Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease

Assessment of quality of life in families affected by maple syrup urine disease: a cross sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Maple syrup urine disease (MSUD) is considered one of the intoxication-type inborn errors of metabolism (IT-IEM). Patients with MSUD are afflicted with a chronic illness, and the disease and its management have both physical and psychological consequences for the patients and their families. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life (QoL) and its main determining factors for patients with MSUD and their families under follow-up in Sohag University Hospital.

METHODS

Parents of 36 patients with MSUD participated in a questionnaire translated into Arabic to assess their QoL. Subsequently, a file review was conducted to identify any key factors that could potentially influence the parents' QoL.

RESULTS

The results of the study indicated that 27 (75 %) of the MSUD patients exhibited poor QoL, while only 9 (25 %) patients reported good QoL across all studied aspects. Significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the disease onset, whether acute or asymptomatic (diagnosed before acute metabolic decompensation) (p=0.001) and the type of screening employed (p=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of data on the QoL of pediatric patients with IT-IEM, including MSUD. The methodological approaches and assessment instruments utilized in existing studies are inconsistent. Identifying the factors that affect QoL would be beneficial for improving patient care, evaluating outcomes and treatments, and planning effective social and psychological interventions to enhance the patients' QoL.

A Qualitative Approach to Quality of Life in Fibrous Bone Dysplasia /McCune Albright Syndrome: Looking Beyond Quantitative Analysis

This study explores FD/MAS patient's perceptions about their disease and its impact on their quality of life. We have evaluated quality of life (QoL) in French Fibrous Dysplasia/MacCune-Albright Syndrome (FD/MAS) patients using a qualitative approach with focus groups to explore perceptions, symptoms and limitations associated with FD/MAS and a quantitative method with the Short Form-36 (SF36) to quantify QoL. Focus groups revealed the heterogeneity of FD forms and allowed for understanding the reasons of reduced QoL. Patients identified pain as the dominant symptom. The impact on mental health was explained by diagnostic uncertainty, disease chronicity and rarity and the inconsistent effectiveness of therapies. Patients talked about disability but also of coping strategies. They expressed their need for comprehensive and multi-disciplinary care from medical and paramedical professionals familiar with their pathology. The quantitative questionnaire SF36 confirmed reduced QoL in these patients compared with the French general population in all sub-domains: physical function (72.1 versus 84.4, p = 0.0001), physical role (60.5 versus 81.1, p = 0.0004), body pain (58.7 versus 72.4, p = 0.0004), general health (50.08 versus 67.6, p < 0.0001), energy (44.58 versus 57.2, p < 0.0001), social function (61.34 versus 80.5, p < 0.0001), emotional role (57.98 versus 81.3, p = 0.0002) and emotional well-being (57.98 versus 81.3, p = 0.0097). Polyostotic patients had poorer QoL compared with monostotic patients. A better understanding of the disease experience and expectations of FD patients will enable practitioners to provide care better adapted to patients' needs, and pave the way for optimizing DF care.

Health-related quality of life in 205 children with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita

PURPOSE

Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) describes a heterogeneous group of rare congenital conditions. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) may be reduced in AMC due to broadly heterogeneous physical impairments and participation limitations. This study described HRQL in children and youth with AMC, compared HRQL between child self- and parent-proxy reports, and identified factors associated with better/worse HRQL.

METHODS

Data on 205 children with AMC (age 8-21 years) from a North American AMC registry across eight hospital sites was used. HRQL was assessed cross-sectionally using the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-Youth-3 Levels (EQ-5D-Y-3 L) by self-report, parent proxy-report or both.

