Does PET/CT give incremental staging information in cancer oesophagus compared to CECT?

Efficacy of 18FDG-PET/CT in Detecting Synchronous Malignancies in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) in detecting second primary malignancies (SPMs) in patients with treatment naïve head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus searched from 1946 to December 2022.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies reporting the performance of 18FDG-PET/CT in patients with treatment-naïve, index HNSCC for detection of SPMs were included. The reference standard was histopathology, clinical follow-up over the duration of study, and other imaging modalities. Multiple investigators completed depth full-text analysis. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines were followed. Methodologic and diagnostic accuracy data were abstracted independently by multiple investigators. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool independently. Bivariate random-effects model meta-analysis and multivariable meta-regression modeling were used.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies examining 4624 patients with a total of 475 SPMs were included in the final analysis. Eleven studies were found to be at low risk for bias, while the rest were in the high-risk category. 18FDG-PET/CT demonstrated pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.88) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00) in detecting SPMs. Further subsite analysis revealed varied diagnostic performance across different anatomical regions, with sensitivity and specificity of esophageal SPMs being 0.47 (0.30-0.64) and 0.99 (0.98-1.00), and sensitivity and specificity of 0.86 (0.73-0.94) and 0.99 (0.98-1.00) for head and neck SPMs. Finally, this imaging modality showed sensitivity and specificity of 0.92 (0.84-0.96) and 0.99 (0.98-1.00) for lung SPMs.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest varied accuracy of 18FDG-PET/CT in detecting SPMs during initial workup for HNSCC, highlighting the importance of screening modalities such as esophagoscopy in high-risk patients.

Prognostic Significance of Pretreatment Staging With 18F-FDG PET in Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

PURPOSE OF THE REPORT

Without the routine use of 18F-FDG PET for initial staging of esophageal cancer, it may lead to inaccurate staging and suboptimal treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET in nonmetastatic esophageal cancer by comparing the survival between patients with and without pretreatment PET.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We selected newly diagnosed esophageal cancer patients without metastasis between 2009 and 2015 from Taiwan Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Research Database. Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET staging was determined according to the implementation of PET within 90 days before starting treatment. Overall survival was calculated from the day of treatment initiation to the death from any cause. Survival curves were compared between patients with and without PET staging using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of the 9078 patients included, 1765 (19.4%) and 7313 (80.6%) patients were staged with and without pretreatment PET, respectively. The median follow-up time for all patients and survivors was 1.29 years and 5.46 years, respectively. The pretreatment PET group had a lower risk of death than the no pretreatment PET group (hazards ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.79; P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, stage, histology, and tumor location, pretreatment PET remained significantly correlated with a lower risk of death (hazards ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.83; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET for staging in nonmetastatic esophageal malignancy is associated with a lower risk of death even after adjusting for age, stage, histology, and tumor location.