1
|
Huflage H, Hendel R, Woznicki P, Conrads N, Feldle P, Patzer TS, Ergün S, Bley TA, Kunz AS, Grunz JP. The Small Pixel Effect in Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting CT of the Lumbar Spine. Invest Radiol 2024; 59:629-634. [PMID: 38329822 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000001069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Image acquisition in ultra-high-resolution (UHR) scan mode does not impose a dose penalty in photon-counting CT (PCCT). This study aims to investigate the dose saving potential of using UHR instead of standard-resolution PCCT for lumbar spine imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight cadaveric specimens were examined with 7 dose levels (5-35 mGy) each in UHR (120 × 0.2 mm) and standard-resolution acquisition mode (144 × 0.4 mm) on a first-generation PCCT scanner. The UHR images were reconstructed with 3 dedicated bone kernels (Br68 [spatial frequency at 10% of the modulation transfer function 14.5 line pairs/cm], Br76 [21.0], and Br84 [27.9]), standard-resolution images with Br68 and Br76. Using automatic segmentation, contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were established for lumbar vertebrae and psoas muscle tissue. In addition, image quality was assessed subjectively by 19 independent readers (15 radiologists, 4 surgeons) using a browser-based forced choice comparison tool totaling 16,974 performed pairwise tests. Pearson's correlation coefficient ( r ) was used to analyze the relationship between CNR and subjective image quality rankings, and Kendall W was calculated to assess interrater agreement. RESULTS Irrespective of radiation exposure level, CNR was higher in UHR datasets than in standard-resolution images postprocessed with the same reconstruction parameters. The use of sharper convolution kernels entailed lower CNR but higher subjective image quality depending on radiation dose. Subjective assessment revealed high interrater agreement ( W = 0.86; P < 0.001) with UHR images being preferred by readers in the majority of comparisons on each dose level. Substantial correlation was ascertained between CNR and the subjective image quality ranking (all r 's ≥ 0.95; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In PCCT of the lumbar spine, UHR mode's smaller pixel size facilitates a considerable CNR increase over standard-resolution imaging, which can either be used for dose reduction or higher spatial resolution depending on the selected convolution kernel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henner Huflage
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (H.H., R.H., P.W., N.C., P.F., T.S., T.A.B., A.S.K., J.-P.G.); and Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (S.E.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bette SJ, Braun FM, Luitjens JH, Kaufmann D, Decker J, Becker J, Scheurig-Muenkler C, Kroencke TJ, Schwarz F. Multiplanar reconstructions of the thoracic spine in a photon counting dual-source CT scanner: comparison to EID-CT. Acta Radiol 2024:2841851241271109. [PMID: 39169708 DOI: 10.1177/02841851241271109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) is a groundbreaking technology with promising results for visualization of small bone structures. PURPOSE To analyze the delineation of the thoracic spine in multiplanar reconstructions (MPR) on PCD-CT compared to energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two euthanized mice were examined using different scanners: (i) 20-slice EID-CT and (ii) dual-source PCD-CT at various CTDIVol values. Readers evaluated the thoracic spine and selected series with best visualization among signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)-matched pairs. RESULTS SNR was significantly higher in PCD-CT reconstructions (Br68) and lower in Hr98 reconstructions compared to EID-CT. Bone detail visualization was superior in PCD-CT (especially in Hr98 reconstructions) compared to EID-CT. CONCLUSION MPR on a PCD-CT had a higher SNR and better bone detail visualization even at lower radiation doses compared to EID-CT. PCD-CT with bone reconstructions showed the best delineation of small bone structures and might be considered in clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie J Bette
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Franziska M Braun
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Jan H Luitjens
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - David Kaufmann
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Josua Decker
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Judith Becker
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christian Scheurig-Muenkler
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Thomas J Kroencke
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Centre for Advanced Analytics and Predictive Sciences (CAAPS), University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schwarz