RESULTS

Mean child-reported PROMIS T-scores were significantly lower than the normal mean for the Upper Extremity (mean = 33.0) and Mobility (mean = 37.2) but in the normal range for Pain Interference (mean = 46.6) and Peer Relationships (mean = 51.7). A lot of problems in EQ-5D-Y-3 L was reported by 37% in Feeling Worried/ Sad/ Unhappy, 46% in Having Pain/Discomfort, 50% in Doing Usual Activities, 56% in Mobility, and 57% in Looking After Myself. Compared to child-report, parents reported significantly worse PROMIS T-scores and higher problems in EQ-5D domains. Wheelchair use, being small for gestational age, prolonged hospitalization after birth, increased number of orthopedic surgeries, and caregiver's stress were associated with lower HRQL scores.

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate the importance of considering both the child's and parents' reports of HRQL, and to provide multimodal interventions that focus on the effect of childhood and parental characteristics to promote HRQL among children with AMC.

Evolving Concept of Value in Health Economics and Outcomes Research: Emerging Tools for Innovation and Access to Cell and Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases

OBJECTIVES

Recent scientific breakthroughs have propelled the development of disease-modifying and potentially curative cell and gene therapies (CGTs) for rare diseases, including those diseases previously considered untreatable. The unique characteristics of CGTs, however, pose challenges to the traditional methods of therapy value determination, reimbursement, and outcome evaluation used by regulatory and assessment agencies for product approval and market access. Notably, CGTs are one-time or short-course treatments, often first-in-class (precluding direct comparisons with effective alternatives), and have health benefits that are largely realized over time.

METHODS

We summarized emerging health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) solutions in 5 areas pertaining to CGTs for rare diseases using examples from literature and recently approved therapies. These solutions include the collection of real-world data to generate real-world evidence, patient centricity and novel value assessment frameworks, evolution of economic evaluation methodologies, novel reimbursement models and management of affordability, and health equity and societal benefits.

RESULTS

Advances in HEOR methods have informed the design and collection of long-term real-world data for CGT efficacy extrapolation, use of novel (including surrogate) endpoints, integration of the patient's voice and preferences, and application of sophisticated statistical methodology and artificial intelligence/machine learning techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuing innovation in HEOR is expected to contribute to improved health outcomes, reduced costs, and enhanced access, ultimately enabling more efficient delivery of CGTs to patients living with rare diseases.

Assessing the effectiveness of measurement scales in evaluating the health-related quality of life in rare disease patients after treatment: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Rare diseases often entail significant challenges in clinical management and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment. HRQoL assessment tools for rare diseases show substantial variability in outcomes, influenced by disease heterogeneity, intervention types, and scale characteristics. The variability in reported quality of life (QoL) improvements following interventions reflects a need to evaluate the effectiveness of HRQoL assessment tools and understand their suitability across diverse contexts.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to analyse the effectiveness of various assessment scales in evaluating QoL and explores the general trends observed in the studies using the same and different assessment scales on rare diseases.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across various databases to identify studies that reported QoL outcomes related to interventions for rare diseases. Search terms included various synonyms, and both the generic and specific terms related to rare diseases and QoL. Key variables, including intervention types, patient demographics, study design, and geographical factors, were analysed to determine their role in influencing the reported HRQoL outcomes. The findings were then compared with existing literature to identify consistent patterns and discrepancies.

RESULTS

A total of 39 studies were included, comprising randomised controlled trials, observational studies, and cohort studies, with 4737 participants. Significant variations were observed in QoL improvements across studies, even when using the same assessment scales. These differences were primarily attributed to the heterogeneity in disease severity, intervention types, and patient characteristics. Studies employing disease-specific scales reported more nuanced outcomes than generic ones. Additionally, methodological differences, including study design and intervention type, contributed to variations in results and geographical factors influencing patients' perceptions of health and well-being.

CONCLUSION

The reported differences in QoL outcomes across studies can be explained by a combination of factors, including disease heterogeneity, treatment modalities, patient demographics, and assessment scale characteristics. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate HRQoL assessment tools based on the research context and patient population. For more accurate comparisons across studies, it is crucial to consider these factors alongside consistent methodology and cultural adaptability of scales. Future research should focus on developing standardised guidelines for QoL assessments that accommodate the diverse needs of patients with rare diseases.

Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6Dv2 in patients with late-onset Pompe disease

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D (3L and 5L) and SF-6Dv2 in a group of Chinese patients with late-on Pompe disease (PD), and compare their performance in this patient group.

METHODS

The data used in this study were obtained from a web-based and cross-sectional survey conducted in China. All participants completed the 3L, 5L, and SF-6Dv2. Information about their sociodemographic status and health conditions was also collected. The measurement properties were assessed by examining ceiling and floor effects, evaluating convergent validity, known-group validity, and test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] and Gwet's AC).

RESULTS

A total of 117 PD patients completed the questionnaire. All dimensions of the 3L showed strong ceiling effects, ranging between 17.1 and 42.7%. All three measures showed good test-retest reliability, with ICC values ranging from 0.85 to 0.87. The Gwet's AC values showed that four out of five dimensions of the 3L showed very good agreement. All hypothesized correlations between the 3L, 5L, SF-6Dv2, and items of WHODAS were supported, indicating satisfactory convergent validity. The 5L showed stronger correlations (|r|= 0.53-0.84) with WHODAS than the other two measures. The outcomes of ANOVA indicated that the 5L had higher F-statistics than the 3L and SF-6Dv2, indicating a stronger discriminant ability to differentiate most condition groups.

CONCLUSION

The 5L demonstrates lower ceiling and floor effects, higher discriminant ability, and better convergent validity than the SF-6Dv2 and 3L in patients with PD. In addition, the 5L may generate a larger utility gain compared to the other two instruments when conducting cost-effectiveness analysis.

A framework for N-of-1 trials of individualized gene-targeted therapies for genetic diseases

Individualized genetic therapies-medicines that precisely target a genetic variant that may only be found in a small number of individuals, as few as only one-offer promise for addressing unmet needs in genetic disease, but present unique challenges for trial design. By nature these new individualized medicines require testing in individualized N-of-1 trials. Here, we provide a framework for maintaining scientific rigor in N-of-1 trials. Building upon best practices from traditional clinical trial design, recent guidance from the United States Food and Drug Administration, and our own clinical research experience, we suggest key considerations including comprehensive baseline natural history, selection of appropriate clinical outcome assessments (COAs) individualized to the patient genotype-phenotype for safety and efficacy assessment over time, and specific statistical considerations. Standardization of N-of-1 trial designs in this fashion will maximize efficient learning from this next generation of targeted individualized therapeutics.

Internal Psychometric Validation of an International Burden of Illness Survey for Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is a rare, chronic, debilitating lymphoproliferative disorder where the mainstay of treatment is symptom management. Our recent international patient survey showed that patients with iMCD have a high symptom burden that has a significant negative patient-reported impact on several aspects of daily life. As part of our ongoing work towards the development of an iMCD symptom burden scale, assessing the survey's psychometric properties is a critical step in understanding its adequacy, relevance, and usefulness. As iMCD is a rare disease, there are challenges to conducting such psychometric analyses which we describe.

METHODS

As part of the exploratory psychometric analysis, three a priori hypothesis sets (HS) were generated by interviewing an iMCD-experienced clinician, a patient, and a caregiver to explore the iMCD patient survey's internal construct validity, given no gold standard iMCD measure exists for external construct validation. HS-1 hypothesized that a convergent or discriminant relationship exists with the patients' self-assessment of symptom effect on daily life between two potentially related or unrelated symptoms, respectively. HS-2 hypothesized that having a greater number of symptoms has a positive convergent relationship with the patients' assessment of symptoms' effect on daily life. Finally, HS-3 hypothesized that patients receiving treatment versus no treatment was associated with patients reporting less effect of symptom burden on their daily life. Spearman's rank absolute correlation strength (ACS) was used for HS-1 and HS-2 (convergent relationship, ACS ≥ 0.3 and p value < 0.05; divergent relationship, ACS < 0.3), and Cohen's d to quantify standardized absolute effect sizes (AES) for HS-3 (AES ≥ 0.5 and p value < 0.05).

