Quality assurance data for regional drip-and-ship strategies- gearing up the transfer process

A simple, organized web-based system improved the transfer efficiency and patient outcomes for endovascular thrombectomy in regional stroke network

BACKGROUND

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a time-sensitive treatment for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. To optimize transfer efficiency, a web-based platform was introduced in the Tainan Stroke Network (TSN). We assessed its application and effectiveness in regional stroke care.

METHOD

This new web-based platform containing a questionnaire-style interface was introduced on October 1, 2021. To assess the transfer efficiency and patient outcomes, acute stroke patients transferred from PSCs to CSC for EVT from April 01, 2020, to December 30, 2022, were enrolled. The patients were classified into the traditional transferal pathway (TTP) group and the new transferal pathway (NTP) group depending on mode of transfer. Patient characteristics, time segments after stroke onset and outcome were compared between groups.

RESULT

A total of 104 patients were enrolled, with 77 in the TTP group and 27 in the NTP group. Compared to the TTP group, the NTP group had a significantly shorter onset-to-CSC door time (TTP vs. NTP: 267 vs. 198 min; p = 0.041) and a higher EVT rate (TTP vs. NTP: 18.2% vs. 48.1%, p = 0.002). Among EVT patients, those in the NTP group had a significantly shorter CSC door-to-puncture time (TTP vs. NTP: 131.5 vs. 110 min; p = 0.029). The NTP group had a higher rate of good functional outcomes at 3 months (TTP vs. NTP: 21% vs. 61.5%; p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

This new web-based EVT transfer system provides notable improvements in clinical outcomes, transfer efficiency, and EVT execution for potential EVT candidates without markedly changing the regional stroke care paradigm.

Telestroke networks for area-wide access to endovascular stroke treatment

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy (EVT) offers a highly effective therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. Comprehensive stroke centers (CSC) are required to provide permanent accessibility to EVT. However, when affected patients are not located in the immediate catchment area of a CSC, i.e. in rural or structurally weaker areas, access to EVT is not always ensured.

MAIN BODY

Telestroke networks play a crucial role in closing this healthcare coverage gap and thereby support specialized stroke treatment. The aim of this narrative review is to elaborate the concepts for the indication and transfer of EVT candidates via telestroke networks in acute stroke care. The targeted readership includes both comprehensive stroke centers and peripheral hospitals. The review is intended to identify ways to design care beyond those areas with narrow access to stroke unit care to provide the indicated highly effective acute therapies on a region-wide basis. Here, the two different models of care: "mothership" and "drip-and-ship" concerning rates of EVT and its complications as well as outcomes are compared. Decisively, forward-looking new model approaches such as a third model the "flying/driving interentionalists" are introduced and discussed, as far as few clinical trials have investigated these approaches. Diagnostic criteria used by the telestroke networks to enable appropriate patient selection for secondary intrahospital emergency transfers are displayed, which need to meet the criteria in terms of speed, quality and safety.

CONCLUSION

The few findings from the studies with telestroke networks are neutral for comparison in the drip-and-ship and mothership models. Supporting spoke centres through telestroke networks currently seems to be the best option for offering EVT to a population in structurally weaker regions without direct access to a CSC. Here, it is essential to map the individual reality of care depending on the regional circumstances.

Endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke with the drip-and-ship model—Insights from the German Stroke Registry

Background

Endovascular therapy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke has been widely established. Globally, stroke patients are transferred either directly to a thrombectomy center (DC) or a peripheral stroke unit with a “drip-and-ship” (DS) model. We aimed to determine differences between the DS and DC paradigms after EVT of acute stroke patients with large-vessel-occlusion (LVO) in the database of the German Stroke Registry (GSR).

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of GSR patients between June 2015 and December 2019 in 23 German centers. Primary outcome was an ordinal shift analysis of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 90 days after index event. Secondary endpoints included time from symptom onset to recanalization and complications. Tertiary endpoint was the association of imaging strategies in DS admissions with outcome.

Results

2,813 patients were included in the DS and 3,819 in the DC group. After propensity score matching mRS after 90 days was higher in DS than DC admissions (OR 1.26; 95%-CI 1.13–1.40). Time from symptom-onset to flow-restoration was shorter in DC than DS (median 199.0 vs. 298.0 min; p < 0.001). DS patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; n=183) before EVT had a lower 90-day mRS than without (n = 944) (OR 0.63; 95%-CI 0.45–0.88). ASPECTS assessed on MRI correlated with 90-day mRS (ρ = −0.326; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Clinical outcome was worse for EVT-eligible patients in the DS setting, even though patients were in a better state of health prior to stroke. A potentially mutable factor was the time delay of 99 min from symptom-onset to successful recanalization. Performing MRI before thrombectomy was associated with good outcome and MRI-ASPECTS was negatively correlated with mRS after 90 days.