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Donau-Isar-Klinikum, Deggendorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grunz JP, Huflage H. Photon-Counting Computed Tomography: Experience in Musculoskeletal Imaging. Korean J Radiol 2024; 25:662-672. [PMID: 38942460 PMCID: PMC11214923 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2024] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Since the emergence of the first photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) system in late 2021, its advantages and a wide range of applications in all fields of radiology have been demonstrated. Compared to standard energy-integrating detector-CT, PCCT allows for superior geometric dose efficiency in every examination. While this aspect by itself is groundbreaking, the advantages do not stop there. PCCT facilitates an unprecedented combination of ultra-high-resolution imaging without dose penalty or field-of-view restrictions, detector-based elimination of electronic noise, and ubiquitous multi-energy spectral information. Considering the high demands of orthopedic imaging for the visualization of minuscule details while simultaneously covering large portions of skeletal and soft tissue anatomy, no subspecialty may benefit more from this novel detector technology than musculoskeletal radiology. Deeply rooted in experimental and clinical research, this review article aims to provide an introduction to the cosmos of PCCT, explain its technical basics, and highlight the most promising applications for patient care, while also mentioning current limitations that need to be overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Peter Grunz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Henner Huflage
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bette S, Risch F, Becker J, Popp D, Decker JA, Kaufmann D, Friedrich L, Scheurig-Münkler C, Schwarz F, Kröncke TJ. Photon-counting detector CT - first experiences in the field of musculoskeletal radiology. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2024. [PMID: 38788741 DOI: 10.1055/a-2312-6914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
The introduction of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) marks a remarkable leap in innovation in CT imaging. The new detector technology allows X-rays to be converted directly into an electrical signal without an intermediate step via a scintillation layer and allows the energy of individual photons to be measured. Initial data show high spatial resolution, complete elimination of electronic noise, and steady availability of spectral image data sets. In particular, the new technology shows promise with respect to the imaging of osseous structures. Recently, PCD-CT was implemented in the clinical routine. The aim of this review was to summarize recent studies and to show our first experiences with photon-counting detector technology in the field of musculoskeletal radiology.We performed a literature search using Medline and included a total of 90 articles and reviews that covered recent experimental and clinical experiences with the new technology.In this review, we focus on (1) spatial resolution and delineation of fine anatomic structures, (2) reduction of radiation dose, (3) electronic noise, (4) techniques for metal artifact reduction, and (5) possibilities of spectral imaging. This article provides insight into our first experiences with photon-counting detector technology and shows results and images from experimental and clinical studies. · This review summarizes recent experimental and clinical studies in the field of photon-counting detector CT and musculoskeletal radiology.. · The potential of photon-counting detector technology in the field of musculoskeletal radiology includes improved spatial resolution, reduction in radiation dose, metal artifact reduction, and spectral imaging.. · PCD-CT enables imaging at lower radiation doses while maintaining or even enhancing spatial resolution, crucial for reducing patient exposure, especially in repeated or prolonged imaging scenarios.. · It offers promising results in reducing metal artifacts commonly encountered in orthopedic or dental implants, enhancing the interpretability of adjacent structures in postoperative and follow-up imaging.. · With its ability to routinely acquire spectral data, PCD-CT scans allow for material classification, such as detecting urate crystals in suspected gout or visualizing bone marrow edema, potentially reducing reliance on MRI in certain cases.. Bette S, Risch F, Becker J et al. Photon-counting detector CT - first experiences in the field of musculoskeletal radiology. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; DOI 10.1055/a-2312-6914.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Bette
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Franka Risch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Judith Becker
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Popp
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Josua A Decker
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - David Kaufmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Lena Friedrich
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christian Scheurig-Münkler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schwarz
- Institute of Conventional and Interventional Radiology, Donauisar Hospital Deggendorf, Deggendorf, Germany
| | - Thomas J Kröncke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Centre for Advanced Analytics and Predictive Sciences (CAAPS), University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|