RESULTS

Our analyses partially supported HS-1. None of the three positive convergent relationships were supported. Of the six discriminant relationships, only dizziness with impaired cognitive function and tiredness with dizziness were supported. HS-2 analyses showed there was convergent validity between the number of symptoms and their effect on aspects of daily life. HS-3 analyses did not provide evidence to support the hypothesis.

CONCLUSION

These internal psychometric construct analyses provide initial support for the bespoke iMCD patient survey and will guide additional work towards the development of the first iMCD-specific symptom burden scale.

Measuring health related quality of life (HRQoL) in Lysosomal Storage Disorders (LSDs): a rapid scoping review of available tools and domains

BACKGROUND

Lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs) are a group of rare inherited metabolic disorders, consisting of over 70 diseases that are characterised by lysosomal dysfunction. Due to their varied and progressive symptoms, LSDs have a continual impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Several recently published studies have provided insight into the HRQoL of individuals with LSDs. However, it is challenging to meaningfully synthesise this evidence, since studies often focus upon a particular type of LSD and / or utilise different self-report questionnaires or patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess HRQoL.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to review the published literature in LSDs, to identify the PROMs which have been used to assess HRQoL and generate a conceptual map of HRQoL domains measured in individuals diagnosed with LSDs.

METHODS

Three electronic databases were searched in March 2022. Primary studies of any design which utilised multi-item PROMs to assess at least one aspect of HRQoL in individuals with LSDs since 2017 were identified. Data were extracted to assess both the characteristics of each study and of the PROMs utilised within each study. The extraction of HRQoL domains and synthesis were informed by an a priori framework, inductively modified to reflect data emerging from the identified literature. Selection and extraction was undertaken independently by two reviewers; discrepancies were ratified by a third reviewer.

RESULTS

Sixty nine studies were identified which were published 2017-2022, with a combined total of 52 PROMs (71 variants) used to assess HRQoL in individuals with LSDs. The final extracted HRQoL framework included 7 domains (Activities; Physical sensations; Autonomy; Cognition; Feelings and emotions; Self-identity; Relationships), characterised by 37 sub-domains.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the breadth and variety of HRQoL domains assessed in individuals with LSDs, across three broad domains of physical, psychological and social functioning. The resultant framework and mapped PROMs will aid researchers and clinicians in the selection of PROMs to assess aspects of HRQoL in people living with LSDs, based on their conceptual coverage.

Video-based assessments of activities of daily living: generating real-world evidence in pediatric rare diseases

INTRODUCTION

Preserving function and independence to perform activities of daily living (ADL) is critical for patients and carers to manage the burden of care and improve quality of life. In children living with rare diseases, video recording ADLs offer the opportunity to collect the patients' experience in a real-life setting and accurately reflect treatment effectiveness on outcomes that matter to patients and families.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the measurement of ADL in pediatric rare diseases and the use of video to develop at-home electronic clinical outcome assessments (eCOA) by leveraging smartphone apps and artificial intelligence-based analysis. We broadly searched PubMed using Boolean combinations of the following MeSH terms 'Rare Diseases,' 'Quality of Life,' 'Activities of Daily Living,' 'Child,' 'Video Recording,' 'Outcome Assessment, Healthcare,' 'Intellectual disability,' and 'Genetic Diseases, Inborn.' Non-controlled vocabulary was used to include human pose estimation in movement analysis.

EXPERT OPINION

Broad uptake of video eCOA in drug development is linked to the generation of technical and clinical validation evidence to confidently assess a patient's functional abilities. Software platforms handling video data must align with quality regulations to ensure data integrity, security, and privacy. Regulatory flexibility and optimized validation processes should facilitate video eCOA to support benefit/risk drug assessment.

Gait characterization in rare bone diseases in a real-world environment - A comparative controlled study

BACKGROUND

Rare bone diseases (RBD) cause physical and sensory disability that affects quality of life. Mobility challenges are common for people with RBDs, and travelling to gait analysis labs can be very complex. Smartphone sensors could provide remote monitoring.

