualitative studies in HOA. We used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist to assess methodological quality and thematically-synthesise the findings. We used GRADE-CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation- Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research) to assess the quality of the evidence.

Results

We identified 13 studies involving people with HOA (288 women and 39 men, average age 61.4 years) and clinicians. Five themes were identified from studies involving people with HOA: i) My hands are painful whenever I use them; ii) It stops me doing everyday activities; iii) It stops me doing things I value; iv) It's psychologically challenging and v) I find ways of doing things. The quality of evidence was moderate except for pain with low quality of evidence. Most studies were conducted in Europe and the United Kingdom with participants recruited predominantly from hospital settings. We were not able to synthesise the three studies that involved clinicians as each explored different topics of HOA. There were no studies that involved carers.

Conclusions

Our findings highlighted the impact of HOA in various areas of life and the need for personalised psychological support in practice.

"It's very saddening, you keep on wondering when the symptoms will be over": A qualitative study exploring the long-term chikungunya disease impact on daily life and well-being, 6 years after disease onset

BACKGROUND

Long-term chikungunya is a mosquito-borne disease, characterized by disabling rheumatic symptoms persisting for years, after infection with the chikungunya virus. Previous studies focused on assessing the well-being of affected individuals from a quantitative perspective using generic instruments, and have reported physical and psychological impairment. However, a common critique is that generic instrument's structured responses and pre-defined health domains selected by health professionals, may not capture the full extent of well-being impairment experienced by patients. This study aimed to explore in-depth to which extent long-term chikungunya disease impacts daily living and the physical, psychological, and social well-being from the experiences and perspective of affected individuals.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Using open-ended questions, in-depth interviews were conducted with 20 purposively selected individuals with long-term chikungunya disease, in Curaçao. Interview audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim. The data were thematically analyzed. Living with persistent rheumatic symptoms affected the participant's daily living and well-being in several ways: experience of physical impact (restricted physical functioning and limitations in activities of daily life); experience of psychological impact (altered emotional state, fear of walking and running, psychosocial aspects of footwear adaptations, and uncertainty about disease progression and future health); and experience of social impact (social isolation and impaired relational maintenance, social dependency, challenges of social support, at-work productivity loss, and giving up leisure activities after work).

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

This study, the first of its kind, indicated that the adverse impact of long-term chikungunya disease is currently underreported. The persistent rheumatic symptoms had a negative effect on functional ability, which in turn impacted broad aspects of daily life and well-being, beyond what is captured by generic instruments. In the view of the findings, physical exercise programs including manual therapy, aerobics, resistance and stretching exercises, and orthopaedic footwear interventions in a multidisciplinary patient-centred approach may improve physical function and subsequently overall well-being.

Detecting the Effect Size of Weather Conditions on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

One of the next frontiers in medical research, particularly in orthopaedic surgery, is personalized treatment outcome prediction. In personalized medicine, treatment choices are adjusted for the patient based on the individual's and their disease's distinct features. A high-value and patient-centered health care system requires evaluating results that integrate the patient's viewpoint. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used to shed light on patients' perceptions of their health status after an intervention by using validated questionnaires. The aim of this study is to examine whether meteorological or light (night vs. day) conditions affect PROM scores and hence indirectly affect health-related outcomes. We collected scores for PROMs from questionnaires completed by patients (N = 2326) who had undergone hip and knee interventions between June 2017 and May 2020 at the IRCCS Orthopaedic Institute Galeazzi (IOG), Milan, Italy. Nearest neighbour propensity score (PS) matching was applied to ensure the similarity of the groups tested under the different weather-related conditions. The exposure PS was derived through logistic regression. The data were analysed using statistical tests (Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test). According to Cohen's effect size, weather conditions may affect the scores for PROMs and, indirectly, health-related outcomes via influencing the relative humidity and weather-related conditions. The findings suggest avoiding PROMs' collection in certain conditions if the odds of outcome-based underperformance are to be minimized. This would ensure a balance between costs for PROMs' collection and data availability.

