Bone strain index in the prediction of vertebral fragility refracture

Usefulness of DXA-based bone strain index in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Bone Strain Index (BSI) is a new dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based index. We retrospectively evaluated data from 153 postmenopausal women with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Lumbar spine and femoral Bone Strain Index (BSI) were sensitive to skeletal impairment in postmenopausal women suffering from T2DM.

PURPOSE

Bone Strain Index (BSI) is a new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based measurement. We evaluated the performance of BSI in predicting the presence of fragility fractures in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) postmenopausal women.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated data from a case-control study of 153 postmenopausal women with a history of at least 5 years of T2DM (age from 40 to 90 years). For each subject, we assessed the personal or familiar history of previous fragility fractures and menopause age, and we collected data about bone mineral density (BMD), BSI, and Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) measurements. Statistical analysis was performed having as outcome the history of fragility fractures.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 153 subjects, n = 22 (14.4%) presented at least one major fragility fracture. A negative correlation was found between lumbar BSI and lumbar BMD (r =  - 0.49, p < 0.001) and between total femur BSI and total femur BMD (r =  - 0.49, p < 0.001). A negative correlation was found between femoral neck BSI and femoral neck BMD (r =  - 0.22, p < 0.001). Most DXA-based variables were individually able to discriminate between fractured and non-fractured subjects (p < 0.05), and lumbar BSI was the index with the most relative difference between the two populations, followed by femoral BSI.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar spine and femoral BSI are sensitive to skeletal impairment in postmenopausal women suffering from T2DM. The use of BSI in conjunction with BMD and TBS can improve fracture risk assessment.

The relationship between bone strain index, bone mass, microarchitecture and mechanical behavior in human vertebrae: an ex vivo study

The aim of this study was to determine whether the Bone Strain Index (BSI), a recent DXA-based bone index, is related to bone mechanical behavior, microarchitecture and finally, to determine whether BSI improves the prediction of bone strength and the predictive role of BMD in clinical practice.

PURPOSE

Bone Strain Index (BSI) is a new DXA-based bone index that represents the finite element analysis of the bone deformation under load. The current study aimed to assess whether the BSI is associated with 3D microarchitecture and the mechanical behavior of human lumbar vertebrae.

METHODS

Lumbar vertebrae (L3) were harvested fresh from 31 human donors. The anteroposterior BMC (g) and aBMD (g/cm2) of the vertebral body were measured using DXA, and then the BSI was automatically derived. The trabecular bone volume (Tb.BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), degree of anisotropy (DA), and structure model index (SMI) were measured using µCT with a 35-µm isotropic voxel size. Quasi-static uniaxial compressive testing was performed on L3 vertebral bodies under displacement control to assess failure load and stiffness.

RESULTS

The BSI was significantly correlated with failure load and stiffness (r = -0.60 and -0.59; p < 0.0001), aBMD and BMC (r = -0.93 and -0.86; p < 0.0001); Tb.BV/TV and SMI (r = -0.58 and 0.51; p = 0.001 and 0.004 respectively). After adjustment for aBMD, the association between BSI and stiffness, BSI and SMI remained significant (r = -0.51; p = 0.004 and r = -0.39; p = 0.03 respectively, partial correlations) and the relation between BSI and failure load was close to significance (r = -0.35; p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

The BSI was significantly correlated with the microarchitecture and mechanical behavior of L3 vertebrae, and these associations remained statistically significant regardless of aBMD.

Generation and Validation of Normative, Age-Specific Reference Curves for Bone Strain Index in Women

Bone Strain Index (BSI), based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is a densitometric index of bone strength of the femur and lumbar spine. Higher BSI values indicate a higher strain applied to bone, predisposing to higher fracture risk. This retrospective, multicentric study on Italian women reports the BSI normative age-specific reference curves. A cohort of Caucasian Italian women aged 20 to 90 years was selected from three different clinical centres. Bone mineral density (BMD) and BSI measurements were obtained for the lumbar spine vertebrae (L1-L4) and for the femur (neck, trochanter and intertrochanter) using Hologic densitometers scans. The data were compared with BMD normative values provided by the densitometer manufacturer. Then, the age-specific BSI curve for the femur and lumbar spine was generated. No significant difference was found between the BMD of the subjects in this study and BMD reference data provided by Hologic (p = 0.68 for femur and p = 0.90 for lumbar spine). Spine BSI values (L1-L4) increase by 84% between 20 and 90 years of age. The mean BSI of the total femur increases about 38% in the same age range. The BSI age-specific reference curve could help clinicians improve osteoporosis patient management, allowing an appropriate patient classification according to the bone resistance to the applied loads and fragility fracture risk assessment.