RESEARCH QUESTION

This study aimed to search for and identify variables that can be used to discriminate between people with RBD and healthy people by using built-in smartphone sensors in a real-world setting.

METHODS

In total, 18 participants (healthy: n=9; RBD: n=9), controlled by age and sex, were included in this cross-sectional study. A freely available App (Phyphox) was used to gather data from built-in smartphone sensors (accelerometer & gyroscope) at 60 Hz during a 15-min walk on a level surface without turns or stops. Temporal gait parameters like cadence, mean stride time and, coefficient variance (CoVSt) and nonlinear analyses, as the largest Lyapunov exponent (LLE) & sample entropy (SE) in the three accelerometer axes were used to distinguish between the groups and describe gait patterns.

RESULTS

The LLE (p=0.04) and the SE of the z-axis (p=0.01), which are correlated with balance control during walking and regularity of the gait, are sufficiently sensitive to distinguish between RBD and controls.

SIGNIFICANCE

The use of smartphone sensors to monitor gait in people with RBD allows for the identification of subtle changes in gait patterns, which can be used to inform assessment and management strategies in larger cohorts.

Health-related quality of life in patients with generalized pustular psoriasis: A systematic literature review

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, chronic, neutrophilic inflammatory skin disease characterized by episodes of widespread eruption of sterile, macroscopic pustules that can be accompanied by systemic inflammation and symptoms. A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis were conducted to determine the impact of GPP on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient-reported severity of symptoms and to compare its impact to patients with plaque psoriasis (plaque PsO). Searches were undertaken in Embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library from 1 January 2002 to 15 September 2022. Screening was carried out by two reviewers independently. Outcome measures included generic (e.g. EQ-5D, SF-36) and dermatology-specific (e.g. DLQI) clinical outcome assessments, and other relevant patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (e.g. severity of pain measured by a numerical rating scale). Overall, 20 studies were found to be eligible for inclusion, of which seven also had data for plaque PsO. The DLQI was the most frequently reported outcome measure (16 out of 20 studies). When reported, mean DLQI (SD) scores varied from 5.7 (1.2) to 15.8 (9.6) across the studies, indicating a moderate to very large effect on HRQoL; the wide range of scores and large SDs were explained by the small population sizes (n ≤ 12 for all studies except two). Similar ranges and large SDs were also observed for other measures within individual studies. However, in general, people with GPP reported a greater impact of their skin condition on HRQoL, when compared to people with plaque PsO (i.e. higher DLQI scores) and higher severity for itch, pain and fatigue. This systematic review highlighted the need for studies with a larger population size, a better understanding of the impact of cutaneous and extracutaneous symptoms and comorbidities on HRQoL during and between GPP flares, and outcome measures specifically tailored to the unique symptoms and the natural course/history of GPP.

Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L and PROPr in patients with spinal muscular atrophy

OBJECTIVES

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare monogenic neuromuscular disorder caused by loss of function mutations. Measuring health-related quality of life to support economic evaluations in this population is encouraged. However, empirical evidence on the performance of preference-based measures (PBMs) in individuals with SMA is limited. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure Information System Preference measure (PROPr) in individuals with SMA.

METHODS

The data used in this study were obtained via a web-based, cross-sectional survey. All participants completed the self-reporting EQ-5D-5L and PROMIS-29 questionnaires. Information about their socioeconomic and health status was also obtained. Ceiling and floor effects, convergent and divergent validity, known-group validity, and the agreement between the two measures were assessed.