A systematic review of the measurement properties of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ)

This systematic review of the literature aimed to identify studies examining the measurement properties of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) in various international populations and investigate its use in various diagnoses and health conditions. The search was conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed), SCOPUS, CINAHL and Web of Science, with no restrictions on publication date, country or patient age. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards to select the health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. 312 publications were identified and screened; 55 studies met the inclusion criteria and were critically reviewed. These publications comprised 16 languages and 11 pathologies and mainly investigated the internal consistency, construct validity and reliability of the MHQ. In general, all the measurement properties of the instrument showed good scores. The present review shows that the MHQ is a valid patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) and can be properly used in different clinical and rehabilitative contexts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2A.

A qualitative evidence synthesis using meta-ethnography to understand the experience of living with osteoarthritis pain

ABSTRACT

Osteoarthritis pain affects the lives of a large number of people around the world. Understanding other people's experience is integral to effective care and qualitative research can have an important part to pay in education and good clinical practice. We aimed to systematically search for, identify, and synthesise qualitative research exploring the experience of living with osteoarthritis in order to incorporate this knowledge into an educational resource. We comprehensively searched four bibliographic databases and used the methods of meta-ethnography to synthesise qualitative research findings. We screened 10123 titles, 548 abstracts and 139 full texts. We included findings from 118 reports (105 unique samples) of at least 2534 adults living with osteoarthritis around the world. We developed 7 themes from more than 600 findings: it is part of my life's tapestry; (yet) it is consuming me; it constrains my body and my occupations; I am becoming separated yet dependent; I accept, but I will not let it define me; (yet) this makes me feel less than the person I was. Our findings highlight the profound impact that osteoarthritis can have on people's lives and the struggle to hold onto a sense of self. They indicate that recognising these losses, and taking osteoarthritis seriously, is an integral part of effective healthcare. This finding may be transferable beyond this condition.

Erosive Hand OsteoArthritis (EHOA): analysis of consecutive patients presenting with EHOA in a hospital-based rheumatology practice and its implications for an upcoming interventional study

INTRODUCTION

Erosive Hand OsteoArthritis (EHOA) is a common rheumatological problem. We aim to determine characteristics of EHOA patients: comorbidities, radiographic erosivity and pain experienced after being diagnosed, in order to find which of these are potentially relevant in upcoming interventional trials.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis of EHOA patients within the electronic database in one centre, with a telephone interview on pain as experienced even exceeding 12 months after being diagnosed.

RESULTS

Eighty-four non-academic EHOA patients were found: 89% females (median age 69 years), 11% males (similar age distribution). Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) erosivity scores in both sexes were comparable; DIPs scored higher than PIP's. Comorbid conditions were crystal-induced arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 8%, 5% and 1%, respectively; seropositivity for rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in 8% and 1% respectively. Pain worst experienced often exceeded a visual analogue score of 5.0, but was unrelated to the total KL score. Some pain reduction was reached with non-steroidals (perorally/transcutaneously) as deduced from continued use in 1 in 3.

CONCLUSIONS

In many EHOA patients, there is an unmet need regarding the treatment of pain, which per se was not directly correlated with erosivity score. Future studies may be designed considering the aforementioned characteristics, acting on the inflammatory process resulting in PIP/DIP erosions, with the exclusion of RA and PsA in order to get a clean study on EHOA. Several studies with monoclonal antibodies have been performed but demonstrated ineffectivity on the outcome of pain. Hope glooms with the arrival of innovative small molecules that may reach EHOA target cells. Key Points • Erosive handOA is a common problem in non-academic rheumatology; it is often associated with significant pain in both sexes exceeding a VASpain of 5.0 even years after being diagnosed; 1 in 3 found some relief in non-steroidals perorally/transcutaneously. • Future studies will have to focus on (episodic) inflammatory hand OA resulting in proven erosivity (EHOA) located in PIP plus DIP joints and may have to exclude comorbid active crystal-induced arthritis as well as rheumatoid/psoriatic arthritis and possibly even RF/ACPA seropositivity in order to get a clean study on EHOA. • As several big monoclonals have failed in EHOA, we may have to search for promising new drugs within the group of small molecules. These will have to show a significant pain-reducing effect and preferably also a disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) effect.