Assessment of DXA derived bone quality indexes and bone geometry parameters in early breast cancer patients: A single center cross-sectional study

Background

Bone mineral density (BMD) lacks sensitivity in individual fracture risk assessment in early breast cancer (EBC) patients treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs). New dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) based risk factors are needed.

Methods

Trabecular bone score (TBS), bone strain index (BSI) and DXA parameters of bone geometry were evaluated in postmenopausal women diagnosed with EBC. The aim was to explore their association with morphometric vertebral fractures (VFs). Subjects were categorized in 3 groups in order to evaluate the impact of AIs and denosumab on bone geometry: AI-naive, AI-treated minus (AIDen-) or plus (AIDen+) denosumab.

Results

A total of 610 EBC patients entered the study: 305 were AI-naive, 187 AIDen-, and 118 AIDen+. In the AI-naive group, the presence of VFs was associated with lower total hip BMD and T-score and higher femoral BSI. As regards as bone geometry parameters, AI-naive fractured patients reported a significant increase in femoral narrow neck (NN) endocortical width, femoral NN subperiosteal width, intertrochanteric buckling ratio (BR), intertrochanteric endocortical width, femoral shaft (FS) BR and endocortical width, as compared to non-fractured patients. Intertrochanteric BR and intertrochanteric cortical thickness significantly increased in the presence of VFs in AIDen- patients, not in AIDen+ ones. An increase in cross-sectional area and cross-sectional moment of inertia, both intertrochanteric and at FS, significantly correlated with VFs only in AIDen+. No association with VFs was found for either lumbar BSI or TBS in all groups.

Conclusions

Bone geometry parameters are variably associated with VFs in EBC patients, either AI-naive or AI treated in combination with denosumab. These data suggest a tailored choice of fracture risk parameters in the 3 subgroups of EBC patients.

The Bone Strain Index: An Innovative Dual X-ray Absorptiometry Bone Strength Index and Its Helpfulness in Clinical Medicine

Bone strain Index (BSI) is an innovative index of bone strength that provides information about skeletal resistance to loads not considered by existing indexes (Bone Mineral Density, BMD. Trabecular Bone Score, TBS. Hip Structural Analysis, HSA. Hip Axis Length, HAL), and, thus, improves the predictability of fragility fractures in osteoporotic patients. This improved predictability of fracture facilitates the possibility of timely intervention with appropriate therapies to reduce the risk of fracture. The development of the index was the result of combining clinical, radiographical and construction-engineering skills. In fact, from a physical point of view, primary and secondary osteoporosis, leading to bone fracture, are determined by an impairment of the physical properties of bone strength: density, internal structure, deformation and fatigue. Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for assessing bone properties, and it allows measurement of the BMD, which is reduced mainly in primary osteoporosis, the structural texture TBS, which can be particularly degraded in secondary osteoporosis, and the bone geometry (HSA, HAL). The authors recently conceived and developed a new bone deformation index named Bone Strain Index (BSI) that assesses the resistance of bone to loads. If the skeletal structure is equated to engineering construction, these three indexes are all considered to determine the load resistance of the construct. In particular, BSI allows clinicians to detect critical information that BMD and TBS cannot explain, and this information is essential for an accurate definition of a patient’s fracture risk. The literature demonstrates that both lumbar and femoral BSI discriminate fractured osteoporotic people, that they predict the first fragility fracture, and further fragility fractures, monitor anabolic treatment efficacy and detect patients affected by secondary osteoporosis. BSI is a new diagnostic tool that offers a unique perspective to clinical medicine to identify patients affected by primary and, specially, secondary osteoporosis. This literature review illustrates BSI’s state of the art and its ratio in clinical medicine.

