The influence of computer-assisted surgery experience on the accuracy and precision of the postoperative mechanical axis during computer-assisted lateral closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy

Surgical accuracy of coronal and sagittal alignment in conventional closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy after computer-assisted surgery experience

BACKGROUND

Although intraoperative navigation can improve the surgeon's proficiency, no studies have analyzed postoperative outcomes of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) after computer-assisted surgery (CAS) experience. The present study compared the clinical and radiographic results between conventional and CAS closed-wedge (CW) HTOs after CAS experience.

METHODS

Each of the 50 conventional and CAS CW HTOs performed by single surgeon between 2015 and 2017 were included. The surgeon had experience of 140 cases of CAS CW HTOs before the study period. The groups were not different in terms of demographics. Clinically, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and range of motion (ROM) were investigated. Radiographically, the mechanical axis (MA), change in posterior tibial slope angle (PTS), and parallel angle were evaluated. The proportions of inlier groups for the postoperative MA (within valgus 2° ± 3°), change in the PTS (within ± 3°), and parallel angle (< 3°) were compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in postoperative clinical results between the conventional and CAS groups. The MA was appropriately corrected in both groups (2.4° versus 2.9°, p = 0.317). The amount of change in PTS was significantly greater in the conventional group (-2.2° versus -0.8°, p = 0.018). The parallel angle was 5.3° in the conventional groups and 3.1° in the CAS group (p = 0.003). The proportion of inlier group was not significantly different in the postoperative MA (72% versus 78%) and change in the PTS (52% versus 66%). The proportion of inlier for the parallel angle was significantly lower in the conventional group (36% versus 60%, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical proficiency after CAS experience could cover the advantages of an intraoperative navigation in coronal adjustment, not in the sagittal adjustments in CW HTOs. A larger cohort with multiple surgeons in multiple centers would be required to identify the general trend.

STUDY DESIGN

Level of evidence III.

Personalised opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with patient-specific plates and instrumentation accurately controls coronal correction and posterior slope: Results from a prospective first case series

BACKGROUND

Patient specific devices represent a promising tool to improve accuracy and simplify high tibial osteotomy (HTO) procedures. The current study aims to assess accuracy of the correction of alignment and posterior tibial slope (PTS), and provide patient reported outcomes (PROMs) of a new personalised cutting guide and fixation plate (TOKA) system for HTO in patients with medial osteoarthritis (OA) and varus knee.

METHODS

25 patients (mean age 54.4 years) with medial OA and varus knee malalignment who underwent HTO with the TOKA system were prospectively evaluated pre-operatively, 1, 3, 6 and 12-months follow-up. Standing long-leg and lateral radiographs of the knee were used to assess the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and the PTS, respectively. Accuracy was defined as the difference in planned minus achieved correction. The patient reported outcomes collected were the KOOS score, EQ5D, KSS score, and VAS pain scores. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative HKA was 170.7° (SD ± 3.2°); the mean postoperative HKA was 177.4° (SD ± 2.9°). The overall mean difference between planned and achieved correction in terms of HKA was 2.1° (SD ± 2.0°). The mean difference between planned and achieved PTS was 0.2° (SD ± 0.4°). All the assessed PROMs had a significant (p < 0.001) increase from the pre-operative value to postoperative evaluation and showed a significant (p < 0.001) improvement with follow-up time.

CONCLUSIONS

TOKA personalised HTO system showed accurate correction in terms of both coronal and sagittal alignment, and excellent patient reported outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4, prospective case series. Registration in public trial registry: registered at ClinicalTrial.gov [NCT04574570].

Fixed distal femoral resection with a valgus cutting angle of 3° is more appropriate in intra-articular valgus deformity than juxta-articular valgus deformity in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective single center study

Background

The traditionally recommended fixed valgus cutting angle (VCA) of 3° is used as the standard method in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for valgus deformity. The accuracy of distal femur cutting can be affected by the type of valgus deformity because the intramedullary rod for distal femoral resection can become impinged on the femoral cortex. The purpose of this study is to analyze the accuracy and precision of a VCA of 3° in mechanical alignment in TKA for valgus deformity, based on the type of the deformity.

Methods

TKAs with a fixed VCA of 3° performed in 110 intra-articular and 102 juxta-articular valgus knees were retrospectively reviewed. The age (65.8 vs. 66.1 years), sex (female: male =78/32 vs. 70/32), body mass index (26.0 vs. 26.0), and severity of deformities (valgus 12.1 vs. valgus 12.5) were not significantly different (P>0.647). The mechanical-lateral-distal-femoral angle (mLDFA) and anatomical-mechanical-axis angle (AMA-A) were evaluated. The adjusted-VCA (aVCA) was defined as the maximum angle within the range without the intramedullary rod impinging on the femoral cortex. The proportion of well-aligned femoral component (mLDFA <90°±3°) was assessed. The correlation between AMA-A-3° or aVCA-3° and postoperative mLDFA-90° was analyzed.