RESULTS

Strong ceiling and floor effects were observed for four dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L and three subscales, including pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function, of the PROMIS-29. All hypothesized associations between EQ-5D-5L/PROMIS-29 and other neuromuscular questions were confirmed, supporting good convergent validity. Moreover, both EQ-5D-5L and PROPr scores differentiated between impaired functional groups, demonstrating good discriminative ability. Poor agreement between the EQ-5D-5L and PROPr utility scores was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The EQ-5D-5L and PROPr both appear to be valid PBMs for individuals with SMA. However, PROPr yielded considerably lower utility scores than EQ-5D-5L and their agreement was poor. Therefore, these two PBMs may not be used interchangeably in economic evaluations of SMA-related interventions.

Informing a national rare disease registry strategy in Australia: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

Rare disease registries (RDRs) facilitate monitoring of rare diseases by pooling small datasets to increase clinical and epidemiological knowledge of rare diseases and promote patient centred best practice. The aim of this study was to understand the current state of RDRs in Australia, data captured, impact on patient outcomes, funding models, and barriers and enablers regarding their establishment and maintenance.

METHODS

An exploratory sequential mixed methods study design was adopted. First, a list of Australian RDRs, primary contacts and data custodians was generated through online and consumer group (Rare Voices Australia (RVA)) contacts. A cross-sectional, anonymous online survey was distributed to registry custodians, managers, or principal investigators of 74 identified Australian RDRs, 88 RVA Partners, 17 pharmaceutical organizations and 12 RVA Scientific and Medical Advisory Committee members. Next, managers and coordinators of RDRs and databases who participated in the survey were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using basic descriptive statistics and content analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty RDRs responded to the survey; nine were national, five were based in Australia and New Zealand, and the remaining were global. Of the 40 survey respondents, eight were interviewed. Most of the RDRs captured similar information regarding patient characteristics, comorbidities and clinical features, diagnosis, family history, genetic testing, procedures or treatment types, response to treatments and complications of treatments. Better treatment outcomes, changes in process of care and changes in quality of care were the most frequently reported benefits of the RDRs. The main challenges proved to be cost/funding of data collection, data completeness, and patient consent. When asked, the participants identified opportunities and challenges regarding potential options to streamline RDRs in Australia in the future.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this study highlighted significant dataset heterogeneity based on the individual disease, and current lack of interoperability and coordination between different existing RDRs in Australia. Nevertheless, a nationally coordinated approach to RDRs should be investigated given the particular benefits RDRs offer, such as access to research and the monitoring of new disease-modifying treatments.

Burden of caregivers of patients with neuronopathic and non-neuronopathic Gaucher disease in Japan: A survey-based study

Background

Gaucher disease (GD), a rare lysosomal storage disorder, is associated with considerable patient and caregiver burden. We examined the applicability of existing caregiver questionnaires and assessed the level of burden in caregivers of patients with GD.

Methods

This cross-sectional, non-interventional study was conducted in Japan. Caregivers of patients with confirmed GD (any type) were recruited (patient association group and referral) for pre-testing (May 2021) or the main survey (October-December 2021). Caregivers completed the Caregiver Impact Questionnaire (CIQ; 30 items) and Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (ZBI; 22 items) on paper. Total CIQ and ZBI scores and subscores were determined overall and by GD type. Inter-item correlations and test-retest reliability (2 rounds, 2 weeks apart) were calculated. The relationship between caregiving duration and caregiver burden was also analyzed.

Results

Nine caregivers (type 2 [GD2]: n = 6; type 3 [GD3]: n = 3) and 25 caregivers (type 1 [GD1]: n = 2; GD2: n = 17; GD3: n = 6) completed the pre-test and main survey, respectively. In the main survey, mean total CIQ score, all CIQ subscores (except emotional function), and total ZBI score were highest in caregivers of patients with GD2 compared with caregivers of patients with GD1/GD3. High test-retest reliability (Kappa >0.6) was observed for 15 CIQ items and 16 ZBI items. CIQ and ZBI scores appeared to be positively correlated with each other and negatively correlated with caregiving duration.

Conclusions

The CIQ and ZBI are applicable, reliable measures to assess burden in caregivers of patients with GD in Japan. Caregiver burden was highest in caregivers of patients with GD2 and decreased with caregiving duration.