The bone strain index predicts fragility fractures. The OFELY study

Recently, the bone strain index (BSI), a new index of bone strength based on a finite element model (FEA) from dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), has been developed. BSI represents the average equivalent strain inside the bone, assuming that a higher strain level (high BSI) indicates a condition of higher risk. Our study aimed to analyze the relationship between BSI and age, BMI and areal BMD in pre- and postmenopausal women and to prospectively investigate fracture prediction (Fx) by BSI in postmenopausal women. Methods. At the 14th annual follow-up of the OFELY study, BSI was measured at spine (Spine BSI) and femoral scans (Neck and Total Hip BSI), in addition to areal BMD with DXA (Hologic QDR 4500) in 846 women, mean (SD) age 60 yr (15). The FRAX® (fracture risk assessment tool) for major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) was calculated with FN areal BMD (aBMD) at baseline; incident fragility fractures were annually registered until January 2016. Results. In premenopausal women (n = 261), Neck and Total Hip BSI were slightly negatively correlated with age (Spearman r = -0.13 and -0.15 respectively, p = 0.03), whereas all BSIs were positively correlated with BMI (r = +0.20 to 0.37, p < 0.01) and negatively with BMD (r = -0.69 to -0.37, p < 0.0001). In postmenopausal women (n = 585), Neck and Total Hip BSI were positively correlated with age (Spearman r = +0.26 and +0.31 respectively, p < 0.0001), whereas Spine BSI was positively correlated with BMI (r = +0.22, p < 0.0001) and all BSIs were negatively correlated with BMD (r = -0.81 to -0.60, p < 0.0001). During a median [IQ] 9.3 [1.0] years of follow-up, 133 postmenopausal women reported an incident fragility Fx, including 80 women with a major osteoporotic Fx (MOF) and 26 women with clinical vertebral Fx (VFx). Each SD increase of BSI value was associated with a significant increase of the risk of all fragility Fx with an age-adjusted HR of 1.23 for Neck BSI (p = 0.02); 1.27 for Total Hip BSI (p = 0.004) and 1.35 for Spine BSI (p < 0.0001). After adjustment for FRAX®, the association remained statistically significant for Total Hip BSI (HR 1.24, p = 0.02 for all fragility Fx; 1.31, p = 0.01 for MOF) and Spine BSI (HR 1.33, p < 0.0001 for all fragility Fx; 1.33, p = 0.005 for MOF; 1.67, p = 0.002 for clinical VFx). In conclusion, spine and femur BSI, an FEA DXA derived index, predict incident fragility fracture in postmenopausal women, regardless of FRAX®.

Operator-Related Errors and Pitfalls in Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry: How to Recognize and Avoid Them

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most common modality for quantitative measurements of bone mineral density. Nevertheless, errors related to this exam are still very common, and may significantly impact on the final diagnosis and therapy. Operator-related errors may occur during each DXA step and can be related to wrong patient positioning, error in the acquisition process or in the scan analysis. The aim of this review is to provide a practical guide on how to recognize such errors in spine and hip DXA scan and how to avoid them, also presenting some of the most common artifacts encountered in clinical practice.

Beyond Bone Mineral Density: A New Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Index of Bone Strength to Predict Fragility Fractures, the Bone Strain Index

For a proper assessment of osteoporotic fragility fracture prediction, all aspects regarding bone mineral density, bone texture, geometry and information about strength are necessary, particularly in endocrinological and rheumatological diseases, where bone quality impairment is relevant. Data regarding bone quantity (density) and, partially, bone quality (structure and geometry) are obtained by the gold standard method of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Data about bone strength are not yet readily available. To evaluate bone resistance to strain, a new DXA-derived index based on the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of a greyscale of density distribution measured on spine and femoral scan, namely Bone Strain Index (BSI), has recently been developed. Bone Strain Index includes local information on density distribution, bone geometry and loadings and it differs from bone mineral density (BMD) and other variables of bone quality like trabecular bone score (TBS), which are all based on the quantification of bone mass and distribution averaged over the scanned region. This state of the art review illustrates the methodology of BSI calculation, the findings of its in reproducibility and the preliminary data about its capability to predict fragility fracture and to monitor the follow up of the pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis.

Prediction of osteoporotic fragility re-fracture with lumbar spine DXA-based derived bone strain index: a multicenter validation study

A new qualitative index of bone strength, based on finite element analysis and named bone strain index, has been recently developed from lumbar DXA scan. This study shows that BSI predicts subsequent re-fracture in osteoporotic patients affected by fragility fractures.

INTRODUCTION

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can provide quantitative (bone mineral density, BMD) and qualitative (trabecular bone score, TBS) indexes of bone status, able to predict fragility fractures in most osteoporotic patients. A new qualitative index of bone strength, based on finite element analysis and named bone strain index (BSI), has been recently developed from lumbar DXA scan. This study presents the validation results of BSI prediction for re-fracture in osteoporotic patients with fragility fractures.

METHODS

In three academic hospitals, 234 consecutive fractured patients with primary osteoporosis (209 females) performed a spine X-ray for the calculation of spine deformity index (SDI) and DXA densitometry for BMD, TBS and BSI at the basal time and in the follow-up at each clinical check. A subsequent fracture was considered as one unity increase of SDI.