Results

Despite the larger AMA-A in the juxta-articular group (6.2° vs. 6.8°, P<0.001), the aVCA was lesser in the juxta-articular group (5.4° vs. 4.1°, P<0.001). The mLDFA was more varus in the intra-articular group (91.7° vs. 90.6°, P<0.001) postoperatively. The proportion of well-aligned femoral component was higher in the juxta-articular group (85.3% vs. 70%, P=0.009). Postoperative mLDFA-90° was moderately correlated with aVCA-3° (r=0.301, r=387), but weakly correlated with AMA-A-3° (r=0.274, r=294) in both groups.

Conclusions

Although a fixed VCA of 3° is a reliable method in achieving mechanical alignment in valgus deformity, it can be more appropriate in juxta-articular deformity than in intra-articular deformity. The aVCA is a more reasonable predictor of femoral component alignment than the AMA-A, considering the femoral cortex impingement of the intramedullary rod.

Long-term outcomes were similar between hybrid and cemented TKAs performed on paired knees at a minimum 15 years of follow-up

PURPOSE

To compare long-term clinical and radiographic results and survival rates between hybrid and cemented total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed on paired knees.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients with hybrid and cemented TKAs performed on paired knees with NexGen® cruciate-retaining prostheses were retrospectively reviewed after a minimum 15 years of follow-up. Mean follow-up period was 17.5 years. Preoperative alignment deformity and range of motion (ROM) were not different between groups. The Knee Society score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and ROM were evaluated. Radiographically, change in joint space width, component loosening, and osteolysis were evaluated. Implant survival rate was analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in clinical results between hybrid and cemented TKAs performed on paired knees of 72 patients at the last follow-up. No significant difference was observed in the change in joint space width between the two groups at the last follow-up (medial = 0.3 mm vs. 0.4 mm; lateral = 0.1 mm vs. 0.2 mm). One hybrid TKA showed tibial component loosening, for which revision was performed. There was femoral osteolysis in one hybrid and one cemented TKA, and tibial osteolysis in eight hybrid TKAs and seven cemented TKAs (n.s., respectively). The 20-year survival rate was 97.7% for hybrid TKAs and 100% for cemented TKAs (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

The long-term outcomes were similar between hybrid and cemented TKAs performed on paired knees at a minimum 15 years of follow-up. The method of femoral component fixation did not have a significant effect on long-term TKA success.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Various Types of Medial Tibial Bone Resorption after Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Thick Cobalt Chromium Tibial Baseplate

Recent literature has implicated a thick cobalt chromium baseplate as a potential source of stress shielding and medial tibial bone resorption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a Western population. The purpose was to calculate the incidence of various types and severity of medial tibial bone resorption utilizing a novel classification system after TKA with a thick cobalt chromium baseplate in Asian patients. Five hundred TKAs using Attune prostheses with mean follow-up of 3.4 years were evaluated, using the prospective radiographic data. The mean age was 71.3 years. The preoperative mechanical axis was varus, 11.2 degrees. The type and severity of medial tibial bone resorption were categorized as type U (resorption under the tibial baseplate up to 50% [U1] or beyond 50% [U2] of medial tibial tray width), C (resorption around the penetrated cement under the baseplate), and M (resorption on the medial tibial cortex without extension to the baseplate). Bone resorption of medial proximal tibia was observed in 96 knees (19.2%). Types U1 and U2 were seen in 46 and 28 knees, respectively. Type C was observed in 12 knees and type M in 10 knees. The type U resorption group had significantly more preoperative varus deformity (varus 12.9 vs. 10.9 degrees, p = 0.017). Medial tibial bone resorption after TKAs using a thick cobalt chromium baseplate is not uncommon and has various locations, types, and severities. The medial tibial bone resorption might be related to various causes, including stress shielding, thermal necrosis from cement in the bony hole, and bony devascularization. The type-U resorption has to be closely observed in patients with preoperative severe varus deformity. This is a Level IV study.

Mid-flexion laxity could be identified with continuous flexion-arc gap assessment in patients with a large preoperative convergence angle

PURPOSE

To analyze the incidence of intraoperative mid-flexion laxity using continuous flexion-arc gap assessment, risk factors for mid-flexion laxity, and clinical results in navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Ninety posterior-stabilized TKAs were performed under navigation guidance for patients with degenerative arthritis and varus deformity. Intraoperatively, the gap between the trial femoral component and insert was evaluated in the navigation system with continuous flexion-arc gap assessment. Each medial and lateral gap at flexion (90°) and extension (0°) were made to be less than 3 mm. Mid-flexion laxity was determined when the gap in the flexion range between 15° and 60° was 3 mm or more. The proportion of knees with mid-flexion laxity was investigated. The factors affecting mid-flexion laxity were identified in terms of demographics, preoperative convergence angle, and change in joint line height and posterior femoral offset. The Knee Society Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 31 cases (34.4%) of lateral mid-flexion laxity (average peak mid-flexion gap = 3.7 mm). The other 59 cases did not show mid-flexion laxity. The preoperative convergence angle was the only significant factor affecting lateral mid-flexion laxity (odds ratio = 1.466, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the clinical results between the groups with and without mid-flexion laxity.