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with myasthenia gravis

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the pandemic on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), anxious-depressive symptoms, feelings of loneliness, and fear of COVID-19 between people with myasthenia gravis (MG) and healthy controls. We also wanted to know in which group the variable fear of COVID-19 interfered the most with the results. This cross-sectional study involved 60 people with MG and 60 healthy controls. Participants using an online platform completed a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale and the Fear of COVID19 Scale (FCV- 19S). The MG group reported worse levels in HRQoL indicators (p = 0.043- <.001), more severe anxiety-depressive symptoms (p = 0.002), and greater fear of COVID-19 (p < 0.001), but there were no differences in feelings of loneliness (p = 0.002). Furthermore, after controlling for the effect of the fear of COVID-19 variable, the differences remained for physical health indicators, but not for the most of psychosocial indicators (Social Functioning p = 0.102, η²_p = 0.023; Role Emotional p = 0.250, η²_p = 0.011; and HADS Total p = 0.161, η²_p = 0.017). The harmful effect of the COVID-19 pandemic was greater in the MG group, and the perceived fear of COVID-19 had also a greater impact among this group, which has increased its negative effect on their psychosocial health.

Perception of Social and Educational Quality of Life of Minors Diagnosed with Rare Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This study explores the perception of social and educational quality of life in minors with rare diseases (RDs). Two meta-analyses were performed, applying the random effects model. Results: Regarding the social Quality of Life, the meta-sample consisted of k = 40 samples, with a total population of 1943 children (mean age = 9.42 years), of whom 687 (35.3%) were girls, 615 (31.4%) were boys and 641 (33%) did not report their sex. The effect size was large (mean size = 7.68; p < 0.000; 99% Confidence Interval; lower limit = 7.22; upper limit = 8.14). The results of the meta-regression and model analysis showed the importance of the measurement instrument (Paediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory and Prototypes of the Quality of life) and the dissimilarity of perception among caregivers. The nationality and the type of RD were not relevant. With respect to the educational Quality of Life, the meta-sample consisted of k = 19 samples, with 699 minors (mean age = 10.3 years), of whom 266 (38%) were girls, 242 (34.6%) were boys and 191 (27.4%) did not report their sex. The effect size was large (mean size = 7.15; p < 0.000; 99% CI; lower limit = 6.35; upper limit = 7.94). The meta-regression and comparison of models showed that the type of RD was essential. The measurement instrument was a moderating variable, especially the Parent version Paediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory. This study reveals the need for further research on RDs and their social−educational effects.

Improving Interpretation of Evidence Relating to Quality of Life in Health Technology Assessments of Rare Disease Treatments

Rare diseases are often severe, debilitating, life-limiting conditions, many of which occur in childhood. These complex conditions have a wide range of clinical manifestations that have a substantial impact on the lives of patients, carers and families and often produce heterogeneous clinical outcomes. Therefore, the evaluation of quality-of-life (QoL) impacts is important. In health technology assessment (HTA), patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and/or health state utility values (HSUVs) are used to determine QoL impacts of new treatments, but their use in rare diseases is challenging due to small and heterogeneous populations and limited disease knowledge. This paper describes challenges associated with the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs)/HSUVs to evaluate QoL in HTA of rare disease treatments (RDTs) and identifies five recommendations to ensure appropriate interpretation of QoL impacts. These were derived from mixed methods research (literature reviews, appraisal document analyses, appraisal committee observations and interviews) examining the use of PROs/HSUVs in HTA of RDTs. They highlight that HTAs of RDTs must (1) understand the QoL impacts of the disease and of treatments; (2) critically assess PRO data, recognising the nuances in development and administration of PROMs/HSUVs, considering what is feasible and what matters most to the patient population; (3) recognise that lack of significant effect on a PRO does not imply no QoL benefit; (4) use different forms of evidence to understand QoL impacts, such as patient input; and (5) provide methodological guidance to capture QoL impacts on patients/carers.