MRI assessment of altered dynamic changes in liver haemodynamics following a meal challenge in compensated cirrhosis

No need for fasting prior to doppler ultrasound of pediatric liver transplants: A self-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Children frequently undergo routine Doppler-ultrasound (DUS) after liver transplantation (LT) for which they are fasted, but this may cause hunger and discomfort.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if DUS measurements, with focus on the portal vein (PV), are affected by prandial changes, and if this affects distress and feasibility of the DUS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Children were prospectively included to undergo a pre- and postprandial DUS on the same day at 6 months after LT. Pre- and anastomotic PV peak systolic velocity (PSV), and hepatic artery and hepatic vein DUS measurements were obtained. Pre- and postprandial measurements, and relative postprandial change of PV velocity ratio (VR) compared to PV anastomotic PSV, were compared using paired-sample t-tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Obscuration by bowel gas, difficulty of DUS, and impact of fasting were assessed using 5-point rating scales.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight children (median age 3.5 years, IQR 1.6-10.8) were included; four were subsequently excluded because they were not fasted (N = 2) or withdrew consent for the second DUS (N = 2). Measurements between pre- and postprandial DUS, and relative postprandial change of VR compared to PV anastomotic PSV, were not significantly different (p > .05). Test consistency was good (ICC = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.29-0.67) for PV anastomotic PSV, and excellent (95% CI = 0.61-0.93) for PV VR. Obscuration by bowel gas or ease of DUS did not change after eating (p > .05). The majority (16/28, 57.2%) found fasting difficult, and several (13/28, 46.4%) got upset when fasted.

CONCLUSION

Children with an LT do not need to be fasted for routine DUS, which may decrease the burden of the examination.

Hepatic artery and portal vein Doppler ultrasound reference values in children aged 0-17 years old

Introduction

Doppler ultrasound of the portal vein peak systolic velocity and hepatic artery peak systolic velocity and resistive index in children is often performed during abdominal ultrasound for the assessment of liver and other abdominal pathology. However, evidence-based reference values are not available. We aimed to determine these reference values and to investigate whether they are age-dependent.

Methods

Children who underwent abdominal ultrasound between 2020 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. Patients without hepatic or cardiac abnormalities at the time of ultrasound or during at least 3 months follow-up were eligible for the study. Ultrasound without hepatic hilum portal vein peak systolic velocity and/or hepatic artery peak systolic velocity and resistive index measurements were excluded. Age-dependent changes were analyzed using linear regression. Normal range reference values were described using percentiles for all ages, and for age subgroups.

Results

One-hundred ultrasound examinations performed in 100 healthy children aged 0-17.9 years (median 7.8 years, interquartile range 1.1-14.1 years) were included. Ninety-nine portal vein peak systolic velocity and 80 hepatic artery peak systolic velocity and resistive index measurements were obtained. There was no significant association between portal vein peak systolic velocity and age (β = -0.056, p = 0.68). There were significant associations between age and hepatic artery peak systolic velocity, and between age and hepatic artery resistive index (β = -0.873, p = 0.04 and β = -0.004, p < 0.001, respectively). Detailed reference values were provided for all ages, and for age subgroups.

Conclusion

Reference values for the hepatic hilum portal vein peak systolic velocity, hepatic artery peak systolic velocity, and hepatic artery resistive index in children were established. Portal vein peak systolic velocity is not age-dependent, whereas hepatic artery peak systolic velocity and hepatic artery resistive index decrease when children get older.

Clinical Applications of 4D Flow MRI in the Portal Venous System

Evaluation of the hemodynamics in the portal venous system plays an essential role in many hepatic pathologies. Changes in portal flow and vessel morphology are often indicative of disease.Routinely used imaging modalities, such as CT, ultrasound, invasive angiography, and MRI, often focus on either hemodynamics or anatomical imaging. In contrast, 4D flow MRI facilitiates a more comprehensive understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms by simultaneously and noninvasively acquiring time-resolved flow and anatomical information in a 3D imaging volume.Though promising, 4D flow MRI in the portal venous system is especially challenging due to small vessel calibers, slow flow velocities, and breathing motion. In this review article, we will discuss how to account for these challenges when planning and conducting 4D flow MRI acquisitions in the upper abdomen. We will address patient preparation, sequence acquisition, postprocessing, quality control, and analysis of 4D flow data.In the second part of this article, we will review potential clinical applications of 4D flow MRI in the portal venous system. The most promising area for clinical utilization is the diagnosis and grading of liver cirrhosis and its complications. Relevant parameters acquired by 4D flow MRI include the detection of reduced or reversed flow in the portal venous system, characterization of portosystemic collaterals, and impaired response to a meal challenge. In patients with cirrhosis, 4D flow MRI has the potential to address the major unmet need of noninvasive detection of gastroesophageal varices at high risk for bleeding. This could replace many unnecessary, purely diagnostic, and invasive esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedures, thereby improving patient compliance with follow-up. Moreover, 4D flow MRI offers unique insights and added value for surgical planning and follow-up of multiple hepatic interventions, including transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, liver transplantation, and hepatic disease in children. Lastly, we will discuss the path to clinical implementation and remaining challenges.

