Comparison of 2D Fat Suppressed Proton Density (FS-PD) and 3D (WATS-c) MRI pulse sequences in evaluation of chondromalacia patellae

Magnetic resonance imaging is able to detect patellofemoral focal cartilage injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect and grade the severity of patellofemoral (PF) cartilage injuries.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases (up to July 1st 2022) to search for studies that reported the diagnostic accuracy of MRI to detect and grade PF cartilage injuries as compared to diagnostic arthroscopy. Risk of bias was judged using the QUADAS-2 tool. Quantitative syntheses were performed to calculate the diagnostic accuracy metric-sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood (LR+) and negative likelihood (LR-) ratios, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR)-and presented as median with 25% and 75% percentiles. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were also calculated. Diagnostic accuracy metrics were calculated for all PF cartilage injuries and then sub-grouped by patellar and trochlear lesions. Diagnostic accuracy was also calculated according to the grading of cartilage injuries.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were included for qualitative analyses and forty studies were included for quantitative synthesis. A total of 3534 participants with a weighted mean age of 38.1 years were included. Diagnostic accuracy was generally high: sensitivity (0.8, 0.6-1.0), specificity (0.9, 0.8-1.0), LR+ (6.4, 3.1-15.3), LR- (0.3, 0.2-0.4) and DOR (21.3, 9.9-121.1). The area under the curve (AUC) of the SROC was 0.9. The diagnostic accuracy was slightly higher for patellar (sensitivity 0.8, specificity 0.8, LR+ 5.3, LR- 0.2, DOR 28.8) than for trochlear lesions (sensitivity 0.7, specificity 0.9, LR+ 5.5, LR- 0.4, DOR 14.3). The sensitivity was generally higher when grading advanced (vs. early or intermediate) cartilage injuries of the patella.

CONCLUSION

The MRI is able to diagnose PF cartilage injuries with reasonably high diagnostic accuracy (as compared to arthroscopy). Clinicians can rely on MRI to reliably diagnose PF cartilage injuries (with some limitations) which will play an important role in deciding for surgical or non-operative treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Optimal Visualization of Os Subfibulare Using 3D Water Selective Cartilage Scan (3D_WATSc) MRI Sequencing: A Case Report

Os subfibulare is an accessory ossicle of the lateral malleolus at the distal end of the fibula. In most instances, os subfibulare is found incidentally on radiographs. While os subfibulare typically remains asymptomatic, some cases may present with ankle pain or instability. To initiate appropriate treatment and maximize patient outcomes, it is crucial to accurately visualize the accessory ossicle. Here, we report a symptomatic case of os subfibulare diagnosed with ankle radiographs and a 3D water selective cartilage scan (3D_WATSc, Ingenia, Philips Healthcare, The Netherlands) magnetic resonance imaging sequence and treated surgically with open ossicle excision and a modified Broström procedure.