CONCLUSIONS

The continuous flexion-arc gap assessment was useful in evaluating mid-flexion laxity using navigation-assisted TKA. The preoperative convergence angle, reflecting soft-tissue laxity, can be a practical and simple radiographic finding for predicting lateral mid-flexion laxity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Intraoperative Assessment of Gap Balancing in Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Navigation with Joint Stability Graphs

The purpose of this study was to assess continuous gaps in the replaced knee throughout the full range of motion (ROM) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a joint stability graph, and to analyze the gap laxity in the mid-flexion range. Ninety-three TKAs were performed using imageless navigation with a joint stability graph. While positioning guides for each respective cut, the surgeon can safely preview the resection's impact for the resulting joint gaps and control the soft tissue balance at the knee flexion of 0° (extension) and 90° (flexion). The gaps between the femoral component and insert were evaluated throughout the full ROM using the joint stability graph. The mechanical axis (MA) and change of joint line height were radiographically evaluated. Posthoc power analyses using a significant α value of 0.05 were performed on the proportion of the mid-flexion instability as a primary outcome to determine whether the sample had sufficient power. The power was determined to be sufficient (100%). The flexion-extension gap differences in each medial and lateral compartment and the mediolateral gap differences in flexion and extension were all ≤3 mm. None of the knees had mid-flexion instability, which is defined by a peak mid-flexion gap that is 3 mm greater than the smaller value of flexion or extension gap. The average MA was well corrected from varus 11.4° to varus 1.0° postoperatively. The proportion of postoperative well-aligned knees (MA ≤ 3°) was 87.1%. The joint line height was well preserved (14.7 vs. 14.8 mm, p = 0.751). The joint stability graph in TKA using the navigation can effectively evaluate the continuous gap throughout the ROM, including the mid-flexion range. Mid-flexion instability was uncommon in primary TKAs with appropriate alignment and proper preservation of the joint line. The Level of evidence for the study is IV.

Appropriate determination of the surgical transepicondylar axis can be achieved following distal femur resection in navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Background

Many surgeons have determined the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) after distal femur resection in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, in most navigation systems, the registration of the sTEA precedes the distal femur resection. This sequential difference can influence the accuracy of intraoperative determination for sTEA when considering the proximal location of the anatomical references for sTEA and the arthritic environment. We compared the accuracy and precision in determinations of the sTEA between before and after distal femur resection during navigation-assisted TKA.

Methods

Ninety TKAs with Attune posterior-stabilized prostheses were performed under imageless navigation. The sTEA was registered before distal femur resection, then reassessed and adjusted after distal resection. The femoral component was implanted finally according to the sTEA determined after distal femur resection. Computed tomography (CT) was performed postoperatively to analyze the true sTEA (the line connecting the tip of the lateral femoral epicondyle to the lowest point of the medial femoral epicondylar sulcus on axial CT images) and femoral component rotation (FCR) axis. The FCR angle after distal femur resection (FCRA-aR) was defined as the angle between the FCR axis and true sTEA on CT images. The FCR angle before distal resection (FCRA-bR) could be presumed to be the value of FCRA-aR minus the difference between the intraoperatively determined sTEAs before and after distal resection as indicated by the navigation system. It was considered that the FCRA-bR or FCRA-aR represented the differences between the sTEA determined before or after distal femur resection and the true sTEA, respectively.

Results

The FCRA-bR was −1.3 ± 2.4° and FCRA-aR was 0.3 ± 1.7° (p < 0.001). The range of FCRA-bR was from −6.6° to 4.1° and that of FCRA-aR was from −2.7° to 3.3°. The proportion of appropriate FCRA (≤ ±3°) was significantly higher after distal femur resection than that before resection (91.1% versus 70%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The FCR was more appropriate when the sTEA was determined after distal femur resection than before resection in navigation-assisted TKA. The reassessment and adjusted registration of sTEA after distal femur resection could improve the rotational alignment of the femoral component in navigation-assisted TKA.

Level of evidence

IV.

Comparison of risk for postoperative hyperextension between cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of postoperative hyperextension and factors affecting hyperextension needs to be investigated separately for cruciate retaining (CR) and posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), because the mechanism for preventing hyperextension is different according to the bearing design. The purpose of the study was to compare the incidence of postoperative hyperextension between CR and PS TKAs and analyze the factors affecting the postoperative hyperextension.

