Endovascular coiling for cerebral aneurysm: single-center experience in Egypt

Outcome after Neuro-interventional Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm (as a First Treatment Modality)

Endovascular treatment is widely applied as the first-line treatment for intracranial aneurysms and includes simple coiling (SC), stent-assisted coiling (SAC), flow diversion stent, and flow disruption stent. The present study is a retrospective cohort study performed in Imam Khomeini Hospital, Department of Neurovascular Intervention, between March 2016 and March 2021. A total number of 229 patients with intracranial aneurysms who underwent therapeutic intravascular interventions were enrolled, of which 89 were treated with SC, 111 with SAC, 25 with flow diversion stent, and 4 with flow disruption stent. The mean age of the subjects was 51.8±12.6 years, and 51.1% were male. Modified Raymond-Roy classification (MRRC) was used to define the occlusion outcome. The success rate, considered as Class I and Class II of MRRC at treatment time was 89% (94.4% in SC, and 84.7% in SAC), which was increased to 90.9% (94% in SC, 93% in SAC, 69.6% in flow diversion stenting, 100% in flow disruption) at 6-month follow-up, and 84.6% (80.8% in SC, 87.8% in SAC, 78.3% in flow diversion stenting, and 100% in flow disruption) at 12-month follow-up. The mean modified Rankin Scale (mRS) before the procedure was 0.05±0.26 which was increased to 0.22±0.76 after the procedure, 0.22±0.76 at 6 months, and 0.30±0.95 at 12 months (P<0.001). Similar to previous studies, the present study demonstrates that neurovascular intervention can treat ruptured aneurysms as the first therapeutic modality with favourable outcomes. A double-blind, randomized clinical trial is needed to eliminate the confounding factors and better demonstrate the outcome.

Effectivity and safety of endovascular coiling versus microsurgical clipping for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing lack of consensus among clinicians regarding on the optimal aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) management approach between endovascular coiling and microsurgical clipping.

METHODS

Comprehensive literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in Medline and Cochrane databases until January 1st, 2023 without language constraints. Effectivity outcomes included one-year mortality, one-year poor outcomes, and one-year complete aneurysmal occlusion, while safety outcomes comprised the incidence of vasospasms, rebleeding, post-operative complications, and cerebral ischemia.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs, involving 3585 aSAH patients, underwent comprehensive quantitative analysis. Among them, 1792 underwent endovascular coiling and 1773 patients had microsurgical clipping. Regarding effectivity, the rates of one-year mortality (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.61-1.03, p = 0.08) exhibited no significant difference. However, endovascular coiling demonstrated an inferior one-year complete aneurysmal occlusion rate (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21-0.53, p < 0.00001), although with significantly lower rates of poor outcomes (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.57-0.81, p < 0.00001) compared to the microsurgical clipping group. As for safety, endovascular coiling group exhibited lower rates of vasospasm (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.92, p = 0.02), post-operative complications (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.23-0.71, p = 0.02), and cerebral ischemia (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.20-0.63, p = 0.0004). No significant effect on the incidence of rebleeding was observed (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.73-1.63, p = 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular coiling proves superior and safer for aSAH patients, but consideration of resources, patient condition, and surgeon preferences is crucial for selecting the optimal approach.

The current landscape of intracranial aneurysms in Africa: management outcomes, challenges, and strategies-a narrative review

Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) pose complex and potentially life-threatening challenges in Africa, where limited resources, restricted access to specialised healthcare facilities, and disparities in healthcare provision amplify the difficulties of management. Timely diagnosis and treatment are pivotal in preventing complications, including subarachnoid haemorrhage. Treatment options encompass observation, surgical clipping, endovascular coiling, and flow diversion. Positive outcomes observed in IA management in Africa include high survival rates, favourable functional outcomes, successful treatment techniques, and the absence of complications in some cases. However, negative outcomes such as postoperative complications, reduced quality of life, perioperative mortality, and the risk of recurrence persist. Challenges in IA management encompass limited access to diagnostic tools, a scarcity of specialised healthcare professionals, and an unequal distribution of services. Addressing these challenges requires interventions focused on improving access to diagnostic tools, expanding the number of trained professionals, and establishing specialised IA treatment centres. Collaboration, research, and capacity-building efforts hold significant importance in improving patient outcomes and reducing disparities in IA management across Africa.

Does establishing a neurovascular unit improve the outcome after surgical clipping for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage? Results from a 5-year observational study in Kuwait

Background:

Failure to prevent rebleeding after cerebral subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is the most frequent reason for high morbidity and mortality of aneurysmal SAH. Our study aims to identify the outcome after surgical clipping of aneurysmal SAH before and after the establishment of the neurovascular unit. The clarifications of the positive turnover in the outcome will be discussed.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort analysis was carried out on our experience with a controlled group of patients who underwent clipping for ruptured cerebral aneurysms (n = 61) from January 2015 to December 2019. A modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used to determine the outcome after 6 months of follow-up.

Results:

The median mRS score (i.e., outcome) on admission was 4, whereas it was with a median score of 2 six months after clipping (P ≤ 0.001). Overall, the cases with a good outcome were 63.9% of the sample, while the poor outcome conditions were 36.1%. The most cases with an improved outcome were after introducing the neurovascular unit, representing a transition of aneurysmal clipping practice in our center. The good outcome was changed from 42% to 76.7%, and the poor outcome was changed from 58% to 23.3% (P = 0.019). The crude mortality rate was similar to the rate worldwide (18%), with a noticeable decrease after organizing a neurovascular subspecialty.

Conclusion:

The outcome after clipping of ruptured SAH can be largely affected by the surgeon’s experience and postoperative intensive care. Organizing a neurovascular team is one of the major factors to achieve good outcomes.