Accuracy of registration techniques and vascular imaging modalities in fusion imaging for aortic endovascular interventions: a phantom study

Advanced Imaging Techniques for Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair: Preoperative, Intraoperative and Postoperative Advancements

BACKGROUND

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) requires extensive preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative imaging for planning, surveillance, and detection of endo-leaks. There have been manyadvancements in imaging modalities to achieve this purpose. This review discussed different imaging modalities used at different stages of treatment of complex EVAR.

METHODS

We conducted a literature review of all the imaging modalities utilized in EVAR by searching various databases.

RESULTS

Preoperative techniques include analysis of images obtained via modified central line using analysis software and intravascular ultrasound. Fusion imaging (FI), carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and Fiber Optic RealShape (FORS) technology have been crucial in obtaining real-time imaging for the detection of endo-leaks during operative procedures. Conventional imaging modalities like computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography are still employed for postoperative surveillance along with computational fluid dynamics and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). The advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have been the breakthrough in developing robust imaging applications.

CONCLUSIONS

This review explains the advantages, disadvantages, and side-effect profile of the abovementioned imaging modalities.

Radiation-free Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair with Fiberoptic and Electromagnetic Guidance:A Phantom Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a radiation-free implantation of a thoracic aortic stent-graft employing fiberoptic and electromagnetic tracking in an anthropomorphic phantom.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anthropomorphic phantom was manufactured based on computed tomography angiography (CTA) data from a patient. An aortic stent-graft application system was equipped with a fiber Bragg gratings fiber and three electromagnetic sensors. The stent-graft was navigated in the phantom by three interventionalists using the tracking data generated by both technologies. One implantation procedure was performed. The technical success of the procedure was evaluated using digital subtraction angiography and pre- and post-interventional CTA. Tracking accuracy was determined at various anatomical landmarks based on separately acquired fluoroscopic images. The mean/maximum errors were measured for the stent-graft application system and the tip/end of the stent-graft.

RESULTS

The procedure resulted in technical success with a mean error below 3 mm for the entire application system and <2 mm for the position of the tip of the stent-graft. Navigation/implantation and handling of the device were rated sufficiently accurate and on a par with comparable, routinely used stent-graft application systems.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates successful stent-graft implantation during a thoracic endovascular aortic repair procedure employing advanced guidance techniques and avoiding fluoroscopic imaging. This is an essential step in facilitating the implantation of stent-grafts and reducing the health risks associated with ionizing radiation during endovascular procedures.