METHODS

Matched 213 CR and PS TKAs with Persona^® prosthesis were retrospectively reviewed. The preoperative demographics, clinical and radiographic knee condition, and pelvic incidence were similar between groups. Appropriate knee extension (0°-5°), confirmed with a goniometer, was achieved intraoperatively. The knee sagittal angle was radiographically measured preoperatively and at 2 years postoperative. The incidence of hyperextension (sagittal angle < - 5°) was investigated. The factors affecting the postoperative hyperextension were analyzed in terms of age, sex, preoperative mechanical axis, knee sagittal angle, postoperative posterior tibial slope (PTS), change of posterior femoral offset, and pelvic incidence.

RESULTS

The knee sagittal angle was not significantly different preoperatively between CR and PS TKAs. The postoperative knee sagittal angle was 2.9° in CR TKAs and 4.4° in PS TKAs (p = 0.004). The incidence of postoperative hyperextension was 11.7% (25/213) in CR TKAs and 4.2% (9/213) in PS TKAs (p = 0.007). The preoperative sagittal angle, postoperative PTS, and pelvic incidence were the significant factors affecting the postoperative hyperextension in CR TKAs (odds ratio 0.869, 2.205, and 1.045, respectively); the preoperative sagittal angle was only the significant factor in PS TKAs (odds ratio 0.857) CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative knee hyperextension occurred more frequently and was affected by more factors in CR TKAs than PS TKAs. Efforts to avoid hyperextension and closed observation are required in TKAs performed in patients with the risk factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Hip-to-calcaneus alignment differs from hip-to-talus alignment in patients with genu varum deformity

PURPOSE

To (1) compare the weight-bearing line (WBL) ratios of the knee joints measured using the conventional (hip-to-talus radiographs, HTRs) and novel (hip-to-calcaneus radiographs, HCRs) orthoradiograms, (2) compare the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle between cases with < 5% and > 5% differences in WBL ratios between two orthoradiograms, and (3) investigate the optimal cutoff value (COV) of the HKA angle causing inconsistency in the orthoradiograms.

METHODS

Sixty limbs of 31 patients with HTR and HCR records were retrospectively reviewed. After drawing the mechanical axis on each radiograph, the WBL ratios of the knees were calculated and compared between the conventional and novel orthoradiograms. In subgroup analysis, cases with < 5% and > 5% differences in WBL ratios between two orthoradiograms were classified as consistent and inconsistent groups, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve based on the HKA angles of the lower limbs was used to identify the COV causing the inconsistency between the orthoradiograms.

RESULTS

Inter- and intra-rater reliabilities of all radiologic measurements were > 0.75. The WBL ratios showed no significant difference between the two orthoradiograms. However, the HKA angle was significantly larger in the inconsistent group than in the consistent group (7.0° ± 1.8° vs. 4.4° ± 2.5°; P < 0.001). The COV of the HKA angle that caused inconsistency in the two orthoradiograms was 4.0° (area under the curve, 0.774).

CONCLUSION

The hip-to-calcaneus alignment differed significantly from the hip-to-talus alignment in patients with genu varum deformity. HCR measurement can be a complementary method for planning corrective osteotomy for patients with genu varum deformity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

A Current Prosthesis With a 1-mm Thickness Increment for Polyethylene Insert Could Result in Fewer Adjustments of Posterior Tibial Slope in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

To compare posterior tibial slope (PTS) and incidence of excessive PTS between cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) with the current prosthesis, providing a 1-mm increment of polyethylene insert thickness, and its predecessor, providing a 2-mm increment.

METHODS

Each of 154 CR TKAs with Persona (current group) and NexGen (predecessor group) prostheses with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative demographics, including age, sex, and body mass index, were similar. Factors affecting the flexion gap were matched in terms of preoperative range of motion, mechanical axis, PTS, preoperative and postoperative posterior femoral offset (PFO), and PFO ratio. The PTS was evaluated radiographically. The incidence of excessive PTS (PTS > 10°) and the frequency of intraoperative PTS-increasing procedures were investigated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative range of motion, mechanical axis, PFO, and PFO ratios between the 2 groups. The preoperative PTS was not significantly different, but the postoperative PTS was significantly lower in the current group (4.6° vs 6.2°, P < .001). There was no case of excessive PTS in the current group, but there were 9 cases (5.8%) in the predecessor group (P = .030). The intraoperative PTS-increasing procedure was performed more frequently in the predecessor group (12.3% vs 21.4%, P = .047).

CONCLUSION

The current prosthesis providing a 1-mm increment of polyethylene insert thickness could decrease the PTS and the occurrence of excessive PTS in CR TKA. The target angle for PTS can be decreased in TKA using the current prosthesis in comparison with its predecessor.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.