Use and effectiveness of Pioneer re-entry device for subintimal true lumen re-entry: single-centre data and a review of the literature

Recanalization of Chronic Femoropopliteal Total Occlusions after Failed Anterograde Attempt: Use of an Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Re-entry Catheter versus the Bidirectional Approach

PURPOSE

To analyze the feasibility and effectiveness of the use of an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided re-entry catheter (IGRC) for femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions (FP-CTOs) after a failed anterograde approach compared with the bidirectional approach without the IGRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2019 and December 2022, an IGRC (Pioneer Plus; Philips Volcano, San Diego, California) was used in 52 patients after failure of conventional recanalization techniques (Group A). In the same period, 48 patients who were also eligible for IGRC use were treated without IGRC using the bidirectional approach (Group B). In Groups A and B, 12 (23.1%) and 3 (6.2%) patients experienced claudication, and 40 (76.9%) and 45 (93.7%) patients experienced critical limb-threatening ischemia, respectively. Clinical and procedural records, angiographic imaging findings, and follow-up data were collected, analyzed, and reviewed.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 49 (94.2%) patients in Group A and 44 (91.7%) patients in Group B (P = .616). Use of the IGRC was associated with a reduction of procedural time (120 vs 133 minutes; P < .001), radiation exposure (47 vs 59 Gy cm2; P < .001), iodinated contrast medium use (98 vs 138 mL; P = .028), and intraprocedural discomfort (numerical rating scale score, 4 vs 6; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the IGRC was equivalently successful for FP-CTO recanalization compared with the use of the bidirectional approach, but it reduced radiation exposure, iodinated contrast medium used, patient discomfort, and procedural time. These advantages suggest that IGRC could be favored as the next-choice option for FP-CTOs after failure of anterograde recanalization.

Percutaneous Intentional Extraluminal Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusions: A Review of Reentry Devices

Percutaneous intentional extraluminal recanalization (PIER) is an endovascular subintimal crossing technique used to treat chronic total occlusions (CTOs) of the peripheral arteries. Intraluminal revascularization remains the standard over PIER when technically feasible; however, when intraluminal approaches fail, PIER may be preferred prior to pursuit of surgical bypass grafting. The major cause of failure of PIER is inability to reenter the true lumen after crossing the CTO. Therefore, several reentry devices and endovascular techniques have been developed to allow for the operators to safely and quickly access the true lumen distal to the occlusion. Reentry devices currently available on the market include the Pioneer Plus catheter, Outback Elite catheter, OffRoad catheter, Enteer catheter, and GoBack catheter. These devices have unique methods of use and specific advantages with regard to their technical success along with reduced procedural and fluoroscopic time. In addition, there are other endovascular techniques available that may facilitate true lumen reentry and these will also be reviewed.

Crossing Algorithm for Infrainguinal Chronic Total Occlusions: An Interdisciplinary Expert Opinion Statement

A crossing algorithm was developed for the endovascular treatment of peripheral chronic total occlusive lesions (CTOs) to educate, guide, and appropriately influence clinical practice aiming at harmonization and standardization of endovascular procedures. The following steps are proposed: One, duplex sonography and if required computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography for the selection of the optimal access site. Two, angiographic evaluation of the proximal/distal cap morphology, presence of collaterals at the origin of the proximal cap and at the distal vessel refilling site. In addition, evaluation of distal vessels, including their diameters and quality, and the presence of calcification or stents within the occlusion zone. Three, antegrade wiring strategies, guidewire (GW) and support catheter technology, as well as GW escalation strategies. Stop the antegrade attempt depending on clinical indication for peripheral artery disease treatment and the presence of retrograde options. Four, retrograde access site, support catheter, or sheath insertion and wiring technology from distally. Five, considering strategy change when progress cannot by achieved, using advanced bidirectional techniques and re-entry devices. Six, in case of successful GW passage from retrograde, GW externalization and treatment from antegrade. Management of the retrograde access by internal or external hemostasis at the end of the procedure. Alternatively, stop the procedure if no progress can be obtained within 3 hours or in case of specific complications. By establishing the algorithm in the daily routine of endovascular specialists, improvements in vessel- and patient-specific outcomes are anticipated. In addition, future research, and continuous collaboration between experts is warranted.