RESULTS

For each unit increase of the investigated indexes, the univariate hazard ratio of re-fracture, 95% CI, p value and proportionality test p value are for age 1.040, 1.017-1.064, 0.0007 and 0.2529, respectively, and for BSI 1.372, 1.038-1.813, 0.0261 and 0.5179, respectively. BSI remained in the final multivariate model as a statistically significant independent predictor of a subsequent re-fracture (1.332, 1.013-1.752 and 0.0399) together with age (1.039, 1.016-1.064 and 0.0009); for this multivariate model proportionality test, p value is 0.4604.

CONCLUSIONS

BSI appears to be a valid DXA index of prediction of re-fracture, and it can be used for a more refined risk assessment of osteoporotic patients.

Bone strain index as a predictor of further vertebral fracture in osteoporotic women: An artificial intelligence-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is an asymptomatic disease of high prevalence and incidence, leading to bone fractures burdened by high mortality and disability, mainly when several subsequent fractures occur. A fragility fracture predictive model, Artificial Intelligence-based, to identify dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) variables able to characterise those patients who are prone to further fractures called Bone Strain Index, was evaluated in this study.

METHODS

In a prospective, longitudinal, multicentric study 172 female outpatients with at least one vertebral fracture at the first observation were enrolled. They performed a spine X-ray to calculate spine deformity index (SDI) and a lumbar and femoral DXA scan to assess bone mineral density (BMD) and bone strain index (BSI) at baseline and after a follow-up period of 3 years in average. At the end of the follow-up, 93 women developed a further vertebral fracture. The further vertebral fracture was considered as one unit increase of SDI. We assessed the predictive capacity of supervised Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to distinguish women who developed a further fracture from those without it, and to detect those variables providing the maximal amount of relevant information to discriminate the two groups. ANNs choose appropriate input data automatically (TWIST-system, Training With Input Selection and Testing). Moreover, we built a semantic connectivity map usingthe Auto Contractive Map to provide further insights about the convoluted connections between the osteoporotic variables under consideration and the two scenarios (further fracture vs no further fracture).

RESULTS

TWIST system selected 5 out of 13 available variables: age, menopause age, BMI, FTot BMC, FTot BSI. With training testing procedure, ANNs reached predictive accuracy of 79.36%, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 83.72%. The semantic connectivity map highlighted the role of BSI in predicting the risk of a further fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Artificial Intelligence is a useful method to analyse a complex system like that regarding osteoporosis, able to identify patients prone to a further fragility fracture. BSI appears to be a useful DXA index in identifying those patients who are at risk of further vertebral fractures.

Usefulness of Dual X-ray Absorptiometry-Derived Bone Geometry and Structural Indexes in Mastocytosis

Reduced bone mass with or without fragility fractures is a common feature of mastocytosis, particularly in adult males. However, bone mineral density does not account for all the fragility fractures, being a part of them attributable to impairment in bone quality. Aim of this study is to assess the usefulness of DXA-derived geometry and structural indexes in the assessment of bone status in mastocytosis. Ninety-six consecutive patients (46 women and 50 men) affected by cutaneous (CM) or systemic (SM) mastocytosis were studied. Mean age (± SD) was 53.3 ± 14.23. Spine lateral X-rays for Genant's scale, DXA for lumbar (L) and femoral (F) bone mineral density (BMD), bone strain index (BSI), lumbar trabecular bone score (TBS), and hip structural analysis (HSA) were performed. Among the laboratory variables, data of serum tryptase were reported. Tryptase was higher in SM (p = 0.035), inversely correlated with LBMD (r =  - 0.232; p = 0.022) and TBS (r =  - 0.280; p = 0.005), and directly with L-BSI (r = 0.276; p = 0.006). L-BSI remained statistically significant (p = 0.006; adjusted R² = 0.101) together with mastocytosis (SM or CM: p = 0.034) in the multivariate regression model with tryptase as dependent variable, being LBMD and TBS not statistically significant (p = 0.887, and p = 0.245, respectively). Tryptase increased about 22 units for each unit increase of L-BSI and about 18 units for SM against CM. L-BSI was lower (p = 0.012), while FN-BSI and FT-BSI were higher in women (p < 0.001) than in men. HSA indexes were significantly higher in men, particularly with SM. SM is a risk factor for reduced bone mass, texture and strength. Since mean L-BSI and Z-modulus of all the femoral sites are statistically higher in men than in female, it could be argued that men have a better femoral bone resistance to bending forces than women, but a worse lumbar bone resistance to compressive loads. DXA indexes of bone quality are useful in mastocytosis' bone assessment and its clinical management.