A pilot study investigating the use of 4D flow MRI for the assessment of splanchnic flow in patients suspected of mesenteric ischaemia

The most common cause of chronic mesenteric ischaemia is atherosclerosis which results in limitation of blood flow to the gastrointestinal tract. This pilot study aimed to evaluate 4D flow MRI as a potential tool for the analysis of blood flow changes post-prandial within the mesenteric vessels. The mesenteric vessels of twelve people were scanned; patients and healthy volunteers. A baseline MRI scan was performed after 6 h of fasting followed by a post-meal scan. Two 4D flow datasets were acquired, over the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the main portal venous vessels. Standard 2D time-resolved PC-MRI slices were also obtained across the aorta above the coeliac trunk, superior mesenteric vein, splenic vein and portal vein (PV). In the volunteer cohort there was a marked increase in blood flow post-meal within the PV (p = 0.028), not seen in the patient cohort (p = 0.116). Similarly, there were significant flow changes within the SMA of volunteers (p = 0.028) but not for the patient group (p = 0.116). Our pilot data has shown that there is a significant haemodynamic response to meal challenge in the PV and SMA in normal subjects compared to clinically apparent CMI patients. Therefore, the interrogation of mesenteric venous vessels exclusively is a feasible method to measure post-prandial flow changes in CMI patients.

Inter-scan and inter-scanner variation of quantitative dual-energy CT: evaluation with three different scanner types

OBJECTIVES

To investigate inter-scan and inter-scanner variation of iodine concentration (IC) and attenuation in virtual monoenergetic images at 65 keV (HU_65keV) in patients with repeated abdominal examinations on dual-source (dsDECT), rapid kV switching (rsDECT), and dual-layer detector DECT (dlDECT).

METHODS

We retrospectively included 131 patients who underwent two abdominal DECT examinations on the same scanner (dsDECT: n = 46, rsDECT: n = 45, dlDECT: n = 40). IC and HU_65keV were measured by placing regions of interest in the liver, spleen, kidneys, aorta, portal vein, and inferior vena cava. Overall IC and HU_65keV for each scanner, their inter-scan differences and proportional variation were calculated and compared between scanner types.

RESULTS

The three scanner-specific cohorts showed similar weight, body diameter, age, sex, and contrast media injection parameters as well as inter-scan differences hereof (p range: 0.23-0.99). Absolute inter-scan differences of HU_65keV and IC were comparable between scanners (p range: 0.08-1.0). Overall inter-scan variation was significantly higher in IC than HU_65keV (p < 0.05). For the liver, rsDECT showed significantly lower inter-scan variation of IC compared to dsDECT/dlDECT (p = 0.005/0.01), while for the spleen, this difference was only significant compared to dsDECT (p = 0.015). Normalizing IC of the liver to the portal vein and of the spleen to the aorta did not significantly reduce inter-scan variation (p = 0.97 and 0.50).

CONCLUSIONS

Iodine measurements across different DECT scanners show inter-scan variation which is higher compared to variation of attenuation values. Inter-scanner differences in longitudinal variation and overall iodine concentration depend on the scanner pairs and organs assessed and should be acknowledged in clinical and scientific DECT applications.

KEY POINTS

• All scanner types showed comparable inter-scan variation of attenuation, while for iodine, the rapid kV switching DECT showed lower variability in the liver and spleen. • Iodine concentration showed higher inter-scan variation than attenuation measurements; normalization to vessels did not significantly improve inter-scan reproducibility of iodine concentration in parenchymal organs. • Differences between the three scanner types regarding overall iodine concentration and attenuation obtained from both timepoints were within the range of average intra-patient, inter-scan differences for most assessed organs and vessels.