Telemetry-controlled simultaneous stimulation-and-recording device (SRD) to study interhemispheric cortical circuits in rat primary somatosensory (SI) cortex

Progresses of animal robots: A historical review and perspectiveness

Animal robots have remarkable advantages over traditional mechatronic ones in terms of energy supply, self-orientation, and natural concealment and can provide remarkable theoretical and practical values for scientific investigation, community service, military detection and other fields. Given these features, animal robots have become high-profile research objects and have recently attracted extensive attention. Herein, we have defined animal robots, reviewed the main types of animal robots, and discussed the potential developing directions. We have also detailed the mechanisms underlying the regulation of animal robots and introduced key methods for manipulating them. We have further proposed several application prospects for different types of animal robots. Finally, we have presented research directions for their further improvement.

Repetitive microstimulation in rat primary somatosensory cortex (SI) strengthens the connection between homotopic sites in the opposite SI and leads to expression of previously ineffective input from the ipsilateral forelimb

The primary somatosensory cortex (SI) receives input from the contralateral forelimb and projects to homotopic sites in the opposite SI. Since homotopic sites in SI are linked by a callosal pathway, we proposed that repetitive intracortical microstimulation (ICMSr) of neurons in layer V of SI forelimb cortex would increase spike firing in the opposite SI cortex thereby strengthening the callosal pathway sufficiently to allow normally ineffective stimuli from the ipsilateral forelimb to excite cells in the ipsilateral SI. The forelimb representation in SI in one hemisphere was mapped using mechanical and electrical stimulation of the contralateral forelimb, a homotopic site was similarly identified in the opposite SI, the presence of ipsilateral peripheral input was tested in both homotopic sites, and ICMS was used to establish an interhemispheric connection between the two homotopic recording sites. The major findings are: (1) each homotopic forelimb site in SI initially received short latency input only from the contralateral forelimb; (2) homotopic sites in layer V in each SI were interconnected by a callosal pathway; (3) ICMSr delivered to layer V of the homotopic SI in one hemisphere generally increased evoked response spike firing in layer V in the opposite homotopic site; (4) increased spike firing was often followed by the expression of a longer latency normally ineffective input from the ipsilateral forelimb; (5) these longer latency ipsilateral responses are consistent with a delay time sufficient to account for travel across the callosal pathway; (6) increased spike firing and the resulting ipsilateral peripheral input were also corroborated using in-vivo intracellular recording; and (7) inactivation of the stimulating site in SI by lidocaine injection or local surface cooling abolished the ipsilateral response, suggesting that the ipsilateral response was very likely relayed across the callosal pathway. These results suggest that repetitive microstimulation can do more than expand receptive fields in the territory adjacent to the stimulating electrode but in addition can also alter receptive fields in homotopic sites in the opposite SI to bring about the expression of previously ineffective input from the ipsilateral forelimb.